Bug#962513: RFS: gexiv2/0.12.1-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

2020-06-08 Thread Jason Crain
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexiv2"

 * Package name: gexiv2
   Version : 0.12.1-1
   Upstream Author : gexiv2-l...@gnome.org
 * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/gexiv2
 * License : GPL-2+
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gexiv2
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libgexiv2-2 - GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library
  gir1.2-gexiv2-0.10 - GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library - 
introspection data
  libgexiv2-dev - GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library - development 
files
  libgexiv2-doc - GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library - documentation

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gexiv2

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gexiv2/gexiv2_0.12.1-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Update d/copyright
   * Remove python2 dependency.
 Remove the override file for the python2 bindings because python2
 support is being phased out. (Closes: #943093, #960711)
   * Update symbols
   * Remove "-Wl,--as-needed" linker flag.
 The bullseye toolchain defaults to linking with as-needed so this is no
 longer necessary.
   * Update debhelper-compat to 13

Regards,

--
  Jason Crain



Bug#962507: RFS: iptables-converter/0.9.8-1.2 [NMU, RC] -- convert iptables-commands from a file to iptables-save format

2020-06-08 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iptables-converter"

 * Package name: iptables-converter
   Version : 0.9.8-1.2
   Upstream Author : Johannes Hubertz 
 * URL : https://github.com/sl0/conv.git
 * License : GPL-3+
 * Vcs : None
   Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

  iptables-converter - convert iptables-commands from a file to iptables-save 
format
  iptables-converter-doc - convert iptables-commands from a file to 
iptables-save format - doc

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/iptables-converter

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iptables-converter/iptables-converter_0.9.8-1.2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Source only upload. (Closes: #956018)
 - No change in source.


-- 
Regards
Sudip



Bug#962491: RFS: xplc/0.3.13-8 [QA] -- Light weight component system

2020-06-08 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xplc"

 * Package name: xplc
   Version : 0.3.13-8
   Upstream Author : Pierre Phaneuf 
 * URL : http://xplc.sourceforge.net/
 * License : LGPL-2.1
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xplc
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libxplc0.3.13 - Light weight component system
  libxplc0.3.13-dev - Light weight component system (Development libraries and 
headers)
  uuidcdef - Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) generator

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/xplc

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xplc/xplc_0.3.13-8.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * QA upload.
   * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
   * Use debhelper-compat.
 - Update to compat level 13.
 - Remove cdbs.
 - Remove dh-autoreconf.
 - Simplify d/rules.
 - List files not installed.
 - Adjust the path for mutiarch location.
   * Mark Vcs to salsa.
   * Remove whitespace from changelog.


-- 
Regards
Sudip



Bug#962441: RFS: siconos/4.3.0+dfsg-1 [RC] -- modeling and simulation of nonsmooth dynamical systems (simulation runner tool)

2020-06-08 Thread Stephen Sinclair
Hi Adam,

Thanks for taking a look.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:29 PM Adam Borowski  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:37:26AM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> >  * Package name: siconos
> >Version : 4.3.0+dfsg-1
>
> But
>
> > Testing this package requires fclib 3.1.0+dfsg-1, which also needs
> > sponsorship.  It can be found here:
> >
> >   https://mentors.debian.net/package/fclib
>
> so thats actually two RFSes in one.  And there are problems with fclib.

I'm not sure what the right protocol is in this case, to be honest.
Should I have issued two RFSes or done this one differently?

> > Changes since the last upload:
> >
> >* New upstream version. (Closes: #962219) (Closes: #961735)
> >* Add dependencies libboost-timer-dev, libboost-chrono-dev.
> >* Depend on openblas and lapacke instead of atlas.
> >* Require fclib 3.1.0
> >* Update location of install paths.
> >* Enable WITH_GENERATION, now required for serialization.
> >* Install new siconos_export_raw_data tool.
> >* Fix cmake import targets to allow independent packages.
> >* Update patches for new upstream version.
> >* Add a flag for gfortran to avoid a regression in GCC-10.
> >  (Closes: #957794)
> >* Remove unused build rule for swig3.0 symlink.
> >* Remove non-existent files from debian/copyright.
> >* Rewrite patch descriptions using gbp pq.
> >* Fix a Python warning about using 'is' with a literal.
>
> It looked ok on my box, and passed both all automated and manual review I've
> done.  But, it fails on some of official buildds: at least on amd64 arm64
> x32.
>
> I seem unable to reproduce the FTBFS locally -- in 15 tries on amd64, 1 on
> arm64, all passed.
>
> Thus, you'd need to investigate and fix that one in fclib first.

I'm very confused about the error on buildd because I have indeed
built the package many times with a fresh debootstrap without such a
segfault.  I will investigate and try to reproduce.

I did my best to avoid problems but it seems I have missed something,
I'd like to understand the difference between buildd and my own
configuration to avoid this happening in the future.

By the way Siconos due to its nature has been quite hard to get
working on any architecture other than amd64 unfortunately.  Is there
a way to mark the package as amd64-only?
In the meantime I try to find solutions for other architectures but it
is slow going.

> It'd be good if you filed a separate RFS for that.  Let's leave this one
> for siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

Okay that sounds like a reasonable approach given this problem.

regards,
Steve



Bug#962441: RFS: siconos/4.3.0+dfsg-1 [RC] -- modeling and simulation of nonsmooth dynamical systems (simulation runner tool)

2020-06-08 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:37:26AM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
>  * Package name: siconos
>Version : 4.3.0+dfsg-1

But

> Testing this package requires fclib 3.1.0+dfsg-1, which also needs
> sponsorship.  It can be found here:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/fclib

so thats actually two RFSes in one.  And there are problems with fclib.

> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>* New upstream version. (Closes: #962219) (Closes: #961735)
>* Add dependencies libboost-timer-dev, libboost-chrono-dev.
>* Depend on openblas and lapacke instead of atlas.
>* Require fclib 3.1.0
>* Update location of install paths.
>* Enable WITH_GENERATION, now required for serialization.
>* Install new siconos_export_raw_data tool.
>* Fix cmake import targets to allow independent packages.
>* Update patches for new upstream version.
>* Add a flag for gfortran to avoid a regression in GCC-10.
>  (Closes: #957794)
>* Remove unused build rule for swig3.0 symlink.
>* Remove non-existent files from debian/copyright.
>* Rewrite patch descriptions using gbp pq.
>* Fix a Python warning about using 'is' with a literal.

It looked ok on my box, and passed both all automated and manual review I've
done.  But, it fails on some of official buildds: at least on amd64 arm64
x32.

I seem unable to reproduce the FTBFS locally -- in 15 tries on amd64, 1 on
arm64, all passed.

Thus, you'd need to investigate and fix that one in fclib first.

It'd be good if you filed a separate RFS for that.  Let's leave this one
for siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   --  on #linux-sunxi
⠈⠳⣄