Re: hal daemon, and most a/v apps core dump after upgrade to 6.2

2007-05-14 Thread Duane Whitty
On Sunday, 13 May 2007 at 22:42:17 -0500, Lane wrote:
 I just upgraded to FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE, after running 5.3 for years.
 
 My primary reason for upgrading was to take advantage of new features in xine 
 and mplayer, and to get flash functionality out 
 of /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin?
 
 Maybe I shoulda waited?
 
 Now I get Segmentation fault (core dumped) when I try to run xine, vlc, or 
 mplayer.  Funny thing, though, is that kmplayer (from KDE 3.5.6) works.  Only 
 when kmplayer starts up it immediately runs mplayer in a second window (not 
 the kmplayer window) and it runs fine!  When I close kmplayer, mplayer 
 closes, too (uh ... duh!).  However, I used to be able to use kmplayer's 
 ability to capture an mms:// stream via a web page, and that is now gone.
 
 I'm not sure if it is relevant, but hald also crashes with Segmentation 
 fault 
 (core dumped) when I run it (on boot or manually) 
 from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald
 
 Another thing I see is that artsd consumes 90-98% CPU (on dual-core system), 
 yet kde thinks it can't start the sound system (even though sound works from 
 audio cd's and videos played via kmplayer).  KDE tries repeatedly to start 
 the sound system, and launches a new artsd process for each try  
 
 I recognize that this is mosly KDE stuff, and much of these rely 
 upon /usr/ports/devel/ffmpeg (rather than /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg), but 
 it only started after upgrading to 6.2-STABLE, so I thought I'd try here 
 first, to see if anyone has similar experience and any pointers.  There are 
 no relevant bugs at bugs.freebsd.org, or at bugs.kde.org ... so I'm kinda 
 fishin', I guess :)
 
 Clearly this is not critical, nor am I suffering from significantly reduced 
 functionality.  But if anyone is of a mind to point me in the right 
 direction, I'd be much obliged.
 
 lane

Did you upgrade your ports yet?  You will need to but I would probably wait 
until
after XOrg 7.2 is brought into the tree.

Duane
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[patch] Xorg 7.2 - graphics/mesa-demos broken for non-NVIDIA

2007-05-14 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
I appear to be stuck with blindness, I don't find where to submit patches for
the new ports-tree.

There are actually 2 mistakes in the port:
-DWITH_NVIDIA_GL=0
triggers
#ifdef WITH_NVIDIA_GL

and the patchfile that introduces the NVIDIA preprocessor macro contains #elif
where it should be #else.
diff -Pur graphics/mesa-demos.orig/Makefile graphics/mesa-demos/Makefile
--- graphics/mesa-demos.orig/Makefile   Mon May 14 08:08:47 2007
+++ graphics/mesa-demos/MakefileMon May 14 08:10:43 2007
@@ -97,8 +97,6 @@
 
 .if defined(WITH_NVIDIA_GL)
 CFLAGS+=   -DWITH_NVIDIA_GL=1
-.else
-CFLAGS+=   -DWITH_NVIDIA_GL=0
 .endif
 
 .include bsd.port.post.mk
diff -Pur graphics/mesa-demos.orig/files/patch-progs-xdemos-yuvrect_client.c 
graphics/mesa-demos/files/patch-progs-xdemos-yuvrect_client.c
--- graphics/mesa-demos.orig/files/patch-progs-xdemos-yuvrect_client.c  Mon May 
14 08:08:47 2007
+++ graphics/mesa-demos/files/patch-progs-xdemos-yuvrect_client.c   Mon May 
14 08:09:29 2007
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 -   glx_memory = glXAllocateMemoryMESA(dpy, screen, ImgWidth * ImgHeight * 2, 
0, 0 ,0);
 +   #ifdef WITH_NVIDIA_GL
 +  glx_memory = glXAllocateMemoryNV(ImgWidth * ImgHeight * 2, 0, 0 ,0);
-+   #elif
++   #else
 +  glx_memory = glXAllocateMemoryMESA(dpy, screen, ImgWidth * ImgHeight * 
2, 0, 0 ,0);
 +   #endif
 if (!glx_memory)
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 -   glXFreeMemoryMESA(dpy, DefaultScreen(dpy), glx_memory);
 +   #ifdef WITH_NVIDIA_GL
 +  glXFreeMemoryNV(glx_memory);
-+   #elif
++   #else
 +  glXFreeMemoryMESA(dpy, DefaultScreen(dpy), glx_memory);
 +   #endif
 glXDestroyContext(dpy, ctx);
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Peter Jeremy
Some good news and some bad news:

Good news:

Upgrade seems OK on my 6.2-STABLE/amd64 system butI needed multiple
portupgrade -a iterations before it upgraded everything.  I think
this is a side-effect of using ports-mgmt/portupgrade rather than
ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel.

