Bug#835197: RFP: fonts-eosrei-emojione
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Control: retitle -1 RFP: fonts-emojitwo -- Color emoji font originally > released as Emojione 2.2 > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Bichawrote: > > It appears like Emojione is no longer under a DFSG-compatible license. > > Updating the bug title, since I'm skeptical that even non-free could > provide the latest Emojione. > > > By the way, my understanding is that the new GNOME color emoji feature > > requires these: > > All of that is done now in Debian Testing except for fontconfig 2.12.6 > (soon I hope). Also fonts-noto-color-emoji is in the NEW queue. > > Mike, I wonder why Mozilla standardized on the Emojione font. Given > Emojione's license shift and the fact that it appears like Linux > distros prefer the Noto emoji, do you think Mozilla would reconsider? > (Fedora 27 includes the Noto emoji by default. I expect Ubuntu 18.04 > LTS to include fonts-noto-color-emoji by default. Probably Debian > GNOME Buster too. It is the same emoji used by Google in the latest > stock Android devices.) Mozilla is not using https://github.com/eosrei/emojione-color-font. It's using https://github.com/mozilla/emojione-colr Mike
Bug#754513: ITP: libressl -- SSL library, forked from OpenSSL
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:17:51AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Thomas Goirand: Well, I don't agree with this view. If LibreSSL pretends to be a replacement for OpenSSL, then they should care about being ABI compatible, so we can easily switch from one implementation to the other. That depends. If the ABI in question includes calls or constants which are the security equivalent of gets() or scanf(%s) or …, then no. As Kurt wrote, GNUTLS becomes a better alternative then. Does gnutls have an openssl shim which actually works as a generic replacement? I dimly recall a couple of not-so-nice incompatibilities … Therefore, I'd very much prefer if we used OpenSSL *or* LibreSSL, but not have the choice between the 2, otherwise, that's a recipe for disaster. Well … Please don't upload LibreSSL to Sid *ever*, unless we collectively decide that we are switching away from OpenSSL (and for which a discussion would have to start). … while IMHO it's possible to safely mix openssl and libressl if we prepare for that (i.e. make sure that _everything_ in libressl is only exported with properly versioned symbols) Contrary to what you seem to believe, this only really works if *both* libraries have versioned symbols. Otherwise, you can end up with libraries linked against the unversioned one using symbols from the versioned one at run time when both are loaded in the same address space. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140713105459.ga16...@glandium.org
Bug#754513: ITP: libressl -- SSL library, forked from OpenSSL
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:02:18PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Bernhard R. Link: * Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org [140713 12:55]: Contrary to what you seem to believe, this only really works if *both* libraries have versioned symbols. Otherwise, you can end up with libraries linked against the unversioned one using symbols from the versioned one at run time when both are loaded in the same address space. Actually, both having versioned symbols is not enough. It is either both must always have had versioned symbols or both must have versioned symbols now and every binary linked against either must have been built (or rebuilt) after the symbols got versioned. Bah. Thanks for the correction. However, it seems that the current OpenSSL package _does_ have fully-versioned symbols, at least if I understand objdump -T correctly. So the situation may not be as dire as this thread suggests. Well, it kind of is. Because those versioned symbols in openssl come from a debian patch, afaict. So while debian may be fine (as long as all build-rdeps have been rebuilt since openssl got those versioned symbols), other distros aren't covered, as well as binaries not compiled on debian. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140713134837.ga18...@glandium.org
Bug#602034: jpeg8 vs jpeg-turbo
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:01:50PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Libjpeg-turbo website [3] has all the signs of an healthy open source project - A SVN repo with many commiters, bug tracker, a mailing list with open discussion etc. libjpeg-turbo is also used by webkit, blink, and gecko. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130424142644.ga20...@glandium.org
Bug#689207: ITP: rust -- a safe, concurrent, practical language
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:22:01PM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org * Package name: rust Version : 0.3.4 Upstream Author : Graydon Hoare et al. rust-...@mozilla.org * URL : http://http://www.rust-lang.org/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C/C++, Rust Description : a safe, concurrent, practical language Rust is a curly-brace, block-structured expression language. It visually resembles the C language family, but differs significantly in syntactic and semantic details. Its design is oriented toward concerns of programming in the large, that is, of creating and maintaining boundaries - both abstract and operational - that preserve large-system integrity, availability and concurrency. . It supports a mixture of imperative procedural, concurrent actor, object-oriented and pure functional styles. Rust also supports generic programming and metaprogramming, in both static and dynamic styles. Good luck bootstrapping it... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120930113924.ga11...@glandium.org
Bug#667733: RFA: mozilla-dom-inspector
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Due to lack of time and interest, I'm putting livehttpheaders up for adoption. See the following thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2012-April/001726.html Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120406110003.32459.78410.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#667732: RFA: livehttpheaders
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Due to lack of time and interest, I'm putting livehttpheaders up for adoption. See the following thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2012-April/001726.html Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120406105941.32383.85253.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#667739: RFA: venkman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Due to lack of time and interest, I'm putting livehttpheaders up for adoption. See the following thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2012-April/001726.html Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120406110040.32520.37001.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#654176: O: libxml2 -- GNOME XML library
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 11:01:20PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: On 01/08/2012 08:10 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: Hello, On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:48:03 +1000 Alexander Zangerl a...@snafu.priv.at wrote: On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:14:52 +0100, Luk Claes writes: I want to help with the packaging of libxml2 and libxslt, though would like to have co-maintainers, so I hope some more people join in. i'd be happy to co-maintain these two library packages. Hi, in attempt to fix one particular annoying bug which affects other package of mine, I've prepared an NMU here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxml2/libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.dsc Unfortunately, I didn't know there's a discussion about new maintainer here :) So, I can offer my help as well. Ok, please request to join the Debian XML/SGML (debian-xml-sgml) group on alioth, commit your changes to the repository and upload the resulting package to mentors.debian.net to make it easier for me to sponsor it. Note that the repo may lack the commits for 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120109073537.ga4...@glandium.org
Bug#654176: O: libxml2 -- GNOME XML library
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Due to lack of time and interest, I intend to orphan the libxml2 package. The package description is: XML is a metalanguage to let you design your own markup language. A regular markup language defines a way to describe information in a certain class of documents (eg HTML). XML lets you define your own customized markup languages for many classes of document. It can do this because it's written in SGML, the international standard metalanguage for markup languages. . This package provides a library providing an extensive API to handle such XML data files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102082448.16479.46757.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#654177: O: libxslt -- XSLT 1.0 processing library - runtime library
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Due to lack of time and interest, I intend to orphan the libxslt package. The package description is: XSLT is an XML language for defining transformations of XML files from XML to some other arbitrary format, such as XML, HTML, plain text, etc. using standard XSLT stylesheets. libxslt is a C library which implements XSLT version 1.0. . This package contains the libxslt library used by applications for XSLT transformations. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102082531.16624.44346.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#637454: RFP: bluegriffon -- Next Generation WYSIWYG HTML editor based on Gecko
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:54:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bluegriffon Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Disruptive Innovations, http://www.disruptive-innovations.com/ Daniel Glazman daniel.glaz...@disruptive-innovations.com Laurent Jouanneau laurent.jouann...@disruptive-innovations.com * URL or Web page : http://www.bluegriffon.org/ * License : MPL 1.1, GPL 2, LGPL 2.1; some graphics also CC-SA Description : Modern WYSIWYG HTML editor based on Gecko From the website: BlueGriffon is a new WYSIWYG content editor for the World Wide Web. Powered by Gecko, the rendering engine of Firefox 4, it's a modern and robust solution to edit Web pages in conformance to the latest Web Standards. BlueGriffon is an intuitive application that provides Web authors (beginners or more advanced) with a simple User Interface allowing to create attractive Web sites without requiring extensive technical knowledge about Web Standards. Because Gecko lives inside BlueGriffon, the document you edit will look exactly the same in Firefox 4. Advanced users can always use the Source View to hard-code their page. BlueGriffon is available in English, Dutch, French, Czech, German, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Simplified Chinese, Spanish and Traditional Chinese There's also a needs-packaging bug report for Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/815498 The team of GetDeb.net already built packages of BlueGriffon 1.1.1: http://www.getdeb.net/software/BlueGriffon https://bugs.launchpad.net/getdeb.net/+bug/820730 Yay, one more copy of the gecko engine :( Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110811151756.ga11...@glandium.org
