[Bug 279174] POLA violation: Graphical Installer for a natively text UI OS

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279174

Bug ID: 279174
   Summary: POLA violation: Graphical Installer for a natively
text UI OS
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Some People
  Priority: ---
 Component: misc
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: concussious.bugzi...@runbox.com

"The new installer is expected to increase the attractiveness of the system for
users who are accustomed to graphical installers and perceive text interfaces
as outdated."

FreeBSD has an exceptionally consistent, elegant, and efficient entirely text
based interface which comprises the base system. People will be astonished
after a graphical bootloader then graphical installer drops them into a text
interface after installing the system.

To be clear, this is amazing work and I hope all of our graphical downstreams
are collaborating and using it. But, there's not a lot of spaces left for
people who need a moderm advanced operating system, not a toy, and prefer TUI.
This has always been one of those spaces.

Thanks everyone, and sorry to speak up in a critical way.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Problem reports for b...@freebsd.org that need special attention

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use:
  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).

The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases.

Status  |Bug Id | Description
+---+---
New |252123 | fetch(3): Fix wrong usage of proxy when request i 
New |262764 | After DVD1 13.0-R install with ports tree, portsn 
New |262989 | sys/conf/files, sys/conf/options, sys/conf/NOTES: 
New |269994 | build options have different kernel and userland  
New |276571 | makefs(8) creates broken UFS images with sectorsi 
Open| 46441 | sh(1): Does not support PS1, PS2, PS4 parameter e 
Open|177821 | sysctl: Some security.jail nodes are funky, dupli 
Open|220246 | syslogd does not send RFC3164-conformant messages 
Open|250309 | devmatch: panic: general protection fault: sysctl 
Open|255130 | Issue with rtsx driver
Open|256952 | kqueue(2): Improve epoll Linux compatibility (com 
Open|257149 | CFLAGS not passed to whole build  
Open|257646 | opensm: rc service is installed by default, but o 
Open|258665 | lib/libfetch: Add Happy Eyeballs (RFC8305) suppor 
Open|259292 | vmware/pvscsi: UNMAP fails on VMWare 6.7 thinly p 
Open|259636 | multiple components: Change "Take Affect" to "Tak 
Open|259655 | periodic: security/security.functions does not re 
Open|259703 | In sys/dev/pci/pci.c, error in do_power_nodriver  
Open|259808 | etc/periodic/daily/100.clean-disks: Fix error (Di 
Open|260214 | acpi_battery: Should provide current/max battery  
Open|260245 | swap/vm: Apparent memory leak: 100% swap usage
Open|261640 | sysctl: Add -F option to display sysctl format st 
Open|261641 | drm-kmod: Launch message is written into (possibl 
Open|261771 | nvme(4): Reports errors every 5 minutes: PRP OFFS 
Open|261971 | kernel crash launching bhyve guest on ZFS: #15 bu 
Open|262157 | su+j: Crashes during mmc(4) fsck after timeout: E 
Open|262192 | Crashes at boot with kern.random.initial_seeding. 
Open|264028 | loader: Incorrect (32gb) memory reported by BTX l 
Open|264075 | freebsd-update in 13.1-RELEASE detects an install 
Open|264188 | kinit(1): Ignores KRB5CCNAME environment variable 
Open|264226 | setting kern.vty=sc causes hang during UEFI boot  
Open|264757 | fetch: Show correct port number in -vv output 
Open|264833 | 12.3-STABLE panic on sync and reboot: panic: slee 
Open|266419 | mrsas: Corrupts memory (crashes) when reading dat 

34 problems total for which you should take action.


[Bug 134767] [sound] [snd_hda] [regression] Sigmatel STAC9205X no sound under RELENG_7_2_0_RELEASE

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134767

Christos Margiolis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |Unable to Reproduce
 Status|Open|Closed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 134767] [sound] [snd_hda] [regression] Sigmatel STAC9205X no sound under RELENG_7_2_0_RELEASE

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134767

--- Comment #11 from Lars Hecking  ---
It is definitely no longer relevant to me. I don't have that machine anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279170] /etc/termcap.db -> /usr/share/misc/termcap.db missing?

