[EPEL-devel] Are we sticking with exa or moving to eza in EPEL?
I realize exa is still in the EPEL9 repos, was wondering if there is an intention to move to its replacement eza as was done in F39 and F40? Ian -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bcf6c3bf53 cacti-1.2.25-1.el7 cacti-spine-1.2.25-1.el7 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-36e0ca3184 netatalk-3.1.18-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0d68b0d3aa chromium-117.0.5938.149-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing barman-3.9.0-1.el7 csdiff-3.1.0-1.el7 csmock-3.5.0-1.el7 lemonldap-ng-2.17.1-3.el7 Details about builds: barman-3.9.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-971eaf54b2) Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL Update Information: Update to 3.9.0 bugfix release. ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Simone Caronni - 3.9.0-1 - Update to 3.9.0. References: [ 1 ] Bug #2241962 - barman-3.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241962 csdiff-3.1.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-de33990258) Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text Update Information: - update to latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Kamil Dudka 3.1.0-1 - update to latest upstream release csmock-3.5.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-de33990258) A mock wrapper for Static Analysis tools Update Information: - update to latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Kamil Dudka 3.5.0-1 - update to latest upstream lemonldap-ng-2.17.1-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f0f54f2f24) Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management Update Information: Initial package Initial package ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Xavier Bachelot - 2.17.1-3 - Fix broken dep on SSOaaS module dependency * Mon Oct 2 2023 Xavier Bachelot - 2.17.1-2 - Add a dep on SSOaaS version - Simplify fix shebang and perms - Drop INSTALL from %doc * Mon Sep 25 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.17.1-1 - Update to 2.17.1 * Wed Aug 30 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.17.0-1 - Update to 2.17.0 * Mon May 15 2023 Xavier Bachelot - 2.16.2-2 - Improve Summary: - Drop updates-alternatives from %post - Split long line - Drop useless comments - Add provides for bundled javascript libraries and adapt License tag accordingly - Add provides for bundled font and adapt License tag accordingly - Make use of %lm_sharedir instead of plain path - Add BR: for uglify-js - Move examples to %_docdir - Fix perms on %lm_vardir/captcha and %_rundir/llng-fastcgi-server - Drop redundant dirs creation and perms change - Conditionalize test that needs network access * Fri May 12 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.16.2-1 - Update to 2.16.2 * Tue Mar 28 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.16.1-1 - Update to 2.16.1 * Wed Feb 1 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.0.16-1 - Update to 2.0.16 * Thu Sep 15 2022 Clement Oudot - 2.0.15.1-1 - Update to 2.0.15.1 * Fri Sep 9 2022 Clement Oudot - 2.0.15-1 - Update to 2.0.15 * Thu Feb 24 2022 Xavier Bachelot - 2.0.14-2 - Prepare for EL9 support * Sat Feb 19 2022 Clement Oudot - 2.0.14-1 - Update to 2.0.14 * Fri Aug 20 2021 Clement Oudot - 2.0.13-1 - Update to 2.0.13 * Thu Jul 22 2021 Clement Oudot - 2.0.12-1 - Update to 2.0.12 * Wed Mar 17 2021 Xavier Bachelot - 2.0.11-2 - Add BR: make * Sat Jan 30 2021 Clement Oudot - 2.0.11-1 - Update to 2.0.11 * Sun Jan 17 2021 Clement Oudot - 2.0.10-1 - Update to 2.0.10 * Sun Sep 6 2020 Clement Oudot - 2.0.9-1 - Update to 2.0.9 * Tue May 5 2020 Clement Oudot - 2.0.8-1 - Update to 2.0.8 * Sat Dec 21 2019 Clement Oudot - 2.0.7-1 - Update to 2.0.7 * Fri Dec 6 2019 Xavier Bachelot - 2.0.6-2 - Tweak for EL8. - Enhance BuildRequires and Requires. - Spec clean up. * Tue Sep 24 2019 Clement Oudot - 2.0.6-1 - Update to 2.0.6 * Sat Jun 29 2019 Clement Oudot - 2.0.5-1 - Update
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-522c9cf128 cacti-1.2.25-1.el8 cacti-spine-1.2.25-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-99a9054ad1 netatalk-3.1.18-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f2e087c62d chromium-117.0.5938.149-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing barman-3.9.0-1.el8 csdiff-3.1.0-1.el8 csmock-3.5.0-1.el8 dr_libs-0-0.23.20231010gitd35a3bc.el8 epel-rpm-macros-8-40 lemonldap-ng-2.17.1-3.el8 mbedtls-2.28.5-1.el8 pdns-4.8.3-1.el8 python-ruamel-yaml-clib-0.2.8-1.el8 stb-0-0.27.20231009gitc4bbb6e.el8 Details about builds: barman-3.9.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-801db4611e) Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL Update Information: Update to 3.9.0 bugfix release. ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Simone Caronni - 3.9.0-1 - Update to 3.9.0. References: [ 1 ] Bug #2241962 - barman-3.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241962 csdiff-3.1.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3b6ae09d6b) Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text Update Information: - update to latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Kamil Dudka 3.1.0-1 - update to latest upstream release csmock-3.5.