Bug#596670: unblock: perdition/1.19~rc3-1

2010-09-13 Thread Horms
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception


Please unblock package perdition

Perdition 1.19~rc4-1 includes several important fixes and I would like it
considered for inclusion in Squeeze.  As it coincides with an upstream
release (1.19-rc4) it also contains one or two (minor) changes that don't
strictly meet the criteria for the freeze. All such changes are minor.  And
are mainly changes that were committed upstream before the freeze hardened.
As both the upstream and Debian maintainer I would be most grateful if
these could be let through.

An annotated list of all the changes between 1.19~rc3-1 (= upstream 1.19-rc3)
and 1.19~rc4-1 (= upstream 1.19-rc4) is as follows. The upstream changelog
can be found at http://hg.vergenet.net/perdition/perdition/

changeset:   871:c232fe1163d0
tag: v1.19-rc4
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:12:52 2010 +0900
summary: Perdition 1.19-rc4

This simply updates configure.ac, debian/changelog
and perdition.spec.in.

changeset:   870:11a92ae20bcc
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:09:55 2010 +0900
summary: rpm: binary dependency on libvanessa_socket2 (= 0.0.12)

From a Debian point of view, this is a source-only change
although it relates to Debian bug #592459.

changeset:   869:055be8c2db1f
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:06:31 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: binary dependency on libvanessa-socket2 (= 0.0.12)

This relates to Debian bug #592459

changeset:   868:3981109ea6ba
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:01:09 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: There is a typo in the changelog for 1.19~rc3-2

This relates to Debian bug #592459

changeset:   867:86df56cded53
user:Christophe Ségui christophe.se...@math.univ-toulouse.fr
date:Thu Sep 09 21:34:24 2010 +0900
summary: Correct parsing of NIS map

This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze

changeset:   866:975801678a3d
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Fri Aug 20 17:13:22 2010 +0900
summary: perdition(8): Clean up introduction

This is a documentation change

changeset:   857:e17ec8401d34
tag: debian-1.19~rc3-2
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Tue Aug 17 16:18:08 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: Update standards version from 3.9.0 to 3.9.1

Self explanatory, I realise that strictly this isn't freeze
material, but it was committed upstream before the
freeze became harder.

changeset:   856:baeb40f36e7d
parent:  849:2493da66045b
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Tue Aug 17 15:45:13 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: BuildDepend on libvanessa-logger-dev (= 0.0.12)

This was included in 1.19~rc3-2.
There is some discussion of it in Debian bug #592459.
It is needed in order for 1.19-rc3 and rc4 to compile.

changeset:   855:263c96021ef9
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Tue Aug 03 09:56:05 2010 +0900
summary: Allocate enough space for fromv

This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze.
The bug is a segmentation fault on start bug for
certain configuration combinations.

changeset:   854:aeff92473a55
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Sat Jul 31 14:23:46 2010 +0900
summary: Fix build failure if pam libraries aren't installed

This doesn't effect Debian as BuildDependencies
ensure that pam is always installed at build time.

As such, I realise that strictly this isn't freeze
material, but it was committed upstream before the
freeze became harder.

changeset:   853:2178a5528029
user:Joachim Sehlstedt u...@newstyledata.net
date:Fri Jul 30 16:02:17 2010 +0900
summary: Load configuration file before setting logger options

This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze.
The problem is that for some configuration parameters
may be ignored.

changeset:   852:1718ccb586e9
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Fri Jul 30 12:08:30 2010 +0900
summary: Don't assign the result of SSLv23_method()

This removes a build warning.

As such, I realise that strictly this isn't freeze
material, but it was committed upstream before the
freeze became harder.

changeset:   851:d4ec17993901
user:Joachim Sehlstedt u...@newstyledata.net
date:Fri Jul 30 11:54:28 2010 +0900
summary: Document --managesieve_capability in man page

This is a documentation change.


unblock perdition/1.19~rc4-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (190, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)


Re: Bringing the 2.6.13 (and beyond) kernel to sid, solving ramdisk generations issues and stuff.

2005-10-15 Thread Horms
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 01:13:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
 On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 01:07:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
  On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 12:19:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
   the plan for solving the ramdisk issues is done in three stages, current 
   svn
   2.6.13 packages implement stage 1, i have patches for both initrd-tools 
   and
   initramfs-tools in svn, and the yaird folk adapted it for yaird, so we 
   may go
   ahead and upload those nextly (if it could be in by monday, that would be
   nice). I will work on the last stage, the kernel-package patch, this WE, 
   and
   do an NMU since Manoj is unavailable for the next times and asked us to 
   do so.
  
  initramfs-tools waits for mklibs.
 
 Well, we can go ahead with yaird for now, what is the mklibs issue ? Or can
 mklibs be disabled for now ? 
 
 Broken but being worked on : s390
  
  Broken gcc or inline assembly, the IBM people expect the later. Hope
  that I get a fix from them at monday.
 
 Ok, as said, if not, it can wait for -3.
 
   The other issue is that 2.6.14 is scheduled for release in the not so 
   distant
   future, so we may skip uploading .13-3 to unstable and go for .14-1 
   directly,
   depending on status of newly introduced breakage in .14 and such.
  
  I vote for the later.
 
 Hehe, but this does suppose we create now another branch and start porting the
 patches and configs, i see nobody volunteering to do that.

I vote for not creating another breach. I vote for moving to .14
(or some -rc variant thereof). Its unlikelty to make much difference
on the initrd front and saves duplication of effort that is inherent
in the more branches approach.

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6.12 kernel packaging

2005-06-21 Thread Horms
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:11:34AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
 On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Horms wrote:
 
 Excellent. Kernels outside the d-k repo are already out in the cold.
 I don't see that moving forward with this makes their situation
 any better, or any worse.
 
 Common source package currently provides linux-source, linux-tree and 
 linux-patch binary packages with functionality equivalent to corresponding 
 kernel- packages. So the arches not controlled by d-k team would need to 
 just change their build-deps.

Ok, understood. I hadn't thought about that, but I don't think that
is an unreasonable inconvenience for non d-k team package maintainers.

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ABI-changing kernel security fixes for sarge

2005-03-23 Thread Horms
Hi,

I am finally nearing the bottom of my todo list for the 
up and coming release of kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9. 
And to date, the only ABI change I have is for CAN-2005-0449, 
as per my mail yesterday.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/03/msg00689.html

To the best of my knowledge 2.6.8 is in the same position -
I worked with Andres Salomon on the fix that went in there,
and the fix that was pulled out, and they are the
same fixes as for 2.4.27.

I am quite comfortable with doing a post-sarge security update
for this if the d-i team feels this is the best approach.
Though it is a remote exploit, and that needs to be
taken into due consideration.

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installing Sarge on Alpha

2004-07-22 Thread Horms
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 12:15:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
  Hi Horms,
  
  On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
   On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
it was a pci fix patch from Herbert Xu that b0rks,
hch has thrown it out for 2.6.7-1.
  
you may want to look at #253787.
  
   Thanks, that does sill seem to be present.
   I will rectify this in the SVN tree ASAP 
   and it should be fixed in the next release,
   likely kernel-source-2.4.26-4.
  
  Thanks for the quick response to this issue.
  
  What is the expected timeline for this kernel-source package to be
  uploaded?
 
 If there are no objections from other members of the kernel team
 I can have this ready today or tomorrow. (Likely tomorrow as
 I have a full day today and I don't want to rush and make some
 silly mistake.)
 
  What is the expected timeline for kernel-image packages built from these
  sources to be uploaded?
 
 I can make i386 kernel-images available at the same time as the
 kernel-source. I don't handle other architectures so I can't speak for
 them.

It didn't atke me as long as I expected to do my other chores
and get the new packages ready. I have put them _tempoarily_
up on http://debian.vergenet.net/

There is a new kernel-source-2.4.26 package, 2.4.26-4 
and a new kernel-image-2.4.26-i386 package, also 2.4.26-4.
There are no changes to the kernel-image package,
other than building it against the new kernel-source.

The change log for the kernel-source package is:

   * Fix stack allocation in crypt(). Patch by Herbert Xu
 (closes: #257120)
 . crypto/cipher.c
   * Reversed patch to PCI initialisation code on Alpha
 Patch by Herbert Xu, Steve Langasek
 (closes: #253787)
 . arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.c

If there are no objections from the kernel-team I plan
to upload these tomorrow.

Feel free to test, build other binary packages etc...  I do not plan to
make any changes to this unless something _bad_ crops up.  But It would
be probably best not to upload a kernel-image package that is built from
kernel-source-2.4.26-2.4.26-4, just in case there is a last minute
change.

-- 
Horms



Re: Installing Sarge on Alpha

2004-07-21 Thread Horms
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 Hi Horms,
 
 On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
  On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
   it was a pci fix patch from Herbert Xu that b0rks,
   hch has thrown it out for 2.6.7-1.
 
   you may want to look at #253787.
 
  Thanks, that does sill seem to be present.
  I will rectify this in the SVN tree ASAP 
  and it should be fixed in the next release,
  likely kernel-source-2.4.26-4.
 
 Thanks for the quick response to this issue.
 
 What is the expected timeline for this kernel-source package to be
 uploaded?

If there are no objections from other members of the kernel team
I can have this ready today or tomorrow. (Likely tomorrow as
I have a full day today and I don't want to rush and make some
silly mistake.)

 What is the expected timeline for kernel-image packages built from these
 sources to be uploaded?

I can make i386 kernel-images available at the same time as the
kernel-source. I don't handle other architectures so I can't speak for
them.

 I'm sorry that I didn't realize this bug had been closed.  The release
 team is currently working on putting together an aggressive schedule for
 the sarge freeze, and there's agreement that this is a bug that needs to
 be fixed before debian-installer can be frozen.  To meet our current
 tentative release schedule, we need a fixed
 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-generic to reach unstable by 31July.  Do you have
 time for the necessary uploads?  If not, is there anything I can do to
 help?  I would need some hand-holding to get up to speed on exactly how
 kernel packages are prepared, but I'm happy to help with alpha builds of
 the actual kernel-images, if nothing else.

Including this bug, I am only aware of 3 bugs against
kernel-source-2.4.26 of particular concern.

(that does not mean I won't look into the other bugs against
 the package, just that they are not a priority)

253787 (this bug): Fix pending as per this discussion.
257120 (ipsec):Fix in SVN already
257001 (m68k): m68k is known to be higly problematic on 2.4
   After some discussion on debian-kernel I plan
   to mark it as wontfix.

If you are aware of other problems please send them to debian-kernel.
I will endevour to look into them ASAP.

-- 
Horms