[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046022] Re: Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service does not exist.

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
The unit is called 'NetworkManager-wait-online.service' not
'NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service'.

** Package changed: plymouth (Ubuntu) => network-manager (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046022

Title:
  Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-
  service.service does not exist.

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  when i try to disable network manager wait online service - I get a 
notificaiton saying as below 
  Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service 
does not exist.

  
  But when i do the analyze blame - i clearly see close to 15 seconds being 
eaten up by the network manager 
  needs attention - since boot speed is pathetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2046022/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046022] [NEW] Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service does not exist.

2023-12-08 Thread Pavanbhushan B
Public bug reported:

when i try to disable network manager wait online service - I get a 
notificaiton saying as below 
Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service 
does not exist.


But when i do the analyze blame - i clearly see close to 15 seconds being eaten 
up by the network manager 
needs attention - since boot speed is pathetic

** Affects: plymouth (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to plymouth in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046022

Title:
  Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-
  service.service does not exist.

Status in plymouth package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  when i try to disable network manager wait online service - I get a 
notificaiton saying as below 
  Failed to disable unit: Unit file NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service 
does not exist.

  
  But when i do the analyze blame - i clearly see close to 15 seconds being 
eaten up by the network manager 
  needs attention - since boot speed is pathetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/2046022/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604

Title:
  Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4

  directx-headers
  - build-dep of the new Mesa

  mesa
  - new major release (23.2.x)
  - new HW support, Meteor Lake..

  [Test case]
  We want to cover at least 2-3 different, widely used and already previously 
supported GPU generations from both AMD and Intel which are supported by this 
release, as those are the ones that cover most bases; nouveau users tend to 
switch to the NVIDIA blob after installation. No need to test ancient GPU's 
supported by mesa-amber. And best to focus on the newer generations (~5y and 
newer) as the older ones are less likely to break at this point.
  - AMD: Vega, Navi1x (RX5000*), Navi2x (RX6000*), Navi3x (RX7000*)
  - Intel: gen9 (SKL/APL/KBL/CFL/WHL/CML), gen11 (ICL), gen12 (TGL/RKL/RPL/DG2)

  Install the new packages and run some tests:
  - check that the desktop is still using hw acceleration and hasn't fallen 
back to swrast/llvmpipe
  - run freely available benchmarks that torture the GPU (Unigine 
Heaven/Valley/Superposition)
  - run some games from Steam if possible

  and in each case check that there is no gfx corruption happening or
  worse.

  Note that upstream releases have already been tested for OpenGL and
  Vulkan conformance by their CI.

  [Where things could go wrong]
  This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to 
catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know 
if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later 
stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1970800] Re: Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar causes a graphical glitch

2023-12-08 Thread Phil Wyett
Still waiting to hear if 'jammy' will be getting this fix. Certainly not
in 'proposed-updates'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970800

Title:
  Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar
  causes a graphical glitch

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  If you click a calendar date in the bottom row of the top panel
  calendar, the backdrop shrinks and the dates overflow out of the
  backdrop boundaries.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..02.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  510.60.02  Wed Mar 16 
11:24:05 UTC 2022
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Apr 28 16:25:17 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   virtualbox/6.1.32, 5.15.0-25-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/6.1.32, 5.15.0-27-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation CometLake-U GT2 [UHD Graphics] [8086:9b41] (rev 02) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] CometLake-U GT2 [UHD 
Graphics] [1462:129c]
 Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] TU117M [GeForce GTX 
1650 Mobile / Max-Q] [1462:129c]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-22 (6 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Prestige 15 A10SC
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.15.0-27-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 11/18/2019
  dmi.bios.release: 1.8
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: E16S3IMS.108
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: MS-16S3
  dmi.board.vendor: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
  dmi.board.version: REV:1.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrE16S3IMS.108:bd11/18/2019:br1.8:svnMicro-StarInternationalCo.,Ltd.:pnPrestige15A10SC:pvrREV1.0:rvnMicro-StarInternationalCo.,Ltd.:rnMS-16S3:rvrREV1.0:cvnMicro-StarInternationalCo.,Ltd.:ct10:cvrN/A:sku16S3.1:
  dmi.product.family: Prestige
  dmi.product.name: Prestige 15 A10SC
  dmi.product.sku: 16S3.1
  dmi.product.version: REV:1.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2build3
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.17-2build1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1970800] Re: Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar causes a graphical glitch

2023-12-08 Thread Coeur Noir
Still broken in 22.04 LTS…

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970800

Title:
  Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar
  causes a graphical glitch

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  If you click a calendar date in the bottom row of the top panel
  calendar, the backdrop shrinks and the dates overflow out of the
  backdrop boundaries.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..02.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  510.60.02  Wed Mar 16 
11:24:05 UTC 2022
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Apr 28 16:25:17 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   virtualbox/6.1.32, 5.15.0-25-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/6.1.32, 5.15.0-27-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation CometLake-U GT2 [UHD Graphics] [8086:9b41] (rev 02) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] CometLake-U GT2 [UHD 
Graphics] [1462:129c]
 Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] TU117M [GeForce GTX 
1650 Mobile / Max-Q] [1462:129c]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-22 (6 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Prestige 15 A10SC
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.15.0-27-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 11/18/2019
  dmi.bios.release: 1.8
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: E16S3IMS.108
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: MS-16S3
  dmi.board.vendor: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
  dmi.board.version: REV:1.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrE16S3IMS.108:bd11/18/2019:br1.8:svnMicro-StarInternationalCo.,Ltd.:pnPrestige15A10SC:pvrREV1.0:rvnMicro-StarInternationalCo.,Ltd.:rnMS-16S3:rvrREV1.0:cvnMicro-StarInternationalCo.,Ltd.:ct10:cvrN/A:sku16S3.1:
  dmi.product.family: Prestige
  dmi.product.name: Prestige 15 A10SC
  dmi.product.sku: 16S3.1
  dmi.product.version: REV:1.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2build3
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.17-2build1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2016217] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in clutter_actor_remove_effect() from st_scroll_view_dispose() from g_object_unref() from GjsAutoPointer() from GjsAutoPointer()

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Fedora)
   Status: Confirmed => New

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Fedora)
 Remote watch: Red Hat Bugzilla #2189124 => None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016217

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in clutter_actor_remove_effect() from
  st_scroll_view_dispose() from g_object_unref() from GjsAutoPointer()
  from GjsAutoPointer()

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock source package in Mantic:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock source package in Noble:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell package in Fedora:
  New

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-shell.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
44.0-2ubuntu3, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/677a794c2788cd0244c8fc6d7d34780a85127bc9 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