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3b6ae09d6b) A mock wrapper for Static Analysis tools Update Information: - update to latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Kamil Dudka 3.5.0-1 - update to latest upstream dr_libs-0-0.23.20231010gitd35a3bc.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-810deeed29) Single-file audio decoding libraries for C/C++ Update Information: Update to `0^20230806gitd35a3bc` (`dr_mp3` 0.6.37, `dr_wav` 0.13.12): ## dr_mp3 ### v0.6.37 - 2023-07-07 - Silence a static analysis warning. ## dr_wav ### v0.13.11 - 07-07-2023 - AIFF compatibility improvements. ### v0.13.12 - 2023-08-07 - Fix a possible crash in `drwav_read_pcm_frames()`. ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Benjamin A. Beasley - 0-0.23 - Update to 0^20230806gitd35a3bc (dr_mp3 0.6.37, dr_wav 0.13.12) epel-rpm-macros-8-40 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c518ffaf10) Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux RPM macros Update Information: Enable full %py3_check_imports macro ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 6 2023 Orion Poplawski - 8-40 - Add full %py3_check_import macro lemonldap-ng-2.17.1-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7aea413f3b) Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management Update Information: Initial package Initial package ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 10 2023 Xavier Bachelot - 2.17.1-3 - Fix broken dep on SSOaaS module dependency * Mon Oct 2 2023 Xavier Bachelot - 2.17.1-2 - Add a dep on SSOaaS version - Simplify fix shebang and perms - Drop INSTALL from %doc * Mon Sep 25 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.17.1-1 - Update to 2.17.1 * Wed Aug 30 2023 Clement Oudot - 2.17.0-1 - Update to 2.17.0 * Mon May 15 2023 Xavier Bachelot - 2.16.2-2 - Improve Summary: - Drop
Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have a release candidate for Fedora Linux 39 Final. Thursday's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled. The next Fedora Linux 39 Final Go/No-Go meeting will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 19 October in #fedora-meeting-1. We will aim for the "target date #1" milestone of 24 October. The release schedule[2] will be updated accordingly soon. [1] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/39/final/buglist [2] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Please help complete validation testing for current Fedora 39 candidate nightly!
Hey folks! You probably saw the mail "Fedora 39 Branched 20231010.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing" today. Although we still don't have an RC for the Fedora 39 Final release, I want to ask folks to please help us fill out the matrices for this candidate as much as possible. It's best if we find any remaining blocker bugs *now*, not wait for an RC before doing the full testing. You can use testcase_stats to see what test cases probably need running - https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/39/ . The pages there shows the execution history and last run date for each test on the corresponding matrix page, so you can see at a glance which tests haven't been run recently or at all. Please focus on tests marked Basic, Beta or Final that have not yet been run, or not been run for some time. And of course, if you find a significant bug, mark the test as a failure, file a bug, and nominate it as a release blocker. Thanks a lot folks! -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243140] New: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243140 Bug ID: 2243140 Summary: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-NYTProf Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.13 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.13 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.12-4.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-NYTProf/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5897/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-NYTProf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243140 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243140%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Python enable dependency generator problem
On 10. 10. 23 23:14, Adam Williamson wrote: If you*want* to auto-generate these requirements, your only options are to get upstream to loosen the version specifiers, or patch the requirements file in %prep before the build requirement generator runs (I think that ordering is possible). Not only it is possible, but it *is* the order in which the build will always run (%prep before %generate_buildrequires) regardless of the order in the specfile. Putting it in any other order in the specfile is possible but confusing. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Python enable dependency generator problem