Bug#637454: RFP: bluegriffon -- Next Generation WYSIWYG HTML editor based on Gecko
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:46:41PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Mike, Mike Hommey wrote: Description : Modern WYSIWYG HTML editor based on Gecko Yay, one more copy of the gecko engine :( Your fear it won't be able to run it with xulrunner directly like e.g. Conkeror does? On a first glance it looked like a xulrunner application, but it seems as if it has a xulrunner application embedded. At least upstream's code repo includes an application.ini, but the upstream tar ball also ships a libxul.so... Haven't looked closer yet, though. The upstream author seems to be the author of the Netscape Composer, too, so I don't wonder about his choice of platform at all. :-) AFAIK, it's quite tied to the underlying engine, but I haven't heard Daniel's plans wrt the rapid release of Firefox. I'm not sure, for example, that the current BG works with the 5.0 engine instead of 4.0. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110811160749.ga12...@glandium.org
Bug#622172: ITP: git-hg -- Script to track mercurial repositories in git
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:22:24PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name * Package name: git-hg Version : 20110408-1 Upstream Author : Barak A. Pearlmutter barak+...@cs.nuim.ie * URL : https://github.com/barak/git-hg * License : Expat Programming Lang: Bash Description : Script to track mercurial repositories in git The right approach for mercurial tracking is IMHO https://github.com/SRabbelier/git/tree/remote-hg Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110410175252.ga5...@glandium.org
Bug#608171: Bug#612837: iceweasel: doesn't show evince in save dialog
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:26:24PM -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: I had been holding off on that through the Squeeze release, but since you brought this up, now's as good a time as any I suppose. So I'm CCing pkg-mozilla-maintainers and the kmozillahelper ITP bug (#608171). Mike, have you had time to check into how kmozillahelper's shell service could be implemented in an extension? Haven't had time for this, I'll try to take a look next week. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110211075832.gb3...@glandium.org
Bug#608171: ITP: kmozillahelper -- Iceweasel-KDE integration
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:05:15AM -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: P. J. McDermott p...@nac.net * Package name: kmozillahelper Version : 0.6.2 Upstream Author : Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz * URL : https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=mozilla-kde4-integrationproject=mozilla%3AFactory * License : Expat Programming Lang: C++ Description : Iceweasel-KDE integration This is an integration helper, designed to make Iceweasel work better in KDE SC 4. This application handles integration in the following areas: * Getting proxy configuration * Getting default applications by file extension, type, and protocol * The Open with: dialog * The file open dialog * The file save dialog, with KIO network transparency * The directory selection dialog * Opening files with default applications * Running applications * Opening the default feed reader * Opening the default mail client * Opening the default news client * Checking and setting the default web browser * Showing KDE notifications on download completions This helper application is developed for and shipped with the openSUSE distribution. It is packaged for and included in Ubuntu. There is also a package for it in the Arch User Repository and a Git repository to port it to Fedora. This application appears to be the most complete, correct, and widely-supported solution to improving Mozilla Firefox's behavior in KDE. Upstream development is visible at the following Git repository: http://gitorious.org/firefox-kde-opensuse Status of this package: I actually have the packaging work mostly done and lintian clean; it just needs mentor review (as I'm not a DD or DM). However, a patch to Iceweasel (mostly XUL and XPCOM shell service files to work with KDE the right way) is necessary for this package to work. ... which is probably not going to happen any time soon. IMHO the best option would be to package it as an extension, and make it work with icedove, iceape and iceweasel. Making it a full fledged extension (which is not impossible) would also make it work with upstream firefox tarballs. I can give a hand if necessary, but I don't know if I'll have a lot of time for it, though. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101228133232.ga6...@glandium.org
Bug#608171: ITP: kmozillahelper -- Iceweasel-KDE integration
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:50:21AM -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: I'm admittedly not too familiar with the Mozilla codebase, so I don't know if packaging this as an extension is possible. If so, then I would agree that that would be better than patching mainline Iceweasel. I was in fact planning to defer to your knowledge and judgment on this once I got the package up on mentors.debian.net. Below is the Mozilla Firefox patch in question, as applied by two distributions; if you have a chance, can you let me know what the best way to include this would be (extension or Iceweasel patch)? openSUSE (upstream) patch, applied to Firefox 3.6.6: http://gitorious.org/firefox-kde-opensuse/firefox-kde-opensuse/blobs/master/mozilla.patch Ubuntu patch, applied to Firefox 3.6.13: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.6.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/patches/firefox-kde.patch IIRC the patch lies in some bug against iceweasel/xulrunner at the moment. I still think it's too intrusive and not implemented the right way. Also, it seems this helper application currently does not work with other Mozilla applications. Because of this, the Ubuntu maintainer renamed the binary package to firefox-kde-support in Ubuntu 10.10. That doesn't make much sense. At the very least mime type handling should work. Any help you can provide with this would be appreciated. If you'd like to see what I have so far (the package is built and lintian-clean, I mainly just have to test it more), I can push the package to mentors.d.n. Otherwise, I'll hold off for now. I'll check what hooks could be used to make that a full extension. The xul/js part should already be feasible. The c++ parts are definitely possible, but I don't know how much work would be required. If you don't hear from me before, let's say, the end of january, please ping the pkg-mozilla-maintainers list, CCing this bug. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101228163421.ga25...@glandium.org
Bug#591894: ITP: pyxpcom -- XPCOM bindings for Python
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey mh+report...@glandium.org * Package name: pyxpcom Version : 0.0~hg20100212-1 Upstream Author : ActiveState Tool Corp. * URL : http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/pyxpcom * License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2 or LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang: C++, Python Description : XPCOM bindings for Python Currently, XPCOM bindings for python are provided by the python-xpcom package, which is built from xulrunner sources. pyxpcom, which is its code name, has been removed from the xulrunner sources since version 1.9.2 and therefore can't be provided from there anymore. Separate sources for pyxpcom are fortunately provided on http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom/, allowing to build against xulrunner-dev. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100806091019.12477.26794.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#583826: RFH: chromium-browser -- Chromium browser
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:21:03PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I request assistance with maintaining the chromium-browser package. In reality, the team mentioned in the Maintainer field currently consists of me. This package really needs a team to work on it. Alioth project: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-chromium/ How about grouping with the webkit team, already ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100531085828.gd3...@glandium.org
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:26 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi, for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads up. :-) Regards, Axel They are, thanks for noticing :) libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the marketing name of the file format. A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end). Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ? I'm not interested in libnestegg, especially because I don't understand why they have to write yet another Matroska demuxer instead of using one of the existing ones... Probably because webm is supposed to be a *strict* subset of matroska, not matroska. I guess other stuff using matroska {de,}muxer won't care about the strictness, which i actually think is not that good. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100520115636.ga13...@glandium.org
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi, for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads up. :-) Regards, Axel They are, thanks for noticing :) libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the marketing name of the file format. A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end). Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100520112646.ga12...@glandium.org
Bug#579796: ITP: othman -- electronic Quran browser in Python
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote: On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Harm others is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of activities usually considered ok[1]. I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That license terms need to be clear not vague. Clear or vague, if they stick to a license that restricts usage, then it fails DFSG #6. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html, for example, for a quite similar case. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100501110426.ga9...@glandium.org
Bug#566378: ITP: dehydra -- Scriptable static analysis tool for C++
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 05:45:59PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07.04.2010 14:11, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:57:31PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Is there any progress on this? Afaics all required dependencies are in unstable/testing. The gcc-4.4-plugindev package may require some additional header files. AFAIK, it only builds with gcc-4.5 and even then, treehydra doesn't work. I don't remember if I tried gcc-4.4-plugin-dev, so I should probably try (again?), but I definitely tried with gcc-4.5-plugin-dev, and while dehydra worked, treehydra didn't. Dehydra doesn't build with gcc-4.4-plugin-dev, because it requires timevar.def, that is only provided in gcc-4.5-plugin-dev. we can add more to gcc-4.4-plugin-dev, if it's required. just tell, what should be added. The failure I had with gcc-4.4-plugin-dev is the lack of timevar.def. But there's no guarantee something else is missing. Apparently, it requires more work. There seems to be support to build dehydra for gcc-4.3 as well. would that be a solution for squeeze? Is it planned to ship gcc-4.3 ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100412062337.ga4...@glandium.org