Note that you _must_ rebuild xorg.conf because the xorg modules are
in a different relative location so the /usr/X11R6 symlink isn't enuf.


Bad news:

My very-out-of-date -current system has gotten into a confused state.
Possibly I didn't help by forgetting to disable my automatic port
INDEX build so that INDEX reverted to the /usr/ports one partway thru.
I fixed that and aborted the portupgrade when I noticed but that
was quite sometime later.

I've been trying to recover using pkgdb -F but that has reached a
state where it's reporting:
Stale dependency: ffmpeg-0.4.9.p1_7 - libGL-6.5.3_1 (graphics/libGL):
The libGL build works but then reports that it conflicts with 
xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1.  The latter is still installed in /usr/X11R6
but graphics/libGL/Makefile also reports that it uses X11BASE.

Has anyone got any suggestions before I start editing the CONFLICTS lines?

-- 
Peter Jeremy


pgpSFStCoUY53.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

2007-05-14 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
 If you follow the thread, there's already some success in reducing the
 time
 required to register ports with many dependencies. On my system
 registering
 x11/xorg now takes between 2 to 3 minutes instead of 10, with all the
 changes.
 I consider that a remarkable improvement.

Absolutely a worthy improvement - by all means lets test it



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

2007-05-14 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
 If you follow the thread, there's already some success in reducing the
 time
 required to register ports with many dependencies. On my system
 registering
 x11/xorg now takes between 2 to 3 minutes instead of 10, with all the
 changes.
 I consider that a remarkable improvement.
 
 Absolutely a worthy improvement - by all means lets test it
 

Search for the archive for the second incarnation of Stephen Montgomery-Smith's
 patch to pkg_create. Besides not yet being fully functional, my work is far
less significant.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2007-05-14 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters,

  This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is

http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/

so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain.  In
addition, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with build problems is

http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get
fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative.

Thanks for your help!

Bill annoying port email Fenner
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


scilab build fails early in process

2007-05-14 Thread Scott Bennett
 After making sure that all the packages/ports that Scilab depends upon
had been installed, including the ATLAS library (always a pain in the neck
to get built), I tried to build scilab.  Very early, it fails in a perl
script I didn't even know was on the system, called autom4ke259 and kept in
/usr/local/bin.  Here's the script output:


Script started on Mon May 14 03:39:11 2007
hellas# umask 022
hellas# env MAKEFLAGS= portinstall -v scilab
---  Session started at: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:40:21 -0500
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 330 packages found 
(-0 +1) . done]
---  Fresh installation of math/scilab started at: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:42:07 
-0500
---  Installing 'scilab-4.1_2' from a port (math/scilab)
---  Build of math/scilab started at: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:42:21 -0500
---  Building '/usr/ports/math/scilab'
===  Cleaning for tk-8.4.14_5,2
===  Cleaning for libxslt-1.1.20
===  Cleaning for gcc-4.2.0_20070501
===  Cleaning for autoconf-2.59_2
===  Cleaning for Xaw3d-1.5E_1
===  Cleaning for atlas-3.6.0_3,1
===  Cleaning for gettext-0.16.1_1
===  Cleaning for tcl-8.4.14_4,1
===  Cleaning for xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1
===  Cleaning for gmake-3.81_1
===  Cleaning for pkg-config-0.21
===  Cleaning for libxml2-2.6.27
===  Cleaning for perl-5.8.8
===  Cleaning for zip-2.32
===  Cleaning for bison-1.75_2,1
===  Cleaning for libgmp-4.2.1_2
===  Cleaning for mpfr-2.2.1
===  Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_2
===  Cleaning for m4-1.4.9
===  Cleaning for help2man-1.36.4_1
===  Cleaning for imake-6.9.0_1
===  Cleaning for blas-1.0_1
===  Cleaning for lapack-3.0_2
===  Cleaning for f2c-20060810_1
===  Cleaning for libtool-1.5.22_4
===  Cleaning for libdrm-2.0.2
===  Cleaning for freetype2-2.2.1_1
===  Cleaning for fontconfig-2.4.2_1,1
===  Cleaning for p5-gettext-1.05_1
===  Cleaning for unzip-5.52_3
===  Cleaning for expat-2.0.0_1
===  Cleaning for scilab-4.1_2
= scilab-4.1-src.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
= Attempting to fetch from http://www.scilab.org/download/4.1/.
scilab-4.1-src.tar.gz 100% of   12 MB  209 kBps 00m00s
===  Extracting for scilab-4.1_2
= MD5 Checksum OK for scilab-4.1-src.tar.gz.
= SHA256 Checksum OK for scilab-4.1-src.tar.gz.
===  Patching for scilab-4.1_2
===  Applying FreeBSD patches for scilab-4.1_2
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on executable in : wish8.4 - found
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on executable in : xsltproc - found
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on executable in : gfortran42 - found
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on shared library: Xaw3d.8 - found
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on shared library: atlas.2 - found
===   scilab-4.1_2 depends on shared library: intl - found
===  Configuring for scilab-4.1_2
Can't locate Autom4te/C4che.pm in @INC (@INC contains: 
/usr/local/share/autoconf259 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at /usr/local/bin/autom4te259 line 39.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/bin/autom4te259 line 39.
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/local/ports/math/scilab.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall77574.0 
make
** Fix the problem and try again.
---  Build of math/scilab ended at: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:46:48 -0500 (consumed 
00:04:27)
---  Fresh installation of math/scilab ended at: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:46:48 
-0500 (consumed 00:04:40)
---  Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! math/scilab   (unknown build error)
---  Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
---  Session ended at: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:46:48 -0500 (consumed 00:06:26)
hellas# exit
exit