  #0  0x7f3aa429dd82 in clutter_actor_remove_effect 
(self=self@entry=0x55d60fa59e90, effect=0x55d6101c48a0) at 
../clutter/clutter/clutter-actor.c:14830
  __inst = 0x55d6101c48a0
  __t = 94377826055744
  __r = 
  _g_boolean_var_274 = 
  __func__ = "clutter_actor_remove_effect"
  #1  0x7f3aa3f9d27f in st_scroll_view_dispose (object=0x55d60fa59e90) at 
../src/st/st-scroll-view.c:246
  priv = 0x55d60fa59a00
  #2  0x7f3aa4aeada0 in g_object_unref (_object=0x55d60fa59e90) at 
../../../gobject/gobject.c:3891
  _pp = 
  gaig_temp = 
  gaig_temp = 
  weak_locations = 
  nqueue = 0x55d60fa6da60
  _ptr = 
  object = 0x55d60fa59e90
  old_ref = 
  retry_atomic_decrement1 = 
  __func__ = "g_object_unref"
  #3  0x7f3aa43b4b2c in GjsAutoPointer<_GObject, void, _object_unref, 
_object_ref>::reset (ptr=0x0, this=) at ../gjs/jsapi-util.h:229
  old_ptr = 
  #4  GjsAutoPointer<_GObject, void, _object_unref, 
_object_ref>::~GjsAutoPointer (this=, this=) at 
../gjs/jsapi-util.h:172
  No locals.
  #5  GjsSmartPointer<_GObject>::~GjsSmartPointer (this=, 
this=) at ../gjs/jsapi-util.h:349
  No locals.
  #6  ObjectInstance::release_native_object (this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1524
  No locals.
  #7  ObjectInstance::release_native_object (this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1500
  No locals.
  #8  0x7f3aa43c9ec0 in ObjectInstance::~ObjectInstance (this=, this=) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1945
  was_using_toggle_refs = false
  had_toggle_up = false
  had_toggle_down = 
  had_toggle_up = 
  had_toggle_down = 
  was_using_toggle_refs = 
  #9  GIWrapperInstance::finalize_impl (this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at ../gi/wrapperutils.h:1113
  No locals.
  #10 ObjectInstance::finalize_impl (gcx=, obj=0x35b1abd24820, 
this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1912
  query = {type = 94377830362416, type_name = 0x7f3aa3fdcda6 
"StScrollView", class_size = 664, instance_size = 48}
  query = 
  _g_boolean_var_74 = 
  #11 GIWrapperBase::finalize 
(gcx=, obj=0x35b1abd24820) at ../gi/wrapperutils.h:411
  priv = 0x55d60fa0ce80

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2016217/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2043027] Re: Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043027

Title:
  Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Clicking does not work correctly with Wacom tablets in the Ubuntu/GNOME X11 
sessions

  Test Case
  -
  One of the people affected by this issue will verify whether their Wacom 
tablet is working noticably better with the upgraded Mutter packages

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  The fix for this issue is included in upstream's mutter 45.2 release so 
please see bug 2043000 as the master bug for this upgrade

  Original Bug Report
  ---
  Tablet seems to work until I open Krita (as I could read on Internet, it may 
be related with Qt Apps).

  When Krita is open, mouse movement works ok with the tablet, but when
  it comes to click action it doesn't work and any further action with
  mouse is not captured (even outside Krita!).

  To regain control of the mouse I have to Alt+Tab and then I can click
  again.

  Some details that may be handy:
  - I've got two monitors
  - Maybe Qt apps related
  - My graphic card is nVidia GTX 1060 6Gb, driver used nvidia-driver-535

  Thanks for your effort. I love Ubuntu!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..06.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  535.129.03  Thu Oct 19 
18:56:32 UTC 2023
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permiso denegado: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Nov  8 17:20:34 2023
  DistUpgraded: 2023-11-08 00:54:28,961 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: 
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
  DistroCodename: mantic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] [10de:1c03] (rev a1) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd. GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] 
[19da:1438]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-09 (578 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223)
  MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic 
root=UUID=9dd904a0-11bb-40fa-9fe8-2f10449a416c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-07 (1 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/15/2020
  dmi.bios.release: 5.17
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0608
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: TUF GAMING B550-PLUS
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0608:bd06/15/2020:br5.17:svnASUS:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnTUFGAMINGB550-PLUS:rvrRevX.0x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuSKU:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2043027] Re: Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

2023-12-08 Thread Christopher Vollick
I am not the original poster, but I had all of the same symptoms. I
manually tried the 45.2-0ubuntu1 version of mutter mentioned above, and
the tablet works now!

Tested Krita, Inkscape, Blender (and general system navigation)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043027

Title:
  Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Clicking does not work correctly with Wacom tablets in the Ubuntu/GNOME X11 
sessions

  Test Case
  -
  One of the people affected by this issue will verify whether their Wacom 
tablet is working noticably better with the upgraded Mutter packages

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  The fix for this issue is included in upstream's mutter 45.2 release so 
please see bug 2043000 as the master bug for this upgrade

  Original Bug Report
  ---
  Tablet seems to work until I open Krita (as I could read on Internet, it may 
be related with Qt Apps).

  When Krita is open, mouse movement works ok with the tablet, but when
  it comes to click action it doesn't work and any further action with
  mouse is not captured (even outside Krita!).

  To regain control of the mouse I have to Alt+Tab and then I can click
  again.

  Some details that may be handy:
  - I've got two monitors
  - Maybe Qt apps related
  - My graphic card is nVidia GTX 1060 6Gb, driver used nvidia-driver-535

  Thanks for your effort. I love Ubuntu!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..06.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  535.129.03  Thu Oct 19 
18:56:32 UTC 2023
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permiso denegado: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Nov  8 17:20:34 2023
  DistUpgraded: 2023-11-08 00:54:28,961 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: 
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
  DistroCodename: mantic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] [10de:1c03] (rev a1) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd. GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] 
[19da:1438]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-09 (578 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223)
  MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic 
root=UUID=9dd904a0-11bb-40fa-9fe8-2f10449a416c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-07 (1 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/15/2020
  dmi.bios.release: 5.17
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0608
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: TUF GAMING B550-PLUS
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039104

Title:
  ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings source package in Mantic:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]

  In response to LP: #2038964 and due to the timing we have forked
  ubuntu-raspi-settings into a separate source package.

  ubuntu-settings must therefore be updated to drop ubuntu-raspi-
  settings* from debian/control as otherwise binary builds of the
  package will be rejected by the archive (if the version number is <=
  23.10.6) or will wrongly supersede the fixes that have just been
  uploaded to mantic (if the version number is > 23.10.6).

  [Test case]
  No testing is planned beyond any autopkgtests which may be none (the package 
itself doesn't have any).  This should not be released to -updates on its own, 
but should be staged in -proposed so any future SRUs needed don't fail to copy 
due to out-of-date packages.

  [Where problems may occur]
  It is unlikely but possible that the removal of the raspi binary package from 
this source package will have inadvertently modified the contents of the other 
remaining binary packages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2039104/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2044019] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

2023-12-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release
  
   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
  
   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release
  
   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a
  minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
  
  [Testing]
  
   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).
  
    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/
  
    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
  
   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15417677/+listing-archive-extra
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231208_113305_ce7d3@/log.gz
- * [arm64] ...
+ * [arm64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20231208_181454_f665b@/log.gz
  * [armhf] ... (autopkgtests infra problems on this arch)
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20231208_140510_db345@/log.gz
  * [riscv64] not available
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20231208_142154_9eaf6@/log.gz
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * A minor release with a total of 157 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.
  