Bug#566378: ITP: dehydra -- Scriptable static analysis tool for C++
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:57:31PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Is there any progress on this? Afaics all required dependencies are in unstable/testing. The gcc-4.4-plugindev package may require some additional header files. AFAIK, it only builds with gcc-4.5 and even then, treehydra doesn't work. I don't remember if I tried gcc-4.4-plugin-dev, so I should probably try (again?), but I definitely tried with gcc-4.5-plugin-dev, and while dehydra worked, treehydra didn't. Dehydra doesn't build with gcc-4.4-plugin-dev, because it requires timevar.def, that is only provided in gcc-4.5-plugin-dev. Treehydra still doesn't work, and I'll check with Taras Glek what should be done with it. There aren't any install rules, are there any paths the -fplugin option of gcc checks other than the current directory ? Also, the copyright in the upstream source is obviously wrong: it reads Copyright (C) 1983 Mozilla Corporation. Until this is clarified, I don't expect this would pass NEW. This, OTOH, has been worked out. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100407121115.ga8...@glandium.org
Bug#574881: ITP: freewrl -- VRML browser for 3D contents works also as mozilla plugin
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:08:51PM +0100, Philippe Coval wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Philippe Coval r...@gna.org * Package name: freewrl Version : 1.22.5 Upstream Author : John Stewart, Sarah Dumoulin ... info-freewrl --at-- crc.ca * URL : http://freewrl.sourceforge.net * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : VRML browser for 3D contents works also as mozilla plugin Player aims to be fully VRML97 compliant, complete with scripting in Perl, Java and Javascript, and EAI . It is written mostly in Perl with some C for library interfaces rendering, and uses OpenGL (Mesa) for graphics. === Notes : === * that vrml viewer was in debian long time ago but went away... * upstream is still active , and many efforts are done by my friend Michel of myosotis project to made it available to debian/ubuntu users also ... So I am trying to help and hope we (co-maintainers) can get it back into debian's main and ubuntu as well * I just set up a git repo on debian's alioth (pkg-multimedia team which IMHO fits best) , imported previous version and working on an current release... * Currently (20100320) latest release builds and runs on most arch ... Just wondering, considering the current move *away* from VRML with new standards like WebGL, is there a compelling reason to add yet another VRML browser ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100322085233.gc20...@glandium.org
Bug#566378: ITP: dehydra -- Scriptable static analysis tool for C++
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Is there any progress on this? Afaics all required dependencies are in unstable/testing. The gcc-4.4-plugindev package may require some additional header files. AFAIK, it only builds with gcc-4.5 and even then, treehydra doesn't work. I don't remember if I tried gcc-4.4-plugin-dev, so I should probably try (again?), but I definitely tried with gcc-4.5-plugin-dev, and while dehydra worked, treehydra didn't. Also, the copyright in the upstream source is obviously wrong: it reads Copyright (C) 1983 Mozilla Corporation. Until this is clarified, I don't expect this would pass NEW. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100322155731.ga10...@glandium.org
Bug#568905: ITP: neercs -- experimental screen clone with improvements
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:52:16PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Hocevar s...@debian.org * Package name: neercs Version : 0.0 (SVN snapshot) Upstream Author : Sam Hocevar Jean-Yves Lamoureux Pascal Terjan * URL : http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/neercs * License : WTFPL Programming Lang: C Description : experimental screen clone with improvements NOTE: this package is ONLY for experimental. It's a long way before it is usable in a production environment. The neercs project aims to gather the best of screen, splitvt, dtach, expect, and many terminal managers into one textmode application. It features attaching and detaching from a terminal, locking, remote process grabbing, 3D transitions, and a screensaver with ASCII flying toasters. Please, pretty please, can you provide a shared library, with my pony ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566378: ITP: dehydra -- Scriptable static analysis tool for C++
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org * Package name: dehydra Version : 0.9.hg20100123 Upstream Author : Mozilla Corporation * URL : https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Dehydra * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C, C++, JS, tiny bits of python Description : Scriptable static analysis tool for C++ Dehydra is a lightweight, scriptable, general purpose static analysis tool capable of application-specific analyses of C++ code. In the simplest sense, Dehydra can be thought of as a semantic grep tool. It presents a wealth of semantic information that can be queried with concise JavaScripts. It is also useful to find bugs in source code as it allows for much more error checking than C++ is capable of by itself. Dehydra is built as a GCC plugin, thus it is easy to use for projects that already support GCC. Dehydra is also useful for generating language bindings and is used to bootstrap Treehydra, a heavy-duty static analysis GCC plugin. (This description is just a copy/paste of https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Dehydra) Please note that treehydra is part of the dehydra build, so it will also be packaged at the same time. As both require gcc 4.5 plugin support, it will live in experimental. Anyone interested in co-maintaining this tool is welcome. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563109: ITP: e17-modules-svn -- Misc plugins for the e17 window manager
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:28:37PM +0100, Albin Tonnerre wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Albin Tonnerre lu...@debian.org * Package name: e17-modules-svn Version : 0.16.999.063 Upstream Author : e17 development team enlightenment-de...@lists.sourceforge.net * URL : http://www.enlightenment.org/ * License : various (GPL2, BSD, LGPL2.1) Programming Lang: C Description : Misc plugins for the e17 window manager This package provides a collection of non-core modules for e17, from the enlightenment.org SVN repository. They provide various functionnality, such as : - Tiling capability - Network status applet - cpu/mem/disks status applet - digital clock applet - experimental composite extension Could the package name *not* include -svn in its name, and use -extras or something similar if e17-modules only is not possible ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:14:54AM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * Package name: release Version : 0.1 (native) Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * License : GPL v3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : provides information about the current releases This package contains information about all releases of Debian and Ubuntu. The release script will give you the codename for e.g. the latest stable release of your distribution. To get information about a specific distribution there are the debian-release and the ubuntu-release scripts. It's based on the idea posted on the ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [1]. Comments, suggestions and feature requests are highly welcome. For Debian I need some informations: Until when were following releases supported: buzz, rex, bo, hamm, slink, and potato? [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg09951.html I fail to see how that can be useful as a package, except if the package only calls an online service, in which case having that as a package makes not much sense. For example, ubuntu-release -d would say lucid on karmic, but what about when lucid is released ? karmic is still going to say lucid, while lucid will be saying the next one. Wouldn't it be simpler for ubuntu to use something like ubuntu-next or ubuntu-dev as a target distribution ? Debian doesn't have these problems, since it only uses unstable. (likewise for stable, where we have s-p-u and stable-security) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520662: O: iceape -- The Iceape Internet Suite
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:02:59PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: OK, it's now 7 months and it's still an O: bug.. WTF. It could be an RFH, but an RFH gets less attention. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551645: ITP: ps3-media-server -- DLNA UPnP Media Server, dedicated to PS3
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:51:03PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com * Package name: ps3-media-server Version : 1.10.5 Upstream Author : PMS Developers * URL : http://code.google.com/p/ps3mediaserver/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: Java Description : DLNA UPnP Media Server, dedicated to PS3 PS3 Media Server is a DLNA compliant Upnp Media Server for the PS3, written in Java, with the purpose of streaming or transcoding any kind of media files, with minimum configuration. It's backed up with the powerful Mplayer/FFmpeg packages. So, if this is a Upnp media server, like mediatomb, how can it be dedicated to the PS3 ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551210: ITP: blame -- display the last modification for each line in an RCS file
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 08:23:34AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org * Package name: blame Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author : Michael Chapman foo...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://blame.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : display the last modification for each line in an RCS file Blame is the equivalent for CVS's annotate command. . An annotated RCS file describes the revision and date in which each line was added to the file, and the author of each line. As much as I do like this software as it turned out to be useful to me in several cases, I'm not sure using the generic 'blame' name is a good idea. Probably rcs-blame (with or without dash, you choose) would be better IMHO. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:58:01PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Michal Čihař wrote: * Package name: gnaughty Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Troy McClure tro...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://gnaughty.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : downloader for adult content Program to automatically download adult sex content, i.e. porn movies and pictures, from a known internet porn directory. Providing a friendly interface, users who feel like having some porn can have it served fastly and directly to their desktop. Do you know about bug 283578 ? Arguably, while hot-babe did contain hot pictures, gnaughty only is a GUI to get them and doesn't provide them. Or at least that is what the description above says. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550723: ITP: gjs -- Mozilla-based javascript bindings for the GNOME platform