Script done, output file is /tmp/scilab.install.out

 Does anyone know how to fix this?  Thanks in advance!


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army.   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Dejan Lesjak
On Monday 14 of May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
 Some good news and some bad news:

 Good news:

 Upgrade seems OK on my 6.2-STABLE/amd64 system butI needed multiple
 portupgrade -a iterations before it upgraded everything.  I think
 this is a side-effect of using ports-mgmt/portupgrade rather than
 ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel.

 Note that you _must_ rebuild xorg.conf because the xorg modules are
 in a different relative location so the /usr/X11R6 symlink isn't enuf.


 Bad news:

 My very-out-of-date -current system has gotten into a confused state.
 Possibly I didn't help by forgetting to disable my automatic port
 INDEX build so that INDEX reverted to the /usr/ports one partway thru.
 I fixed that and aborted the portupgrade when I noticed but that
 was quite sometime later.

 I've been trying to recover using pkgdb -F but that has reached a
 state where it's reporting:
 Stale dependency: ffmpeg-0.4.9.p1_7 - libGL-6.5.3_1 (graphics/libGL):
 The libGL build works but then reports that it conflicts with
 xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1.  The latter is still installed in /usr/X11R6
 but graphics/libGL/Makefile also reports that it uses X11BASE.

 Has anyone got any suggestions before I start editing the CONFLICTS lines?

Manual upgrade of libraries should probably work 
(ie cd /path/to/test/tree/x11/xorg-libraries  make build  make deinstall 
 make install).

Dejan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Current unassigned ports problem reports

2007-05-14 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. 
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental 
development code and obsolete releases. 
Bugs can be in one of several states:

o - open
A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed.

a - analyzed
The problem is understood and a solution is being sought.

f - feedback
Further work requires additional information from the
 originator or the community - possibly confirmation of
 the effectiveness of a proposed solution.

p - patched
A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or
 confirmation from originator) are still open.

r - repocopy
The resolution of the problem report is dependent on
 a repocopy operation within the CVS repository which
 is awaiting completion.

s - suspended
The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information
 or resources.  This is a prime candidate
 for somebody who is looking for a project to do.
 If the problem cannot be solved at all,
 it will be closed, rather than suspended.

c - closed
A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated,
 documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned.
Critical problems
Serious problems

