application as Marketing Manager

[Hakan]

Hello,

I am looking for a Job as Marketing Manager, Campaign Manager or Mediabuyer
for the adult
business. If you hiring Inhouse or Remote, please contact me.

For years, I have been successful at optimizing Display and Google Ad
Campaigns.
Between 2010 and 2020, I have experience as Google Ad Specialist.

I can supply CV and references if required.

Best Regards,

Hakan

https://www.linkedin.com/in/hakan-yigit-844789248/


Berlin, Germany
skype hakan688
i...@mediabuyer.de
Powered By Express Post

Bug#1055063: nmu: gprbuild_2024.1.20231009-2 in experimental

[Nicolas Boulenguez]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: gprbu...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gprbuild

Hello.

The gprbuild source package builds the libgnatprj-dev binary package.
Libgnatprj-dev Depends: on
  gnat-13-HASH, provided by gnat-13
  libxmlada-unicode-dev-HASH, provided by libxmlada-unicode-dev,
  and so on for each Ada library.

The .deb I have uploaded for amd64 contains invalid hash sums, hence
cannot be installed (most probably because I was mixing
unstable/experimental).

The .deb for other architectures, built by buildds, seems OK.

Please rebuild gprbuild against libxmlada-*-dev/23.0.0-6 (already
available in experimental for amd64).  The rebuild should fix the
hashes in the Depends field.

Thanks.

nmu gprbuild_2024.1.20231009-2 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against 
libxmlada-*-dev/23.0.0-6, fixing libgnatprj-dev dependencies"

Processed: nmu: gprbuild_2024.1.20231009-2 in experimental

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> affects -1 + src:gprbuild
Bug #1055063 [release.debian.org] nmu: gprbuild_2024.1.20231009-2 in 
experimental
Added indication that 1055063 affects src:gprbuild

-- 
1055063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1055059: nmu: runc_1.1.5+ds1-1+b4

[Reinhard Tartler]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:runc

nmu runc_1.1.5+ds1-1+b4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against 
golang-github-urfave-cli_1.22.14-1"


please rebuild runc (again) to pickup dependency changes. I believe this 
rebuild to allow
britney to detect the right combination of package version to allow runc to 
migrate.

Thanks

Processed: nmu: runc_1.1.5+ds1-1+b4

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> affects -1 + src:runc
Bug #1055059 [release.debian.org] nmu: runc_1.1.5+ds1-1+b4
Added indication that 1055059 affects src:runc

-- 
1055059: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055059
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1055044: RM: sugar-artwork/0.120-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1055044 [release.debian.org] RM: sugar-artwork/0.120-1
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1055044 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1055044 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 RM: gtk2-engines-sugar [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el 
> ppc64el s390x] -- RoM; NBS
Bug #1055044 [ftp.debian.org] RM: sugar-artwork/0.120-1
Changed Bug title to 'RM: gtk2-engines-sugar [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 
mips64el ppc64el s390x] -- RoM; NBS' from 'RM: sugar-artwork/0.120-1'.

-- 
1055044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1055044: RM: sugar-artwork/0.120-1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 RM: gtk2-engines-sugar [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 
mips64el ppc64el s390x] -- RoM; NBS

On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 06:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The binary package gtk2-engines-sugar is obsolete, and seems to need
> manual removal from testing for newer releases to migrate.
> 

No, it needs removing from unstable. Individual binary packages don't
get manually removed from testing. Reassigning to FTP Team.

Regards,

Adam