On Tue, 2023-10-10 at 17:30 -0300, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to add python enable dependency generator on python-pymemcache, > but when adding it to the specfile, it asks for some old version of some > needed packages: > https://paste.centos.org/view/33623ed7 > > Fedora repos have a more updated version, but this dependency generator is > asking for an older version of those packages: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-faker > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gevent > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pylibmc > > > How to fix this? Did you include the `-t` arg for the generator? `%pyproject_buildrequires -t`? If so, it'll be pulling these dependencies from tox.ini, which pulls them from https://github.com/pinterest/pymemcache/blob/master/test-requirements.txt , which pins very specific versions. If you *want* to auto-generate these requirements, your only options are to get upstream to loosen the version specifiers, or patch the requirements file in %prep before the build requirement generator runs (I think that ordering is possible). Alternatively of course you can omit `-t` so the dependency generator won't work out the requirements from tox.ini , but then you can't run the tests during %check unless you specify the requirements manually... -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Python enable dependency generator problem
It looks like you are using “%pyproject_buildrequires -t”, and upstream’s tox.ini gets its dependencies from the file test-requirements.txt, which pins exact versions of everything (==). Obviously, it’s very rare that this will line up with the versions packaged in Fedora. If you’re going to use that file, you’ll need to patch it in %prep to remove the version pins, or at least convert them to lower bounds (s/==/>=) if that seems appropriate. You should also patch out the dependency on pytest-cov (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_linters). If that all gets too messy, a less satisfying but more straightforward alternative would be to eschew tox, maintain the list of BR’s for the tests manually in the spec file the old-fashioned way, and run the tests with %pytest instead of %tox. On Tue, Oct 10, 2023, at 4:30 PM, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to add python enable dependency generator on > python-pymemcache, but when adding it to the specfile, it asks for some > old version of some needed packages: > https://paste.centos.org/view/33623ed7 > > Fedora repos have a more updated version, but this dependency generator > is asking for an older version of those packages: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-faker > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gevent > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pylibmc > > > How to fix this? > > > Priscila. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: kdump enabled in F39
On Tue, 2023-10-10 at 12:15 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm having some difficulty tracking down why it's being enabled on Fedora 39 > but not on Fedora 38. > > On both Fedora 38 and 39, /etc/kdump.conf contains > > auto_reset_crashkernel yes > > However, I've never seen the reported behavior until Fedora 39. > > While the crashkernel parameter is being set on the kernel command line, the > kdump.service unit is disabled. I don't know how these things interact, so I > don't know how big a deal the issue is. Maybe it's just wasted space on the > kernel command line? > > In any case, eventually it will clutter up the command line for everyone once > they update their kernel because this parameter will be added. And I don't > know how we fix it with an update because it means stepping on everyone's > /etc/kdump.conf - without a way of knowing if they want this or some other > setting applied. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243068 Detailed follow-up in the bug report, but for anyone following along here, I think this was caused by changes to the set of scripts in kexec-tools between F38 and F39 which have the effect that a crashkernel= arg will almost always get added whenever a kernel is installed, or kexec-tools is updated. Previously that was not the case. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have a release candidate for Fedora Linux 39 Final. Thursday's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled. The next Fedora Linux 39 Final Go/No-Go meeting will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 19 October in #fedora-meeting-1. We will aim for the "target date #1" milestone of 24 October. The release schedule[2] will be updated accordingly soon. [1] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/39/final/buglist [2] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Python enable dependency generator problem
Hello, I'm trying to add python enable dependency generator on python-pymemcache, but when adding it to the specfile, it asks for some old version of some needed packages: https://paste.centos.org/view/33623ed7 Fedora repos have a more updated version, but this dependency generator is asking for an older version of those packages: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-faker https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gevent https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pylibmc How to fix this? Priscila. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
kdump enabled in F39
