Re: [digitalradio] RSID Query

2010-04-10 Thread H Stang
Tony,
Thanks for bringing up this Topic. I knew nothing about RSID. I will start 
researching the topic. 

Your right about end results, no contacts. I keep going thru audio files or 
going to the dummy load to figure out the mode. I just did a quick search on my 
other computer and it appears this is some type of automatic identifier as to 
the mode. I am not sure of the ramifications of the use of RSID but it sounds 
like it might help me out. 

I hear a signal and I think it is DominoEx or Olivia or what ever is being sent 
and I never make the contact or cannot figure out what the mode is. It gets 
frustrating when you get a really strong signal in the evening , and you think 
you can work the operator and ragchew for a while.

Again thanks for the bringing up the topic, this may help me out in identifying 
modes.

Hal
WD4MDA
  - Original Message - 
  From: Tony 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 7:18 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] RSID Query



  All,

  I was just wondering if there's any confusion or misunderstanding among 
  the group about RS-ID? We all know that it's not always easy to identify 
  a mode by sight and sound yet I still see many calling CQ without any 
  mode identification. The end result, no contacts. I'm sure most of the 
  seasoned digital ops know what RS ID is and what it does, so what's the 
  reasoning behind not using it?

  Tony -K2MO

  FLDIGI - Check RX ID / TX ID in upper right corner of program window.
  Click CONFIGURE / IDS to set preferences.

  MULTIPSK - Click RS ID / RX RS ID in main window.
  Click CONFIGURATION / MANAGMENT OF ID's.
  Check CONTINUOUS DETECTION.

  Ham Radio Deluxe / DM780 Version 5

  Open DM780. Click OPTIONS / MODES + IDs / REED SOLOMON TAB.
  Check: ENABLE RSID DETECTION / SHOW IN QSO WINDOW AS HYPERLINK
  SHOW POPUP WINDOW / SHOW RSID BUTTON ON QSO TRANSMIT TOOLBAR



  


--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2801 - Release Date: 04/09/10 
14:32:00


[digitalradio] Solar Powered D-STAR Repeater

2010-04-10 Thread Trevor .
ON4BK's D-STAR repeater ON0CPS is possibly the first to operate entirely on 
solar energy 

ON0CPS operates in the Amateur Radio 70cm band with 439.5625 MHz output and 
431.9625 MHz input. During the day there is usually enough sun to keep the 
repeater going and charge the two 120Ah batteries which power the repeater at 
night. So far the repeater has been running over a month on solar power alone.

Source: Royal Union of Belgian Radio Amateurs (UBA) 
http://tinyurl.com/BelgiumUBA 

ON4BK website http://tinyurl.com/yyajoxx 

73 Trevor M5AKA
Daily Amateur Radio Email/RSS News: http://www.southgatearc.org/
Email Your News To: editor at southgatearc.org
Or Upload Using Form At: http://www.southgatearc.org/news/your_news_1.htm
 



  


[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-04-10 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /RSIDqstNOV09.doc 
  Uploaded by : obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com 
  Description : Nov'09 QST article on RS-ID  

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/RSIDqstNOV09.doc 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com
 





[digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST

2010-04-10 Thread obrienaj


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, H Stang wd4...@... wrote:

 Tony,
 Thanks for bringing up this Topic. I knew nothing about RSID. I will start 
 researching the topic. 



I have added a scan of the QST November 2009 article that i wrote for Steve 
Ford's column, it describes the general intent behind RS ID.  ALso note, there 
is a video of RS-ID in the files section.

Andy K3UK




[digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission protection

2010-04-10 Thread Rick Muething
All,

 

I have been busy with WINMOR but do monitor the group and thought it might
add some balance to put forth some facts and observations.

 

1)   The majority of WL2K users are not 30 day wonder hams on expensive
yachts. Marine mobile users are probably  20% of all registered WL2K users
(about 15,000 total current active users).

2)   Those that are Marine Mobile have (on average) the same radio
skills as the average ham.some much better. Getting digital radio to work at
all on a small sailboat (most MM users are not wealthy and have yachts of
 35 feet) when you are sitting in a plastic boat inside the antenna near
field is a challenge. I have seen and helped set up over 100 such
installations.