   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described
  above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked
  in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044019

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release

   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs

   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2016217]

2023-12-08 Thread fedora-admin-xmlrpc
This component is maintained by the GNOME project. Issues with it should
be reported directly to GNOME at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/.

This issue should only be kept open if it:

1. Relates to Fedora packaging or integration with other Fedora components
2. Is required for Fedora release processes, such as blocker bugs and freeze 
exceptions

If this issue isn't needed for either of these two reasons, please:

 * create an issue with GNOME
 * add a link to the GNOME issue here
 * close this issue as CLOSED/UPSTREAM

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016217

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in clutter_actor_remove_effect() from
  st_scroll_view_dispose() from g_object_unref() from GjsAutoPointer()
  from GjsAutoPointer()

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock source package in Mantic:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock source package in Noble:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell package in Fedora:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-shell.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
44.0-2ubuntu3, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/677a794c2788cd0244c8fc6d7d34780a85127bc9 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

  #0  0x7f3aa429dd82 in clutter_actor_remove_effect 
(self=self@entry=0x55d60fa59e90, effect=0x55d6101c48a0) at 
../clutter/clutter/clutter-actor.c:14830
  __inst = 0x55d6101c48a0
  __t = 94377826055744
  __r = 
  _g_boolean_var_274 = 
  __func__ = "clutter_actor_remove_effect"
  #1  0x7f3aa3f9d27f in st_scroll_view_dispose (object=0x55d60fa59e90) at 
../src/st/st-scroll-view.c:246
  priv = 0x55d60fa59a00
  #2  0x7f3aa4aeada0 in g_object_unref (_object=0x55d60fa59e90) at 
../../../gobject/gobject.c:3891
  _pp = 
  gaig_temp = 
  gaig_temp = 
  weak_locations = 
  nqueue = 0x55d60fa6da60
  _ptr = 
  object = 0x55d60fa59e90
  old_ref = 
  retry_atomic_decrement1 = 
  __func__ = "g_object_unref"
  #3  0x7f3aa43b4b2c in GjsAutoPointer<_GObject, void, _object_unref, 
_object_ref>::reset (ptr=0x0, this=) at ../gjs/jsapi-util.h:229
  old_ptr = 
  #4  GjsAutoPointer<_GObject, void, _object_unref, 
_object_ref>::~GjsAutoPointer (this=, this=) at 
../gjs/jsapi-util.h:172
  No locals.
  #5  GjsSmartPointer<_GObject>::~GjsSmartPointer (this=, 
this=) at ../gjs/jsapi-util.h:349
  No locals.
  #6  ObjectInstance::release_native_object (this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1524
  No locals.
  #7  ObjectInstance::release_native_object (this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1500
  No locals.
  #8  0x7f3aa43c9ec0 in ObjectInstance::~ObjectInstance (this=, this=) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1945
  was_using_toggle_refs = false
  had_toggle_up = false
  had_toggle_down = 
  had_toggle_up = 
  had_toggle_down = 
  was_using_toggle_refs = 
  #9  GIWrapperInstance::finalize_impl (this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at ../gi/wrapperutils.h:1113
  No locals.
  #10 ObjectInstance::finalize_impl (gcx=, obj=0x35b1abd24820, 
this=0x55d60fa0ce80) at 
/usr/src/gjs-1.76.0-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../gi/object.cpp:1912
  query = {type = 94377830362416, type_name = 0x7f3aa3fdcda6 
"StScrollView", class_size = 664, instance_size = 48}
  query = 
  _g_boolean_var_74 = 
  #11 GIWrapperBase::finalize 
(gcx=, obj=0x35b1abd24820) at ../gi/wrapperutils.h:411
  priv = 0x55d60fa0ce80

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2016217/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045043] Re: Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I successfully completed the test case with fonts-noto-color-emoji
2.042-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045043

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.1/

  Or see https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-
  color-emoji/

  More background at https://jenniferdaniel.substack.com/p/breaking-the-
  cycle

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See LP: #2034986 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. In this case, it is not
  believed that the color emoji font is used by GNOME Shell itself so a
  simple restart of any apps that use emoji should be enough to fix that
  issue.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]
  I do not intend to prepare this update for Ubuntu 23.04. People are 
encouraged to upgrade to 23.10 for UI improvements and 23.04 will reach end of 
life around January.

  This update does not require nototools to be updated.

  This update is a prerequisite for a GNOME Characters update for Ubuntu
  23.10. See LP: #2045056

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/2045043/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2035076] Re: Can't enter capital accented letters with Caps Lock on Wayland

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I successfully completed the test case with mutter 45.2-0ubuntu1 on
Ubuntu 23.10.

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035076

Title:
  Can't enter capital accented letters with Caps Lock on Wayland

Status in Mutter:
  Fix Released
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter package in Fedora:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Capital accented letters can't be entered using CAPS LOCK in the Wayland 
session

  Test Case
  -
  Open a terminal and install basic French support:
  sudo apt install language-pack-gnome-fr

  Open the Settings app. In the sidebar, click Keyboard
  Click +, choose French (France), then choose the French (AZERTY) keyboard
  Close the Settings app
  In the top right of the screen, click en and switch the keyboard layout to 
French (AZERTY)
  In the text editor, type é (this is the number 2 key on a US English 
keyboard).
  Now, press the Caps Lock key to enable Caps Lock.
  Press the same key. You should get É

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  This fix is included in mutter 45.2 so see the master bug for this upstream 
update: LP: #2043000

  Original bug report
  ---
  Most programs don't recognize Italian accented capital letters.
  When "Caps Lock" is on àèìòù should be written as ÀÈÌÒÙ... but for some 
reasons they are not capitalized.
  I've noticed that everything works fine using the Live session which still 
uses X11 session.

  It looks there's no problem with programs that use xwayland like Gimp
  and MarkText.

  WORKAROUND
  ===
  In "Settings -> Keyboard" it's possible to set a "compose key".
  For example I've selected the [Super left] key. If I want to compose È I 
press and immediately release each key:
  [Super left] + [E] + [Alt Gr] + [']

  If you want É:
  [Super left] + [E] + [']

  Do the same for the other vowels.
  ===

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-text-editor 45~beta-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.3.0-7.7-generic 6.3.5
  Uname: Linux 6.3.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Sep 11 11:48:41 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-09-07 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Daily amd64 (20230906.3)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: gnome-text-editor
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2035076/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2043000] Re: Update mutter to 45.2

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
The mesa regression I referred to was in Noble mesa 23.3.0-1ubuntu1 but fixed 
in 23.3.0-2ubuntu1
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mutter/noble/amd64

mutter 45.2 is now in Noble Proposed:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-1ubuntu1

I have installed mutter 45.2-0ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 23.10 and verified that
the Ubuntu, Ubuntu on Xorg, GNOME, and GNOME Classic sessions still work
well.

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043000

Title:
  Update mutter to 45.2

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  There is a new bugfix release in the stable 45 series.
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/blob/45.2/NEWS

  Test Case
  -
  Complete the test case from

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Mutter

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  Mutter is an essential component of the default Ubuntu desktop and for the 
desktop used by Ubuntu Budgie.

