Re: no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

[Rex Dieter]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

>> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones  writes:
> 
> RWMJ> Couldn't it use inotify (or whatever we're using these days to
> RWMJ> detect filesystem changes)?  So when you drop in the unit file,
> RWMJ> systemd notices and reloads.
> 
> Well, the point is that systemd isn't running or even installed when the
> daemons are installed.  The question is what happens when systemd comes
> up later.  (And yes, systemd could use rpm file triggers so that we can
> drop the scriptlets entirely.  That would be great, but it's an entirely
> separate discussion.)
> 
> I know this thread has gone in a completely different direction, but the
> original message was about modifying or removing the dependencies.  Can
> we drop dependencies on systemd and still have a system that works as
> expected if systemd gets installed later?

One way to help make that work would be to adjust existing systemd 
scriptlets to use triggers (on systemd)

(that's probably not practical though)

-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rpmbuild Perl dependency finder broken since F23?

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

The "perl -w" option is also deprecated, and usually quite
inappropriate to put in the #! line. It's aimed at producing warnings
about *potential* problems, and can generate spew that is difficult to
parse in normal operation.

See http://www.perl.com/pub/2004/08/09/commandline.html for details on
just low long "perl -w" has been deprecated and the "use warnings"
technique encouraged, instead. That note dates back to 2004: it may be
time to update the code..

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Michael Schwendt  wrote:
> Here's a test-case:
>
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1291903
>
> The Perl script contents somehow confuse the dep generator.
>
> Which component to assign to?
> rpm or perl-generators?
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 791  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893   
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
 555  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626   
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
 405  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849   
sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
  48  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-edbea40516   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el5
  46  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-10d919912b   
git-1.8.2.1-2.el5
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-582c8075e6   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el5
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-481f9cfb21   
shellinabox-2.19-1.el5
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-d1309b0eb2   
libsndfile-1.0.17-8.el5


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing

dpm-xrootd-3.6.0-1.el5
innotop-1.10.0-0.3.81da83f.el5

Details about builds:



 dpm-xrootd-3.6.0-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1f905acef3)
 XROOT interface to the Disk Pool Manager (DPM)

Update Information:

- introduced the XrdDPMStatInfo plugin - updated rpm spec to require at least
xrootd 4.2




 innotop-1.10.0-0.3.81da83f.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e996f86bc2)
 A MySQL and InnoDB monitor program

Update Information:

Fix for MariaDB 10.1 and 10.2, align with upstream

___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290619] perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.18 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290619

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.18-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-Whois-IP'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-df81bca44c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1289785] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289785



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1289785] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289785

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1. |perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.
   |fc24|fc24
   ||perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.
   ||fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-12-19 13:26:05



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1292177] Symbol error loading perl module Authen::Krb5.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-15.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Authen-Krb5'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-bfab18906a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1292061] Review Request: perl-POE-Loop-Event - Bridge that allows POE to be driven by Event.pm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292061

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-POE-Loop-Event-1.305-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-POE-Loop-Event'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b553b7be30

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1292057] Review Request: perl-DBIx-QueryLog - Logging queries for DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292057

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBIx-QueryLog-0.41-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-QueryLog'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3a58d43cc5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 286  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
  78  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-925e9374c9   
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el7
  48  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-ca44dee931   
python-django-1.6.11-4.el7
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-04215ad374   
moodle-3.0-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f82c6fc04a   
p7zip-15.09-4.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-2c063edb76   
pdf2djvu-0.7.21-1.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e45e108151   
php-twig-1.23.1-2.el7 php-symfony-2.7.7-2.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-67166d0519   
shellinabox-2.19-1.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0272adfe4b   
gwenhywfar-4.13.1-2.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-31d852eeac   
php-horde-Horde-Core-2.22.4-1.el7 php-horde-Horde-Perms-2.1.6-1.el7 
php-horde-Horde-Service-Weather-2.3.1-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-3a5146ccf7   
nodejs-handlebars-4.0.5-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8f1a7dffa9   
quassel-0.11.1-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

dpm-xrootd-3.6.0-1.el7
gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd-1-0.8.20151218gitadabfdf.el7
hiera-1.3.4-5.el7
innotop-1.10.0-0.3.81da83f.el7
kmahjongg-4.10.5-2.el7
kmines-4.10.5-2.el7
kpat-4.10.5-2.el7
ktorrent-4.3.1-21.el7
lightdm-kde-0.3.2.1-12.el7
marble-4.10.5-3.el7
nodejs-d-1.0.0-1.el7
nodejs-es5-ext-0.10.10-1.el7
nodejs-es6-iterator-2.0.0-1.el7
nodejs-es6-symbol-3.0.2-1.el7
nodejs-is-windows-0.1.0-1.el7
nodejs-next-tick-0.2.2-2.el7
nodm-0.7-3.el7
pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP08-2.el7
perl-DBIx-QueryLog-0.41-1.el7
perl-File-Type-0.22-23.el7
perl-POE-Loop-Event-1.305-1.el7
rabbitmq-server-3.3.5-15.el7
shinken-2.4.2-2.el7
sysreporter-3.0.2-1.el7

