Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not working

2018-11-23 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss

On 23/11/18 4:01 pm, Dpto Ciberseguridad via dmarc-discuss wrote:


"v=DMARC1;p=reject;ruc=mailto:dmarc@x;

It worked fine till last month when testing emails, we saw it was not 
rejecting unauthorized emails.


Note that setting p=reject does not mean that receivers will reject 
messages from the domain that don't meet DMARC rules, it only means that 
you're requesting that receivers do so. Reasons for not doing so include:


 * Not believing that the domain registrant is competent (e.g. because
   you've published an invalid record)
 * Not believing that all non-complying messages are invalid, perhaps
   on the basis of local information.
 * Deciding to accept-and-discard instead of reject in order to avoid a
   specific failure mode with mailing lists and rejections.

Per Steven's comment, if you've not been studying (indeed, receiving) 
aggregate reports, there is a good chance that receivers can see 
legitimate email that you're unaware of and are therefore ignoring your 
request.


- Roland
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not working

2018-11-23 Thread Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss

On 11/23/2018 00:01, Dpto Ciberseguridad via dmarc-discuss wrote:

Hello,

Last year we configured DMARC registry for another company with 
something like this


"v=DMARC1;p=reject;ruc=mailto:dmarc@x;

It worked fine till last month when testing emails, we saw it was not 
rejecting unauthorized emails.


"ruc" is not a valid tag in a DMARC policy record. Did you mean "rua" ?


Looking for information in Internet, some DMARC testers did not pass 
ruc syntaxis so we only changed ruc to ruf; but the problem is still 
present.


"rua" and "ruf" only determine where reports are sent, provided the 
receiver sends the corresponding type of report. They do not normally 
have anything to do with enforcement, unless perhaps a receiver decides 
that the record is invalid and therefore ignores it completely. But you 
say receivers were rejecting invalid messages previously...


If you weren't receiving aggregate reports ("rua"), how certain are you 
that the invalid messages were rejected due to your DMARC policy?


--S.

___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)


[dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not working

2018-11-23 Thread Dpto Ciberseguridad via dmarc-discuss

Hello,

Last year we configured DMARC registry for another company with 
something like this


"v=DMARC1;p=reject;ruc=mailto:dmarc@x;

It worked fine till last month when testing emails, we saw it was not 
rejecting unauthorized emails.


Looking for information in Internet, some DMARC testers did not pass ruc 
syntaxis so we only changed ruc to ruf; but the problem is still present.


Any idea?


Many thanks

___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)