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:11:34AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gustavo Noronha Silva gustavo.noro...@collabora.co.uk * Package name: gjs Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Litl * URL : http://live.gnome.org/Gjs * License : MIT, with parts triple licensed under: GPL2+, LGPL2+, MPL1.1 Programming Lang: C Description : Mozilla-based javascript bindings for the GNOME platform Gjs is a Javascript binding for GNOME, that allows you to use all of GNOME's platform libraries using the Javascript language. It's mainly based on the Mozilla javascript engine and the GObject introspection framework. Please tell me this can build against a system library. PS: why spidermonkey ? It looks a strange choice when most gnome applications switched away from gecko and now use webkit... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:58:45PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 07 Oct 2009, Marcus Better wrote: This is non-free. Please keep it out of Debian. Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing. There is no need to repeat that story here, let me just point to this page: http://www.extjs.com/company/dual.php Here they make claims that directly contravene parts of GPL-3: If you derive a commercial advantage by having a closed source solution, you must purchase an appropriate number of commercial licenses from Ext. This applies to you if you use it in a non-open source project. It doesn't apply here. If you wish to use the open source license of an Ext product, you must contribute all your source code to the open source community and you must give them the right to share it with everyone too. Dual licensing is a common choice (trolltech/mysql) and doesn't make the software non-free. At least the (out of context) quotes you give do not make this software non-free. There may be other issues I don't know but you'll have to explain in more depth what the problems are. Except the issue is not about dual licensing, but about intent being different to what the license actually says. i.e. The GPL3 the code is supposed to be released under doesn't have these obligations, and anybody not contributing back or taking commercial advantage in a closed source solution is in its total rights under the GPL3 license. If these rights are supposed to be taken off, then this means the code is not meant to be under GPL3. What they really want is probably AGPL. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#544546: ITP: libfop-java -- Print formatter driven by formatting objects (XSL-FO)
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org * Package name: libfop-java Version : 0.95 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation. * URL : http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/ * License : ASL 2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Print formatter driven by formatting objects (XSL-FO) libfop-java reads a formatting object (FO) tree and renders the resulting pages to a specified output. Output formats currently supported include PDF, PS, PCL, AFP, XML (area tree representation), Print, AWT and PNG, and to a lesser extent, RTF and TXT. There is already a package for fop: http://packages.debian.org/sid/fop Maybe all you want is make it more suitable to be used by other packages? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520662: O: iceape -- The Iceape Internet Suite
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: Hi Mike and all, On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. This is now 5 months old and (no surprisingly) nobody adopted iceape, time to ask for removal? Let's just keep the bug this way, it's currently not really orphaned, but in desperate need for hands. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#530022: ITP: vmfs-tools -- Tools to access VMFS filesystems
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org * Package name: vmfs-tools Version : 0.1.0 soon to be released Upstream Author : Christophe Fillot c...@utc.fr Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org * URL : none yet * License : GPLv2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Tools to access VMFS filesystems VMFS is a clustered filesystem designed to store virtual machine disks for VMware ESX or ESXi Server hosts. This set of tools allows to access these filesystems from some other non ESX/ESXi host for e.g. maintenance tasks. Only read access is available at the moment, but write access is under works. Multiple extents are supported. The VMFS can be accessed with a command line tool or mounted through a userspace filesystem (FUSE-based). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522683: RFA: acpi-support -- glue layer for translating laptop buttons, plus legacy suspend support
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/4/12 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org: Expect grumpy people every time that you add something new that they have to learn. I also had troubles with hal and X when I tried the X servers in experimental. But I have not read any serious criticism based on technical facts in the bug report you showed. I don't know if the fact that hal has 65 (sixty-five) outstanding bugs (many of which lay unanswered, some since YEARS), plus 10 forwarded bugs, qualifies as technical. Bug count is not a good metric. Take a look at the bug count for linux-2.6, glibc, iceweasel... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522996: ITP: jruby1.2 -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org * Package name: jruby1.2 Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : The JRuby Team * URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/ * License : tri-license CPL/GPL/LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description : 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby JRuby is tightly integrated with Java to allow the embedding of the interpreter into any Java application with full two-way access between the Java and the Ruby code. Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522996: ITP: jruby1.2 -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:40:54PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote: On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote: The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three different versions in the archive instead of one, or two at most? jruby1.0 will indeed be removed shortly from the archive, so we can move forward without accumulating too many versions of jruby. But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1 still be needed ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522996: ITP: jruby1.2 -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote: On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote: But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1 still be needed ? As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons; backward-compatibility is something many people like to *try* before actually taking the leap. Backward compatibility apply for ruby 1.8 vs ruby 1.9. I don't see it applying between jruby 1.1 and jruby 1.2, except for bugs. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522196: #522196 - RFP: gnu icecat - the GNU version of Mozilla Firefox
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Nico Golde n...@ngolde.de wrote: Hi, * Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com [2009-04-02 19:45]: [Security team BCC'ed] Hi, Do we really need another mozilla browser around? Last time I heard the iceweasel maintainers were looking for other people to help them. I don't think yet another clone of firefox is going to do any good in any sense (including the security POV). As providing security support for the ice* suite is already PITA and I see no reason why we should include this given that we have ice* I strongly oppose to include this to Debian. Actually, after talking to Giuseppe Scrivano (submitter of the RFP, and icecat upstream maintainer), it appears icecat can be summarized (implementation-wide) as a few preferences changes and an extension over firefox/iceweasel, plus, obviously, branding. If someone is interested in icecat in Debian, one can surely come up with a nice small package on top of iceweasel (modulo branding, but it would be nice to fix that in firefox upstream so that branding for iceweasel itself would be easier, see the deb/iceweasel-rename branch of the iceweasel git repo). See #522331, too, for some ideas that could(should) go into iceweasel. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner owner 520661 a...@debian.org thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :). Can you make your git tree public somewhere so that the transition will be technically more or less seemless? I'm not sure this is a good idea you jump in on xulrunner. Because that would mean more work for you, and I know you already have enough work, and that would also mean the mozilla team would basically not grow. Moreover, I'm not sure I will be able to keep my promise of actually stopping to maintain it... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: retitle 520661 O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner thanks orphaning back in case fresh blood wants to work on this. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner owner 520661 a...@debian.org thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :). Can you make your git tree public somewhere so that the transition will be technically more or less seemless? I'm not sure this is a good idea you jump in on xulrunner. Because that would mean more work for you, and I know you already have enough work, and that would also mean the mozilla team would basically not grow. Moreover, I'm not sure I will be able to keep my promise of actually stopping to maintain it... dude, if thats the case then don't orphan it :) ... or at least tell me offline that you want to use this O: to attract contributors rather than giving it away. In the end I still have the dream to eliminate one huge duplication of work - which xulrunner is imo. If we could share sources packages here and there it would be a huge win imo. xulrunner is all but a duplication of work. It's even the contrary! At most, it is a duplication of source tarball. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520661: O: xulrunner
Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520664: O: nss -- Network Security Service libraries
Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. -- System Informatione Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520662: O: iceape -- The Iceape Internet Suite
Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520663: O: nspr -- NetScape Portable Runtime Library
Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519339: ITP: tmux -- an alternative to screen, licensed under 3-BSD
