FreeBSD Port: rsync-2.6.9_1
just incase you didn't know, I didn't see anything on the ports list for this. It wont build due to the off by one error. Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: rsync-2.6.9_1
Brian wrote: just incase you didn't know, I didn't see anything on the ports list for this. It wont build due to the off by one error. Have you refreshed the vulnerability database? (portaudit -Fda)? Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: FreeBSD Port: rsync-2.6.9_1
Brian wrote: just incase you didn't know, I didn't see anything on the ports list for this. It wont build due to the off by one error. portaudit -F ...and try again. -- John Marshall ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
Hi, recently I had a look at the upcoming version of the PCB layout tool eagle, in beta test at the moment. I am currently maintaining both the international (cad/linux-eagle) and german ports of this tool. This new beta version however refuses to run as it depends on glibc-2.4 while our linux_base-fc4 ships glibc 2.3.6. Do we have a roadmap or an estimated timeframe as to when a more recent linux_base and their extra packages (linux-xorg and such) becomes standard for the ports tree? TIA, Riggs ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Port: WebCalendar-1.0.5
Hi, The guys from webcalendar release on 4 aug a new version of webcalendar. Do you have any idea when it will be available from the ports? With regards, Ruud Boon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: WebCalendar-1.0.5
On Thu, August 23, 2007 09:50, Ruud Boon wrote: Hi, The guys from webcalendar release on 4 aug a new version of webcalendar. Do you have any idea when it will be available from the ports? With regards, Ruud Boon webcalender 1.1.3 (Which was released on aug 4) is a development version, 1.0.5 is the latest stable version, so www/webcalendar is up to date. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CFD: changing x11-toolkits/pmw to py-Pmw
Hi all
In PR 115302, I suggested changing x11-toolkits/pmw to py-Pmw.
- It is a Python package named Pmw.
- Add py- prefix as well as other Python package ports.
I hope it is good for all.
But I would like to hear any suggestion.
Thank you
--
TAOKA Fumiyoshi
Dependent ports are followed:
$ awk -F '|' '/py25-pmw/ {print $2,$6}' INDEX-6
/usr/ports/biology/pymol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/devel/pypersrc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/french/aster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/french/eficas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/french/gibi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/french/homard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/games/ptkei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/misc/cuecat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/net/forg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/net-im/fugu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/pmw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-tktreectrl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
Quoting Thomas Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:46:39 +0800): Hi, recently I had a look at the upcoming version of the PCB layout tool eagle, in beta test at the moment. I am currently maintaining both the international (cad/linux-eagle) and german ports of this tool. This new beta version however refuses to run as it depends on glibc-2.4 while our linux_base-fc4 ships glibc 2.3.6. Do we have a roadmap or an estimated timeframe as to when a more recent linux_base and their extra packages (linux-xorg and such) becomes standard for the ports tree? If you find a glibc-2.4 for FC4 we can import it somehow. If you don't, we need to wait for the possibility to go to FC^ or newer. But as from FC5 on, we need 2.6.x emulation for the linuxulator. This will only be available in 7.x with x = 1 (there's some support now, but it is not finished), and only if activated by the user. So by default we can not install FC6+ on 7.x (I doubt we will change the linuxulator default to 2.6.x in the 7.x-timeframe). As we don't have good enough support for 2.6.x in 7-current, I didn't even thought about how to tackle the ports collection part. Remember, we have to support even 6.x for a while. Introducing the FC6+ ports is easy, but how to do it in a good way which works on all supported releases... Bye, Alexander. -- I love Mickey Mouse more than any woman I've ever known. -- Walt Disney http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portupgrade won't change an origin for a downgrade
Hi, I've a situation where I need to downgrade apache from www/apache22 to www/apache20. (Reason is because I want to play with mod_security and _it_ doesn't seem to want to play with 2.2) It has a fair whack of dependencies and I will need to rebuild those to suit - php in particular, as it tends to put things into different places depending on apache version. Now, the command I figured would just do the job is this: portupgrade -rpf --batch -o www/apache20 apache\* This _should_ change the origin of the current apache port to www/apache20, rebuild it and all downward dependencies and build packages for each. But it doesn't: --- Reinstalling 'apache-2.2.4_2' (www/apache22) --- Building '/usr/ports/www/apache22' === Cleaning for apache-2.2.4_2 To enable a module category: WITH_CATEGORY_MODULES To disable a module category: WITHOUT_CATEGORY_MODULES Per default categories are: AUTH AUTHN AUTHZ DAV CACHE MISC Categories available: AUTH AUTHN AUTHZ CACHE DAV EXPERIMENTAL LDAP MISC PROXY SSL SUEXEC THREADS To see all available knobs, type make show-options To see all modules in different categories, type make show-categories You can check your modules configuration by using make show-modules === Extracting for apache-2.2.4_2 = MD5 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2. = MD5 Checksum OK for apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-57.c. = SHA256 Checksum OK for apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-57.c. === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Patching for apache-2.2.4_2 === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Applying FreeBSD patches for apache-2.2.4_2 === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.59 - found and so on I guess that -o isn't compatible with -f in the way that I'd like it to be (and in the way that the man page might imply) so... What's my best option here? I can deinstall and reinstall apache (and I have to force the deletion as it is because of the deps) but then my dependency list is shot unless I record it before I proceed. thanks, joel -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade won't change an origin for a downgrade
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:01:08PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote: Hi, I've a situation where I need to downgrade apache from www/apache22 to www/apache20. (Reason is because I want to play with mod_security and _it_ doesn't seem to want to play with 2.2) It has a fair whack of dependencies and I will need to rebuild those to suit - php in particular, as it tends to put things into different places depending on apache version. Now, the command I figured would just do the job is this: portupgrade -rpf --batch -o www/apache20 apache\* This _should_ change the origin of the current apache port to www/apache20, rebuild it and all downward dependencies and build packages for each. But it doesn't: --- Reinstalling 'apache-2.2.4_2' (www/apache22) --- Building '/usr/ports/www/apache22' === Cleaning for apache-2.2.4_2 To enable a module category: WITH_CATEGORY_MODULES To disable a module category: WITHOUT_CATEGORY_MODULES Per default categories are: AUTH AUTHN AUTHZ DAV CACHE MISC Categories available: AUTH AUTHN AUTHZ CACHE DAV EXPERIMENTAL LDAP MISC PROXY SSL SUEXEC THREADS To see all available knobs, type make show-options To see all modules in different categories, type make show-categories You can check your modules configuration by using make show-modules === Extracting for apache-2.2.4_2 = MD5 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2. = MD5 Checksum OK for apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-57.c. = SHA256 Checksum OK for apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-57.c. === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Patching for apache-2.2.4_2 === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Applying FreeBSD patches for apache-2.2.4_2 === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === apache-2.2.4_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.59 - found and so on I guess that -o isn't compatible with -f in the way that I'd like it to be (and in the way that the man page might imply) so... What's my best option here? I can deinstall and reinstall apache (and I have to force the deletion as it is because of the deps) but then my dependency list is shot unless I record it before I proceed. thanks, joel -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113485 I think it was fixed in latest portupgrade version, cause it works for me: #portupgrade -rpf --batch -o www/apache20 apache\* --- Downgrading 'apache-2.2.4_2' to 'apache-2.0.59' (www/apache20) --- Building '/usr/ports/www/apache20' === Cleaning for apache-2.0.59 snip portupgrade-2.3.1,2 HTH, Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
Hi, thank you for clearing this up. So, to summarise, - we will not have linux 2.6 compatibility before 7.1-R - we will probably never have 2.6 in the 6 series - we need 2.6 compatibility for the more recent linux_base-fc I guess we will stick with the current eagle version for a while then. That's okay, I know this it not trivial work and takes time. OTOH this eagle beta I was referring to, is according to many beta test reports far from ready to be released. I just wanted to get an overview of our current state with regard to the linux emulation. Thanks again, Riggs ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/compat/linux/usr/bin/ld -- old devel/linux_devel port?
[I sent this to freebsd-questions@ three days ago but got no answers. I hope these two lists are more appropriate places for this question.] Hello, What is the recommended way for obtaining linux ld binary (/compat/linux/usr/bin/ld)? I found in the archives that devel/linux_devel port used to provide it, but it seems that there is no such port now, except emulators/linux*-gentoo*. Thank you, Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmaster - excluding ports from cmd line
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Howard Goldstein wrote: Is there a portmaster option equivalent to portupgrade's -x exclude globbing? I realize that this question was asked a long time ago, sorry I didn't answer at the time. This option was added in May of this year, version 1.17. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
If you find a glibc-2.4 for FC4 we can import it somehow. If you no we cant. glibc-2.4 requires 2.6 kernel. ie. its the same operation as switching to newer FC don't, we need to wait for the possibility to go to FC^ or newer. But as from FC5 on, we need 2.6.x emulation for the linuxulator. This will only be available in 7.x with x = 1 (there's some support now, but it is not finished), and only if activated by the user. So by default we can not install FC6+ on 7.x (I doubt we will change the linuxulator default to 2.6.x in the 7.x-timeframe). let me clarify things a little. the 2.6 support in 7-current is good enough. I am not aware of panics and the only does not work because of 2.6 program I know is java which I have sent a patch to kib@ to commit it (so it should be in before 7.0R) yet, 7.x wont ship 2.6 emulation on default so any newer FC is out of question. otoh I'd like to switch 2.6 emulation on default right after 7.0R is released in 8-current. to uncover new bugs and test stuff etc. hopefully I can also get someone (kib? netchild?) to commit most of the stuff I did over this summer (epoll is ready, *at will hopefully settle soon, some minor fixes can be commited with just a little discussion etc.) based on the results from the 2.6 on default testing in 8-current we'll see if we can ship 8.0R with 2.6 on defaul (my personal guess is yes we can)2 my view of things... roman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 21:01 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: let me clarify things a little. the 2.6 support in 7-current is good enough. I am not aware of panics and the only does not work because of 2.6 program I know is java which I have sent a patch to kib@ to commit it (so it should be in before 7.0R) Well, just for the record, Enemy Territory stopped working with 2.6 for me, but I can live with that (Doom 3 runs still fine, for example). On my -CURRENT desktop, I have 2.6 support enabled from the first day of commit and never plan to go back, not just for one game or even Java. From the perspective of a common everyday desktop user, I'd call current 2.6 support fine enough, and we are talking about 7.0 that's not even out yet. Anyway, good job, Roman and the rest of the team. Just my two pieces of a random currency. m. -- Michal Varga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stonehenge ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade won't change an origin for a downgrade
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:51:09 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: Check http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113485 I think it was fixed in latest portupgrade version, cause it works for me: #portupgrade -rpf --batch -o www/apache20 apache\* --- Downgrading 'apache-2.2.4_2' to 'apache-2.0.59' (www/apache20) --- Building '/usr/ports/www/apache20' === Cleaning for apache-2.0.59 snip portupgrade-2.3.1,2 That's great news - thanks. I should have checked my version was up to date before I posted :) joel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with lphoto
FYI: lphoto depends on py-kde, not just py-qt. It doesn't depend on py-qt4. But more importantly, it never worked well (anything useful with hardware never worked) and over time it got more and more broken. I did look at the shipwreck a few months ago but decided to let it sink. This port should be *removed* unless someone gives it a lot of love. Dan On Saturday 18 August 2007 12:06:10 Rene Ladan wrote: w.r.pestman schreef: Dear FreeBSD team, First of all I would like to say that I am very content having FreeBSD on my machine. And I like the FreeBSD ports very much. Up to now, however, I have not been able to install the application lphoto properly. The installation proceeds with no error messages. However, it systematically crashes at startup. See attachment. What's wong? [...] It seems like Python and QT are not properly bound together. What happens if you upgrade the python ports to 2.5 (see /usr/ports/UPDATING, entry 20070730) ? I'm seeing another Python/QT mismatch when starting devel/eric4 : Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/eric4/eric4.py, line 35, in module from KdeQt.KQApplication import KQApplication File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/eric4/KdeQt/__init__.py, line 20, in module import Preferences File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/eric4/Preferences/__init__.py, line 32, in module class Prefs(object): File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/eric4/Preferences/__init__.py, line 182, in Prefs CallTipsStyle : Qsci.QsciScintilla.CallTipsNoContext, AttributeError: CallTipsNoContext I'm not familiar with eric, but perhaps it's using qscintilla for qt3? eric4 builds fine on CURRENT, except for the py25-qt4-gui-4.2_1 dependency, which I added as a package from the i386-6-latest directory. Regards, Rene ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:46:39PM +0800, Thomas Zander wrote: Hi, recently I had a look at the upcoming version of the PCB layout tool eagle, in beta test at the moment. I am currently maintaining both the international (cad/linux-eagle) and german ports of this tool. This new beta version however refuses to run as it depends on glibc-2.4 while our linux_base-fc4 ships glibc 2.3.6. Do we have a roadmap or an estimated timeframe as to when a more recent linux_base and their extra packages (linux-xorg and such) becomes standard for the ports tree? first we have to have 2.6 emulation on default, then we can switch to default linux-base-fc6. I plan to do the switch to 2.6 emulation on default when 7.0R is shipped. roman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qpopper
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:35:15 +0300 Sanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I have problem at qpopper install from port. When he try checked i've got message Checked for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be located Hi Sanda, The qpopper's configure script tries to find sendmail on various sane places (/usr/sbin, /usr/lib, /usr/ucblib), so where is sendmail in your system? What is the output of # ls -l `which sendmail` ? Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gnome2 broken in evolution-exchange
The build of gnome2 breaks in evolution-exchange. Evidently evolution-exchange depends on (devel/)evolution-gconf-tools, but either doesn't know that or portupgrade doesn't understand that until evolution-exchange breaks in configure and therefore breaks gnome2. The situation is somewhat exacerbated by the broken evolution-exchange emitting a nonsense message about gnomelogalyzer (which is useless, but contains directions for sending massive amounts of system information to someone --- and also suggests running portuprade -a which is a waste of time because the depend in evolution-exchange will still be broken). Just ignore the gnomelogalyzer nonsense and read the real output of the configure script. It doesn't explicitly name the missing port in devel, but you can figure it out and install it (it will drag in most of evolution). -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gnome2 broken in evolution-exchange
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:02:39PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: The build of gnome2 breaks in evolution-exchange. Evidently evolution-exchange depends on (devel/)evolution-gconf-tools, but either doesn't know that or portupgrade doesn't understand that until evolution-exchange breaks in configure and therefore breaks gnome2. The situation is somewhat exacerbated by the broken evolution-exchange emitting a nonsense message about gnomelogalyzer (which is useless, but contains directions for sending massive amounts of system information to someone --- and also suggests running portuprade -a which is a waste of time because the depend in evolution-exchange will still be broken). Just ignore the gnomelogalyzer nonsense and read the real output of the configure script. It doesn't explicitly name the missing port in devel, but you can figure it out and install it (it will drag in most of evolution). -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 It doesn't require devel/evolution-gconf-tools here, and builds fine. Please check http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/bugging.html and report all that needed. (CCing gnome@). Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