  A severe enough bug could mean that people are unable to use their
  desktop version of Ubuntu.

  Smaller bugs could interrupt people's workflows.

  mutter is part of GNOME Core and is included in the GNOME micro
  release exception

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME

  Other Info
  --
  Ubuntu 24.04 "Noble" has mutter 45.1 with all the non translation commits 
cherry-picked. It will get updated to 45.2 (and eventually to 46) after a mesa 
regression is handled.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2043000/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046001] [NEW] PipeWire: Too many open files

2023-12-08 Thread Jeff
Public bug reported:

Starting with Ubuntu 23.10 , PipeWire regularly started running into a
file descriptor limits likely to a known leak which is already fixed
upstream, therefore either updating or fix backporting would be
required.

Symptoms vary:
- Media playback may not start
- Media playback may start but without sound
- Media playback may suppress the audio output of another source

Sample log output:
```
mod.access: 0x560d8eda5270: client 0x560d8f26fa50 sandbox check failed: Too 
many open files
mod.access: 0x560d8eda5270: client 0x560d8f26fa50 sandbox check failed: Too 
many open files
mod.client-node: can't create node: Too many open files
mod.protocol-native: connection 0x560d8f270390: could not recvmsg on fd:0: Bad 
file descriptor
mod.protocol-native: 0x560d8ed941a0: connection_data: client 0x560d8f26fa50 
error -9 (Bad file descriptor)
```

More info:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/3406

** Affects: pipewire (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => pipewire
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pipewire in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046001

Title:
  PipeWire: Too many open files

Status in pipewire package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Starting with Ubuntu 23.10 , PipeWire regularly started running into a
  file descriptor limits likely to a known leak which is already fixed
  upstream, therefore either updating or fix backporting would be
  required.

  Symptoms vary:
  - Media playback may not start
  - Media playback may start but without sound
  - Media playback may suppress the audio output of another source

  Sample log output:
  ```
  mod.access: 0x560d8eda5270: client 0x560d8f26fa50 sandbox check failed: Too 
many open files
  mod.access: 0x560d8eda5270: client 0x560d8f26fa50 sandbox check failed: Too 
many open files
  mod.client-node: can't create node: Too many open files
  mod.protocol-native: connection 0x560d8f270390: could not recvmsg on fd:0: 
Bad file descriptor
  mod.protocol-native: 0x560d8ed941a0: connection_data: client 0x560d8f26fa50 
error -9 (Bad file descriptor)
  ```

  More info:
  https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/3406

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/2046001/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046001] [NEW] PipeWire: Too many open files

2023-12-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

Starting with Ubuntu 23.10 , PipeWire regularly started running into a
file descriptor limits likely to a known leak which is already fixed
upstream, therefore either updating or fix backporting would be
required.

Symptoms vary:
- Media playback may not start
- Media playback may start but without sound
- Media playback may suppress the audio output of another source

Sample log output:
```
mod.access: 0x560d8eda5270: client 0x560d8f26fa50 sandbox check failed: Too 
many open files
mod.access: 0x560d8eda5270: client 0x560d8f26fa50 sandbox check failed: Too 
many open files
mod.client-node: can't create node: Too many open files
mod.protocol-native: connection 0x560d8f270390: could not recvmsg on fd:0: Bad 
file descriptor
mod.protocol-native: 0x560d8ed941a0: connection_data: client 0x560d8f26fa50 
error -9 (Bad file descriptor)
```

More info:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/3406

** Affects: pipewire (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
PipeWire: Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop 
Packages, which is subscribed to pipewire in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 183700] Re: Cannot calculate wildcards in MS excel sheets

2023-12-08 Thread Jordancox
OpenOffice.org (and its successor, LibreOffice) aims to be compatible
with Microsoft Office formats, but there might be occasional differences
in behavior. Here are a few suggestions  from
https://calculadoradeiva.mx/:

Check OpenOffice.org Version:
Ensure that you are using the latest version of OpenOffice.org. Bugs and 
compatibility issues are often addressed in newer releases.

Alternative Formulas:
If the wildcard issue persists, you might try alternative formulas or functions 
in OpenOffice.org that achieve a similar result. For example, you could use 
regular expressions in combination with other functions.

Documentation and Support:
Check the official documentation and user forums for OpenOffice.org. There 
might be specific information about handling wildcard characters or workarounds 
suggested by the community.

Consider LibreOffice:
LibreOffice is a fork of OpenOffice.org and may have different or improved 
features. If the issue persists, you might want to try LibreOffice to see if it 
behaves differently.

Report the Issue:
If the problem is a bug in OpenOffice.org, consider reporting it to the 
developers. They may be able to address it in future releases. Look for a bug 
tracker or support forum on the OpenOffice.org website.

Remember that while both OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Excel aim for
compatibility, there may be differences in how certain features are
implemented. In some cases, adjustments to formulas or functions may be
necessary when transitioning between the two.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183700

Title:
  Cannot calculate wildcards in MS excel sheets

Status in OpenOffice:
  In Progress
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in openoffice.org package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: openoffice.org

  When opening an MS excel sheet with wildcards used in an IF statement
  the Microsoft version recognises it and uses it in the calculation,
  but OpenOffice.org doesn't, with the result the value been set to 0.
  Here's an example:

  In row 2 we've got a number of cells with codes in it, let's say
  B2...L2. In an other cell there's the formula =(COUNTIF(B2:L2;"A")).
  When OpenOffice sees the V in a cell in the list, the cell is counted
  as it should be. But when the formula is modified with wildcards in
  it:  =(COUNTIF(B2:L2;"*A*")) the V will not be recognised in the cell,
  and MS Office sees every V listed in it, also when the cell contains
  information like AW, the A will be regognised in a cell with the
  formula =(COUNTIF(B2:L2;"*A*")) and the W will be regognised in an
  other cell with =(COUNTIF(B2:L2;"*W*")) in it. This is very important
  that when a cell is marked with both characters that they should be
  extracted to both formulas, so the ASAP jobs (A) and the Waiting for
  new parts (W) will be calculated.

  This bug also includes the =(COUNTIF(B2:L2;"?A?")) question mark
  method when a cell always contains 3 characters and the middle
  character is being recognised as an A. This will also result in
  miscalculation. BTW as far as i'm well informed, the wildcards and
  question signs are undocumented features of MS Office.

  An example sheet is listed here:
  http://www.snertwerk.com/members/laurens/tmp/spreadsheet.ods

  To get OpenOffice more compatible with importing MS Office documents
  these options should be implemented.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/183700/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039543] Re: Miss placed Hexchat icon when switching workspaces

2023-12-08 Thread lotuspsychje
I can reproduce this bug with ubuntu-desktop 24.04 development branch @
8/12/23

just the same as described above.

I would like to add, when switching workspaces via the left upper dots
this bug does not seem to occur

only via worspaces switching on the dock icons and workspace indicator
extension(not installed by default)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-appindicator in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039543

Title:
  Miss placed Hexchat icon when switching workspaces

Status in Ubuntu AppIndicators:
  New
Status in gnome-shell-extension-appindicator package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  While switching workspaces, Hexchat icon in the app indicator appears
  bigger than the normal and in a wrong position then disappears.

