Re: Unretiring a package
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:43 PM Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > According to > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming > > unretiring a package requires review if retired for more than eight weeks. > According to releng, the package slim has been retired for 6+ weeks. Do I > still need to ask for review of this package, and file a BZ request? The package was actually retired almost a year ago, so yes. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Unretiring a package
According to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming unretiring a package requires review if retired for more than eight weeks. According to releng, the package slim has been retired for 6+ weeks. Do I still need to ask for review of this package, and file a BZ request? Thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: unretiring valabind package
Hi gil,
>1) maybe you should open a bug for review the package ... ?
Yes I did already ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270630
You know - chicken egg problem - the procedure says first announce on devel
list, then create the review request.
>2) you must use %license macro for LICENSE text file
will do - thanks
> i do not understand why _pkgdocdir is versioned
Plan is to get radare2 to fedora. I believe the original packager of
valabind thought of keeping possibility to simultaneously install multiple
versions of radare. The upstream is definitely preparing and using this
possibility.
So far I decided to keep the functionality for compatibility with the
previous package.
>4) you could remove also "Group: Applications/Engineering" is no
more required
Yes I know it is optional now, but I would like to keep it for compatibility
with EPEL, where the valabind package was not orphaned.
See https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/valabind/
Best regards
Michal Ambroz
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: gil <punto...@libero.it>
Komu: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Datum: 12. 10. 2015 4:05:39
Předmět: Re: unretiring valabind package
"
Hi
1) maybe you should open a bug for review the package ... ?
2) you must use %license macro for LICENSE text file
3) maybe you could remove %{!?_pkgdocdir: %global %{_docdir}/%{name}-%
{version}}
i do not understand why _pkgdocdir is versioned
4) you could remove also "Group: Applications/Engineering" is no
more required
regards
gil
Il 12/10/2015 03:51, Michal Ambroz ha scritto:
"Hello,
I would like to unretire the package "valabind" and become the owner for the
orphaned package.
With the current release of valabind 0.9.2 it seems to build nicely with
recent vala version in rawhide
and recent versions of Fedora, so I would like to unretire it.
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814)
Spec URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/valabind.spec
(https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/valabind.spec)
SRPM URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
(https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm)
Fedora Account System Username: rebus
Description:
Valabind is a tool to parse vala[1] or vapi files to transform them
into swig[2] interface files, C++, NodeJS-ffi or GIR. With swig, you
can create language bindings for any API written in vala or C with a
vapi interface. It can also generate bindings for C++.
This emails is following the unretiring policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#
Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package)
Best regards
Michal Ambroz
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: notificati...@fedoraproject.org(mailto:notificati...@fedoraproject.org)
Komu: re...@seznam.cz(mailto:re...@seznam.cz)
Datum: 12. 10. 2015 0:08:25
Předmět: rebus's scratch build of valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
"Task 11410814 on buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: build (noarch)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814)
Task 11410817 on buildvm-27.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: buildArch (i386)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410817
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410817)
logs:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/build.log
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/build.log)
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/state.log
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/state.log)
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/root.log
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/root.log)
rpms:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-0.9.2-1.
fc24.i686.rpm
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm)
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-
debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm)
srpms:
Task 11410816 on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: buildArch (x86_64)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410816
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410816)
logs:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/root.log
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/root.log)
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/state.log
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/state.log)
https://koji
unretiring valabind package
Hello, I would like to unretire the package "valabind" and become the owner for the orphaned package. With the current release of valabind 0.9.2 it seems to build nicely with recent vala version in rawhide and recent versions of Fedora, so I would like to unretire it. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814 Spec URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/valabind.spec SRPM URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: rebus Description: Valabind is a tool to parse vala[1] or vapi files to transform them into swig[2] interface files, C++, NodeJS-ffi or GIR. With swig, you can create language bindings for any API written in vala or C with a vapi interface. It can also generate bindings for C++. This emails is following the unretiring policy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers# Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Původní zpráva -- Od: notificati...@fedoraproject.org Komu: re...@seznam.cz Datum: 12. 10. 2015 0:08:25 Předmět: rebus's scratch build of valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide completed "Task 11410814 on buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org Task Type: build (noarch) Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814 Task 11410817 on buildvm-27.phx2.fedoraproject.org Task Type: buildArch (i386) Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410817 logs: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/state.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/root.log rpms: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-0.9.2-1. fc24.i686.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind- debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm srpms: Task 11410816 on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org Task Type: buildArch (x86_64) Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410816 logs: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/root.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/state.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/build.log rpms: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/valabind- debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/valabind-0.9.2-1. fc24.x86_64.rpm srpms: Task 11410815 on arm02-builder23.arm.fedoraproject.org Task Type: buildArch (armhfp) Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410815 logs: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/state.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/root.log rpms: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/valabind-0.9.2-1. fc24.armv7hl.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/valabind- debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.armv7hl.rpm srpms: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/valabind-0.9.2-1. fc24.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814 -- You received this message due to your preference settings at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/rebus.id.fedoraproject.org/ email/20888"-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: unretiring valabind package
Hi
1) maybe you should open a bug for review the package ... ?
2) you must use %license macro for LICENSE text file
3) maybe you could remove %{!?_pkgdocdir: %global
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}}
i do not understand why _pkgdocdir is versioned
4) you could remove also "Group: Applications/Engineering" is no more
required
regards
gil
Il 12/10/2015 03:51, Michal Ambroz ha scritto:
Hello,
I would like to unretire the package "valabind" and become the owner
for the orphaned package.
With the current release of valabind 0.9.2 it seems to build nicely
with recent vala version in rawhide
and recent versions of Fedora, so I would like to unretire it.
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814
Spec URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/valabind.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: rebus
Description:
Valabind is a tool to parse vala[1] or vapi files to transform them
into swig[2] interface files, C++, NodeJS-ffi or GIR. With swig, you
can create language bindings for any API written in vala or C with a
vapi interface. It can also generate bindings for C++.
This emails is following the unretiring policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
Best regards
Michal Ambroz
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: notificati...@fedoraproject.org
Komu: re...@seznam.cz
Datum: 12. 10. 2015 0:08:25
Předmět: rebus's scratch build of valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
Task 11410814 on buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: build (noarch)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814
Task 11410817 on buildvm-27.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: buildArch (i386)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410817
logs:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/state.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/root.log
rpms:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/817/11410817/valabind-debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm
srpms:
Task 11410816 on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: buildArch (x86_64)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410816
logs:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/state.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/build.log
rpms:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/valabind-debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/816/11410816/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
srpms:
Task 11410815 on arm02-builder23.arm.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: buildArch (armhfp)
Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410815
logs:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/state.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/root.log
rpms:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc24.armv7hl.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/valabind-debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc24.armv7hl.rpm
srpms:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/815/11410815/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/rebus.id.fedoraproject.org/email/20888
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Policy for unretiring a package
Hello, I would ask, if there an official policy about unretiring an package. The background of my question is, that a package which is maintained by me was retiered due FTBFS issue. Now I was able to fix this issues and want to unretiring it. I have done a google search and found a ticket with the statement, that a review request will been not required when the package was not retired for more then two weeks. But because i'M not sure, I would like to ask for any clarification. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Policy for unretiring a package
Hi, On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: I would ask, if there an official policy about unretiring an package. I have done a google search and found a ticket with the statement, that a review request will been not required when the package was not retired for more then two weeks. The documentation about this sucks, the best I found so far is this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
