Tony,
Thus there is no thruput advantage compared to modes wich use less bandwidth.
(and not even between the two baud rates in ROS)
So: ROS 2250Hz mode is too wide for the crowded bands we already have. Or:
operating ROS is contradictory to common HAM radio operating practice. Or: ROS
is like driving a SUV in the inner city of Amsterdam.
Therefor: three hard coded calling frequencies [on the 20m band] for a too
wide mode (compared to current common modes) is pushing band capacity to, or
even over the limit.
So those who still think ROS is a nice mode to experiment with are blind for
the facts about ROS from a mere technical perspective. So not even talking
about the social aspects of the development of ROS and it's developer, that
also contradicts common operating practice as has been shown in this group.
But I am repeating myself... ;-)
Marc, PD4U
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony d...@... wrote:
On 8/5/2010 12:32 PM, pd4u_dares wrote:
While the mode performs well over HF, the additional bandwidth
doesn't
appear to have any throughput advantage over other modes that use
less
spectrum. In fact, path simulations indicate that there is no
difference
in throughput between ROS 500/16 and ROS 2250/16.
SIC Marc, PD4U
Mark,
Comments?
Tony
