[digitalradio] Re: CALL ID via PSKReporter

2010-05-14 Thread Andy obrien
The raw Multipsk version of this is listed as


01:26:36 CQ KA1GMN-EM12KU  + 1  1297 Hz 10.133220 MHz
23:44:35 CQ N9DSJ-EN52TI-9  1405 Hz 14.072000 MHz
23:54:11N9DSJ-EN52TI   -20  1986 Hz 14.072000 MHz
00:09:03N9DSJ-EN52TI   -11  279 Hz 14.072000 MHz
01:30:43 CQ K7LRB  + 3  1017 Hz 14.072000 MHz
01:33:39 CQ WB0ZYU -20  2051 Hz 14.072000 MHz
01:35:46 CQ K2MO-FN30GM-20  1012 Hz 14.072000 MHz
20 W  13 dBi   W 14.072000 MHz
01:36:34 CQ K2MO-FN30GM-20  3612 Hz 14.072000 MHz
20 W  13 dBi   W 14.072000 MHz
03:38:07 CQ AK4B   -11  3520 Hz 14.072000 MHz
03:39:06 CQ AK4B   -12  3666 Hz 14.072000 MHz


On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
 While I play around with ways to automatically upload my CALL_ID.txt
 file in Multipsk to my web site,  I should mention that PSKreporter
 already has a feature that does much of what I am trying to do.  See
 that attached screenshot that shows call ID's that I received.  PSK
 Reporter can be configured to have it show Call IDs received by
 multiple callsigns.  It is not as instant as I would like,  PSK
 Reporter updates every 2-3 minutes, I think.  Not bad though.

 A reminder, my interest in this subject matter is based on a desire to
 see RS ID and Call ID capabilities for the basis of some rough
 equivalent of a CW Skimmer , but for digital modes.

 Andy K3UK



Re: [digitalradio] Re: CALL ID via PSKReporter

2010-05-14 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello to all,

The Multipsk version to use for Call ID must be either the 4.16 or the 4.17 but 
not inferior because, i changed some specifications and added some 
possibilities (Prop ID, Text ID inside the generic Call ID system...). It's now 
stable but not completly compatible with the first Call ID versions (i.e in 
Multipsk=4.15).

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; wn...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:27 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: CALL ID via PSKReporter


The raw Multipsk version of this is listed as


01:26:36 CQ KA1GMN-EM12KU  + 1  1297 Hz 10.133220 MHz
23:44:35 CQ N9DSJ-EN52TI-9  1405 Hz 14.072000 MHz
23:54:11N9DSJ-EN52TI   -20  1986 Hz 14.072000 MHz
00:09:03N9DSJ-EN52TI   -11  279 Hz 14.072000 MHz
01:30:43 CQ K7LRB  + 3  1017 Hz 14.072000 MHz
01:33:39 CQ WB0ZYU -20  2051 Hz 14.072000 MHz
01:35:46 CQ K2MO-FN30GM-20  1012 Hz 14.072000 MHz
20 W  13 dBi   W 14.072000 MHz
01:36:34 CQ K2MO-FN30GM-20  3612 Hz 14.072000 MHz
20 W  13 dBi   W 14.072000 MHz
03:38:07 CQ AK4B   -11  3520 Hz 14.072000 MHz
03:39:06 CQ AK4B   -12  3666 Hz 14.072000 MHz


On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
 While I play around with ways to automatically upload my CALL_ID.txt
 file in Multipsk to my web site, I should mention that PSKreporter
 already has a feature that does much of what I am trying to do. See
 that attached screenshot that shows call ID's that I received. PSK
 Reporter can be configured to have it show Call IDs received by
 multiple callsigns. It is not as instant as I would like, PSK
 Reporter updates every 2-3 minutes, I think. Not bad though.

 A reminder, my interest in this subject matter is based on a desire to
 see RS ID and Call ID capabilities for the basis of some rough
 equivalent of a CW Skimmer , but for digital modes.

 Andy K3UK





http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links





[digitalradio] Re: Network 105 / Multipsk

2010-05-14 Thread sholtofish
Tony,

It would be interesting to experiment with packet over nvis paths too. The 
higher signal to noise ratio typical with nvis would really speed throughput. 
Maybe you could devise a simulation of this Tony?

Another idea which keeps nagging at me is using SCS's Robust Packet with their 
fairly cheap kiss Tracker TNC. Robust packet looks like it either works at 200 
or 600 baud with a fairly narrow bandwidth.

I can imagine, should the 300 baud limit be abolished (FCC please!) then an 
nvis network of 600 baud Robust Packet (either SCS or a sound card version) 
coupled with the flexibility and features of John's BPQ node software might 
prove an excellent emcom facility.

Even plain old FSK HF packet is dramatically enhanced by the parallel decoders 
working in the SCS Tracker.

73

Sholto




--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony d...@... wrote:

 Patrick,
 
 Sholto is the one who twisted my arm to revisit HF Packet. Net 105 is 
 a remarkable network and one can only imagine how many messages have 
 been processed since the 1980s'; all on a shared channel with a 
 relatively narrow mode.
 
 I've used the network to connect to Sholto when there is no propagation 
 between us. I can log into his packet mailbox and leave him a message 
 thanks to magic of digipeating.
 
 Your program does a wonderful job on HF packet.
 
 Tony -K2MO
 




Re: [digitalradio] Re: Network 105 / Multipsk

2010-05-14 Thread Tony

On 5/14/2010 4:50 PM, sholtofish wrote:


Tony, It would be interesting to experiment with packet over nvis 
paths too. The higher signal to noise ratio typical with nvis would 
really speed throughput. Maybe you could devise a simulation




It would be interesting Sholto. In addition to high signal-to-noise 
ratios, NVIS propagation appears to be relatively stable. The path 
simulator indicated that the mode is especially sensitive to channel 
distortion so I would expect throughput issues if the ionosphere became 
somewhat agitated, regardless of how strong the signals where.


PathSim's NVIS simulation tries to emulate a situation where ground 
waves interfere with NVIS sky waves. The delay between the two signals 
can destroy throughput so this is something to consider if the other guy 
is close enough to hear via ground wave.


Another idea which keeps nagging at me is using SCS's Robust Packet 
with their fairly cheap kiss Tracker TNC. Robust packet looks like it 
either works at 200 or 600 baud with a fairly narrow bandwidth.




Only one way to find out Sholto - I'll take a look at the price.

Tony -K2MO




--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Tony d...@... wrote:


 Patrick,

 Sholto is the one who twisted my arm to revisit HF Packet. Net 105 is
 a remarkable network and one can only imagine how many messages have
 been processed since the 1980s'; all on a shared channel with a
 relatively narrow mode.

 I've used the network to connect to Sholto when there is no propagation
 between us. I can log into his packet mailbox and leave him a message
 thanks to magic of digipeating.

 Your program does a wonderful job on HF packet.

 Tony -K2MO





__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 5113 (20100513) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com