Hi folks, I'm having some difficulty tracking down why it's being enabled on Fedora 39 but not on Fedora 38. On both Fedora 38 and 39, /etc/kdump.conf contains auto_reset_crashkernel yes However, I've never seen the reported behavior until Fedora 39. While the crashkernel parameter is being set on the kernel command line, the kdump.service unit is disabled. I don't know how these things interact, so I don't know how big a deal the issue is. Maybe it's just wasted space on the kernel command line? In any case, eventually it will clutter up the command line for everyone once they update their kernel because this parameter will be added. And I don't know how we fix it with an update because it means stepping on everyone's /etc/kdump.conf - without a way of knowing if they want this or some other setting applied. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243068 Thanks, -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-10-11 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha #topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues * https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting=Open #topic Old Business (if needed) #topic General Issues / Open Floor Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243069] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231010.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||31010.001-1.fc40 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-10-10 15:25:11 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e63c3a0771 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243069 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243069%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243069] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231010.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e63c3a0771 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e63c3a0771 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243069 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243069%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:57:40AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE > > nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing > > include dirs: > > > > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or > > > directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3/QtCore: No such file or > > > directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > > > I did manage to figure out this meant we needed an additional build > > dependency (qt6-qtbase-private-devel, FYI), but it made me think if > > there's a reason this shouldn't be an error. > > > > If it's an error, then at least we can evaluate these things and > > ensure we have the right build inputs... > > > > What do y'all think? > > I might be missing the point, but what issue did this cause? > I don't know if it did or didn't. For all I know, it could have led to a miscompilation. It was fixed before we landed it as it was caught while working on packaging. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:57:40AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, > > Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE > nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing > include dirs: > > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or directory > > [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3/QtCore: No such file or > > directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > I did manage to figure out this meant we needed an additional build > dependency (qt6-qtbase-private-devel, FYI), but it made me think if > there's a reason this shouldn't be an error. > > If it's an error, then at least we can evaluate these things and > ensure we have the right build inputs... > > What do y'all think? I might be missing the point, but what issue did this cause? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Type-Tiny] PR #2: Don't support Fedora < 37
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Type-Tiny` that you are following: `` Don't support Fedora < 37 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Type-Tiny/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243069] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231010.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243069 Bug ID: 2243069 Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231010.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 20231010.001 Upstream release that is considered latest: 20231010.001 Current version/release in rawhide: 20231006.001-1.fc40 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Business-ISBN-Data/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2674/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243069 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243069%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 39 compose report: 20231010.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-39-20231009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 10 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 2.14 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 170.02 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Cloud_Base tar-gz x86_64 Path: Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-GCP-39-20231010.n.0.x86_64.tar.gz Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-39-20231010.