  Please check the attached screen cast for details.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator 57-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct 17 11:17:05 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-12 (5 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231011)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/2039543/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039543] Re: Miss placed Hexchat icon when switching workspaces

2023-12-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-appindicator in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039543

Title:
  Miss placed Hexchat icon when switching workspaces

Status in Ubuntu AppIndicators:
  New
Status in gnome-shell-extension-appindicator package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  While switching workspaces, Hexchat icon in the app indicator appears
  bigger than the normal and in a wrong position then disappears.

  Please check the attached screen cast for details.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator 57-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct 17 11:17:05 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-12 (5 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231011)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/2039543/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045043] Re: Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I successfully completed the test case with fonts-noto-color-emoji
2.042-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 on Ubuntu 23.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045043

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.1/

  Or see https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-
  color-emoji/

  More background at https://jenniferdaniel.substack.com/p/breaking-the-
  cycle

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See LP: #2034986 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. In this case, it is not
  believed that the color emoji font is used by GNOME Shell itself so a
  simple restart of any apps that use emoji should be enough to fix that
  issue.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]
  I do not intend to prepare this update for Ubuntu 23.04. People are 
encouraged to upgrade to 23.10 for UI improvements and 23.04 will reach end of 
life around January.

  This update does not require nototools to be updated.

  This update is a prerequisite for a GNOME Characters update for Ubuntu
  23.10. See LP: #2045056

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/2045043/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags added: block-proposed-mantic

** Description changed:

+ [SRU Justification]
+ 
  In response to LP: #2038964 and due to the timing we have forked ubuntu-
  raspi-settings into a separate source package.
  
  ubuntu-settings must therefore be updated to drop ubuntu-raspi-settings*
  from debian/control as otherwise binary builds of the package will be
  rejected by the archive (if the version number is <= 23.10.6) or will
  wrongly supersede the fixes that have just been uploaded to mantic (if
  the version number is > 23.10.6).
+ 
+ [Test case]
+ No testing is planned beyond any autopkgtests which may be none (the package 
itself doesn't have any).  This should not be released to -updates on its own, 
but should be staged in -proposed so any future SRUs needed don't fail to copy 
due to out-of-date packages.
+ 
+ [Where problems may occur]
+ It is unlikely but possible that the removal of the raspi binary package from 
this source package will have inadvertently modified the contents of the other 
remaining binary packages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039104

Title:
  ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings source package in Mantic:
  New

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]

  In response to LP: #2038964 and due to the timing we have forked
  ubuntu-raspi-settings into a separate source package.

  ubuntu-settings must therefore be updated to drop ubuntu-raspi-
  settings* from debian/control as otherwise binary builds of the
  package will be rejected by the archive (if the version number is <=
  23.10.6) or will wrongly supersede the fixes that have just been
  uploaded to mantic (if the version number is > 23.10.6).

  [Test case]
  No testing is planned beyond any autopkgtests which may be none (the package 
itself doesn't have any).  This should not be released to -updates on its own, 
but should be staged in -proposed so any future SRUs needed don't fail to copy 
due to out-of-date packages.

  [Where problems may occur]
  It is unlikely but possible that the removal of the raspi binary package from 
this source package will have inadvertently modified the contents of the other 
remaining binary packages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2039104/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1711538] Re: Tap-to-click does not work on the GDM login screen

2023-12-08 Thread Alexander Browne
Still an issue with current releases. Default GNOME/libinputa doesn't
enable tap-to-click, but Ubuntu does for the GNOME desktop, and
therefore it should also for GDM.

Easy workaround posted in duplicate bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1968315/comments/1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1711538

Title:
  Tap-to-click does not work on the GDM login screen

Status in gnome-control-center:
  Fix Released
Status in GNOME Settings Daemon:
  Won't Fix
Status in gdm3 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Tap-to-click does not work in GDM login

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: gdm3 3.25.90.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.12.0-11.12-generic 4.12.5
  Uname: Linux 4.12.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Fri Aug 18 16:16:56 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-04 (105 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170503)
  SourcePackage: gdm3
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1711538/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045056] Re: Update the Characters app for Unicode 15.1

2023-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I successfully completed both test cases with gnome-characters
45.0-1ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 23.10 after installing fonts-noto-color-emoji
2.042-0ubuntu0.23.10.1

I am temporarily setting the block-proposed-mantic tag since the
Characters app does not display the new emoji well until the new fonts-
noto-color-emoji is installed. So let's let the fonts-noto-color-emoji
land in -updates first.

** Description changed:

  Impact
  --
  This adds one new feature: new emoji and Unicode characters from Unicode 15.1 
for easier browsing, selecting, and copying.
  
  Prerequisite
  
  Install fonts-noto-color-emoji 2.041 . See LP: #2045043
  Make sure the Characters app is not running and wait a few seconds for it to 
finish closing in the background.
  
  Test Case 1
  ---
  Install the update
  Open the Characters app.
  Select an emoji character and click Copy Character
  Paste the emoji somewhere.
  You should see the emoji you pasted.
  
  Test Case 2
  ---
  Open the Characters app.
  Use the search feature to search for "phoenix"
  A phoenix emoji should show up. This is one of the new Emoji 15.
- https://blog.emojipedia.org/whats-new-in-unicode-15-0/
+ https://blog.emojipedia.org/whats-new-in-unicode-15-1/
  
  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  GNOME Characters is part of GNOME Core and falls under the GNOME Stable 
Release Update microrelease exception
  
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME
  
  It is installed by default in Ubuntu Desktop, Edubuntu, Ubuntu Budgie,
  and Ubuntu Cinnamon. However, a bug in this app should not impact
  anything else on the system.
  
  Other Info
  --
  The GNOME Characters app in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS uses a different mechanism to 
display emoji and does not support any emoji from recent years. The update to 
enable recent emoji is entangled with the switch to GTK4 and Ubuntu Budgie has 
requested that we not switch any apps to GTK4 for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. Therefore, 
this update is only for Ubuntu 23.10.
  
  This particular change was proposed upstream but was not merged because
  at the time it was proposed, Google had yet to update the color emoji
  font. I expect it to be merged "soon", but it seems better for our users
  to not wait until then.
  
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-characters/-/merge_requests/110
  
  ===
  Note to SRU team
  
  This update can be accepted into mantic-proposed now, but let's wait to push 
it to mantic-updates until after fonts-noto-color-emoji is fully phased.
  
  It is a minor detail but this would prevent a few broken emoji sequences
  from temporarily showing in the app. For instance, phoenix would be
  represented as bird+fire.

** Description changed:

  Impact
  --
  This adds one new feature: new emoji and Unicode characters from Unicode 15.1 
for easier browsing, selecting, and copying.
  
  Prerequisite
  
  Install fonts-noto-color-emoji 2.041 . See LP: #2045043
  Make sure the Characters app is not running and wait a few seconds for it to 
finish closing in the background.
  
