Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
Hello Dariusz and Andrey, I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still working on it? I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it impossible to distribute the binary? Yes, I am currently working on profanity package. Libstrophe, its main dependency, has been pushed to NEW today. -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140811140415.gb30...@blackstar.cs.put.poznan.pl
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:32:05PM +0200, Stefano Rossi wrote: Hello Dariusz and Andrey, I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still working on it? I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it impossible to distribute the binary? OpenSSL license is incompatible with GPL, see also the thread at https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00729.html -- WBR, wRAR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140611072914.ga14...@belkar.wrar.name
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
Hello Dariusz and Andrey, I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still working on it? I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it impossible to distribute the binary? Thank you both, Stefano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/84cddb0a-d44a-4601-acd0-6e77f8662...@stefanorossi.me
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
On 28 April 2014 22:23, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can take wget as an example: No, please use a more secure library with a better license. Great News, Upstream reimplemented to use gnuTLS, so no need to relicense. -- Pozdrawiam, Dariusz Dwornikowski, Assistant Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAGnkunc8HG=4mdHTAUhFpJAYohTAG+2s2BQL_q�5s0hza...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
At Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:22:59 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes: PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) The resulting binary cannot be distributed. Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be distributable ? The GPL and the OpenSSL license are incompatible. Thank You Russ, Would it be ok if upstream adds the clause as explained in [1] ? The upstream is very responsive and open to all suggestions, so it should not be a problem. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can take wget as an example: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/w/wget/wget_1.15-1_copyright Jeroen Dekkers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhupb47v.wl%jer...@dekkers.ch
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can take wget as an example: No, please use a more secure library with a better license. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140428202328.ga1...@scru.org
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes: PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) The resulting binary cannot be distributed. Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be distributable ? The GPL and the OpenSSL license are incompatible. Thank You Russ, Would it be ok if upstream adds the clause as explained in [1] ? The upstream is very responsive and open to all suggestions, so it should not be a problem. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140427062258.ga1...@blackstar.cs.put.poznan.pl
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) The resulting binary cannot be distributed. Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be distributable ? The GPL and the OpenSSL license are incompatible. Thank You Russ, Would it be ok if upstream adds the clause as explained in [1] ? The upstream is very responsive and open to all suggestions, so it should not be a problem. Yes, assuming all copyright holders agree to change the license. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl * Package name: profanity Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : James Booth boothj5...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.profanity.im/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: C Description : a console based XMPP client Profanity is a console based XMPP client written in C using ncurses and libstrophe, inspired by Irssi. It supports: * XMPP chat services, including GoogleTalk and Facebook, * command driven interface, * customizable functionality and user interface, * Off the Record message encryption, * chat room support, * roster management, * flexible resource and priority settings, * desktop notifications, * unicode support, * integrated DuckDuckGo search, * sending tiny URLs, * plugin written in C, Python, Ruby and Lua. Since I did not get a response from XMPP packaging team, I will strat packaging it by myself with a possibility to move to XMPP team when they respond. Profanity depends on a great XMPP library libstrophe, which is not in Debian yet. I am currently working on providing a high quality package (ITP 511341), for that reason I am working with upstream to adjust the source for Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140426073200.ga9...@blackstar.cs.put.poznan.pl
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 09:32:00AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl * Package name: profanity Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : James Booth boothj5...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.profanity.im/ * License : GPL-3 PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) The resulting binary cannot be distributed. -- WBR, wRAR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140426081210.ga31...@belkar.wrar.name
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) The resulting binary cannot be distributed. Hey Andrey, Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be distributable ? -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140426164451.ga9...@blackstar.cs.put.poznan.pl
Re: Bug#745872: ITP: profanity -- a console based XMPP client
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes: PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) The resulting binary cannot be distributed. Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be distributable ? The GPL and the OpenSSL license are incompatible. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87d2g4kp1b@windlord.stanford.edu