Details about builds:



 dpm-xrootd-3.6.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6f5482b4eb)
 XROOT interface to the Disk Pool Manager (DPM)

Update Information:

- introduced the XrdDPMStatInfo plugin - updated rpm spec to require at least
xrootd 4.2




 gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd-1-0.8.20151218gitadabfdf.el7 
(FEDORA-EPEL-2015-37a2f01901)
 Configure the place where notifications are shown

Update Information:

Initial build for epel7.




 hiera-1.3.4-5.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-d072146b04)
 A simple hierarchical database supporting plugin data sources

Update Information:

This is downgrade of hiera from 3.0.4 to to 1.3.4 within EPEL7. The upgrade
should never have happened as hiera 3 is not suitable for puppet 3.7.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1286826 - hiera 1.3.4 removed from repo beaks packstack install of 
kilo on CentOS 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286826




 innotop-1.10.0-0.3.81da83f.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c23f5a2e04)
 A MySQL and InnoDB monitor program

Update Information:

Fix for MariaDB 10.1 and 10.2, align with upstream




 kmahjongg-4.10.5-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-06f5c58464)
 A tile matching game

Update Information:

Fix runtime dependencies for el7.2

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1292265 - epel7 kmahjongg has wrongly versioned dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292265

[Bug 1292061] Review Request: perl-POE-Loop-Event - Bridge that allows POE to be driven by Event.pm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292061



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-POE-Loop-Event-1.305-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update perl-POE-Loop-Event'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6b4a63f294

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1292057] Review Request: perl-DBIx-QueryLog - Logging queries for DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292057



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBIx-QueryLog-0.41-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update perl-DBIx-QueryLog'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b0b0f5aae7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi

[Peter Robinson]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich  wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could anybody help to figure out what gone wrong here?
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6ec19b0161

I've seen it a couple of times this week while doing the updates
pushe, not sure what's going on but I've filed a issue for it

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/746
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290614] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPANfile-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290614

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA
   |Nfile-0.07-1.fc24   |Nfile-0.07-1.fc24
   |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA
   |Nfile-0.07-1.fc23   |Nfile-0.07-1.fc23
   ||perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA
   ||Nfile-0.07-1.fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290614] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPANfile-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290614



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPANfile-0.07-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290609] perl-App-grindperl-0.004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290609

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-App-grindperl-0.004-1. |perl-App-grindperl-0.004-1.
   |fc24|fc24
   ||perl-App-grindperl-0.004-1.
   ||fc22
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-12-20 02:52:26



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290609] perl-App-grindperl-0.004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290609



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-App-grindperl-0.004-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rpmlint error and packaging guidelines

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:31:08 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:

> > %global sover 1
> >
> > …
> >
> > %install
> > # Install the built binaries.
> >
> > ln -fs %{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}.0 \
> >   %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}
> >
> > …
> >
> > %files
> > # doc-files, license, other files
> > %{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}*
> >
> >
> > If the SO-version changes during an update, build will fail, because 
> > of installed, but not packaged files;  so you don't miss to adjust the 
> > value properly and the symlink won't dangle then.

Instead of creating the symlink yourself with "ln", you can run

  ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}

in %install to create any symlink, if missing.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1289785] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289785

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1. |perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.
   |fc24|fc24
   |perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1. |perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.
   |fc23|fc23
   ||perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.
   ||fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1289785] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289785



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.24-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290614] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPANfile-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290614



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPANfile-0.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1290614] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPANfile-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290614

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA
   |Nfile-0.07-1.fc24   |Nfile-0.07-1.fc24
   ||perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA
   ||Nfile-0.07-1.fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-12-20 01:54:03



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Bodhi

[Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich]

Hi!