  Test Case 1
  ---
  Install the update
  Open the Characters app.
  Select an emoji character and click Copy Character
  Paste the emoji somewhere.
  You should see the emoji you pasted.
  
  Test Case 2
  ---
  Open the Characters app.
  Use the search feature to search for "phoenix"
  A phoenix emoji should show up. This is one of the new Emoji 15.
- https://blog.emojipedia.org/whats-new-in-unicode-15-1/
- 
+ https://blog.emojipedia.org/whats-new-in-unicode-15-1-and-emoji-15-1/
  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  GNOME Characters is part of GNOME Core and falls under the GNOME Stable 
Release Update microrelease exception
  
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME
  
  It is installed by default in Ubuntu Desktop, Edubuntu, Ubuntu Budgie,
  and Ubuntu Cinnamon. However, a bug in this app should not impact
  anything else on the system.
  
  Other Info
  --
  The GNOME Characters app in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS uses a different mechanism to 
display emoji and does not support any emoji from recent years. The update to 
enable recent emoji is entangled with the switch to GTK4 and Ubuntu Budgie has 
requested that we not switch any apps to GTK4 for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. Therefore, 
this update is only for Ubuntu 23.10.
  
  This particular change was proposed upstream but was not merged because
  at the time it was proposed, Google had yet to update the color emoji
  font. I expect it to be merged "soon", but it seems better for our users
  to not wait until then.
  
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-characters/-/merge_requests/110
  
  ===
  Note to SRU team
  
  This update can be accepted into mantic-proposed now, but let's wait to push 
it to mantic-updates until after fonts-noto-color-emoji is fully phased.
  
  It is a minor detail but this would prevent a few 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2044019] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

2023-12-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release
  
   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
  
   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release
  
   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a
  minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
  
  [Testing]
  
   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).
  
    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/
  
    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
  
   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15417677/+listing-archive-extra
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231208_113305_ce7d3@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] ... (autopkgtests infra problems on this arch)
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20231208_140510_db345@/log.gz
  * [riscv64] not available
- * [s390x] ...
+ * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20231208_142154_9eaf6@/log.gz
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * A minor release with a total of 157 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.
  
   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described
  above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked
  in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044019

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release

   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs

   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
    

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1958019]

2023-12-08 Thread hyc
(In reply to Miggy from comment #790)
> It seems the sound no longer works for the legion 7 16achg6 on kernel 6.6.
> It's been working great for the last year on all kernels, but 6.6 just
> doesn't work.
> 
> I'm not sure if anyone else is having similar issues? Manjaro Linux here.

I had no luck with sound on Ubuntu's 6.2 either. I dropped back to 5.19
to get sound working again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958019

Title:
  [Lenovo Legion7 16ACHg6 82N6, Realtek ALC287, Speaker, Internal] No
  sound at all

Status in sound-2.6 (alsa-kernel):
  Confirmed
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  On my Lenovo Legion-7-16ACHg6 laptop I can't hear any sound by
  internal speakers, but it work by headphones connected to standard
  jack aux.

  uname -r
  5.11.0-44-generic

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-44-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC2:  i3draven   1266 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  i3draven   1266 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  i3draven   1266 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/pcmC1D0p:   i3draven   1266 F...m pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Jan 15 15:10:53 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-11 (96 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:Generic failed
  Symptom_Card: Family 17h (Models 10h-1fh) HD Audio Controller - HD-Audio 
Generic
  Symptom_DevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC2:  i3draven   1266 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  i3draven   1266 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  i3draven   1266 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/pcmC1D0p:   i3draven   1266 F...m pulseaudio
  Symptom_Jack: Speaker, Internal
  Symptom_Type: No sound at all
  Title: [82N6, Realtek ALC287, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 11/08/2021
  dmi.bios.release: 1.49
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: GKCN49WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0R32862 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Legion 7 16ACHg6
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.49
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrGKCN49WW:bd11/08/2021:br1.49:efr1.49:svnLENOVO:pn82N6:pvrLegion716ACHg6:skuLENOVO_MT_82N6_BU_idea_FM_Legion716ACHg6:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0R32862WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLegion716ACHg6:
  dmi.product.family: Legion 7 16ACHg6
  dmi.product.name: 82N6
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_82N6_BU_idea_FM_Legion 7 16ACHg6
  dmi.product.version: Legion 7 16ACHg6
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sound-2.6/+bug/1958019/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045667] Autopkgtest regression report (gnome-shell/45.2-0ubuntu1)

2023-12-08 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted gnome-shell (45.2-0ubuntu1) for mantic 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

riseup-vpn/0.21.11+ds1-5build1 (armhf)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/mantic/update_excuses.html#gnome-shell

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045667

Title:
  Update gnome-shell to 45.2

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  There is a new bugfix release in the stable 45 series.

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/blob/45.2/NEWS

  Test Case
  -
  Complete all the non-optional test cases at 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GNOMEShell

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  GNOME Shell is the heart of the Ubuntu desktop experience.

  A severe enough bug could mean that people are unable to use their
  desktop version of Ubuntu.

  Smaller bugs could interrupt people's workflows.

  GNOME Shell is included in the GNOME micro release exception

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME

  Other Info
  --
  gnome-shell provides the GNOME version number for the Settings app About 
page, as of Ubuntu 22.10 (in earlier Ubuntu releases, this was provided by 
gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop3)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2045667/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2044019] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

2023-12-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release
  
   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
  
   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release
  
   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a
  minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
  
  [Testing]
  
   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).
  
    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/
  
    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
  
   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15417677/+listing-archive-extra
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231208_113305_ce7d3@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] ... (autopkgtests infra problems on this arch)
- * [ppc64el] ...
+ * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20231208_140510_db345@/log.gz
  * [riscv64] not available
  * [s390x] ...
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * A minor release with a total of 157 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.
  
   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described
  above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked
  in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044019

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release

   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs

   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2044019] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

2023-12-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Patch removed: "libreoffice_7.6.3-0ubuntu0.23.10.1.diff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019/+attachment/5726245/+files/libreoffice_7.6.3-0ubuntu0.23.10.1.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044019

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release

   * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs

   7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15417677/+listing-archive-extra
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231208_113305_ce7d3@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] ... (autopkgtests infra problems on this arch)
  * [ppc64el] ...
  * [riscv64] not available
  * [s390x] ...
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice

  [Regression Potential]

   * A minor release with a total of 157 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.

   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as
  described above should provide reasonable confidence that no
  regressions sneaked in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045980] [NEW] AppArmor config denies 'k' access to suggest.sqlite-shm

2023-12-08 Thread Chris Markiewicz
Public bug reported:

This occurs in the ESR builds from ppa:mozillateam/ppa.

My dmesg log is filled with lines such as:

[ 3015.575852] audit: type=1400 audit(1702042069.563:12459):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_lock" class="file" profile="firefox"
name="/home/chris/.cache/mozilla/firefox/pws2qa7b.default/suggest.sqlite-
shm" pid=25154 comm=4267494F5468727E506F6F6C202332 requested_mask="k"
denied_mask="k" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000

Possibly relatedly, a number of sites would start to load and then
freeze. At times they would allow scrolling but not clicking or typing,
or the tab throbber would keep going. Closing firefox required a SIGTERM
to fully shut down, while these requests continued to be made.