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:43:37PM +, Steve Kemp wrote: On Thu Mar 12, 2009 at 22:37:41 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: - a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first line of output of a specific command; That is also possible in GNU Screen. - a cleaner, modern, easily extended, BSD-licensed codebase. That would be a nice bonus. Frankly the GNU Screen codebase is very messy. (I've worked with it a fair bit.) The design of tmux seems less secure, too. In which way is it less secure? I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else. Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519339: ITP: tmux -- an alternative to screen, licensed under 3-BSD
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:19:40PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else. [Mike Hommey] Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen. Well, if by in /tmp you mean in /var/run/screen. Well, that's a Debian thing. Upstream default is /tmp/screens, and last time I checked on RH, it was there too. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#482390: ITP: unbound -- Validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:17:29PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: unbound Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ * URL : http://unbound.net/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl, Python, etc.) Description : Validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver. Unbound is designed as a set of modular components, so that also DNSSEC (secure DNS) validation and stub-resolvers (that do not run as a server, but are linked into an application) are easily possible. Note: this is _NOT_ the final description that will be used in the packaging, no need to answer to tell me it sucks, I'm aware of it :) I merely cutpasted one § of the upstream homepage. You're late, already. #482277. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#478167: ITP: cowpoke -- Builds a single Debian source package with a remote cowbuilder
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:02:27AM +0930, Ron wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package name: cowpoke Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : git://git.debian.org/git/users/ron/cowpoke.git (coming soon) License : GPL Programming Lang: bash Description : Builds a single Debian source package with a remote cowbuilder The cowpoke script automates the task of sending a package to a remote cowbuilder instance, to be built (and optionally also signed and uploaded) immediately. It is not a replacement for a scheduling build daemon in situations where many packages are continuously being built, but it does take a lot of the manual work out of the task of doing a 'final' package build in a clean-room environment (or for alternative architectures), for people with build machines that are idle enough for manual scheduling to be entirely sufficient. Do we really need a new package for a single script ? Can't that go in in with cowbuilder ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468290: ITP: mozilla-dom-inspector -- tool for inspecting the DOM of pages in Mozilla-based browsers
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: mozilla-dom-inspector Version : ?? Upstream Author : Mozilla Foundation * URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6622 * License : MPL/GPL/LGPL Programming Lang: Javascript Description : tool for inspecting the DOM of pages in Mozilla-based browsers Current mozilla trunk doesn't bundle the DOM inspector with Firefox and friends anymore, which means we'll have to make it an external package soon. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#450850: ITP: libllmozlib -- A wrapper library with simple API for embedding of Gecko browsers via XULRunner
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 04:58:57PM +, robin cornelius wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: robin cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libllmozlib Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Callum Prentice [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.ubrowser.com * License : Mozilla Tri-licence MPL1.1 or GPL2 or LGPG2.1 Programming Lang: CPP Description : A wrapper library with simple API for embedding of Gecko browsers via XULRunner No need to talk about XULRunner in the short description. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377467: helping svn-buildpackage development
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: Hello Mike, I would like to know if you are still interested in co-maintaining svn-buldpackage? I have recently had the time to fix quite a few bugs in it, but still a helping hand is always welcome. I'm unfortunately not using svn anymore. I can send you some scripts I made, though they are for svk and would need some adaptation to be useable with svn, that make use of the svn perl API to extract a tar from a given path at some release and is able to create a .diff.gz (from a diff of 2 branches) and a .dsc file. I don't have much free time, too. BTW, the graphs you generate at http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts/ are great and is really conforting and motivating to see those abrupt falls: http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts/s/svn-buildpackage.png P.S.: those scripts seem to have gone a little awry; see the directories , , +, -, , , R, [, ] and `. These are due to regular fuckage in the package bug list file on qa.debian.org, which in turn are usually due to bad bug report formatting and bugs ending assigned to impossible package names. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#443392: ITP: gitpkg -- helper scripts for maintaining packages with git
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp * Package name: gitpkg Description : helper scripts for maintaining packages with git This packages provides some simple scripts that assist with maintaining Debian packages in git. . gitpkg- creates a source package from tagged revisons. git-debimport - creates a git repository from a set of existing packages. Couldn't that be merged with git-buildpackage ? Well, they are kind of orthogonal, so I don't really see what sense that would make. If you are using the git-buildpackage framework, then you don't really need these scripts (...) Actually, I don't see why it's necessary to have a package for 2 scripts that might not be even 100 lines each. These scripts could be distributed with git-buildpackage. There is no reason git-buildpackage should be limited to the set of scripts it already contains, or a single possible workflow for using git to maintain debian packages ? What are we going to see next ? Yet another package because someone else will feel none of gitpkg or git-buildpackage fit his needs ? Why not have only one package containing different tools that fit different needs ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#443392: ITP: gitpkg -- helper scripts for maintaining packages with git
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: gitpkg Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://people.debian.org/~ron/gitpkg/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: bash Description : helper scripts for maintaining packages with git This packages provides some simple scripts that assist with maintaining Debian packages in git. . gitpkg- creates a source package from tagged revisons. git-debimport - creates a git repository from a set of existing packages. Couldn't that be merged with git-buildpackage ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441301: ITP: url2file -- wget a URL into a file an print the filename
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:35:51PM +0200, Loic Dachary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Owner: Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: url2file Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Loic Dachary * URL or Web page : http://specs.dachary.org/url2file/ * License : GNU GPLv2 or later Description : wget a URL into a file an print the filename Do we really need a new package for a 10 lines script ? Can't that be included in another one ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441301: ITP: url2file -- wget a URL into a file an print the filename
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Loic Dachary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:35:51PM +0200, Loic Dachary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Owner: Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: url2file Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Loic Dachary * URL or Web page : http://specs.dachary.org/url2file/ * License : GNU GPLv2 or later Description : wget a URL into a file an print the filename Do we really need a new package for a 10 lines script ? Can't that be included in another one ? Maybe it could, do you have specific ideas ? Maybe moreutils ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441302: ITP: getxpath -- extract a value from a XML file using a XPATH expression
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ondrej Certik wrote: same here, do we really need a package for a wrapper around xsltproc, where the GPL header is larger than the script itself? Why not to put that script inside the xsltproc package instead of creating a new one? sounds like an good idea. And with my libxslt maintainer hat on, I must say I'm not against it. So Loic, if you're okay with the idea, please reassign the bug as a wishlist against xsltproc. It would also be helpful if you'd attach the script and the xslt to the bug. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440938: ITP: xulrunner-l10n -- language packages for xulrunner
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:11:51PM +0200, arno renevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: arno renevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: xulrunner-l10n Version : 1.8.1-1 Upstream Author : Mozilla Project and Mozilla Localization Projects * URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/l10n/ * License : GPL, LGPL, and MPL Description : language packages for xulrunner XULRunner is a single gecko runtime that can be used to bootstrap multiple XUL + XPCOM applications that are as rich as Firefox and Thunderbird. . This package provides localizations for xulrunner Additional informations: xulrunner-l10n will have similarity with iceweasel-l10n; some part of xulrunner-l10n source will come from iceweasel-l10n source package, other part will come from mozilla cvs. source package will provide 43 localization packages + one meta package xulrunner-l10n-all which depends on all localization packages. Unlike iceweasel-l10n, localization packages will not be installed as extensions, but directly in /usr/share/xulrunner/chrome because current version of xulrunner does not allow global extensions for all applications. Hopefully, that will change in the future, and localization packages could be real mozilla extensions. Actually, it *does* allow global extensions, but applications embedding libxul or using xulrunner have to initialize the extensions manager by themselves in order to get these extensions enabled. This is something that is, unfortunately, not very likely to change. Note having added stuff in the chrome without extensions recently, I can't tell you if it will be necessary to go through a registration phase, but I think putting a chrome.manifest file alongside should be enough. If it is not, please bug me so that we find something (which might be in the form of a script provided by the libxul package) Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440938: ITP: xulrunner-l10n -- language packages for xulrunner
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:45:18PM +0200, arno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007, à 17:50:35 +0200, Mike a écrit : Actually, it *does* allow global extensions, but applications embedding libxul or using xulrunner have to initialize the extensions manager by themselves in order to get these extensions enabled. This is something that is, unfortunately, not very likely to change. What I meant here is you can use global extension for some applications, but not for xulrunner globally. ie: an extension has to provide an install.rdf referencing all xulrunner application it works with. So if you have a xulrunner extension, and you create a new application, you must: - enable extension manager (easy: can be done in the application itself) - change something in extension install.rdf (difficult: you must modify another debian package). That's what I want to avoid here. I think it will be easier to avoid that in xulrunner 1.9 (I'm not totally sure, but that's what I understand from mozilla bug 299716) Yes, in this case, the changes scheduled for xulrunner 1.9 might be helpful. Note having added stuff in the chrome without extensions recently, I can't tell you if it will be necessary to go through a registration phase, but I think putting a chrome.manifest file alongside should be enough. adding a .jar and a manifest in /usr/share/xulrunner/chrome/ seems to work fine. That's the way we do things in my paid job. But if you want to provide a components/ directory, you have to provide a real extension - otherwise, the component(s) may not be reregistered after modifications. You can add the component(s) in /usr/lib/xulrunner/components and touch the /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg file. The new component(s) will be autoregistered at application startup. (Works the same with removed components). See the xulrunner-gnome-support package. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440391: ITP: ganeti -- Virtual server cluster management platform
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:23:19AM +0100, Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ganeti Debian Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: ganeti Version : 1.2~b1 Upstream Author : Ganeti Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: Python Description : Virtual server cluster management platform Ganeti is a virtual server cluster management software tool built on top of the Xen virtual machine monitor and other Open Source software. After setting it up it will provide you with an automated environment to manage highly available virtual machine instances. There is already an ITP for this: #440359. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#435058: ITP: smolt -- Fedora hardware profiler
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:28:46PM -0400, Ricky Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ricky Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: smolt Version : 0.9.8.3 Upstream Author : Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/smolt/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Fedora hardware profiler The Fedora hardware profiler is a server-client system that does a hardware scan against a machine and sends the results to a public Fedora Project turbogears server. The sends are anonymous and should not contain any private information other than the physical hardware information and basic OS info. What is the added value for Debian users of sending these informations *to Fedora* ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433812: ITP: pssh -- Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:57:35PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Parallel scp (pscp) FYI (and if you don't already know) /usr/bin/pscp is also provided by putty-tools. That's something I'm still wondering about - I can't see the advantage of pscp over scp. Putty is nice to have for all the people who switch from Windows to Debian and who're used to it - but pscp??? I don't know for the unix version, but the windows version of pscp can load putty configurations, which makes it quite easy to do fancy setups (like going through proxies and such) and be able to use them with pscp. People using putty are likely to love this feature, while having to write openssh conf files might be a problem for them. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#432310: ITP: umtsmon -- Use it to control UMTS/GPRS cards in notebooks
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 12:49:20PM +0200, Andreas Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: ITP: umtsmon -- Use it to control UMTS/GPRS cards in notebooks Version: 0.6-1 Hi! I use this tool for configuring my UMTS card with a GUI. As it is not (yet) in the debian repositories I created a debian package and uploaded it to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/umtsmon May be it's useful for others, too :-) Next time, please use reportbug wnpp to file a proper ITP ;) Ccing debian-devel, as ITPs are supposed to go there, too. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428855: ITP: webkit -- HTML rendering engine library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: webkit Version : svn snapshot Upstream Author : Apple Computer Inc. * URL : http://www.webkit.org/ * License : mixed LGPL and BSD Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : HTML rendering engine library WebKit is an open source web browser engine. WebKit is also the name of the Mac OS X system framework version of the engine that's used by Safari, Dashboard, Mail, and many other OS X applications. WebKit's HTML and JavaScript code began as a branch of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE. (Note this won't be the long description, it's only a copy/paste of the beginning of the website, to briefly explain what it will be about) I would pretty much like, if people is interested, to create a pkg-webkit maintenance group on alioth. So please, interested people, contact me. I will have a useable package in a few days, but it will still need work in the control and copyright files before being uploaded to sid. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428855: ITP: webkit -- HTML rendering engine library
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:39:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: webkit Version : svn snapshot Upstream Author : Apple Computer Inc. * URL : http://www.webkit.org/ * License : mixed LGPL and BSD Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : HTML rendering engine library WebKit is an open source web browser engine. WebKit is also the name of the Mac OS X system framework version of the engine that's used by Safari, Dashboard, Mail, and many other OS X applications. WebKit's HTML and JavaScript code began as a branch of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE. (Note this won't be the long description, it's only a copy/paste of the beginning of the website, to briefly explain what it will be about) I would pretty much like, if people is interested, to create a pkg-webkit maintenance group on alioth. So please, interested people, contact me. I will have a useable package in a few days, but it will still need work in the control and copyright files before being uploaded to sid. A private reply to this ITP made me realize I didn't specify it: both the QT and Gtk backend will be provided. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428855: ITP: webkit -- HTML rendering engine library
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:23:26PM -0500, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A private reply to this ITP made me realize I didn't specify it: both the QT and Gtk backend will be provided. In the same package? If so, wouldn't that possible pull in packages unneeded by the rest of the system? From the same source package, yes. It will be a multiple binary package, obviously. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422423: ITP: libtool-cvs -- Generic library support script - CVS snapshot
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:01:32PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libtool-cvs Version : 2.1a (2007-04-10) Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Shell Description : Generic library support script - CVS snapshot Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#419696: ITP: freeimage -- Library to support popular graphics image formats
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:16:39PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: freeimage Version : 3.9.3 Upstream Author : Hervé Drolon [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://freeimage.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL or FreeImage Public License Programming Lang: C++ Description : Library to support popular graphics image formats FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, and cross-platform (works both with Linux, 32 bit Windows and Mac OS X). Is it just a NIH effect or does it have advantages over imlib, gd, imagemagick and all the others image libraries we already have in the archive ? Mike
Bug#416150: ITP: nspr -- NetScape Portable Runtime Library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: nspr Version : 4.6.6 Upstream Author : Mozilla Project * URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/nspr/ * License : GPL/LGPL/MPL Programming Lang: C Description : NetScape Portable Runtime Library This library provides platform independent non-GUI operating system facilities including: * threads, * thread synchronisation, * normal file I/O and network I/O, * interval timing and calendar time, * basic memory management (malloc and free), * shared library linking. This library is already provided by the xulrunner source package, but the intent is now to have it built from a separate package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372629: ITA/RFS: libspf2 -- Sender Policy Framework library, written in C
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (...) Have not taken a look at the package, but does the short description Description: Sender Policy Framework library, written in C really have to say written in C ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409367: ITP: iceape-locales -- language packs for Iceape
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:20:06PM +0100, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Luberda wrote: Yeah, it seems we have in Debian three different ways of naming translation packages: *-l10n-* used for iceweasel and openoffice.org locales. *-locale-*used for icedove and enigmail translations. *-i18n-* used by kde packages. afaik, there are only icedove packages left using *-locale-*, so i'd like to get rid of the *-locale-* using packages completely now. Is there any particular reason for iceape-l10n-* being a better name then iceape-locale-*? consistency. end users and dumb people like me like it when they don't have to learn package naming schemes again and again for every group of packages. dreammaybe, we can even have a consistency within all debian packages for lenny (I don't care so much if it is *-i18n-* or *-l10n-*)./dream dreamnot only for names but for short descriptions[1], or even better, long descriptions, too/dream Mike 1. development files for libfoo, libfoo -- development files, Header files and static libraries for libfoo, libfoo (development headers), libfoo (development package), etc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222899: Is this legal? [RFP: djohn -- Distributed password cracker]