Could anybody help to figure out what gone wrong here? 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6ec19b0161


Dmitrij
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1293079] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.62 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293079

Bug ID: 1293079
   Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.62 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
psab...@redhat.com, st...@silug.org



Latest upstream release: 1.62
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.61-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Strptime/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rawhide report: 20151219 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

Compose started at Sat Dec 19 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libOpenMeshCore.so.3.2
[alliance]
alliance-5.0-40.20090901snap.fc22.i686 requires libXm.so.2
[csound]
csound-wiimote-6.03.2-7.fc24.i686 requires libwiiuse.so.0
[eclipse-jbosstools]
eclipse-jbosstools-as-4.2.2-1.fc22.noarch requires 
osgi(org.eclipse.tm.terminal)
[fawkes]
fawkes-core-0.5.0-26.fc24.i686 requires libmicrohttpd.so.10
fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-26.fc24.i686 requires libgeos-3.4.2.so
fawkes-plugin-xmlrpc-0.5.0-26.fc24.i686 requires libmicrohttpd.so.10
[gnash]
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_date_time.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-cygnal-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_date_time.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-dejagnu-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-fileio-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-lirc-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-extension-mysql-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-klash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-klash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:gnash-plugin-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_thread.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0
1:python-gnash-0.8.10-19.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
[golang-github-kraman-libcontainer]
golang-github-kraman-libcontainer-devel-0-0.4.gitd700e5b.fc24.noarch 
requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/pkg/netlink)
[golang-github-kubernetes-heapster]
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/google/cadvisor/info/v1)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/google/cadvisor/client)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/coreos/fleet/schema)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/coreos/fleet/registry)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/coreos/fleet/pkg)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/coreos/fleet/machine)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/coreos/fleet/etcd)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-1.fc24.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/coreos/fleet/client)

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151219 nightly compose nominated for testing

[adamwill]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151219. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/24

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Security_Lab
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Download

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relval: https://www.happyassassin.net/wikitcms/
On behalf of: adamwill
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Fedora Policy on generated code

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:13:54PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 1) Do we require that the original data used to generate this code is
> included in the SRPM?

Yes.  This seems like a widely accepted principle in the free software
world.  eg. The GNU GPL contains this phrase: "The source code for a
work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to
it."  I assume that the generated code would not be the preferred form
in most cases.

> 2) Do we require that whatever tools are necessary to generate this
> code is packaged in Fedora (with all the legal and policy requirements
> that this implies)?

Be nice, but surely not an absolute requirement.  But ...

> If we do not, do we require that the code used by upstream is free
> software?

There's a bit of ambiguity in the word "code".  I think there are two
cases:

(a) proprietary input --> proprietary generator --> ?? generated code

(b) free input --> proprietary generator --> free generated code

In case (a) it seems doubtful the generated code could really be free
software.

Case (b) is the tricky one.  There's some work going on to add FPGAs
as a service to the Cloud, and I wonder if we'll need an exception for
FPGA netlists and stuff like that, since the tooling to create those
is crazy proprietary.  The inputs (Verilog/VHDL code) can be free
software.  The problem is it's impossible to prove that the binary I
give you was generated from the VHDL input, and if you want to rebuild
it you'll need to install some completely proprietary design tool that
you may even have to pay $$$ for.

> 3) Do we require that building in Fedora always requires regeneration
> of this code from the original data?

Nice to have but not an absolute requirement.  Maybe we can just ask
that packagers document in the spec file how to regenerate the
generated files.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpmlint error and packaging guidelines

[Mattia Verga]

While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the error:
libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0

Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or at least I was unable 
to find it) that symbolic links to soname must be installed by the 
package instead of rely on ldconfig calls for creating and removing them 
when installing and uninstalling the package.


Since the upstream maintainer wants to rely on ldconfig and doesn't want 
to ship the symbolik links, can the package be submitted for review as 
is, or I must edit the sources to fix that error?


Thanks
Mattia
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 182  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828   
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
 164  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031   
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
 158  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
  89  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8148   
optipng-0.7.5-5.el6
  89  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8156   
nagios-4.0.8-1.el6
  78  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-68a2c2db36   
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el6
  48  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
  20  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el6
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-da771a002d   
moodle-2.7.11-1.el6
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c1e2a347ee   
xsupplicant-2.2.0-13.el6
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-df28a72135   
shellinabox-2.19-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4ea455db6d   
gwenhywfar-4.13.1-2.el6
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-06bd1d268e   
nodejs-handlebars-4.0.5-1.el6
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-26f2bb9749   
libpng10-1.0.66-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

dpm-xrootd-3.6.0-1.el6
innotop-1.10.0-0.3.81da83f.el6
libpng10-1.0.66-1.el6
nodejs-d-1.0.0-1.el6
nodejs-es5-ext-0.10.10-1.el6
nodejs-es6-iterator-2.0.0-1.el6
nodejs-es6-symbol-3.0.2-1.el6
nodejs-is-windows-0.1.0-1.el6
nodejs-next-tick-0.2.2-2.el6
pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP08-2.el6
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.18-1.el6
shinken-2.4.2-2.el6
sysreporter-3.0.2-1.el6

Details about builds:



 dpm-xrootd-3.6.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f3987cf642)
 XROOT interface to the Disk Pool Manager (DPM)

Update Information:

- introduced the XrdDPMStatInfo plugin - updated rpm spec to require at least
xrootd 4.2




 innotop-1.10.0-0.3.81da83f.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-154331c792)
 A MySQL and InnoDB monitor program

Update Information:

Fix for MariaDB 10.1 and 10.2, align with upstream




 libpng10-1.0.66-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-26f2bb9749)
 Old version of libpng, needed to run old binaries

Update Information:

An underflow read was found in png_check_keyword in libpng10. An attacker could
possibly use this flaw to cause an out-of-bounds read by tricking an
unsuspecting user into processing a specially crafted PNG image.    The fix
for CVE-8126 was incomplete in the previous 1.0.64 update.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1291312 - CVE-2015-8540 libpng: underflow read in 
png_check_keyword()
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291312
  [ 2 ] Bug #1281756 - CVE-2015-8126 CVE-2015-8472 libpng: Buffer overflow 
vulnerabilities in png_get_PLTE/png_set_PLTE functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281756




 nodejs-d-1.0.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-03ce51864d)
 Property descriptor factory

Update Information:

Update to upstream 1.0.0 release

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1292424 - Review Request: nodejs-d - Property descriptor factory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292424




 nodejs-es5-ext-0.10.10-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7354dc4f7f)
 ECMAScript 5 extensions and ES6 shims

Update Information:

Update to upstream 0.10.10 release

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1292416 - Review Request: nodejs-es5-ext - 

[Bug 1290619] perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.18 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290619



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.18-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update perl-Net-Whois-IP'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-d6b9531f80

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rpmlint error and packaging guidelines

[Björn Esser]

Am 19.12.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Mattia Verga:

While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the error:
libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0

Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or at least I was unable
to find it) that symbolic links to soname must be installed by the
package instead of rely on ldconfig calls for creating and removing them
when installing and uninstalling the package.

Since the upstream maintainer wants to rely on ldconfig and doesn't want
to ship the symbolik links, can the package be submitted for review as
is, or I must edit the sources to fix that error?


You can easily fix that error by creating a symlink during %install and 
include that into the %files of the package, like this:



On top of the spec-file:

%global sover 1

…

%install
# Install the built binaries.

ln -fs %{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}.0 \
  %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}

…

%files
# doc-files, license, other files
%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}*


If the SO-version changes during an update, build will fail, because of 
installed, but not packaged files;  so you don't miss to adjust the 
value properly and the symlink won't dangle then.


Cheers
  Björn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide 20151219 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Minimal disk raw armhfp

No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151218

Images in Rawhide 20151218 but not this:

Minimal disk raw armhfp

Failed openQA tests: 3 of 57

ID: 1326Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1326
ID: 1325Test: i386 kde_live default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1325
ID: 1272Test: x86_64 universal server_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1272

Passed openQA tests: 54 of 57
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rpmlint error and packaging guidelines

[Mattia Verga]

Il 19/12/2015 15:02, Björn Esser ha scritto:

Am 19.12.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Mattia Verga:
While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the 
error:
libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink 
/usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0


Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or at least I was unable
to find it) that symbolic links to soname must be installed by the
package instead of rely on ldconfig calls for creating and removing them
when installing and uninstalling the package.

Since the upstream maintainer wants to rely on ldconfig and doesn't want
to ship the symbolik links, can the package be submitted for review as
is, or I must edit the sources to fix that error?


You can easily fix that error by creating a symlink during %install 
and include that into the %files of the package, like this:



On top of the spec-file:

%global sover 1

…

%install
# Install the built binaries.

ln -fs %{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}.0 \
  %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}

…

%files
# doc-files, license, other files
%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}*


If the SO-version changes during an update, build will fail, because 
of installed, but not packaged files;  so you don't miss to adjust the 
value properly and the symlink won't dangle then.


Cheers
  Björn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Thank you, the %{sover} trick is a great workaround!

Mattia
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org