Looking through the AppArmor profile, there was a line:

  owner @{HOME}/.{firefox,mozilla}/**/*.{db,parentlock,sqlite}* k,

I added the following to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.firefox:

  owner @{HOME}/.cache/mozilla/firefox/**/*.sqlite* k,

This definitely resolves the dmesg issue, and it seems to be resolving
the intermittent hanging issue. Reloading the apparmor profile without
restarting firefox seems to have been successful.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apparmor esr

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045980

Title:
  AppArmor config denies 'k' access to suggest.sqlite-shm

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This occurs in the ESR builds from ppa:mozillateam/ppa.

  My dmesg log is filled with lines such as:

  [ 3015.575852] audit: type=1400 audit(1702042069.563:12459):
  apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_lock" class="file" profile="firefox"
  name="/home/chris/.cache/mozilla/firefox/pws2qa7b.default/suggest.sqlite-
  shm" pid=25154 comm=4267494F5468727E506F6F6C202332 requested_mask="k"
  denied_mask="k" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000

  Possibly relatedly, a number of sites would start to load and then
  freeze. At times they would allow scrolling but not clicking or
  typing, or the tab throbber would keep going. Closing firefox required
  a SIGTERM to fully shut down, while these requests continued to be
  made.

  Looking through the AppArmor profile, there was a line:

owner @{HOME}/.{firefox,mozilla}/**/*.{db,parentlock,sqlite}* k,

  I added the following to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.firefox:

owner @{HOME}/.cache/mozilla/firefox/**/*.sqlite* k,

  This definitely resolves the dmesg issue, and it seems to be resolving
  the intermittent hanging issue. Reloading the apparmor profile without
  restarting firefox seems to have been successful.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2045980/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2040488] Re: loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion 'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' failed

2023-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted udisks2 into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/2.10.1-1ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040488

Title:
  loading lvm2 module crashes: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion
  'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' failed

Status in udisks2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in udisks2 source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Trying to load the lvm2 module crashes udisks immediately:

     busctl call org.freedesktop.UDisks2
  /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/Manager org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Manager
  EnableModule sb lvm2 true

  udisksd[5709]: cannot register existing type 'UDisksDaemon'
  udisksd[5709]: g_once_init_leave: assertion 'result != 0' failed
  udisksd[5709]: udisks_module_lvm2_new: assertion 'UDISKS_IS_DAEMON (daemon)' 
failed
  systemd[1]: Started systemd-coredump@2-5767-0.service - Process Core Dump 
(PID 5767/UID 0).

    Module libudev.so.1 from deb 
systemd-253.5-1ubuntu6.amd64
     Module libsystemd.so.0 from 
deb systemd-253.5-1ubuntu6.amd64
     Stack trace of thread 5709:
     #0  0x56079be701ad 
udisks_module_manager_load_modules (udisksd + 0x601ad)
     #1  0x56079be5fdf5 n/a 
(udisksd + 0x4fdf5)
     #2  0x7f7d5f122a11 n/a 
(libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0x5aa11)
     #3  0x7f7d5f17e46f n/a 
(libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0xb646f)
     #4  0x7f7d5f12346f 
g_main_loop_run (libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0x5b46f)
     #5  0x56079be323d2 main 
(udisksd + 0x223d2)
     #6  0x7f7d5ee280d0 
__libc_start_call_main (libc.so.6 + 0x280d0)
     #7  0x7f7d5ee28189 
__libc_start_main_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x28189)
     #8  0x56079be324f5 _start 
(udisksd + 0x224f5)

  This breaks at least cockpit, and possibly other consumers of udisks
  (GNOME Disks perhaps?). This is a regression in mantic, earlier
  releases were fine.

  [Test Plan]

  The above reproducer confirms the check. The busctl command should
  succeed, and afterwards `systemctl status udisks2` should still be
  "active (running)" instead of "failed".

  autopkgtests should take care of regression testing, and they were
  happy with the noble update. I'm also happy to run cockpit's
  integration tests against the updated version; it exercises udisks2
  thoroughly (and we find lots of bugs with it). At the moment we don't
  test 23.10 mantic at all, because it is so broken
  (https://github.com/cockpit-project/bots/pull/5432).

  [Where problems could occur]

  Changing the linker options is quite invasive. The autopkgtests cover
  the runtime functionality though, and as modules are currently 100%
  broken they can't possibly get any worse.

  [Other info]

  Fix committed to Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-
  team/udisks2/-/commit/e22881abdd90bd4878add165ccc46008a17163f8

  Noble debdiff:
  
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/701038246/udisks2_2.10.1-1ubuntu1_2.10.1-1ubuntu2.diff.gz

  ProblemType: Crash
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Oct 25 12:13:14 2023
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/udisks2/udisksd
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2044019] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

2023-12-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
For reference
https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/log/?h=wip/mantic-7.6

** Summary changed:

- [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.3 for mantic
+ [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
-  * LibreOffice 7.6.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
-  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.3_release
+  * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
+  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release
  
-  * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.3 
(that's a total of 116 bugs):
+  * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.4 
(that's a total of 157 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
+  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.4/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
  
-  7.6.3 RC2 is identical to the 7.6.3 release
+  7.6.4 RC1 is identical to the 7.6.4 release
  
   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a
  minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
  
  [Testing]
  
   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).
  
    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
- https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1459/
+ https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1558/
  
    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
  
   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
- Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15409029/+listing-archive-extra
- * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231204_140350_e86f9@/log.gz
- * [arm64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20231204_121007_4cf76@/log.gz
+ Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15417677/+listing-archive-extra
+ * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231208_113305_ce7d3@/log.gz
+ * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] ... (autopkgtests infra problems on this arch)
- * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20231204_113322_18e7a@/log.gz
+ * [ppc64el] ...
  * [riscv64] not available
- * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20231204_115147_339ff@/log.gz
+ * [s390x] ...
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
-  * A minor release with a total of 116 bug fixes always carries the
+  * A minor release with a total of 157 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.
  
   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described
  above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked
  in.

** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.6.4-0ubuntu0.23.10.1.diff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019/+attachment/5727515/+files/libreoffice_7.6.4-0ubuntu0.23.10.1.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044019

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.6.4 is in its forth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.4_release

   * Version 7.6.2 is currently 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045977] Re: GNOME Shell crash with Wayland

2023-12-08 Thread Marcos Alano
Result of the command: journalctl -u org.gnome.Shell@wayland.service
--user --since=2023-12-08

** Attachment added: "gnome-shell-with-wayland.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2045977/+attachment/5727514/+files/gnome-shell-with-wayland.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045977

Title:
  GNOME Shell crash with Wayland

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My GNOME session got idle and crashed. In the journalctl logs there is
  more details

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-shell 45.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-14.14-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Dec  8 10:43:43 2023
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-26 (742 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 45.2-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-08-18 (113 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2045977/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045977] [NEW] GNOME Shell crash with Wayland

2023-12-08 Thread Marcos Alano
Public bug reported:

My GNOME session got idle and crashed. In the journalctl logs there is
more details

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: gnome-shell 45.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-14.14-generic 6.5.3
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Dec  8 10:43:43 2023
DisplayManager: gdm3
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-26 (742 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 45.2-0ubuntu1
SourcePackage: gnome-shell
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-08-18 (113 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug mantic third-party-packages wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045977

Title:
  GNOME Shell crash with Wayland

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My GNOME session got idle and crashed. In the journalctl logs there is
  more details

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-shell 45.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-14.14-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Dec  8 10:43:43 2023
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-26 (742 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 45.2-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-08-18 (113 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2045977/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045043] Re: Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

2023-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji into mantic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-
emoji/2.042-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045043

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.1/

  Or see https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-
  color-emoji/

  More background at https://jenniferdaniel.substack.com/p/breaking-the-
  cycle

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See LP: #2034986 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. In this case, it is not
  believed that the color emoji font is used by GNOME Shell itself so a
  simple restart of any apps that use emoji should be enough to fix that
  issue.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]
  I do not intend to prepare this update for Ubuntu 23.04. People are 
encouraged to upgrade to 23.10 for UI improvements and 23.04 will reach end of 
life around January.

  This update does not require nototools to be updated.

  This update is a prerequisite for a GNOME Characters update for Ubuntu
  23.10. See LP: #2045056

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/2045043/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045043] Please test proposed package

2023-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-
emoji/2.042-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045043

Title:
  Update fonts-noto-color-emoji for Unicode 15.1

Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Ubuntu has included Google's color emoji font by default for years.
  Annually, the Unicode Consortium releases a new Unicode standard with
  new emoji. Internet communication platforms quickly adopt the new
  emoji and it's important that those emoji also work on the latest
  Ubuntu release.

  Emojipedia provides a list of the emoji provided by this font.

  Click the Show new link to see the new emoji. Click the changed link
  to see other changes that were made in this release.
  https://emojipedia.org/google/15.1/

  Or see https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-
  color-emoji/

  More background at https://jenniferdaniel.substack.com/p/breaking-the-
  cycle

  [Test Plan]

  The test plan is outlined on this wiki:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/EmojiFont

  [Where problems could occur]

  Sometimes there is an issue with the display of a particular font
  after the font has been updated. See LP: #2034986 for instance.
  Perhaps this is a bug with font caching. In this case, it is not
  believed that the color emoji font is used by GNOME Shell itself so a
  simple restart of any apps that use emoji should be enough to fix that
  issue.

  This could technically be a User Interface Freeze change, but the new
  and changed emoji don't show in the Ubuntu docs or official
  screenshots. So there doesn't seem to be a need to notify the Docs
  team. There are no translations here so no need to notify the
  Translations team.

  [Other]
  I do not intend to prepare this update for Ubuntu 23.04. People are 
encouraged to upgrade to 23.10 for UI improvements and 23.04 will reach end of 
life around January.

  This update does not require nototools to be updated.

  This update is a prerequisite for a GNOME Characters update for Ubuntu
  23.10. See LP: #2045056

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/2045043/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045056] Re: Update the Characters app for Unicode 15.1

2023-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-characters into mantic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
characters/45.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gnome-characters (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-characters in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045056

Title:
  Update the Characters app for Unicode 15.1

Status in gnome-characters package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-characters source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  This adds one new feature: new emoji and Unicode characters from Unicode 15.1 
for easier browsing, selecting, and copying.

  Prerequisite
  
  Install fonts-noto-color-emoji 2.041 . See LP: #2045043
  Make sure the Characters app is not running and wait a few seconds for it to 
finish closing in the background.

  Test Case 1
  ---
  Install the update
  Open the Characters app.
  Select an emoji character and click Copy Character
  Paste the emoji somewhere.
  You should see the emoji you pasted.

  Test Case 2
  ---
  Open the Characters app.
  Use the search feature to search for "phoenix"
  A phoenix emoji should show up. This is one of the new Emoji 15.
  https://blog.emojipedia.org/whats-new-in-unicode-15-0/

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  GNOME Characters is part of GNOME Core and falls under the GNOME Stable 
Release Update microrelease exception

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME

  It is installed by default in Ubuntu Desktop, Edubuntu, Ubuntu Budgie,
  and Ubuntu Cinnamon. However, a bug in this app should not impact
  anything else on the system.

  Other Info
  --
  The GNOME Characters app in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS uses a different mechanism to 
display emoji and does not support any emoji from recent years. The update to 
enable recent emoji is entangled with the switch to GTK4 and Ubuntu Budgie has 
requested that we not switch any apps to GTK4 for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. Therefore, 
this update is only for Ubuntu 23.10.

  This particular change was proposed upstream but was not merged
  because at the time it was proposed, Google had yet to update the
  color emoji font. I expect it to be merged "soon", but it seems better
  for our users to not wait until then.

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-characters/-/merge_requests/110

  ===
  Note to SRU team
  
  This update can be accepted into mantic-proposed now, but let's wait to push 
it to mantic-updates until after fonts-noto-color-emoji is fully phased.

  It is a minor detail but this would prevent a few broken emoji
  sequences from temporarily showing in the app. For instance, phoenix
  would be represented as bird+fire.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-characters/+bug/2045056/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
missing sru header?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039104

Title:
  ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings source package in Mantic:
  New

Bug description:
  In response to LP: #2038964 and due to the timing we have forked
  ubuntu-raspi-settings into a separate source package.

  ubuntu-settings must therefore be updated to drop ubuntu-raspi-
  settings* from debian/control as otherwise binary builds of the
  package will be rejected by the archive (if the version number is <=
  23.10.6) or will wrongly supersede the fixes that have just been
  uploaded to mantic (if the version number is > 23.10.6).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2039104/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045667] Re: Update gnome-shell to 45.2

2023-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-shell into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/45.2-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045667

Title:
  Update gnome-shell to 45.2

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  There is a new bugfix release in the stable 45 series.

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/blob/45.2/NEWS

  Test Case
  -
  Complete all the non-optional test cases at 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GNOMEShell

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  GNOME Shell is the heart of the Ubuntu desktop experience.

  A severe enough bug could mean that people are unable to use their
  desktop version of Ubuntu.

  Smaller bugs could interrupt people's workflows.

  GNOME Shell is included in the GNOME micro release exception

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME

  Other Info
  --
  gnome-shell provides the GNOME version number for the Settings app About 
page, as of Ubuntu 22.10 (in earlier Ubuntu releases, this was provided by 
gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop3)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2045667/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045962] [NEW] Not updated since years

2023-12-08 Thread Francois Thirioux
Public bug reported:

Hi,

Maybe updates are done only for LTS but the Noble version is the same as Jammy.
So request: update :-) .
(I know we have the very good Yaru theme.)

** Affects: adwaita-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adwaita-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045962

Title:
  Not updated since years

Status in adwaita-icon-theme package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  Maybe updates are done only for LTS but the Noble version is the same as 
Jammy.
  So request: update :-) .
  (I know we have the very good Yaru theme.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adwaita-icon-theme/+bug/2045962/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp