Re: Accepted orc 0.4.7-1 (source all amd64)

2010-09-13 Thread Julien Cristau 
Hi Sebastian,

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17:08 +, Sebastian Dröge wrote:

  orc (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
  .
* New upstream release:
  + debian/rules:
- Update shlibs version for API additions.

That's not exactly helpful in the middle of a freeze, since it means
reverse-deps get stuck with a dependency that's not satisfied in
testing.  The changes aren't small either, so I'm not looking forward to
reviewing this.  So what's your plan for orc in squeeze?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted orc 0.4.7-1 (source all amd64)

2010-09-13 Thread Sebastian Dröge 
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:50 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Hi Sebastian,
 
 On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17:08 +, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
 
   orc (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
   .
 * New upstream release:
   + debian/rules:
 - Update shlibs version for API additions.
 
 That's not exactly helpful in the middle of a freeze, since it means
 reverse-deps get stuck with a dependency that's not satisfied in
 testing.  The changes aren't small either, so I'm not looking forward to
 reviewing this.  So what's your plan for orc in squeeze?

Hrm, this should've go to experimental instead of unstable. I'll upload
a 1:0.4.6-1 later, which will be the same as previous 0.4.6-1. Sorry


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Accepted orc 0.4.7-1 (source all amd64)

2010-09-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 20:42 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
 On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:50 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  Hi Sebastian,
  
  On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17:08 +, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
  
orc (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
  * New upstream release:
+ debian/rules:
  - Update shlibs version for API additions.
  
  That's not exactly helpful in the middle of a freeze, since it means
  reverse-deps get stuck with a dependency that's not satisfied in
  testing.  The changes aren't small either, so I'm not looking forward to
  reviewing this.  So what's your plan for orc in squeeze?
 
 Hrm, this should've go to experimental instead of unstable. I'll upload
 a 1:0.4.6-1 later, which will be the same as previous 0.4.6-1. Sorry

That should be 1:0.4.6-2 or similar; package filenames don't include
epochs so the packages for 0.4.6-1 (which is still in testing) and
1:0.4.6-1 would have the same filenames.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284404677.23417.475.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net