Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 performance, Windows 10 vs Mint, big different

2019-06-23 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hello, 

I have tried to enable LargeSystemCache on Windows 10, no effect.

With or without LargeSystemCache, the second query run on Windows 10 was about 
33% faster than the first run, I guest File Cached did work although still saw 
disk activity.

But even the second query runs, it was still about 20% slower than Linux Mint.

I will avoid Windows and use Linux for firebird if it is possible.

Regards,
Anto.

Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 performance, Windows 10 vs Mint, big different

2019-06-23 Thread Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]

Hello,


Don't know, if this means file cached work or not.


It works.

I recommend to do several experiments with different Pafe buffers and 
FileSystemCacheThreshold values (Buffers > FileSystemCacheThreshold , 
Buffers < FileSystemCacheThreshold ), and check RAMMap. Try to do it 
with and without restart of  the computer.




If file cached worked, then there is something else that make Firebird 
runs slower on Windows 10.




Windows 10 is a desktop OS, and it demonstrates slowness in so many 
cases, caused by so many reasons, so I would not use it as a server, 
until there is no other choice.
I personally experienced slowness on one of my own desktops, and perfect 
performance on the another one. Better just stay out from this lottery.


Try to make experiments with Windows Server, it will make more sense.

Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon




Anto






Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 performance, Windows 10 vs Mint, big different

2019-06-23 Thread Helen Borrie hele...@tpg.com.au [firebird-support]
Anto wrote:

> Thanks for your info.

> Downloaded ver 1.52, now it worked.

> On Process tab of RAMMap, firebird.exe took 2,183,484K.
> On File details tab, database file took 2,603,168K.

> Don't know, if this means file cached work or not.

> If file cached  worked, then there is something else that make
> Firebird runs slower on Windows 10.

It is worth reading this:
http://dyemanov.blogspot.com/2012/03/firebird-vs-windows-file-system-caching.html

Helen


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com



Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 performance, Windows 10 vs Mint, big different

2019-06-22 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Thanks for your info.

Downloaded ver 1.52, now it worked.

On Process tab of RAMMap, firebird.exe took 2,183,484K.
On File details tab, database file took 2,603,168K.

Don't know, if this means file cached work or not.

If file cached worked, then there is something else that make Firebird runs 
slower on Windows 10.

Anto

Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 performance, Windows 10 vs Mint, big different

2019-06-22 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Thanks for the info.

I downloaded ver 1.52, now it works.

As I expected, on Windows 10, File System Cached doesn't work.

Discussion continue here, as it is a related topic
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/firebird-support/conversations/messages/134237
 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/firebird-support/conversations/messages/134237

Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 performance, Windows 10 vs Mint, big different

2019-06-22 Thread 'Carlos H. Cantu' lis...@warmboot.com.br [firebird-support]
RAMMap 1.51 works fine with Windows 10.

Carlos
Migration Guide to Firebird 3
http://www.firebirdnews.org/migration-guide-to-firebird-3/

tycfs> Hi guys,

tycfs> I compared firebird 3 SS performance in windows 10 pro 64 vs
tycfs> Linux mint 19.1 cinnamon 64 bit.

tycfs> Both OS use the same database configurations & almost the same
tycfs> speed ssd. Windows use a bit faster ssd.

tycfs> On windows 10, I have turn off everything than can be turn
tycfs> off, such as bloat ware, unnecessary services, background applications, 
etc.

tycfs> Database page buffer set to 131072, and page size set to
tycfs> 16384. Both OS have 16GB RAM. File cached threshold, set to 384000.

tycfs> Run query a few times via flamerobin, the results were,
tycfs> Firebird run faster on Mint, at least 20% faster,  that was a big 
different.

tycfs> Don't know why on windows the performance was bad. Perhaps on
tycfs> windows 10, file cached didn't work, cause I saw the disk kept spinning 
while query ran.
tycfs> This is strange, on Windows 7, with the same database
tycfs> configuration, firebird took about 5GB RAM, which means that file cached 
work fine.

tycfs> Couldn't inspect actual RAM usage on windows 10 cause RAMMap doesn't 
work.



tycfs> 
tycfs> Posted by: trsk...@yahoo.com
tycfs> 

tycfs> ++

tycfs> Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Documentation item
tycfs> on the main (top) menu.  Try FAQ and other links from the left-side menu 
there.

tycfs> Also search the knowledgebases at
tycfs> http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/ 

tycfs> ++
tycfs> 

tycfs> Yahoo Groups Links