S Tracker  Resp.  Description

o ports/105549ports/www/squid_radius_auth doesn't work on sparc64
o ports/106369vpnd caused kernel panic with ppp mode
o ports/106372vpnd can't run with slip mode
o ports/107536editors/scite: Can't write on SciTE text editor
f ports/108077www/linux-flashplugin9 crashes linux-firefox
f ports/108413net/vnc does not works.
f ports/108537print/hplip: Build failure
f ports/108606Courier MTA terminates abnormaly after installation
f ports/108748mod_fcgid 1.10 does not work inside jail
f ports/109160net/samba3 crashes freebsd when accessing a share resi
f ports/110035Port fix for sysutils/be_agent
f ports/110454Joomla port Makefile has incorrect url for package
f ports/110943start-dccifd  chowns /var/run to user dcc
f ports/111012quagga's ripd does not see ng interfaces
f ports/51ports/lang/stklos: l/bin/stklos-install is a buggy she
o ports/111224 ports  [PATCH] security/pam_per_user conflicts with security/
f ports/111338graphics/yafray: doesn't respect CXX, CXXFLAGS and eve
o ports/111462syslog-ng2 default configuration file path
o ports/111923[PATCH] databases/unixODBC overwrites config file on p
f ports/111966Clamav-milter no up
f ports/111980multimedia/mplayer: compilation error
o ports/112067ports/paraview 2.4.4 does not compile properly
f ports/112083mail/qsheff overwrites configuration upon upgrade
f ports/112094www/lynx: plist missing configuration file
o ports/112097ghostscript-gpl-nox11 compile fails due to missing fil
o ports/112115ghostscript-gpl-nox11 compile fails due to missing fil
f ports/112118[PATCH] sysutils/pipemeter: fix crashes
o ports/112197[MAINTAINER UPDATE]: devel/libstrfunc upgrade to 8.3
f ports/112277MD5 and SHA256 mismatch for science/hdf5
f ports/112280MD5 and SHA256 mismatch for science/hdf5
f ports/112287www/rt36: add missed patches for MULTIPLE_INSTANCES
o ports/112389[MAINTAINER] mail/MailScanner: update to 4.59.4
f ports/112468sysutils/bacula-server 2.0.3 port build fails for sqli
o ports/112545print/ghostscript-gpl 8.54 fail without all driver (or
f ports/112648net/dante:  net:/socks5: Buffer Overflow in some SOCK

35 problems total.

Non-critical problems

S Tracker  Resp.  Description

s ports/59254 ports that write something after bsd.port.mk
o ports/94921 isakmpd fails on amd64
o ports/95854 New Port: www/ochusha
o ports/100896[new ports] emulators/vmware-server-guestd1 emulators/
o ports/101275bug fixed in sudo that prevented use in LDAP user acco
o ports/103395security/gnome-ssh-askpass interferes with gnome-scree
o ports/107354net/icmpinfo: icmpinfo -vvv does not recocnize any ICM
f ports/107368audio/normalize: [patch] - normalize-mp3 and normalize
f ports/107621net/proxychains doens't compile on 4 and 5
f ports/107937jailed net/isc-dhcp3-server wouldn't run with an immut
f ports/108104print/hplip: documentation gets installed though NOPOR
o ports/108595pstree (sysutils/psmisc) don't work in jail
f ports/108723  

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Tim Bishop
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
 failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
 CVS.

The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
xforwarding because the xauth program has moved. This can be fixed by
setting the option:

XAuthLocation /usr/local/bin/xauth

It defaults to X11R6.

I guess this should be fixed after the xorg merge?

Tim.

-- 
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984


pgplbo5Az6AnH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Florent Thoumie
Tim Bishop wrote:
 On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
 failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
 CVS.
 
 The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
 xforwarding because the xauth program has moved. This can be fixed by
 setting the option:
 
 XAuthLocation /usr/local/bin/xauth
 
 It defaults to X11R6.
 
 I guess this should be fixed after the xorg merge?

Shouldn't be a problem if you have the symlink from X11R6 to local.

But yes, this will be fixed.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Tim Bishop
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:56:54PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
 Tim Bishop wrote:
  On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
  Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
  failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
  CVS.
  
  The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
  xforwarding because the xauth program has moved. This can be fixed by
  setting the option:
  
  XAuthLocation /usr/local/bin/xauth
  
  It defaults to X11R6.
  
  I guess this should be fixed after the xorg merge?
 
 Shouldn't be a problem if you have the symlink from X11R6 to local.

Yeah - I'm running without the symlink so I can discover problems (in my
scripts and config mainly). :-)

Tim.

-- 
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: first? patch [ HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing ]

2007-05-14 Thread Sam Lawrance


On 13/05/2007, at 5:26 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:


On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:20:53PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:


On 13/05/2007, at 5:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:


On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:


On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:


On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:


I ran into a little problem with the gstreamer-plugins, to be
exact with
the 'bad' plugin. What's in a name. Attached patch to gstreamer-
plugins which
eliminates X11BASE from configure args fixes it.


This actually seems to indicate that something you have installed
references /usr/X11R6 in a .la file.  I actually built this
successfully myself during the upgrade tests, so I guess something
went wrong with the upgrade on your machine.  Can you please  
provide

the full log, as well as the result of

find /usr/local/lib -name \*.la | xargs grep /usr/X11R6/lib/
libfontconfig.la


Just a quick me too.  Last night I installed 6.2-RELEASE with  
gnome
and goffice from the release packageset, then proceeded to  
follow the
xorg upgrade instructions.  The two errors I got are listed  
below.  I

will try to investigate tonight.


OK, still waiting for the log from Danny, so maybe you'll get in  
first

with yours.


I hope there's a nice prize, or showgirls springing out of big cakes.

http://people.freebsd.org/~lawrance/xorg-upgrade.bz2


I think I have figured this out.  In short: portupgrade does not  
include new, previously not installed, dependencies in its list of  
tasks when updating.   In this particular case, gstreamer-plugins-bad  
was built before one of its dependencies was updated, and we end up  
with a crufty old reference to X11R6.


Less short:

Before the xorg upgrade, gstreamer-plugins-bad was not installed on  
my system.   It was installed during the upgrade as part of running  
portupgrade -a.


Upon further inspection of the xorg-upgrade log above I noticed that  
there were two build attempts for gstreamer-plugins-bad, and neither  
was directly performed by portupgrade (ie. the ports framework did  
it).  The first attempt was as a dependency of gstreamer-plugins- 
dts.  The second (and successful) attempt was as a dependency of  
gstreamer-plugins-xvid.


I reverted the system to its original state and ran portupgrade -an  
to show the order of updates that portupgrade would perform.   
gstreamer-plugins-bad was not in the list.  I think this means is  
that if a port being upgraded has a new dependency, that dependency  
will _not_ be included in the list portupgrade uses to determine  
which packages to update and at what point.


Using portupgrade with the flags -aRn made no difference.

A few people have reported their systems updating correctly after a  
several attempts with portupgrade -a;  this is possibly one of the  
reasons.  It seems like an effective workaround for the moment.


The only issue I can think of is if an out of order build succeeds,  
and the later update of a dependency breaks something at runtime.





___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Tim Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
 xforwarding because the xauth program has moved. This can be fixed by
 setting the option:

 XAuthLocation /usr/local/bin/xauth

 It defaults to X11R6.

 I guess this should be fixed after the xorg merge?

Doesn't the migration script create a /usr/X11R6 - /usr/local symlink?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

2007-05-14 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith

[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

Basically I think we are stuck on making make package-depends go any
faster.

However I do think that the modifications I made to pkg_create go a very
significant way to solving the problem of registration taking so very long.

Stephen



You are right about invoking make being the problem. However, I was able to
increase the performance of package-depends by 20 to 30 percent, by avoiding
recursive make calls and moving the recursion into the stack of the shell
invocation.

With my changes there's less than 10% overhead over the sum of make calls. I.e.
 for 56 seconds of make calls (x11/xorg on my system) there are only 4 more
seconds of processing, instead of 15 to 20 seconds.

The original make package-depends does some things I don't understand. Once
I've figured them out I will post my little patch here.





Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is 
already to be found in +CONTENTS.  So here is a proof of concept patch 
to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concept because no error 
checking, and things like that).


For me it makes registration about 3 times faster.


--- bsd.port.mk-origMon May 14 09:28:42 2007
+++ bsd.port.mk Mon May 14 09:33:39 2007
@@ -2387,7 +2387,7 @@
 DISABLE_CONFLICTS= YES
 .endif
 .if !defined(PKG_ARGS)
-PKG_ARGS=  -v -c -${COMMENT:Q} -d ${DESCR} -f ${TMPPLIST} -p 
${PREFIX} -P `cd ${.CURDIR}  ${MAKE} package-depends | ${GREP} -v -E 
${PKG_IGNORE_DEPENDS} | ${SORT} -u` ${EXTRA_PKG_ARGS} $${_LATE_PKG_ARGS}
+PKG_ARGS=  -v -c -${COMMENT:Q} -d ${DESCR} -f ${TMPPLIST} -p 
${PREFIX} -P `cd ${.CURDIR}  ${MAKE} actual-package-depends | ${GREP} -v -E 
${PKG_IGNORE_DEPENDS} | ${SORT} -u` ${EXTRA_PKG_ARGS} $${_LATE_PKG_ARGS}
 .if !defined(NO_MTREE)
 PKG_ARGS+= -m ${MTREE_FILE}
 .endif
@@ -5216,10 +5216,26 @@
fi; \
done
 
+ACTUAL-PACKAGE-DEPENDS?= \
+   pkgs=`(for dir in ${_LIB_RUN_DEPENDS:C,[^:]*:([^:]*):?.*,\1,}; do \
+   dir=$$(${REALPATH} $$dir); \
+   if [ -d $$dir ]; then \
+   pkgname=$$(cd $$dir; ${MAKE} -V PKGNAME); \
+   ${ECHO_CMD} $$pkgname; \
+   ${GREP} @pkgdep /var/db/pkg/$$pkgname/+CONTENTS | 
${SED} s/@pkgdep //; \
+   fi; \
+   done) | sort -u`; \
+   for pkgname in $$pkgs; do \
+   ${ECHO_CMD} $$pkgname`${GREP} @comment ORIGIN: 
/var/db/pkg/$$pkgname/+CONTENTS | ${SED} s/@comment ORIGIN//`; \
+   done
+
 # Print out package names.
 
 package-depends:
@${PACKAGE-DEPENDS-LIST} | ${AWK} '{print $$1:$$3}'
+
+actual-package-depends:
+   @${ACTUAL-PACKAGE-DEPENDS}
 
 # Build packages for port and dependencies
 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FreeBSD Port: dspam-3.6.8_2

2007-05-14 Thread Ed Lucero


 -Original Message-
 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 12:32 PM
 To: Ed Lucero
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Shawn O'Connor
 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: dspam-3.6.8_2
 
 On Fri, 11 May 2007 09:47:49 -0700
 Ed Lucero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi
 
  I was interested in finding out when dspam 3.8.0 Stable will be
  ported.
 
 It's in -devel, I'll will MFD it after the Ports freeze is over.
 
 --
 IOnut

Thanks!

When is the ports freeze over?

Ed

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD Port: rrdtool-1.2.23

2007-05-14 Thread Brian E. Conklin
There seems to be a problem with rrdtool 1.2.23 when compiling on various
versions of FreeBSD if ruby 1.8 is installed. There has been a bit of chatter
in newsgroups about this. I am including the tail of the output from one of
my servers making the attempt to compile hoping it will help find the
solution. Thanks.

===Begin Snip===
Making all in bindings
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings'
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings'
cd perl-piped  /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Writing Makefile for RRDp
cd perl-piped  gmake
gmake[4]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings/perl-piped'
cp RRDp.pm blib/lib/RRDp.pm
Manifying blib/man3/RRDp.3
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings/perl-piped'
cd perl-shared  /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL   RPATH=/usr/local/lib
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Writing Makefile for RRDs
cd perl-shared  gmake
gmake[4]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings/perl-shared'
cp RRDs.pm blib/lib/RRDs.pm
cp ntmake.pl blib/lib/ntmake.pl
/usr/bin/perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/xsubpp  -typemap
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/typemap  RRDs.xs  RRDs.xsc  mv
RRDs.xsc RRDs.c
cc -c  -I../../src -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN
-DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/usr/local/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
-pipe   -DVERSION=\1.2023\ -DXS_VERSION=\1.2023\ -DPIC -fPIC
-I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE  -DPERLPATCHLEVEL=8 RRDs.c
Running Mkbootstrap for RRDs ()
chmod 644 RRDs.bs
rm -f blib/arch/auto/RRDs/RRDs.so
cc  -shared  -L/usr/local/lib RRDs.o -L../../src/.libs/  -lrrd -lm -o
blib/arch/auto/RRDs/RRDs.so   \
\

chmod 755 blib/arch/auto/RRDs/RRDs.so
cp RRDs.bs blib/arch/auto/RRDs/RRDs.bs
chmod 644 blib/arch/auto/RRDs/RRDs.bs
Manifying blib/man3/RRDs.3
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings/perl-shared'
cd ruby  /usr/local/bin/ruby extconf.rb  gmake EPREFIX=/usr/local
sitedir=/usr/local/lib/ruby
checking for rrd_create() in -lrrd... yes
creating Makefile
gmake[4]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings/ruby'
Makefile:144: Commands were specified for file `RRD.so' at Makefile:114,
Makefile:144: but `RRD.so' is now considered the same file as
`/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/RRD.so'.
Makefile:144: Commands for `/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/RRD.so'
will be ignored in favor of those for `RRD.so'.
gmake[4]: Circular /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/RRD.so -
/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/RRD.so dependency dropped.
cc -I. -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6 -I. -I../../src  -fPIC -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe-fPIC  -c main.c
/usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel -m 0755 RRD.so
/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6
install: RRD.so: No such file or directory
gmake[4]: *** [/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/RRD.so] Error 71
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings/ruby'
gmake[3]: *** [ruby] Error 2
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings'
gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/bindings'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/ports/net/rrdtool.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/net/rrdtool.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
/tmp/portupgrade.12882.96 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade
UPGRADE_PORT=rrdtool-1.2.19_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.2.19_1 make
** Fix the problem and try again.
---  Skipping 'mail/mailgraph' (mailgraph-1.13) because a requisite package
'rrdtool-1.2.19_1' (net/rrdtool) failed (specify -k to force)
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! net/rrdtool (rrdtool-1.2.19_1)(install error)
* mail/mailgraph (mailgraph-1.13)
---  Packages processed: 0 done, 142 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed
mx2#

===End Snip===

Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director of Information Services
voice: 360.427.3423
fax: 360.427.3433
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: rrdtool-1.2.23

2007-05-14 Thread Kian Mohageri

On 5/14/07, Brian E. Conklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

There seems to be a problem with rrdtool 1.2.23 when compiling on various
versions of FreeBSD if ruby 1.8 is installed. There has been a bit of chatter
in newsgroups about this. I am including the tail of the output from one of
my servers making the attempt to compile hoping it will help find the
solution. Thanks.



http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112412

Also see these ports PRs:
- 112483
- 112513

It should be fixed soon after the ports thaw.  Until then, you can
disable ruby support manually as described.

-Kian
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

2007-05-14 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

Basically I think we are stuck on making make package-depends go any
faster.

However I do think that the modifications I made to pkg_create go a 
very
significant way to solving the problem of registration taking so 
very long.


Stephen



You are right about invoking make being the problem. However, I was 
able to
increase the performance of package-depends by 20 to 30 percent, by 
avoiding
recursive make calls and moving the recursion into the stack of the 
shell

invocation.

With my changes there's less than 10% overhead over the sum of make 
calls. I.e.
 for 56 seconds of make calls (x11/xorg on my system) there are only 
4 more

seconds of processing, instead of 15 to 20 seconds.

The original make package-depends does some things I don't 
understand. Once

I've figured them out I will post my little patch here.





Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is 
already to be found in +CONTENTS.  So here is a proof of concept patch 
to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concept because no error 
checking, and things like that).


For me it makes registration about 3 times faster.


And also, the only reason it goes slow is because it has to do
(cd $$dir; make -V PKGNAME)
for every dir in _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS.  But if instead we kept a file in 
/var/db/pkg called something like +PACKAGE_NAMES, where as each port is 
created we add in a one line entry with this mapping of origin to 
package name, then registration would take less than a second.  It also 
has the advantage that the created +REQUIRED_BY really would be an 
accurate reflection of the true state of affairs rather than what it 
should be (meaning that if you cvsup ports and then build on top of old 
dependencies, +REQUIRED_BY would still be accurate).


Stephen

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

2007-05-14 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from  
Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:13 -0500):



Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is


Probably me...


already to be found in +CONTENTS.  So here is a proof of concept patch
to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concept because no error
checking, and things like that).


As you want to use the origin (it seems), grep for DEPORIGIN instead  
of pkgdep, should be even more fast than what you already have.


Bye,
Alexander.

--
This was the most unkindest cut of all.
-- William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar

http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org   netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

2007-05-14 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from 
Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:13 -0500):



Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is


Probably me...


Yes


already to be found in +CONTENTS.  So here is a proof of concept patch
to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concept because no error
checking, and things like that).


As you want to use the origin (it seems), grep for DEPORIGIN instead 
of pkgdep, should be even more fast than what you already have.




I don't know how to do this except by using perl, which is not part of 
the base system.  This is because DEPORIGIN is on the next line.  And I 
am not expert at any tools except C and perl.  Also I doubt that it will 
speed things up very much - I think that grepping a bunch of files is 
quite fast (compared to say invoking make which is very slow).



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: dspam-3.6.8_2

2007-05-14 Thread Scot Hetzel

On 5/14/07, Ed Lucero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I was interested in finding out when dspam 3.8.0 Stable will be
  ported.

 It's in -devel, I'll will MFD it after the Ports freeze is over.


When is the ports freeze over?


The ports freeze will be over after xorg 7.2 gets imported into the
ports tree.  We are currently waiting for the results of testing the
upgrade procedure.

Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


New port: coldfusion7 www/java/lang

2007-05-14 Thread Christopher Olsen

I have created a new port for coldfusion 7.0.2

http://cupid.ubixos.com/coldfusion7.tgz

I have tested it on a few machine and it works... Any questions please 
let me know..