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-39-20231009.n.0.iso Image: Workstation live aarch64 Path: Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-39-20231009.n.0.iso Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-39-20231009.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: blivet-gui-2.4.2-4.fc39 Old package: blivet-gui-2.4.2-2.fc39 Summary: Tool for data storage configuration RPMs: blivet-gui blivet-gui-runtime Size: 430.05 KiB Size change: 1.68 KiB Changelog: * Tue Sep 12 2023 Vojtech Trefny - 2.4.2-3 - Add cmdline option to force blivet-gui to keep above other apps (#2238282) - Add a cmdline option to enabled blivet's auto_dev_updates flag (#2238292) * Fri Oct 06 2023 Vojtech Trefny - 2.4.2-4 - Fix logic when checking for dialog response (#2241761) Package: dracut-059-14.fc39 Old package: dracut-059-12.fc39 Summary: Initramfs generator using udev RPMs: dracut dracut-caps dracut-config-generic dracut-config-rescue dracut-live dracut-network dracut-squash dracut-tools Size: 2.36 MiB Size change: 3.71 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 20 2023 Pavel Valena - 059-13 - fix(dracut.spec): add jq dependency to network subpackage * Thu Oct 05 2023 Adam Williamson - 059-14 - Backport PR #2196 to fix boot with iso-scan feature Package: firefox-118.0.1-7.fc39 Old package: firefox-118.0.1-4.fc39 Summary: Mozilla Firefox Web browser RPMs: firefox firefox-langpacks firefox-wayland firefox-x11 Size: 430.63 MiB Size change: -6.10 KiB Changelog: * Thu Oct 05 2023 Kalev Lember - 118.0.1-5 - Fix flatpak build * Fri Oct 06 2023 Martin Stransky - 118.0.1-6 - Removed DBusActivatable flag from desktop file as it crashes KDE (rhbz#2242454). * Fri Oct 06 2023 Alessandro Astone - 118.0.1-7 - Don't include -x11 and -wayland desktop files in the main package (rhbz#2242523) Package: glibc-2.38-7.fc39 Old package: glibc-2.38-6.fc39 Summary: The GNU libc libraries RPMs: compat-libpthread-nonshared glibc glibc-all-langpacks glibc-benchtests glibc-common glibc-devel glibc-doc glibc-gconv-extra glibc-headers-s390 glibc-headers-x86 glibc-langpack-aa glibc-langpack-af glibc-langpack-agr glibc-langpack-ak glibc-langpack-am glibc-langpack-an glibc-langpack-anp glibc-langpack-ar glibc-langpack-as glibc-langpack-ast glibc-langpack-ayc glibc-langpack-az glibc-langpack-be glibc-langpack-bem glibc-langpack-ber glibc-langpack-bg glibc-langpack-bhb glibc-langpack-bho glibc-langpack-bi glibc-langpack-bn glibc-langpack-bo glibc-langpack-br glibc-langpack-brx glibc-langpack-bs glibc-langpack-byn glibc-langpack-ca glibc-langpack-ce glibc-langpack-chr glibc-langpack-ckb glibc-langpack-cmn glibc-langpack-crh glibc-langpack-cs glibc-langpack-csb glibc-langpack-cv glibc-langpack-cy glibc-langpack-da glibc-langpack-de glibc-langpack-doi glibc-langpack-dsb glibc-langpack-dv glibc-langpack-dz glibc-langpack-el glibc-langpack-en glibc-langpack-eo glibc-langpack-es glibc-langpack-et glibc-langpack-eu glibc-langpack-fa glibc-langpack-ff glibc-langpack-fi glibc-langpack-fil glibc-langpack-fo glibc-langpack-fr glibc-langpack-fur glibc-langpack-fy glibc-langpack-ga glibc-langpack-gd glibc-langpack-gez glibc-langpack-gl glibc-langpack-gu glibc-langpack-gv glibc-langpack-ha glibc-langpack-hak glibc-langpack-he glibc-langpack-hi glibc-langpack-hif glibc-langpack-hne glibc-langpack-hr glibc-langpack-hsb glibc-langpack-ht glibc-langpack-hu glibc-langpack-hy glibc-langpack-ia glibc-langpack-id glibc-langpack-ig glibc-langpack-ik glibc-langpack-is glibc-langpack-it glibc-langpack-iu glibc-langpack-ja glibc-langpack-ka glibc-langpack-kab glibc-langpack-kk glibc-langpack-kl glibc-langpack-km glibc-langpack-kn glibc-langpack-ko glibc-langpack-kok glibc-langpack-ks glibc-langpack-ku glibc-langpack-kw glibc-langpack-ky glibc-langpack-lb glibc-langpack-lg glibc-langpack-li glibc-langpack-lij glibc-langpack-ln glibc-langpack-lo glibc-langpack-lt glibc-langpack-lv glibc-langpack-lzh glibc-langpack-mag glibc-langpack-mai glibc-langpack-mfe glibc-langpack-mg glibc-langpack-mhr glibc
Re: Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, > > Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE > nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing > include dirs: > > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or > directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3/QtCore: No such file or > directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > I did manage to figure out this meant we needed an additional build > dependency (qt6-qtbase-private-devel, FYI), but it made me think if > there's a reason this shouldn't be an error. > > If it's an error, then at least we can evaluate these things and > ensure we have the right build inputs... > Missing an include directory isn't necessarily the problem though, it is the missing headers that aren't present when they are included that would be - and that should trigger a build error for the missing file. What advantage does failing on this warning provide that the failure on the include file missing doesn't? -Ian > > What do y'all think? > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?