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:04:21PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AFAIK, in many jurisdictions, in regards to copyright circumvention it is often determined on the basis of 'is there any commercially viable legal use?' rather than 'is there any legal use?'. Did anyone *actually* use the program for legal purposes? Of course, as you mention the trial is not done yet, and if he's let off that should set a good precedent. But if he's not, that would set a very bad one. And in a country where the acquittal rate is below 1%[1]... Anyways, there a huge load of programs, starting with tools provided in a standard Windows environment, that can be used for copyright infringment or other illegal affairs. Should we just put all computer programmers to prison ? Mike 1. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=259848 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396611: ITP: mach -- make a chroot of a rpm-based distribution
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:00:03PM +0100, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: mach Why does it have to have the same name as a well know (old) micro-kernel? Mike
Bug#350740: Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:24:16PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: Hi all, Sorry to but in, but have you seen the log of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350740 This guy seems pretty interested and active. It seems your work and his are uncoordinated at the moment though. I agree. Hendrik-Jan if you have an account on alioth.debian.org can you tell me the name. Or if you don't have an account, can you set one up? Then I will arange for you to get access to the seamonkey SVN repository. 1.1 sounds like it should go to experimental. For etch we should concentrate on 1.0.5 or whatever is the most recent stable version IMO. I think we should try to talk with the release managers. All new major versions of mozilla products are going to be released just after the hypothetical date of the freeze, but since upstream will drop support for the current branches within six months after etch hypothetical release date, that means we'll be on our own for security support quite quickly. On the other hand, the soon to be released branches will be supported at least 6 more months, which means we'll be on our own much later. It is a better long term support plan... I've already mentioned this to Alexander but I'll say it again, IMO seamonkey should be one package rather than split up. It is supposed to be an Internet suite after all and people who want a more fine-grained set of packages can use firefox et al. I think we should not impose to users who currently use mozilla-browser and al. packages to have everything installed. A meta seamonkey package installing all the fine grained packages would be a good thing though. I know quite a lot of people, including me in the past, using mozilla-browser only, and not caring about the composer or the mail client. Some other do only use the composer and might want to install only it (though these ones would be better using nvu, but composer is going to be somehow resurrected) btw, I might get some time to work on seamonkey again soon. I have already uploaded 1.0.5 for Linspire but their standards and ours are different so I can't simply copy my existing package. I still insists on all the things I said before my vacation, about the patches and all. Please do consider all that, and/or comment http://people.debian.org/~glandium/seamonkey-patches/README Now, some comments on Hendrik-Jan messages: Unfortunately, building Seamonkey on its own libs (and shipping them), is also a no-go as the libnspr4-dev and libnss3-dev packages of xulrunner then conflict with it. If anyone knows of a way around this, feel free to comment on this. Don't ship the libraries in /usr/lib. Ship them in /usr/lib/seamonkey like firefox does. You can put them in a common package on which all the seamonkey packages will depend, if you will. The system myspell dictionaries are now correctly linked (were in components, are now in dictionaries). Please consider using the system myspell libraries. I have a patch for that, that is already applied to firefox 2.0b2 in experimental. - transition/dummy package (how do I do this?) The only solution is to make these transition packages from the mozilla source package, because they have an epoch. Cheers Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: Bug#350740: Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:27:40AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Now, some comments on Hendrik-Jan messages: - transition/dummy package (how do I do this?) The only solution is to make these transition packages from the mozilla source package, because they have an epoch. You can generate the transition packages from seamonkey just fine -- you can override the version used in the binary package from debian/rules -- they do not need to match the source version (though it's the default and deviating should be done with care). See gcc-defaults for a well known example. Well, yeah, you can do painful things. I tend to like the KISS principles. ;) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
Hi Alex, On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:47:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please upload them somewhere for now? When do you leave on vacation? I'll upload to gluck in ${HOME}/public_html, which means it will be on people.debian.org/~glandium/. Expect it to be done some time tonight (local time: GMT+2) I'm leaving on sunday, but will more than probably put me away from saturday. Did you have time to work on seamonkey during the past two weeks ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Hi Alex, On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:47:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please upload them somewhere for now? When do you leave on vacation? I'll upload to gluck in ${HOME}/public_html, which means it will be on people.debian.org/~glandium/. Expect it to be done some time tonight (local time: GMT+2) I'm leaving on sunday, but will more than probably put me away from saturday. Did you have time to work on seamonkey during the past two weeks ? Sorry, still working on the final security patches. Its because my work-capacity has been significantly reduced during the last few weeks by severe private-life hazards. Please understand that I have to fix some real life issues first. I regret all this, but I did not choose this doom either. I would understand if you would not go ahead lifting this package as I have to admit that I will not be able to put much time into this any-time soon (at least not till nov). No problem, I'll try to do something with my own spare time. Good luck with your RL issues, whatever they are. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:47:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please upload them somewhere for now? When do you leave on vacation? I'll upload to gluck in ${HOME}/public_html, which means it will be on people.debian.org/~glandium/. Expect it to be done some time tonight (local time: GMT+2) http://people.debian.org/~glandium/seamonkey-patches/ There is a README with comments on some patches, some issues with what is currently in svn, and some thoughts for the packaging based on my knowledge from firefox and xulrunner. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:46:36AM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:04:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: + maintenance place: + svn used by jaldhar? + complete checkin ... deflated As Jaldhar apparently has not much time, can we just highjack the svn archive for now? Or should we move to a new place? As you wish. I'm almost done with the patches triage, I'll soon be able to upload a set of patch for seamonkey. Note that I'll be on vacation from saturday until sep 20th, so I won't be able to work a lot on seamonkey from then. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:24:11AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:46:36AM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:04:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: + maintenance place: + svn used by jaldhar? + complete checkin ... deflated As Jaldhar apparently has not much time, can we just highjack the svn archive for now? Or should we move to a new place? As you wish. I'm almost done with the patches triage, I'll soon be able to upload a set of patch for seamonkey. I have a set of patches for seamonkey, and a set of changes I want to do to the files that are currently in the collab-maint svn, according to the patches. I also have 4 or 5 patches that need porting to seamonkey, i.e. take the idea and do the same with the seamonkey specific build system/code. (For example, there is a patch to correctly install default.xpm which only applies to the xulrunner/ subdirectory of xulrunner, but for which the issue is also in all others mozilla products, but at a different place, with a possibly different fix) Please tell me where I should put all these before leaving, so that you can do your homework when I'm not here ;) Cheers Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:09:25PM -0700, Alex Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Allow me to stick my two cents in, as the person currently representing the SeaMonkey community unofficially. Wherever you post patches that alter the SeaMonkey code, I'd like to at least read them and offer feedback. I'm obviously not in a position to reject a patch, but if changes are being made, we should see which ones can be ported back to mozilla.org as a matter of course for forward-development of mozilla.org products. Firefox 2.0 (and consequently SeaMonkey 1.1) are due to be released within a few months, so now's a pretty good time to keep an eye out for last-minute changes the Etch and Debian communities need. Don't worry, most of these patch are patches that are either taken from upstream bugzilla, been sent upstream, or soon to be sent. Most of them have been applied and thus tested for quite a long time on firefox, xulrunner and thunderbird in Debian. Some have been applied in mozilla.org trunk or even 1.8.1 in the best case, and some are still discussed. Don't worry ;) Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please upload them somewhere for now? When do you leave on vacation? I'll upload to gluck in ${HOME}/public_html, which means it will be on people.debian.org/~glandium/. Expect it to be done some time tonight (local time: GMT+2) I'm leaving on sunday, but will more than probably put me away from saturday. Cheers Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350740: seamonkey for etch ?