3)   Certainly there are a number of operators that fail to listen
first  or don't use the tools and procedures recommended to connect. E.g.
AirMail limits the calling cycle to normally  20 seconds for most stations.
Unfortunately bad operators and procedures exist in ham radio in every mode.

4)   Marinas by and large don't do or sell radio installations (I have
NEVER seen even one).  They sell GAS/Diesel, dockage, supplies, beer and
bait. In fact most marine radio service companies have minimal experience
with ham radios or HF digital modes.

5)   Scanning has been used in the past to improve the utilization of HF
Pactor server stations but can be an issue.  Pactor has some but limited
busy channel detection capability.  WL2K is now looking at and testing
alternatives to the conventional scanning used in Pactor.  The new WINMOR
protocol allows more options and experimentation. 

a.   RMS WINMOR server stations [Beta operation started in January 2010]
operate on ONE frequency which can be changed (on the hour) during the day
(most use 1 - 3  frequencies over a 24 hour day). The frequency list clients
use indicate which frequency is in use on which UTC hour. The client
software (RMS Express) shows users ONLY those frequencies in current use
along with the propagation prediction to the remote server stations.  Users
can refresh their server station list over the air or over the internet if
available.

b.  WINMOR uses an effective channel busy detector to warn users if a
channel appears busy in the bandwidth of interest. The detector isn't
perfect (neither is the human ear!) but it can detect most modes even in
weak conditions (SSB, CW, PSK, Pactor, Olivia, WINMOR etc).

c.   The RMS WINMOR stations (servers) also have a similar DSP based
detector which can block a reply to a connect request. This will prevent for
example answering a connect request over an existing session/QSO not
audible to the station originating the connect request (hidden transmitter
situation). We're still experimenting and refining this but it definitely
helps avoid accidental interference.

 

To summarize: Painting all Winlink users with a broad brush of wealthy
yachties with limited radio skills  is no where near the truth and is an
obvious attempt distort the facts to promote some agenda.  If given the
flexibility to work on and experiment with these digital modes it is
possible to address issues and make progress improving our hobby.  If we try
and legislate every detail we end up generating rules or band plans that
become obsolete quickly.  This discourages experimentation (I still hope
that is part of our hobby.) and progress.  

 

I don't have the time to get into flame wars or extended blogging ..If you
have a legitimate technical question on WINMOR or a question about WL2K I
will try and answer it with accurate facts.

 

73,

 

Rick Muething, KN6KB



Re: [digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST

2010-04-10 Thread H Stang
Thanks Andy

Hal Stang
WD4MDA
Hellschrieber #: FD 2599
wd4...@comcast.net
Jacksonville FL

  - Original Message - 
  From: obrienaj 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 6:44 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST





  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, H Stang wd4...@... wrote:
  
   Tony,
   Thanks for bringing up this Topic. I knew nothing about RSID. I will start 
researching the topic. 
  

  I have added a scan of the QST November 2009 article that i wrote for Steve 
Ford's column, it describes the general intent behind RS ID. ALso note, there 
is a video of RS-ID in the files section.

  Andy K3UK



  


--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2801 - Release Date: 04/09/10 
14:32:00


Re: [digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-04-10 Thread Patrick Lindecker
 Hello Andy,

You wrote a nice article. Congratulations!

Just a remark, the RS ID does not carry the parameters of the mode but just 
contain a number which corresponds to a mode or a sub-mode with its own 
parameters.

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio



 Hello,

 This email message is a notification to let you know that
 a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio
 group.

  File: /RSIDqstNOV09.doc
  Uploaded by : obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com
  Description : Nov'09 QST article on RS-ID

 You can access this file at the URL:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/RSIDqstNOV09.doc

 To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
 http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

 Regards,

 obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com






 

 http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
 Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links




 




Re: [digitalradio] RSID Query

2010-04-10 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Only works with sound card modes?

That a question not a comment.
I really have no clue.




[digitalradio] Re: RSID Query

2010-04-10 Thread obrienaj
works with anything IF the mode uses the code.

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@... wrote:

 Only works with sound card modes?
 
 That a question not a comment.
 I really have no clue.