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279170

Bug ID: 279170
   Summary: /etc/termcap.db -> /usr/share/misc/termcap.db missing?
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: misc
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: ja...@catflap.org

I was looking at a ktrace dump file recently (/bin/ls) and noticed that
during initialisation, it attempted to read /etc/termcap.db - as that
failed, it then read the text version pointed to by /etc/termcap

Adding a link: /etc/termcap.db -> /usr/share/misc/termcap.db

caused subsequent runs to use the termcap.db version.

Is there any reason why /etc/termcap is linked, whilst /etc/termcap.db
isn't? And if so, what's the purpose of /usr/share/misc/termcap.db ?

Cheers, Jamie

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279154] loader.efi shows wrong kernel name, but boots correct kernel

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279154

Bug ID: 279154
   Summary: loader.efi shows wrong kernel name, but boots correct
kernel
   Product: Base System
   Version: Unspecified
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: free...@kumba.dev

NOTE: This is with FreeBSD 14.1-BETA2

I am not 100% on this yet, but I think I am seeing a bit of a visual bug in
loader.efi.  On an Intel NUC8i5BEH, I build and use a custom kernel that is
installed to /boot/kernel.custom.

In /boot, I create two symlinks:
  - "GENERIC" which points at /boot/kernel
  - "CUSTOM" which points at /boot/kernel.custom

In /boot/loader.conf, I set these three variables:
> kernels="CUSTOM GENERIC"
> kernel="CUSTOM"
> bootfile="/boot/kernel.custom/kernel"

Under 14.0-RELEASE, the boot menu would show for Item #6, this text:
> 6. Kernel: default/CUSTOM (X of Y)

But under 14.1-BETA2, I see this:
> 6. Kernel: default/GENERIC (X of Y)

Which shouldn't happen, because the default kernel is the first element in the
'kernels' variable.  However, despite what the menu shows, the correct kernel,
pointed at by "CUSTOM", is what is booted (likely because of the setting of the
'kernel' variable or the bootfile variable).

So I think this could be just a visual bug, but I am not 100% certain at the
moment.  I haven't updated a system using the classic BIOS loader yet to see if
it's got the same bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279152] panic: VERIFY3(NULL == dmu_buf_set_user(l->l_dbuf, >l_dbu)) failed (0x == 0xfffff808149f9800x)

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279152

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||crash

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 279152] panic: VERIFY3(NULL == dmu_buf_set_user(l->l_dbuf, >l_dbu)) failed (0x == 0xfffff808149f9800x)

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279152

Bug ID: 279152
   Summary: panic: VERIFY3(NULL == dmu_buf_set_user(l->l_dbuf,
>l_dbu)) failed (0x == 0xf808149f9800x)
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: p...@freebsd.org

cpuid = 1
time = 1716101420
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe0170b555f0
vpanic() at vpanic+0x13f/frame 0xfe0170b55720
spl_panic() at spl_panic+0x3a/frame 0xfe0170b55780
zap_expand_leaf() at zap_expand_leaf+0x8b7/frame 0xfe0170b55810
fzap_add_cd() at fzap_add_cd+0x1a3/frame 0xfe0170b558b0
fzap_add() at fzap_add+0x88/frame 0xfe0170b558d0
zap_add_impl() at zap_add_impl+0x291/frame 0xfe0170b55950
zap_add() at zap_add+0x70/frame 0xfe0170b559a0
zfs_link_create() at zfs_link_create+0x153/frame 0xfe0170b55af0
zfs_link() at zfs_link+0x37f/frame 0xfe0170b55b60
VOP_LINK_APV() at VOP_LINK_APV+0x86/frame 0xfe0170b55b90
kern_linkat_vp() at kern_linkat_vp+0x33c/frame 0xfe0170b55cc0
kern_linkat() at kern_linkat+0x17b/frame 0xfe0170b55de0
sys_link() at sys_link+0x28/frame 0xfe0170b55e00
amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x158/frame 0xfe0170b55f30
fast_syscall_common() at fast_syscall_common+0xf8/frame 0xfe0170b55f30
--- syscall (9, FreeBSD ELF64, link), rip = 0x19021dc7251a, rsp =
0x19021ac60538, rbp = 0x19021ac60670 ---

How to reproduce:
root@mercat1:~ # cd /usr/src/tools/test/stress2/misc
root@mercat1:/usr/src/tools/test/stress2/misc # ./all.sh -al5 zfs3.sh

Console log:
https://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/log0525.txt

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.