Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:24:03PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Yes, I'll take those too. Thanks Jonathan, upload made. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130206104453.GB322@debian
Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:01:47PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: I would accept the Uploaders fix and the other documentation fixes along with it, but not the standards version. Can you prepare a debdiff before uploading and send it to this bug please? Thank you, looking at it now. Would you accept the following documentation fixes too: removing dm-upload-allowed; adding a provides: doom-engine (closes: #692762)? If so, I can work from the git master where they've been addressed; otherwise I'll cherry pick the fixes that I mentioned in the -release mail from November. Sorry if it seems like I'm moving the goal posts here, that wasn't my intention when I fixed those bugs in git, honest! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130205211223.GF21754@debian
Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Hi, On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:12:23PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:01:47PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: I would accept the Uploaders fix and the other documentation fixes along with it, but not the standards version. Can you prepare a debdiff before uploading and send it to this bug please? Thank you, looking at it now. Would you accept the following documentation fixes too: removing dm-upload-allowed; adding a provides: doom-engine (closes: #692762)? If so, I can work from the git master where they've been addressed; otherwise I'll cherry pick the fixes that I mentioned in the -release mail from November. Sorry if it seems like I'm moving the goal posts here, that wasn't my intention when I fixed those bugs in git, honest! Yes, I'll take those too. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Hi, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation fix only: * Add myself back to uploaders. 1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy violation. HOWEVER! There are a number of other documentation problems in chocolate-doom which I could fix, if the release team would approve them for wheezy. They are: obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright maintainer upstream-contact (paragraph at line 1) obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright name upstream-name (paragraph at line 1) obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright format-specification format (paragraph at line 1) comma-separated-files-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 19 missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright public domain (paragraph at line 69) duplicate-changelog-files usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/ChangeLog.gz usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/changelog.gz If the release team would be prepared to accept fixes for the above into wheezy, I'll do a -3 upload to unstable fixing them all. Please only unblock -2 if you are happy to fix the Uploaders issue *but not* any of the above. FINALLY! I could also fix out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.3) at the same time, which is almost certainly only a documentation fix too, but for some reason I'd be more hesitant to do that. I would accept the Uploaders fix and the other documentation fixes along with it, but not the standards version. Can you prepare a debdiff before uploading and send it to this bug please? Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Hi, just a ping for this - I hadn't filed a bug for the issue that the unblock would resolve, I have now - #694520 On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation fix only: * Add myself back to uploaders. 1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy violation. HOWEVER! There are a number of other documentation problems in chocolate-doom which I could fix, if the release team would approve them for wheezy. They are: obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright maintainer upstream-contact (paragraph at line 1) obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright name upstream-name (paragraph at line 1) obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright format-specification format (paragraph at line 1) comma-separated-files-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 19 missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright public domain (paragraph at line 69) duplicate-changelog-files usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/ChangeLog.gz usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/changelog.gz If the release team would be prepared to accept fixes for the above into wheezy, I'll do a -3 upload to unstable fixing them all. Please only unblock -2 if you are happy to fix the Uploaders issue *but not* any of the above. FINALLY! I could also fix out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.3) at the same time, which is almost certainly only a documentation fix too, but for some reason I'd be more hesitant to do that. Thank you in advance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121106215338.ga5...@ubik.ncl.ac.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121127101840.GA8359@debian
Re: Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Hi folks, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: 1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy violation. ^^ I believe this is ≥ important and so qualifies for the release policy update on November 8th, I could fix, if the release team would approve them for wheezy. They are: ^^ these would not. Can you please clarify whether the updated policy applies to pending unblock requests filed *prior* to the policy update? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121108175547.GC3915@debian
Re: Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Neil clarified on -devel. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121108203612.GD11858@debian
Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation fix only: * Add myself back to uploaders. 1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy violation. HOWEVER! There are a number of other documentation problems in chocolate-doom which I could fix, if the release team would approve them for wheezy. They are: obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright maintainer upstream-contact (paragraph at line 1) obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright name upstream-name (paragraph at line 1) obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright format-specification format (paragraph at line 1) comma-separated-files-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 19 missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright public domain (paragraph at line 69) duplicate-changelog-files usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/ChangeLog.gz usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/changelog.gz If the release team would be prepared to accept fixes for the above into wheezy, I'll do a -3 upload to unstable fixing them all. Please only unblock -2 if you are happy to fix the Uploaders issue *but not* any of the above. FINALLY! I could also fix out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.3) at the same time, which is almost certainly only a documentation fix too, but for some reason I'd be more hesitant to do that. Thank you in advance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121106215338.ga5...@ubik.ncl.ac.uk