[digitalradio] WINMOR practices

2010-04-10 Thread k3uk
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Rick Muething rmueth...@cfl.rr.com wrote:


 5)   Scanning has been used in the past to improve the utilization of HF 
 Pactor server stations but can be an issue.  Pactor has some but limited busy 
 channel detection capability.  WL2K is now looking at and testing 
 alternatives to the conventional scanning used in Pactor.  The new WINMOR 
 protocol allows more options and experimentation.

 a.   RMS WINMOR server stations [Beta operation started in January 2010] 
 operate on ONE frequency which can be changed (on the hour) during the day  
 (most use 1 - 3  frequencies over a 24 hour day). The frequency list clients 
 use indicate which frequency is in use on which UTC hour. The client software 
 (RMS Express) shows users ONLY those frequencies in current use along with 
 the propagation prediction to the remote server stations.  Users can refresh 
 their server station list over the air or over the internet if available.

 b.  WINMOR uses an effective channel busy detector to warn users if a 
 channel appears busy in the bandwidth of interest. The detector isn't perfect 
 (neither is the human ear!) but it can detect most modes even in weak 
 conditions (SSB, CW, PSK, Pactor, Olivia, WINMOR etc).

 c.   The RMS WINMOR stations (servers) also have a similar DSP based 
 detector which can block a reply to a connect request. This will prevent for 
 example answering a connect request over an existing session/QSO not 
 audible to the station originating the connect request (hidden transmitter 
 situation). We're still experimenting and refining this but it definitely 
 helps avoid accidental interference.

  

I can attest to the above., especially  the ONE frequency part.  The system 
works well

Andy K3UK
via
HF WINMOR
:)



[digitalradio] Re: WINMOR practices

2010-04-10 Thread obrienaj
and I sent that messages via noisy 30M through Rick's station

Andy K3UK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, k...@... wrote:

 On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Rick Muething rmueth...@... wrote:
 
 
  5)   Scanning has been used in the past to improve the utilization of 
  HF Pactor server stations but can be an issue.  Pactor has some but limited 
  busy channel detection capability.  WL2K is now looking at and testing 
  alternatives to the conventional scanning used in Pactor.  The new WINMOR 
  protocol allows more options and experimentation.
 
  a.   RMS WINMOR server stations [Beta operation started in January 
  2010] operate on ONE frequency which can be changed (on the hour) during 
  the day  (most use 1 - 3  frequencies over a 24 hour day). The frequency 
  list clients use indicate which frequency is in use on which UTC hour. The 
  client software (RMS Express) shows users ONLY those frequencies in current 
  use along with the propagation prediction to the remote server stations.  
  Users can refresh their server station list over the air or over the 
  internet if available.
 
  b.  WINMOR uses an effective channel busy detector to warn users if a 
  channel appears busy in the bandwidth of interest. The detector isn't 
  perfect (neither is the human ear!) but it can detect most modes even in 
  weak conditions (SSB, CW, PSK, Pactor, Olivia, WINMOR etc).
 
  c.   The RMS WINMOR stations (servers) also have a similar DSP based 
  detector which can block a reply to a connect request. This will prevent 
  for example answering a connect request over an existing session/QSO not 
  audible to the station originating the connect request (hidden transmitter 
  situation). We're still experimenting and refining this but it definitely 
  helps avoid accidental interference.
 
   
 
 I can attest to the above., especially  the ONE frequency part.  The system 
 works well
 
 Andy K3UK
 via
 HF WINMOR
 :)





[digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST

2010-04-10 Thread kc4cop
Andy:

I can not find your QST artical on RS-ID searching for RS-ID, RSID, or 
Steve Ford November

Dick Zseltvay, KC4COP

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, H Stang wd4...@... wrote:

 Thanks Andy
 
 Hal Stang
 WD4MDA
 Hellschrieber #: FD 2599
 wd4...@...
 Jacksonville FL
 
   - Original Message - 
   From: obrienaj 
   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 6:44 AM
   Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST
 
 
 
 
 
   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, H Stang wd4mda@ wrote:
   
Tony,
Thanks for bringing up this Topic. I knew nothing about RSID. I will 
 start researching the topic. 
   
 
   I have added a scan of the QST November 2009 article that i wrote for Steve 
 Ford's column, it describes the general intent behind RS ID. ALso note, there 
 is a video of RS-ID in the files section.
 
   Andy K3UK
 
 
 
   
 
 
 --
 
 
 
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
   Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2801 - Release Date: 04/09/10 
 14:32:00





[digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST

2010-04-10 Thread obrienaj

http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/oLzAS3ppyX5PuXDut992Yr1Zt6uLbB-RIF8Wvr-4uQXPzvJFA0KYsaRGcbYbLKfz08OQY9qdBdTS2V8p1Mgw/RSIDqstNOV09.doc

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kc4cop dic...@... wrote:

 Andy:
 
 I can not find your QST artical on RS-ID searching for RS-ID, RSID, or 
 Steve Ford November
 
 Dick Zseltvay, KC4COP
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, H Stang wd4mda@ wrote:
 
  Thanks Andy
  
  Hal Stang
  WD4MDA
  Hellschrieber #: FD 2599
  wd4mda@
  Jacksonville FL
  
- Original Message - 
From: obrienaj 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 6:44 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RSID Query- Nov 09 QST
  
  
  
  
  
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, H Stang wd4mda@ wrote:

 Tony,
 Thanks for bringing up this Topic. I knew nothing about RSID. I will 
  start researching the topic. 

  
I have added a scan of the QST November 2009 article that i wrote for 
  Steve Ford's column, it describes the general intent behind RS ID. ALso 
  note, there is a video of RS-ID in the files section.
  
Andy K3UK
  
  
  

  
  
  --
  
  
  
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2801 - Release Date: 04/09/10 
  14:32:00
 





RE: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission protection

2010-04-10 Thread Dave AA6YQ
Thanks, Rick.

I have suggested in the past that your SCAMP/WINMOR channel busy detector
could be inexpensively back-fit into WinLink PMBOs. Has anyone taken a look
at this?

 73,

 Dave, AA6YQ


-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Muething
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 8:30 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission protection




All,



I have been busy with WINMOR but do monitor the group and thought it might
add some balance to put forth some facts and observations.



1)   The majority of WL2K users are not 30 day wonder hams on expensive
yachts. Marine mobile users are probably  20% of all registered WL2K users
(about 15,000 total current active users).

2)   Those that are Marine Mobile have (on average) the same radio
skills as the average ham.some much better. Getting digital radio to work at
all on a small sailboat (most MM users are not wealthy and have yachts of
 35 feet) when you are sitting in a plastic boat inside the antenna near
field is a challenge. I have seen and helped set up over 100 such
installations.

3)   Certainly there are a number of operators that fail to listen
first  or don't use the tools and procedures recommended to connect. E.g.
AirMail limits the calling cycle to normally  20 seconds for most stations.
Unfortunately bad operators and procedures exist in ham radio in every mode.

4)   Marinas by and large don't do or sell radio installations (I have
NEVER seen even one).  They sell GAS/Diesel, dockage, supplies, beer and
bait. In fact most marine radio service companies have minimal experience
with ham radios or HF digital modes.

5)   Scanning has been used in the past to improve the utilization of HF
Pactor server stations but can be an issue.  Pactor has some but limited
busy channel detection capability.  WL2K is now looking at and testing
alternatives to the conventional scanning used in Pactor.  The new WINMOR
protocol allows more options and experimentation.

a.   RMS WINMOR server stations [Beta operation started in January 2010]
operate on ONE frequency which can be changed (on the hour) during the day
(most use 1 - 3  frequencies over a 24 hour day). The frequency list clients
use indicate which frequency is in use on which UTC hour. The client
software (RMS Express) shows users ONLY those frequencies in current use
along with the propagation prediction to the remote server stations.  Users
can refresh their server station list over the air or over the internet if
available.

b.  WINMOR uses an effective channel busy detector to warn users if a
channel appears busy in the bandwidth of interest. The detector isn't
perfect (neither is the human ear!) but it can detect most modes even in
weak conditions (SSB, CW, PSK, Pactor, Olivia, WINMOR etc).

c.   The RMS WINMOR stations (servers) also have a similar DSP based
detector which can block a reply to a connect request. This will prevent for
example answering a connect request over an existing session/QSO not
audible to the station originating the connect request (hidden transmitter
situation). We're still experimenting and refining this but it definitely
helps avoid accidental interference.