* Neal Gompa: > Hey all, > > Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE > nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing > include dirs: > >> cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or directory >> [-Wmissing-include-dirs] >> cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3/QtCore: No such file or >> directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > > I did manage to figure out this meant we needed an additional build > dependency (qt6-qtbase-private-devel, FYI), but it made me think if > there's a reason this shouldn't be an error. Was there a subsequent build failure due to the missing headers? Could you share a link to the full build log? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231010.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:11 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 62.29 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.51 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -1.11 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker x86_64 Path: Container/x86_64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.x86_64.tar.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker x86_64 Path: Container/x86_64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.x86_64.tar.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64 Path: Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.iso Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.iso Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker aarch64 Path: Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20231010.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20231009.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: futuresql-0.1.1-1.fc40 Summary: Non-blocking database framework for Qt RPMs:futuresql-qt5 futuresql-qt5-devel futuresql-qt6 futuresql-qt6-devel Size:623.40 KiB Package: golly-4.2-3.fc40 Summary: Cellular automata simulator (includes Conway's Game of Life) RPMs:golly golly-data golly-devel Size:14.98 MiB Package: kf6-kded-5.240.0^20231005.021018.cbc5874-1.fc40 Summary: KDE Frameworks 6 Tier 3 addon with extensible daemon for system-level services RPMs:kf6-kded kf6-kded-devel Size:443.91 KiB Package: kf6-kdesu-5.240.0^20231001.121632.8b7a35c-1.fc40 Summary: KDE Frameworks 6 Tier 3 integration with su RPMs:kf6-kdesu kf6-kdesu-devel Size:654.96 KiB Package: kf6-kiconthemes-5.240.0^20231005.110037.668fdc1-1.fc40 Summary: KDE Frameworks 6 Tier 3 integration module with icon themes RPMs:kf6-kiconthemes kf6-kiconthemes-devel Size:1.28 MiB Package: kf6-kpeople-5.240.0^20231003.021019.6f4b1b4-1.fc40 Summary: KDE Frameworks 6 Tier 3 library for contact and people aggregation RPMs:kf6-kpeople kf6-kpeople-devel Size:1.18 MiB Package: kf6-ktextwidgets-5.240.0^20231003.060127.1cc7bdc-1.fc40 Summary: KDE Frameworks 6 Tier 3 addon with advanced text editing widgets RPMs:kf6-ktextwidgets kf6-ktextwidgets-devel Size:1.88 MiB Package: libdicom-1.0.5-1.fc40 Summary: C library and tools for reading DICOM data sets RPMs:libdicom libdicom-devel libdicom-doc libdicom-tools Size:615.91 KiB Package: mod_qos-11.74-1.fc40 Summary: Quality of service module for Apache RPMs:mod_qos Size:4.81 MiB Package: python-pynsgr-1.0.3-4.fc40 Summary: Interface to the NeuroScience Gateway REST interface RPMs:python-pynsgr-doc python3-pynsgr Size:63.50 KiB Package: python-tinygrad-0.7.0-1.fc40 Summary: You like pytorch? You like micrograd? You love tinygrad! RPMs:python3-tinygrad Size:366.81 KiB Package: receptor-1.4.1-3.fc40 Summary: Multi-service relayer with remote execution and orchestration capabilities RPMs:python3-receptor-python-worker receptor receptorctl Size:34.82 MiB Package: rust-unic-ucd-category-0.9.0-11.fc40 Summary: UNIC ??? Unicode Character Database ??? General Category RPMs:rust-unic-ucd-category+default-devel rust-unic-ucd-category-devel Size:38.19 KiB Package: xeus-zmq-1.1.1-1.fc40 Summary: ZeroMQ based middleware for xeus RPMs:xeus-zmq xeus-zmq-devel Size:619.15 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CImg-1:3.3.1-1.fc40 Old package: CImg-1:3.2.6-2.fc39 Summary: C++ Template Image Processing Toolkit RPMs: CImg-devel Size: 2.62 MiB Size change: 4.18 KiB Changelog: * Wed Oct 04 2023 josef radinger - 1:3.3.0-1 - bump version * Fri Oct 06 2023 josef radinger - 1:3.3.1-1 - bump version Package: ca-certificates-2023.2.62_v7.0.401-4.fc40 Old package: ca-certificates
[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Branched 20231010.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Branched 20231010.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/39 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20231010.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?
Hey all, Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing include dirs: > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or directory > [-Wmissing-include-dirs] > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3/QtCore: No such file or > directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs] I did manage to figure out this meant we needed an additional build dependency (qt6-qtbase-private-devel, FYI), but it made me think if there's a reason this shouldn't be an error. If it's an error, then at least we can evaluate these things and ensure we have the right build inputs... What do y'all think? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review plea - x2gokdrive
Thanks Orion, I'll take these. Sorry for the delay, but I could not commit earlier due to lack of time. I don't need any review on my side so that's no problem. Jos On 9/25/23 21:17, Orion Poplawski wrote: Could someone (perhaps someone interested in X2Go) please review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215420 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215421 I'd love to be able to offer a review swap, but I'm completely underwater. If anyone wants to help out on any of my packages, that would be great. I'm led to believe by https://pagure.io/pagure/blob/master/f/doc/usage/tips_tricks.rst that this[1] should show the packages that I am the primary maintainer on, but it doesn't seem to be working. 1 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/orion?acl=main%20admin Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