Hi everyone, (Sorry for the duplicates people may receive) I'd like to know what the status is for these ITP on seamonkey. Is actually someone working on it ? Are there any preliminary packages ? Being myself maintainer of xulrunner and co-maintainer of firefox, I can give a hand if necessary. I think Alexander Sack, who has worked on mozilla security updates wouldn't mind giving some advices too. If it appears that noone is working on that, I'll take over the ITPs and upload a seamonkey package by the end of september (I think), but I first need to know if someone is doing something or not, to avoid duplication of efforts. Thanks for your attention. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:08:05PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here the svn url I just looked up in my inbox ... svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/seamonkey Jaldhar ... whats the current state ... we are starting to run out of time if we want to be safe to see this in etch? Well, in the current state, it still requires a lot of work to split the package in smaller parts like mozilla, and add transition packages. It would also be necessary to port most of the patches from xulrunner to make it work on all debian architectures. BTW, I need to do some sorting on my patches in xulrunner, that would be the occasion to prepare a list of patches to port to seamonkey. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:04:00PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:00:22PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Well, in the current state, it still requires a lot of work to split the package in smaller parts like mozilla, and add transition packages. It would also be necessary to port most of the patches from xulrunner to make it work on all debian architectures. Hmm... so should we take this over to make things happen faster? What do you mean by port most of the patches from xulrunner ... won't they apply cleanly? Most should apply with no problem. But IIRC some kinda depend on the soname patch (the one to add sonames to the xulrunner libs), which is not a thing I want to see applied on seamonkey, firefox and others because they don't need to. But that work is not a very difficult one. Plus, I really need to do some triage in my patch-set, between build-system patches, code patches, debian-specific patches, etc. So maybe we want to use seamonkey to see how good team maintainence for mozillas can work? Jaldhar would you agree to set [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the maintainer and list all that contribute explicitly as co-maintainer? Mike, what do you think about it? I think this is a great idea. It would be a preliminary step for me to turn the xulrunner maintainance into a team one, which i'd like to see happen, but not before I've clearly documented the whys and the hows of the xulrunner packaging, which a team maintainance of seamonkey will help me doing. I hope to be able to switch xulrunner to a team maintainance soon after the etch release, then we'll be able to experiment building the other mozilla applications on top of it, which, by then, should almost be officially supported upstream. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:04:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so lets discuss some basics like preferred package layout etc. Please comment and object: + package layout: upstream orig.tar.gz (no embedded tarball) ... but separate patches included (dpatch or something) dpatch is what I use for xulrunner. Tarball in tarball is something I hate, I'm happy to see you don't want that :) + packages needed: + all current mozilla application equivalents + the -dev, but without libxxx packages. Why would we need mozilla-dev packages at all ? + a dbg package ... I want to see a dbg for all mozilla packages we have in etch. I will reupload a thunderbird build which I cancelled previously because I wanted security fixes to go into etch first. Agreed + maintenance place: + svn used by jaldhar? Why not ? Though if we go for the complete checkin, we'd probably rather use a separate svn tree. Creating one for the team, if there isn't any yet, could be a good idea. + complete checkin ... deflated For both firefox and xulrunner, we are using a complete checkin, and it doesn't waste so much space, the repository is actually smaller than the checked out tree. Firefox has patches applied, but xulrunner uses dpatch, having the complete tree in svn helps me to generate the patches efficiently. + initial work-load: + mike reviews his patches clears up which ones are needed for archs, build system etc. I'll do that in the next few days. + I move package to layout (orig.tar.gz + patches) as mentioned above (or whatever we decide to use) + anyone who has time does the work to tweak configure options and debhelper files to produce the packages mentioned above. We can either split this up in front or just first comes first serves? Anything important I missed? Sounds good :) Cheers Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382531: ITP: furl -- a small utility for displaying the HTTP headers returned by Web servers
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:35:42PM +0200, Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: furl Version : 2.1 Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.gumbynet.org.uk/software/furl.html * License : GPL v2 (or later) Programming Lang: C Description : a small utility for displaying the HTTP headers returned by Web servers furl is a small utility for displaying the HTTP headers returned by Web servers in response to client requests . It can impersonate two different browser: Internet Explorer and Mozilla Is there a real benefit over lynx -dump -head and similar things ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379343: ITP: jrpg -- kanji learning game
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:02:20PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: jrpg Version : 20060524-2151 Upstream Author : Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : mostly GPL, but will go in non-free because of non-free graphics Are these graphics distributable at all ? It seems to me they are taken from the Final Fantasy games, I'm afraid that means they are not free to distribute without a license from Square Software... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377467: RFH: svn-buildpackage -- helper programs to maintain Debian packages with Subversion
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:26:52AM +0200, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the svn-buildpackage package. My spare time is exhausted by other things IRL and other more urgent projects. The codeveloper should ideally be a good perl coder. I'd be interested to give a hand on it, though my spare time is not necessarily better than yours. If other people stand up, maybe we could start an alioth project ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359955: ITP: gaim-libnotify -- display notification bubbles in gaim
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:19:39PM +0200, Marco Cabizza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Marco Cabizza [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: gaim-libnotify Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Duarte Enriques [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://gaim-libnotify.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : display notification bubbles in gaim gaim-libnotify is a gaim plugin which displays notification bubbles in Gaim using libnotify and notification-daemon. Notification bubbles of what kind of events ? It would be useful to know without having to try. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:58:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: gst-fluendo-mp3 Version : 0.10.0 Upstream Author : Jan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.fluendo.com/resources/fluendo_mp3.php * License : MIT Description : Fluendo mp3 decoder GStreamer plugin This GStreamer plugin permits decoding of MPEG 1 audio layer III streams. It is derived from the ISO MPEG dist10 reference package. . This plugin differs from the GStreamer MAD plugin in that it doesn't depend on a GPL library. . http://www.fluendo.com/resources/fluendo_mp3.php What about the redistribution contract that any distribution or Unix maker out there who want to include the Fluendo MP3 plug-in with their distribution have to sign to become an official redistributor ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#349164: Bug#349165: O: ieee80211 -- Source for the 802.11 (wireless) network stack for Linux
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 01:36:20PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Mike Hommey wrote: As it is now included in vanilla kernel since 2.6.14 and is impossible to build without breaking the debian packaging system for recent kernels (see #338775), I lost interest in packaging ieee80211. I'm therefore orphaning it. Shouldn't it then be simply removed from unstable? (likewise with ipw2200) Regards, Rene Well, some people prefer using the upstream ones instead of the vanilla kernel ones, because there are still issues with the version in vanilla kernel. Some other people don't want to upgrade kernel, and for them it's the only solution to get these drivers. For these people, the current drivers are better than nothing. Removing them would not be nice to these people. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#349164: Bug#349165: O: ieee80211 -- Source for the 802.11 (wireless) network stack for Linux
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:01:57PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 01:36:20PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't it then be simply removed from unstable? (likewise with ipw2200) Well, some people prefer using the upstream ones instead of the vanilla kernel ones, because there are still issues with the version in vanilla kernel. Yes, but that still won't work then as you say those don't build with newer kernels, didn't you? I found no clean solution for doing that, but there are workarounds to make it work, but that implies overwriting other packages' files. If the adopting maintainer wants to provide scripts or howtos to go this not-clean-but-only way, that's fine by me. Some other people don't want to upgrade kernel, and for them it's the only solution to get these drivers. For these people, the current drivers are better than nothing. Removing them would not be nice to these people. Hmm. That's a point. But a question remains : are they numerous ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#349164: Bug#349165: O: ieee80211 -- Source for the 802.11 (wireless) network stack for Linux
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:58:12PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about dpkg-divert? (which I incidentially am doing for ieee80211softmac) ;-). But that will get a mess when I'd have to deal with in-kernel-image ieee80211 module and out-of-kernel-image ieee80211 module... I tried that kind of approach but there still is a problem with the symbols list in /usr/src/linux-header-x.x/i/can't/remember/exactly/where that is used by the makefiles and scripts provided by the kernel to create the module and its symbol dependency list. Actually there's no need for the dpkg-divert thing, since you can put the modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/updates/ And that's why external ipw2200 won't load with external ieee80211 because it depends on old symbols. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#349165: O: ieee80211 -- Source for the 802.11 (wireless) network stack for Linux
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the ieee80211 package. As it is now included in vanilla kernel since 2.6.14 and is impossible to build without breaking the debian packaging system for recent kernels (see #338775), I lost interest in packaging ieee80211. I'm therefore orphaning it. The package description is: This package provides the source code for the 802.11 (wireless) network stack module for the Linux kernel. Though it has been incorporated in latest kernel versions, the bundled one might not be up-to-date to build third-party wireless modules such as ipw2100 or ipw2200 which are common on Centrino notebooks. . In order to compile these modules you need the kernel sources (or the kernel-headers for the kernel-image packages from Debian). For compile instructions look into /usr/share/doc/ieee80211-source/README.Debian or simply use the module-assistant utility. . The project's homepage can be found here: http://ieee80211.sourceforge.net -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]