To summarize: Painting all Winlink users with a broad brush of wealthy
yachties with limited radio skills  is no where near the truth and is an
obvious attempt distort the facts to promote some agenda.  If given the
flexibility to work on and experiment with these digital modes it is
possible to address issues and make progress improving our hobby.  If we try
and legislate every detail we end up generating rules or band plans that
become obsolete quickly.  This discourages experimentation (I still hope
that is part of our hobby.) and progress.



I don't have the time to get into flame wars or extended blogging ..If you
have a legitimate technical question on WINMOR or a question about WL2K I
will try and answer it with accurate facts.



73,



Rick Muething, KN6KB





[digitalradio] QRV: 3596, 7102,10145,5, 14109, 18106

2010-04-10 Thread Andy obrien
QRV: 3596, 7102,10145,5, 14109, 18106  ALE 141, happy to change modes
once a link is established.
(no takers when I have tried ALE400)


KB3JAJ: [02:02:28][ 3.5MHz ] De [K3UK]
[02:08:18][FRQ 07102000][SND][TWS] [KI6TCB ][AL0] BER 29 SN 05


Andy K3UK
FN02hk


Re: [digitalradio] RSID Query

2010-04-10 Thread Tony

On 4/10/2010 5:05 AM, H Stang wrote:


*Tony,*
*Thanks for bringing up this Topic. I knew nothing about RSID. I will 
start researching the topic. *


My pleasure Hal. Check out Andy's QST article in the reflectors files 
section and Patrick Lindecker's documentation on RSID:

http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm

**
* I am not sure of the ramifications of the use of RSID but it sounds 
like it might help me out. *


Well, RSID is about 170Hz wide so you wouldn't want to use it within a 
cluster of PSK31 signals. It's unnecessary anyway since PSK31 is easily 
recognized. On the other hand, it may not be easy for some to 
distinguish PSK63F from PSK63 so it best to use it if there's enough 
elbow room. The majority of modes use more spectrum than the 170Hz RSID 
anyway so there's no QRM issue there.


Simply put, RSID is a short duration digital identifier that precedes 
the digital mode signal so others can detect which mode is in use. It's 
not unusual to detect the RSID without actually hearing the mode itself 
so it is highly sensitive.


*I hear a signal and I think it is DominoEx or Olivia or what ever is 
being sent and I never make the contact or cannot figure out what the 
mode is. It gets frustrating when you get a really strong signal in 
the evening , and you think you can work the operator and ragchew for 
a while.*


We've all been there Hal. I'm sure you remember the early days, there 
were only a few sound card modes to choose from; now there are more than 
we can count, let alone identify by ear ;   ). That's where RSID comes in.


Tony -K2MO



- Original Message -
*From:* Tony mailto:d...@optonline.net
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, April 09, 2010 7:18 PM
*Subject:* [digitalradio] RSID Query

All,

I was just wondering if there's any confusion or misunderstanding
among
the group about RS-ID? We all know that it's not always easy to
identify
a mode by sight and sound yet I still see many calling CQ without any
mode identification. The end result, no contacts. I'm sure most of
the
seasoned digital ops know what RS ID is and what it does, so
what's the
reasoning behind not using it?

Tony -K2MO

FLDIGI - Check RX ID / TX ID in upper right corner of program window.
Click CONFIGURE / IDS to set preferences.

MULTIPSK - Click RS ID / RX RS ID in main window.
Click CONFIGURATION / MANAGMENT OF ID's.
Check CONTINUOUS DETECTION.

Ham Radio Deluxe / DM780 Version 5

Open DM780. Click OPTIONS / MODES + IDs / REED SOLOMON TAB.
Check: ENABLE RSID DETECTION / SHOW IN QSO WINDOW AS HYPERLINK
SHOW POPUP WINDOW / SHOW RSID BUTTON ON QSO TRANSMIT TOOLBAR



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2801 - Release Date:
04/09/10 14:32:00




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 5014 (20100409) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com