Looking forward to hearing from someone soon..


-Christopher



Christopher Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
88B Toledo Street
Farmingdale, NY 11735

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:19:40PM +0100, Tim Bishop wrote:
 On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:56:54PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
  Tim Bishop wrote:
   On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
   Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
   failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
   CVS.
   
   The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
   xforwarding because the xauth program has moved. This can be fixed by
   setting the option:
   
   XAuthLocation /usr/local/bin/xauth
   
   It defaults to X11R6.
   
   I guess this should be fixed after the xorg merge?
  
  Shouldn't be a problem if you have the symlink from X11R6 to local.
 
 Yeah - I'm running without the symlink so I can discover problems (in my
 scripts and config mainly). :-)

There are probably quite a few of them.  It will be best to wait until
after the import to start addressing these to avoid confusing the
issue.

Kris

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-14 Thread Carl Johan Gustavsson
Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Dear porters,

 We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
 done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
 remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
 can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
 need now is for everyone to download this tarball:

   http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz

 Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your
 existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin
 the upgrade process.  In particular, please pay special attention to
 the instructions on how to record and report information should
 something go wrong: without a transcript of the upgrade session we may
 be unable to determine what went wrong on your system, and your report
 may be wasted.

 We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
 developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
 test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
 it on the general user base.

 Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
 failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
 CVS.

 Kris

   
Hi!

I upgraded to 7.2 on a i386 machine running 6-STABLE and it went quite
smooth, the only problem was that i didnt have the xorg-6.9-meta port
installed which i noticed when the upgrade was done, but it was just to
install the new meta port. The mergescript left some stuff in /usr/X11R6
which i had to delete manually, probably some stuff i installed manually
like themes or things that havn't been deinstalled correctly (long
before the upgrade, most of the files wasn't referenced by installed
ports, checked by pkg_info -W).  I also had to reinstall the
nvidia-driver manually after the portupgrade -a finished. I noticed it
was missing when i tried to start X after the upgrade.

My install was done using the first tarball and portupgrade-devel, but i
used a mergescript from a later release. The log are available  by request.

Thank you for all working on this.

/cjg
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Weird issue after Xorg upgrade

2007-05-14 Thread Diego Depaoli

Hi all,
it could be unrelated to Xorg upgrade, but now root, only root, is
unable to switch from X to console.
Ctrl+Alt+Fn doesn't work neither after a 'startx' neither after a [kdm|gmd|xdm].
Regular users instead can do it.
?

--
Diego Depaoli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [patch] Xorg 7.2 - graphics/mesa-demos broken for non-NVIDIA

2007-05-14 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Marcelo Araujo wrote:
 Hey folks!
 
 I investigated this problem.
 I'm not sure about this!
 But, you must OPEN the PRs, for I will check it.
 You has to use for doing this, the tools, GNATS-WEB,
 ports-mgmt/porttools or sysutils/gtk-send-pr.
 
 Best Regards.
 

The PR is there. Please have a look, as usual it might take a couple of minutes
before it shows up.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112668
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Weird issue after Xorg upgrade

2007-05-14 Thread youshi10

On Mon, 14 May 2007, Diego Depaoli wrote:


Hi all,
it could be unrelated to Xorg upgrade, but now root, only root, is
unable to switch from X to console.
Ctrl+Alt+Fn doesn't work neither after a 'startx' neither after a 
[kdm|gmd|xdm].

Regular users instead can do it.
?

--
Diego Depaoli


Sounds unrelated because I can switch to the console no problem under Linux.

Some questions:
-Do you use a login daemon for user's to access the machine?
-Have you checked the console for error messages or /var/log/Xorg.0.log?
-What video driver do you use?
-How did you upgrade to Xorg 7.2?

-Garrett

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing [SUCCESS]

2007-05-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
 Everything built with no errors. Tested, looks good with KDE (fonts look 
 better). One error, had to merge skype by hand.

Thanks, yeah I think skype (and probably skype-devel) needs a version
bump to move it out of /usr/X11R6.

Kris


pgp343PEWgvmT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing [SUCCESS]

2007-05-14 Thread youshi10

On Mon, 14 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:


On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:

Everything built with no errors. Tested, looks good with KDE (fonts look
better). One error, had to merge skype by hand.


Thanks, yeah I think skype (and probably skype-devel) needs a version
bump to move it out of /usr/X11R6.

Kris


firefox, thunderbird, and irc/xchat2 built and run like clockwork, btw :).

-Garrett

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]