Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire 
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 10:53:09AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
> > >[sorry for the delay in replying]
> > >
> > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> 
> > >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of 
> > >> these
> > >> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
> > >
> > >It's worked before.
> > >
> > >> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> > >
> > >Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway.
> > >
> > >> 15/16 July
> > >> 22/23 July
> > >> 
> > >> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]
> > >
> > >One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking
> > >on other people. :|
> > 
> > Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy...
> 
> Yes, sorry. :-( So are Summer weekdays it would appear.
> 
> Based on the other responses received, it looks like the only logical
> answer is the 22nd, closing {o,}pu-new next weekend.

Yes; let's make it that unless there are any objections.

Thanks.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
> >[sorry for the delay in replying]
> >
> >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
> >> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
> >
> >It's worked before.
> >
> >> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> >
> >Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway.
> >
> >> 15/16 July
> >> 22/23 July
> >> 
> >> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]
> >
> >One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking
> >on other people. :|
> 
> Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy...

Yes, sorry. :-( So are Summer weekdays it would appear.

Based on the other responses received, it looks like the only logical
answer is the 22nd, closing {o,}pu-new next weekend.

Regards,

Adam

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-07 Thread Steve McIntyre 
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>[sorry for the delay in replying]
>
>On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
>> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
>
>It's worked before.
>
>> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
>
>Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway.
>
>> 15/16 July
>> 22/23 July
>> 
>> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]
>
>One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking
>on other people. :|

Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have
 nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free
 speech because you have nothing to say."
   -- Edward Snowden

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 04/07/17 16:34, Charles Chambers wrote:
> Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs 
> installing 9.0 can be worked out?
> 
> It is summer, after all.

There will be a 9.2 release. Whatever doesn't get included in 9.1 can be fixed
in 9.2. If we applied that argument, we'd never do a point release.

Emilio

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-04 Thread Charles Chambers 
Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs
installing 9.0 can be worked out?

It is summer, after all.



On Jun 25, 2017 12:10 PM, "Jonathan Wiltshire"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
>
> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> 15/16 July
> 22/23 July
>
> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
> Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
>
> 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
>
>

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-02 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez 
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
> 
> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> 15/16 July
> 22/23 July
> 
> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]

Hi!

Please, choose the date that suits you better and we'll manage to have
somebody around from the pressblicity team :)

Ana

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
[sorry for the delay in replying]

On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?

It's worked before.

> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)

Definitely now too soon, and didn't really work for me anyway.

> 15/16 July
> 22/23 July
> 
> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]

One of those should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking
on other people. :|

Cheers,

Adam

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-27 Thread Joerg Jaspert 
On 14714 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> 15/16 July

Both of them don't work for me.

> 22/23 July

That I could do.

-- 
bye, Joerg

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Hi,

Jonathan Wiltshire  (2017-06-25):
> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of
> these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
> 
> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> 15/16 July
> 22/23 July

I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these week-ends, so no
preferences from me.


KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Steve McIntyre 
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Hi,
>
>A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
>suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
>
>8/9 July (probably a bit soon)

Impossible for me, I'm busy all weekend.

>15/16 July
>22/23 July

Both look fine for me.

I'm happy to do 8.9 on the same weekend, but media will take a short
while to come out after 9.1. The first point release always throws up
surprises IME...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have
 nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free
 speech because you have nothing to say."
   -- Edward Snowden