Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Yes Dave, Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner (20MB file limit) here http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/ It runs the submitted file through 19 different scanners, with the occasional false-positive on one or two. Results of the scans are shared with the anti-virus companies. The site generates a permalink for each file that allows you to distribute the scanning results to whomever. Just ran the 3 executables through the site Cluster.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/7142b3c4c3e3076d5f55aa826a272678a67d1cbb PSKReporter.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/b8e275b738f1634bcc24fa081b1a83eb27e1289c ROS v4.8.4 Beta.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/e6e6238fb976a46d4db4dae564d59c5f2757ab73 de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 1:29 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: Has anyone checked to see whether the ROS code contains a keylogger, trojans, or a rootkit? 73, Dave, AA6YQ
AW: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
@rein Function can be switched off (now) .. So why worry about? But all user have to switch it off cause after installing it is set to on . Greetz Sigi Dg9bfc
RE: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Thanks, Laurie. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Laurie, VK3AMA Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:08 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster Yes Dave, Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner (20MB file limit) here http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/ It runs the submitted file through 19 different scanners, with the occasional false-positive on one or two. Results of the scans are shared with the anti-virus companies. The site generates a permalink for each file that allows you to distribute the scanning results to whomever. Just ran the 3 executables through the site Cluster.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/7142b3c4c3e3076d5f55aa826a272678a67d1cbb PSKReporter.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/b8e275b738f1634bcc24fa081b1a83eb27e1289c ROS v4.8.4 Beta.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/e6e6238fb976a46d4db4dae564d59c5f2757ab73 de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 1:29 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: Has anyone checked to see whether the ROS code contains a keylogger, trojans, or a rootkit? 73, Dave, AA6YQ
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Laurie, Then why don't they filter it at the cluster? Makes more sence, if you ask me. Cheerio! Kr. Bonne. Op 25-07-10 04:01, Laurie, VK3AMA schreef: Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster. de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote: After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in heck anyone is even using it. What are the chances of giving it a rest? 73 Buddy WB4M http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit) Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 Yahoo! Groups Links http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit) Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 Yahoo! Groups Links attachment: kristoff_bonne.vcf
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Hi Laurie Great link! Thanks :) La5vna Steinar On 25.07.2010 09:07, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote: Yes Dave, Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner (20MB file limit) here http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/ It runs the submitted file through 19 different scanners, with the occasional false-positive on one or two. Results of the scans are shared with the anti-virus companies. The site generates a permalink for each file that allows you to distribute the scanning results to whomever. Just ran the 3 executables through the site Cluster.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/7142b3c4c3e3076d5f55aa826a272678a67d1cbb PSKReporter.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/b8e275b738f1634bcc24fa081b1a83eb27e1289c ROS v4.8.4 Beta.exe http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/e6e6238fb976a46d4db4dae564d59c5f2757ab73 de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 1:29 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: Has anyone checked to see whether the ROS code contains a keylogger, trojans, or a rootkit? 73, Dave, AA6YQ
AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Glad i could help Iif you do NOT use cat the autogenerated spots on 20m are sent as 14000 . so not correct But when sending by hand qrg is correct I asked jose if he can solve that . that a user without can do not send wrong qrg . maybe he will find a solution for that As we have now the autoreport to pskreporter we do not need the autospots anymore (but jose thinks it is still needed) So every user should switch that off and spot only by hand Greetz sigi
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Hi Sigi, Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots, the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User. Jose, clearly doesn't understand the Ham/Cluster culture. Maybe we can change his attitude by passing on these concerns to his Beta-Tester who might be better placed to change his mind. I know who the Beta-Tester is, email me privately and I will pass on the info (no it is not me, Hi) de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 5:50 AM, Siegfried Jackstien wrote: As we have now the autoreport to pskreporter we do not need the autospots anymore (but jose thinks it is still needed)
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Lauri, Why is it, that only a handful of amateurs seem to be concerned about this? If people said we do not use the program until this is fixed, I am sure it would get fixed in an hurry. 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- From: Laurie, VK3AMA group...@vkdxer.com Sent: Jul 24, 2010 6:44 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster Hi Sigi, Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots, the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User. Jose, clearly doesn't understand the Ham/Cluster culture. Maybe we can change his attitude by passing on these concerns to his Beta-Tester who might be better placed to change his mind. I know who the Beta-Tester is, email me privately and I will pass on the info (no it is not me, Hi) de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 5:50 AM, Siegfried Jackstien wrote: As we have now the autoreport to pskreporter we do not need the autospots anymore (but jose thinks it is still needed) http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit) Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots, the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User. To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of any auto-spots came up. Isn't there any honesty at all possible with this author! :-( This wholesale abuse of ham radio traditions and spamming clusters, etc. by this author, is just not acceptable, and to my knowledge has never been done before. 73, Skip KH6TY
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots, the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User. To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of any auto-spots came up. Isn't there any honesty at all possible with this author! :-( This wholesale abuse of ham radio traditions and spamming clusters, etc. by this author, is just not acceptable, and to my knowledge has never been done before. 73, Skip KH6TY After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in heck anyone is even using it. What are the chances of giving it a rest? 73 Buddy WB4M
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster. de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote: After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in heck anyone is even using it. What are the chances of giving it a rest? 73 Buddy WB4M http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit) Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster. de Laurie, VK3AMA On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote: After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in heck anyone is even using it. What are the chances of giving it a rest? 73 Buddy WB4M http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit) Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 Yahoo! Groups Links
RE: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Has anyone checked to see whether the ROS code contains a keylogger, trojans, or a rootkit? 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:37 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots, the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User. To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of any auto-spots came up. Isn't there any honesty at all possible with this author! :-( This wholesale abuse of ham radio traditions and spamming clusters, etc. by this author, is just not acceptable, and to my knowledge has never been done before. 73, Skip KH6TY
