Re: Comments regarding xnnpack_0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1_amd64.changes

2020-04-28 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Paul,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:14:28AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:23:41AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > Could you please accept it first? I'm sure it will be fixed in the next
> > upload? :-)
> 
> Hurm, I wouldn't reject over this, and I think I said I accepted it. Are
> you not seeing it yet?
>
> I just ssh'd into ftp-master, and it's showing up on an ls[1], but tracker
> and friends aren't responding to me right now. Are you sure it's not
> already been acccepted and built? Buildds look to have it.

There is no problem anymore.

Immediately after I sent out the original mail I received the ACCEPTED
notice. Nothing other than latency in the mail systems.

Thank you!
 
> >  
> > > Thanks for your work,
> > >   Paul (and a Trainee)
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> [1]: 
> xnnpack| 0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1 | buildd-experimental | source
> xnnpack| 0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1 | experimental| source
> xnnpack| 0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1 | experimental-debug  | source
> 
> 
> -- 
>  .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte 
> : :'  : Proud Debian Developer
> `. `'`  4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3
>  `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag



-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Comments regarding xnnpack_0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1_amd64.changes

2020-04-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:23:41AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Could you please accept it first? I'm sure it will be fixed in the next
> upload? :-)

Hurm, I wouldn't reject over this, and I think I said I accepted it. Are
you not seeing it yet?

I just ssh'd into ftp-master, and it's showing up on an ls[1], but tracker
and friends aren't responding to me right now. Are you sure it's not
already been acccepted and built? Buildds look to have it.

>  
> > Thanks for your work,
> >   Paul (and a Trainee)
> > 
> > 

[1]: 
xnnpack| 0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1 | buildd-experimental | source
xnnpack| 0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1 | experimental| source
xnnpack| 0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1 | experimental-debug  | source


-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte 
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3
 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Comments regarding xnnpack_0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1_amd64.changes

2020-04-27 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Paul,

Thank you very much for the work!

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:44:03AM +, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote:
> Hey lumin,
> 
> Package looks good, I've marked it for accept.
> 
> A trainee noticed that debian/patches/clog.patch is empty. Is that 
> intentional?

That's a mistake, and I've already fixed it for the next upload.

I did `quilt new clog.patch`, but I forgot to do `quilt add `.
As a result an empty file was created.

Could you please accept it first? I'm sure it will be fixed in the next
upload? :-)
 
> Thanks for your work,
>   Paul (and a Trainee)
> 
> 

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Comments regarding xnnpack_0.0~git20200425.54f5917-1_amd64.changes

2020-04-27 Thread Paul Richards Tagliamonte
Hey lumin,

Package looks good, I've marked it for accept.

A trainee noticed that debian/patches/clog.patch is empty. Is that intentional?

Thanks for your work,
  Paul (and a Trainee)



-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers