[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-20be2834b0 openbgpd-7.9-1.el9 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9391e7aeda jpegoptim-1.5.3-1.el9 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b837bf60e1 ffmpeg-5.1.3-1.el9 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bc7379a215 chromium-111.0.5563.146-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing f38-backgrounds-38.1.0-1.el9 fail2ban-1.0.2-3.el9 libmediainfo-23.03-1.el9 mediaconch-23.03-1.el9 mediainfo-23.03-1.el9 picocom-3.1-13.el9 python-translationstring-1.3-23.el9 Details about builds: f38-backgrounds-38.1.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-70c25f0ea1) Fedora 38 default desktop background Update Information: New release with final version of default wallpaper. Full details on the [release note](https://github.com/fedoradesign/backgrounds/releases/tag/v38.1.0). ChangeLog: * Sat Apr 1 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 38.1.0-1 - Update to 38.1.0 * Thu Mar 16 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 38.0.2-1 - Update to 38.0.2 * Thu Mar 16 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 38.0.1-2 - Upload correct source file * Thu Mar 16 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 38.0.1-1 - Update to 38.0.1 fixing non-existant webp files * Sat Feb 11 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 38.0.0-2 - Migrate licenses to SDPX format * Sat Feb 11 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 38.0.0-1 - New release for F38 Beta default backgrounds fail2ban-1.0.2-3.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-07bf30a1f1) Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple authentication errors Update Information: * Update to 1.0.2 * Add upstream patch to remove warning about allowipv6 (bz#2160781) * Fix dependencies to bring in fail2ban-selinux ChangeLog: * Thu Mar 30 2023 Orion Poplawski - 1.0.2-3 - Add upstream patch to remove warning about allowipv6 (bz#2160781) * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0.2-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Dec 17 2022 Richard Shaw - 1.0.2-1 - Update to 1.0.2. References: [ 1 ] Bug #2069791 - no access to some log files, Apache, Nginx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069791 [ 2 ] Bug #2100549 - Fail2ban stops processing journal log events after an imjournal rotation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100549 [ 3 ] Bug #2100820 - Selinux no access to journal from f2b/f.sshd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100820 [ 4 ] Bug #2160781 - allowipv6 = auto needs to be added to Definition section of /etc/fail2ban.conf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160781 libmediainfo-23.03-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-da69fde937) Library for supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file Update Information: Update to 23.03. ChangeLog: * Sat Apr 1 2023 Vasiliy N. Glazov - 23.03-1 - Update to 23.03 * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 22.12-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2182783 - mediaconch-23.03 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182783 mediaconch-23.03-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-da69fde937) Most relevant technical and tag data for video and audio files (CLI) Update Information: Update to 23.03. ChangeLog: * Sat Apr 1 2023 Vasiliy N. Glazov - 23.03-1 - Update to 23.03 * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 22.09-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Oct 29 2022 Vasiliy N. Glazov -
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9a3db4278b openbgpd-7.9-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e0ec985df4 chromium-111.0.5563.146-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7be8f2df20 seamonkey-2.53.16-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing libmediainfo-23.03-1.el7 mediainfo-23.03-1.el7 Details about builds: libmediainfo-23.03-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0ef9d45e59) Library for supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file Update Information: Update to 23.03. ChangeLog: * Sat Apr 1 2023 Vasiliy N. Glazov - 23.03-1 - Update to 23.03 * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 22.12-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2182783 - mediaconch-23.03 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182783 mediainfo-23.03-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0ef9d45e59) Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file (CLI) Update Information: Update to 23.03. ChangeLog: * Sat Apr 1 2023 Vasiliy N. Glazov - 23.03-1 - Update to 23.03 * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 22.12-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2182783 - mediaconch-23.03 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182783 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2181845] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.70 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181845 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.7 |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.7 |0-1.fc39|0-1.fc39 ||perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.7 ||0-1.fc38 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-04-02 00:16:24 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-cf1af5822a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181845 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2178364] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.68 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178364 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.6 |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.6 |8-1.fc39|8-1.fc39 ||perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.7 ||0-1.fc38 Last Closed||2023-04-02 00:16:22 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-cf1af5822a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178364 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Unretire nvi (make Berkeley vi great again)
Hello I'd like to unretire nvi nvi is retired because the upstream kotnet.org disappeared, Just use another source from git/Debian/Slackware can fix it. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721 releng: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11370 Could anyone review it? thanks ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?
Oh, and I forgot one important thing. Any sponsor that would disagree with being assigned tickets this way would be able to opt out by adding something like `auto_assign: false` to their sponsor.yaml https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors#b-your-personal-config-on-fedorapeopleorg Jakub On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 11:17 PM Jakub Kadlčík wrote: > > Hello, > > I've set myself a goal to improve the package review process. My first > step was creating https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors , I am > currently working on https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service > and contribute to the `fedora-review` tool. I have some ideas about > what to do next, and now I'd like to discuss one of them. > > Currently, we have 31 people waiting to be sponsored > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/needsponsor.html > many of them waiting for months. To get to the point of waiting to be > sponsored, all of these people invested their time to learn the basics > of RPM packaging and went through the tedious process of a package > review without quitting. It's not very nice of us to let them wait for > an indefinite amount of time without a reply after all of this. > > I believe there is a technical solution to this problem, so I'd like > to write a script that would: > > - Be run weekly > - Take a small number of active sponsors (say 5 of them, or maybe 10% > of them) and give each of them one of the waiting tickets > - Technically, it would be done by setting NEEDINFO on the ticket > - If a sponsor was already given one ticket, he wouldn't get another > - It could prioritize sponsors who didn't get tickets for the longest > time > - It could consider sponsors' interests > https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/interests > > Additionally: > > - If a sponsor is not able or willing to work on a ticket, they could > either set NEEDINFO on another sponsor or just drop themselves. The > ticket would then get a new sponsor next week > - After a month without a response to a NEEDINFO, another sponsor > would be assigned > > We currently have 37 active sponsors and 31 tickets waiting to be > sponsored, so the whole queue should get processed within a couple of > weeks and every sponsor should get only one ticket. After that I have > no idea how often will every sponsor be bothered. Maybe once a year? > > What do you think? Would you be okay with a system like this? > Please forward to sponsors that you know, if there is no strong > disagreement, I'll proceed with the implementation. > > Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2183727] perl-Function-Parameters-2.002002 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183727 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Function-Parameters-2. |perl-Function-Parameters-2. |002001 is available |002002 is available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Releases retrieved: 2.002002 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.002002 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.1.6-1.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Function-Parameters/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9311/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Function-Parameters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183727 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?
Hello, I've set myself a goal to improve the package review process. My first step was creating https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors , I am currently working on https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service and contribute to the `fedora-review` tool. I have some ideas about what to do next, and now I'd like to discuss one of them. Currently, we have 31 people waiting to be sponsored https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/needsponsor.html many of them waiting for months. To get to the point of waiting to be sponsored, all of these people invested their time to learn the basics of RPM packaging and went through the tedious process of a package review without quitting. It's not very nice of us to let them wait for an indefinite amount of time without a reply after all of this. I believe there is a technical solution to this problem, so I'd like to write a script that would: - Be run weekly - Take a small number of active sponsors (say 5 of them, or maybe 10% of them) and give each of them one of the waiting tickets - Technically, it would be done by setting NEEDINFO on the ticket - If a sponsor was already given one ticket, he wouldn't get another - It could prioritize sponsors who didn't get tickets for the longest time - It could consider sponsors' interests https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/interests Additionally: - If a sponsor is not able or willing to work on a ticket, they could either set NEEDINFO on another sponsor or just drop themselves. The ticket would then get a new sponsor next week - After a month without a response to a NEEDINFO, another sponsor would be assigned We currently have 37 active sponsors and 31 tickets waiting to be sponsored, so the whole queue should get processed within a couple of weeks and every sponsor should get only one ticket. After that I have no idea how often will every sponsor be bothered. Maybe once a year? What do you think? Would you be okay with a system like this? Please forward to sponsors that you know, if there is no strong disagreement, I'll proceed with the implementation. Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19 > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > > == Summary == > Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.19.0 4.19] release. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:ffesti| Florian Festi]] > * Email: ffesti(a)redhat.com > > > == Detailed Description == > RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many of > them are internal in nature such as moving from automake to cmake, > improvements to the test suite, stripping copies of system functions, > splitting translations into a separate project and more. There are > still several user facing changes: > > * New rpmsort(8) utility for sorting RPM versions > * x86-64 architecture levels (v2-v4) as architectures > * Support for %preuntrans and %postuntrans scriptlets > * Creating User and Groups from sysusers.d files including Provides > and Requires or Recommends > ([https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2432 PR], > [https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2277 > Discussion]) > * [https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dynamic_specs.html > Dynamic Spec generation] > ** find_lang now being able to generate language sub packages > > The 4.19 alpha release is expected in April and the final release is > expected in time for the Fedora 39 release cycle as usual. > > == Feedback == > > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > This release comes with many improvements. It opens the possibility > for Fedora to adopt the new major features mentioned above. > > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > ** Release RPM 4.19 alpha > ** Rebase RPM > ** Assist with dealing with incompatibilities > ** Integrate new User/Group handling > *** Conflicts with the current one including the Provides generation > in ''systemd-rpm-macros'' > > * Other developers: > ** Test new release, report issues and bugs > > * Release engineering: > * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change) > * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) > * Alignment with Community Initiatives: > > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > * %patch without arguments and options is an error > * %patchN syntax is deprecated > * File globbing is now more consistent > > > == How To Test == > > Rpm receives a thorough and constant testing via every single package > build, system installs and updates. New features can be tested > specifically as per their documentation. > > > == User Experience == > > There are no major differences in the normal user experience. > > == Dependencies == > * Deprecated APIs are removed. This may require adjustments to > software still using them. > * so-name of librpm changes. Packages depending on it are expected to > need a re-build > * Packages running in the changes mentioned in the > ''Upgrade/compatibility impact'' section might need adjusting. This > should be relatively rare, though. > > == Contingency Plan == > > * Contingency mechanism: Revert back to RPM 4.18 > * Contingency deadline: Beta freeze > * Blocks release? No > > == Documentation == > > Release notes at https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.19.0 and reference manual at > https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/ > > == Release Notes == > https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.19.0 (still work in progress) Sounds cool, can't wait to test! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 38 compose report: 20230401.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-38-20230331.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230401.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 65 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.87 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 2.80 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 64.93 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-38-20230401.n.1.s390x.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-38-20230331.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: iwyu-0.19-1.fc38 Summary: C/C++ source files #include analyzer based on clang RPMs:iwyu Size:2.77 MiB Package: rust-assert-str-0.1.0-1.fc38 Summary: Macros for asserting multiline strings RPMs:rust-assert-str+default-devel rust-assert-str-devel Size:21.53 KiB Package: rust-miniz_oxide0.5-0.5.4-1.fc38 Summary: DEFLATE compression and decompression library rewritten in Rust based on miniz RPMs:rust-miniz_oxide0.5+default-devel rust-miniz_oxide0.5-devel Size:62.26 KiB Package: rust-mutate_once-0.1.1-2.fc38 Summary: Interior mutability, write-once and borrowable as plain RPMs:rust-mutate_once+default-devel rust-mutate_once-devel Size:19.54 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: FlightGear-2020.3.18-1.fc38 Old package: FlightGear-2020.3.17-2.fc38 Summary: The FlightGear Flight Simulator RPMs: FlightGear Size: 29.52 MiB Size change: 2.42 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 21 2023 Fabrice Bellet - 2020.3.18-1 - new upstream release Package: FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.82.cvs20141002.fc38 Old package: FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.81.cvs20141002.fc38 Summary: Flightgear map tools RPMs: FlightGear-Atlas Size: 2.90 MiB Size change: -1.57 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 21 2023 Fabrice Bellet - 0.5.0-0.82.cvs20141002 - rebuild with newer SimGear Package: FlightGear-data-2020.3.18-1.fc38 Old package: FlightGear-data-2020.3.17-1.fc38 Summary: FlightGear base scenery and data files RPMs: FlightGear-data Size: 1.68 GiB Size change: 475.53 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 2020.3.17-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Mar 21 2023 Fabrice Bellet - 2020.3.18-1 - new upstream release Package: HepMC3-3.2.5-7.fc38 Old package: HepMC3-3.2.5-6.fc38 Summary: C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators RPMs: HepMC3 HepMC3-devel HepMC3-doc HepMC3-interfaces-devel HepMC3-rootIO HepMC3-rootIO-devel HepMC3-search HepMC3-search-devel python3-HepMC3 python3-HepMC3-rootIO python3-HepMC3-search Size: 57.20 MiB Size change: 10.89 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 21 2023 Mattias Ellert - 3.2.5-7 - Rebuild for root 6.28 - Fix Python 3.12 build Package: PyX-0.16-1.fc38 Old package: PyX-0.15-10.fc37 Summary: Python graphics package RPMs: PyX PyX-doc Size: 4.79 MiB Size change: -1.15 MiB Changelog: * Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.15-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Mar 23 2023 Jos?? Matos - 0.16-1 - Update to 0.16 - Remove patch already included in this version Package: SimGear-2020.3.18-1.fc38 Old package: SimGear-2020.3.17-2.fc38 Summary: Simulation library components RPMs: SimGear SimGear-devel Size: 10.70 MiB Size change: 90.90 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 21 2023 Fabrice Bellet - 2020.3.18-1 - new upstream release - Fix a new Clang compile failure with current XCode Package: abrt-2.16.1-1.fc38 Old package: abrt-2.16.0-2.fc38 Summary: Automatic bug detection and reporting tool RPMs: abrt abrt-addon-ccpp abrt-addon-kerneloops abrt-addon-pstoreoops abrt-addon-upload-watch abrt-addon-vmcore abrt-addon-xorg abrt-atomic abrt-cli abrt-console-notification abrt-dbus abrt-desktop abrt-devel abrt-gui abrt-gui-devel abrt-gui-libs abrt-libs abrt-plugin-bodhi abrt-plugin-machine-id abrt-tui python3-abrt python3-abrt-addon python3-abrt-container-addon python3-abrt-doc Size: 5.03 MiB Size change: -11.40 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 30 2023 Michal Srb - 2.16.1-1 - Update to upstream release 2.16.1 Package: apron-0.9.13-17.fc38 Old package: apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 Summary: Numerical abstract domain library RPMs: apron apron-devel japron ocaml-apron ocaml-apron-devel Size: 19.00 MiB Size change: -12.37 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 23 2023 Jerry James - 0.9.13-17 - Fix reinsertion of -Werror=format-security (bz 2181282) Package: bind9-next-32:9.19.11-1.fc38 Old package: bind9-next-32:9.19.10-1.fc38 Summary: The Berkeley
Re: Heads-up: fast_float 4.0.0 coming to Rawhide
Thanks; you’re correct. At least I got the year right! On Sat, Apr 1, 2023, at 8:47 AM, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Should this be 2023-04-07? 2023-03-07 has been weeks ago ? > > On 3/31/23, Ben Beasley wrote: >> In one week (2023-03-07), or slightly later, I plant to update >> fast_float to 4.0.0[1] in Rawhide. This new major release contains one >> small but technically incompatible change: errc::result_out_of_range is >> now set on over/underflow. A PR[2] is ready, and I have already verified >> (by local mock builds) that dependent packages c4core and libscn remain >> compatible. >> >> [1] https://github.com/fastfloat/fast_float/releases/tag/v4.0.0 >> >> [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fast_float/pull-request/4 >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2183727] New: perl-Function-Parameters-2.002001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183727 Bug ID: 2183727 Summary: perl-Function-Parameters-2.002001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Function-Parameters Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.002001 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.002001 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.1.6-1.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Function-Parameters/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9311/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Function-Parameters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183727 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: DNF Sytem Upgrade requirements for an F37 → F38 upgrade
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:25 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > I will submit systemd-tests-251.14-2.fc37 with the patch. > > I doubt that it solves the issue completely, but it shouldn't make > > it worse, so let's at least do this for now. > > Thank you, I see it's still being built in koji. I will spin a VM with > the same configuration over the weekend and try the upgrade again. Something is glitching on my provider's side and it's impossible to create new VMs. I've opened a ticket, but I doubt anyone is going to deal with it before Monday. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads-up: fast_float 4.0.0 coming to Rawhide
Should this be 2023-04-07? 2023-03-07 has been weeks ago ? On 3/31/23, Ben Beasley wrote: > In one week (2023-03-07), or slightly later, I plant to update > fast_float to 4.0.0[1] in Rawhide. This new major release contains one > small but technically incompatible change: errc::result_out_of_range is > now set on over/underflow. A PR[2] is ready, and I have already verified > (by local mock builds) that dependent packages c4core and libscn remain > compatible. > > [1] https://github.com/fastfloat/fast_float/releases/tag/v4.0.0 > > [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fast_float/pull-request/4 > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230401.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230331.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230401.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 70 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 2.13 MiB Size of dropped packages:9.11 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 3.34 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 18.46 KiB Size change of upgraded packages: 22.65 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: -84.88 KiB = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Phosh raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Phosh-Rawhide-20230401.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230401.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230331.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: snobol4-2.3.1-2.fc39 Summary: A port of Macro SNOBOL4 RPMs:snobol4 snobol4-devel Size:2.13 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: nimbus-0.1.4-26.fc38 Summary: Desktop theme originally from Sun RPMs:gtk-nimbus-engine nimbus-icon-theme nimbus-metacity-theme nimbus-theme-gnome Size:9.11 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: 389-ds-base-2.3.2-3.fc39 Old package: 389-ds-base-2.3.2-2.fc39 Summary: 389 Directory Server (base) RPMs: 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-devel 389-ds-base-libs 389-ds-base-snmp cockpit-389-ds python3-lib389 Size: 21.00 MiB Size change: -22.93 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 Viktor Ashirov - 2.3.2-3 - Fix build issue against setuptools 67.0.0 (#2183375) Package: GeographicLib-2.2-2.fc39 Old package: GeographicLib-2.2-1.fc39 Summary: Library for geographic coordinate transformations RPMs: GeographicLib GeographicLib-devel GeographicLib-doc mingw32-GeographicLib mingw32-python3-GeographicLib mingw64-GeographicLib mingw64-python3-GeographicLib python3-GeographicLib Size: 3.95 MiB Size change: 34.47 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 Sandro Mani - 2.2-2 - Switch to pypi source Package: PyDrive2-1.15.2-1.fc39 Old package: PyDrive2-1.15.1-2.fc39 Summary: Google Drive API Python wrapper library, maintained fork of PyDrive RPMs: python3-PyDrive2 Size: 126.40 KiB Size change: 278 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga - 1.15.2-1 - Update to 1.15.2 - Closes rhbz#2183618 Package: audacity-3.1.3-9.fc39 Old package: audacity-3.1.3-6.fc38 Summary: Multitrack audio editor RPMs: audacity audacity-manual Size: 43.15 MiB Size change: 111.43 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.1.3-7 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Mar 05 2023 Gwyn Ciesla - 3.1.3-8 - migrated to SPDX license * Thu Mar 30 2023 Yaakov Selkowitz - 3.1.3-9 - Added patch to fix GCC 13 build error (Fixes RHBZ: 2171444) Package: awscli-1.27.104-1.fc39 Old package: awscli-1.27.103-1.fc39 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 3.29 MiB Size change: 28 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.27.104-1 - 1.27.104 Package: container-selinux-2:2.208.0-1.fc39 Old package: container-selinux-2:2.206.0-1.fc39 Summary: SELinux policies for container runtimes RPMs: container-selinux Size: 51.35 KiB Size change: -69 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 RH Container Bot - 2:2.208.0-1 - auto bump to v2.208.0 Package: debian-keyring-2023.3-1.fc39 Old package: debian-keyring-2023.2-1.fc39 Summary: GnuPG archive keys of the Debian archive RPMs: debian-keyring Size: 109.03 KiB Size change: 12 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 Sandro Mani - 2023.3-1 - Update to 2023.3 Package: esmi_ib_library-1.5.0^20220622gitf4ce871-3.fc39 Old package: esmi_ib_library-1.5.0^20220622gitf4ce871-1.fc39 Summary: E-SMI: EPYC System management Interface In-band Library RPMs: e_smi_tool esmi_ib_library esmi_ib_library-devel esmi_ib_library-doc Size: 385.78 KiB Size change: 846 B Changelog: * Wed Mar 29 2023 Davide Cavalca - 1.5.0^20220622gitf4ce871-2 - Fix build on EPEL 8 and EPEL 9 * Fri Mar 31 2023 Davide Cavalca - 1.5.0^20220622gitf4ce871-3 - Number patches for compatibility with el8 Package: fedmsg-1.1.7-1.fc39 Old package: fedmsg-1.1.6-1.fc39 Summary: Tools for Fedora Infrastructure real-time messaging RPMs: fedmsg fedmsg-base fedmsg-doc python3-fedmsg Size: 753.31 KiB Size change: 83 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 31 2023 Michal Konecny - 1.1.7-1 - Bump to version 1.1.7 See changelog at https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/releases/tag/1.1.7 Package: fedora-messaging-3.3.0-1.fc39 Old package: fedora-messaging-3.2.0-6.fc38 Summary: Set of tools for using Fedora's messaging infrastructure RPMs: fedora
Re: Node.js repackaging status and questions
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 12:04 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Hi, > > As a brief summary: > > - The Node.js repackaging change [1-2] was accepted for F38. > - Packages nodejs16 and nodejs18 were created without any review [3-4] (?). This is fine, packages that are only alternative versions of existing packages are exempt from package review. > - Package nodejs20 was created a month ago, but I didn't find any > review request. Why? Same reason - alternative versions do not require package review. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process > - This repackaging has been pushed to F37 too. Why, if this was a F38 change? I agree, this is unusual. > - Now we have conflicts in F37 and F38 [5], with FTBFS for those > requiring unversioned nodejs. That sounds like a packaging bug. The default nodejs version should always provide the "unversioned" nodejs, and other versions must not provide the unversioned names. (This is how Python packages work in Fedora for a while, but it looks like the process is still very buggy for nodejs.) (Side note: It was explicitly decided against using alternatives for this purpose, because the way it's done for Python - and now NodeJS - should be less error-prone and buggy. Java is one of the few things in Fedora that still uses alternatives for this use case.) Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Node.js repackaging status and questions
On 01/04/2023 13:10, Jiri Vanek wrote: I would heavily recomend to use alternatives for this,a nd thus remain aligned with other major runtimes. Alternatives can't be used on immutable Fedora versions (Silverblue, Kinoite, etc). -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Node.js repackaging status and questions
Hello! I woudl like to - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging#Feedback - add, that also java is using alternatives for major versions of jdk switching. Weahve master java - to switch runtime, and javac to switch devel subpackages. Man pages are also slaves to the java/javac master so the always corespond to the proper selected java. I would heavily recomend to use alternatives for this,a nd thus remain aligned with other major runtimes. One more reason to use alternatives might be theirs future - build over overlayfs, an *userspace* version of alternatives is being.. discussed ( I would realy lke to say developed, but it seems it is still ony on paper). Still the proof of concept already existed. Thanx! J. On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 12:04, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Hi, > > As a brief summary: > > - The Node.js repackaging change [1-2] was accepted for F38. > - Packages nodejs16 and nodejs18 were created without any review [3-4] (?). > - Package nodejs20 was created a month ago, but I didn't find any > review request. Why? > - This repackaging has been pushed to F37 too. Why, if this was a F38 change? > - Now we have conflicts in F37 and F38 [5], with FTBFS for those > requiring unversioned nodejs. > > It seems to me that there hasn't been a proper review and tracking of > this change. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130002 > [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 > [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 > [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179086 > > -- > Iñaki Úcar > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Node.js repackaging status and questions
Hi, As a brief summary: - The Node.js repackaging change [1-2] was accepted for F38. - Packages nodejs16 and nodejs18 were created without any review [3-4] (?). - Package nodejs20 was created a month ago, but I didn't find any review request. Why? - This repackaging has been pushed to F37 too. Why, if this was a F38 change? - Now we have conflicts in F37 and F38 [5], with FTBFS for those requiring unversioned nodejs. It seems to me that there hasn't been a proper review and tracking of this change. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130002 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179086 -- Iñaki Úcar ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Need help to build Blender 3.5.0
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2023/03/30 13:04: Hello team, Blender 3.5.0 got released today at this time of writing. Unfortunately, failure occurred with the following link possibly related to cycles: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99301805 Can someone investigate the problem? Thanks gcc is ICEing. Reported against gcc for now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183692 Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
