Re: portmaster-with-package-support release candidate available for testing

2009-12-04 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:53:52 +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:


 Err... Delete that. setenv PACKAGESITE /usr/ports/packages is the
 correct one. IMHO PACKAGESITE should be set to that by default.

I also see that I need to run 'portmaster --check-depends' manually after 
doing a 'portmaster -a -PP'

-- 
chs

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


unbreak devel/smake

2009-12-04 Thread Andriy Gapon

Here is a straightforward change to resolve name conflict between fexecve(2) and
 same named function in smake sources:

.if ${OSVERSION} = 800032
post-patch:
@${FIND} ${WRKSRC} -name *.[ch] | ${XARGS} ${REINPLACE_CMD} \
-e 's/fexecve/fexecve_bsd/'
.endif


OSVERSION condition is actually not necessary, I kept it just for clarity.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: bsd.gnustep.mk: gnustep-objc

2009-12-04 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 04/12/2009 10:58 Dirk Meyer said the following:
 Andriy Gapon schrieb:,
 
 What is the purpose of installing libobjc.so from gnustep-objc in the case 
 when
 GNUSTEP_WITH_BASE_GCC is defined?
 Is /usr/lib/libobjc.so somehow not suitable?
 Esp. given that all stable and old-stable versions of FreeBSD have GCC 4.2.
 Am I missing something?
 
 There are FreeBSD releases which did not have a shared libobjc.
 or the shared object is unuseable.

Do we still support ports on any of those releases?
If yes, then perhaps we can add a check for those, presumably old, releases.
I think there is no need to impose gnustep-objc on newer, good releases.

 Especially support for non i386 was broken.

gnustep-objc is not perfect in that respect too:
NOT_FOR_ARCHS=  ia64 amd64

 For example:
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51484
 
 The port builds a tested version of libobjc.so which is needed
 to build gnsutep ports.

Judging by information at the end of the following post, it seems that
gnustep-objc is some rather dated code and needed only in non-mainstream 
situations:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss-gnus...@gnu.org/msg11288.html

 There are still a few ports which do not build with the base gcc yet.
 This could be fixed in time.
 
 You can build it by setting in /etc/make.conf
 GNUSTEP_WITHOUT_LIBOBJC=yes
 GNUSTEP_WITH_BASE_GCC=yes

Did you mean I can avoid gnustep-objc with these settings?

 But gcc will be replaced in base, so I do put not very much effort in
 fixing the base stuff.

I don't think that this will happen any time soon.
Anyway, what are problems are there with base gcc with respect to objc?
I mean, this part must be identical to what is in upstream gcc (of the same
version).

My main point is that currently it's not possible to use GNUSTEP_WITH_BASE_GCC
on recent FreeBSD releases for e.g. amd64.  Because GNUSTEP_WITH_BASE_GCC
injects a gnustep-objc dependency and gnustep-objc doesn't build on amd64.
OTOH, everything is OK without GNUSTEP_WITH_BASE_GCC as well as with explicit
GNUSTEP_WITH_GCC42.  But why do I have to install another gcc 4.2.X from ports
when base gcc is also 4.2?

Most probably I still do miss something important.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: What's going on at Opera ? or is it only me ?

2009-12-04 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
Op Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:09:58 +0100 schreef Claude Buisson  
clbuis...@orange.fr:



Hello,

1) On November 2, I submitted a bug report (DSK-269766) to Opera  
concerning

Opera 10.01 for FreeBSD 6.4, namely that the binary was linked with

libstdc++.so.6
libgcc_s.so.1

which do not exist in FreeBSD 6.4,

and also with

libstdc++.so.5

which in the correct library in FreeBSD 6.4

So Opera could not be started, with the message:

/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required  
by

opera


Unfortunately, our bug system is not open for reading by the public, but I  
can tell you that this bug report has been received and is being looked at  
by our build system maintainers. A temporary solution is to install any of  
the gcc 4 ports on your system (eg. lang/gcc43).


Arjan van Leeuwen
Opera Software

--
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: What's going on at Opera ? or is it only me ?

2009-12-04 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen

Op Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:49:23 +0100 schreef Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:


Claude Buisson wrote:
2) Today, I installed Opera 10.10 on a FreeBSD 7.2 system, and now the  
IPv6

connectivity is lost !!

On the same system:

Opera show me the Network problem screen, saying that
http://ipv6.google.com/
in unavailable, and

Firefox connects perfectly to http://ipv6.google.com/


So, am I a perfect idiot, or Opera is unable to produce a working
browser (at
least for FreeBSD) ?


I can't comment intelligently about the library issues, but inre the
IPv6 problems there are reports on another (non-FreeBSD) list that
Opera is having problems in this area. It's not 100% clear what the
problems were, although they seem to have been related to how Opera
was preferring Teredo even when better options were available. It's
also not 100% clear to me what the fix applied to the latest version
was, although the rumor is that they simply changed it to prefer IPv4.

Sorry to reply with sketchy information, but I wanted you to know that
you were not alone. :)


This is correct. There was a problem in Opera for users who had both IPv6  
and IPv4 connections on *nix systems, for which we needed an immediate  
solution, because URLs that were reachable through both IPv4 and IPv6 were  
no longer working in Opera. We are aware of current problems with IPv6  
addresses in Opera 10.10 (which were a result of the fix for that), and  
this will be fixed ASAP.


Arjan van Leeuwen
Opera Software

--
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: What's going on at Opera ? or is it only me ?

2009-12-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Arjan (Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:19:58 +0100) *
| Unfortunately, our bug system is not open for reading by the public, but I  
| can tell you that this bug report has been received and is being looked at  
| by our build system maintainers
`*

This issue aside: Thank you, all your team, for the outstanding
browser which is a true pleasure to use!

(And for fixing (in 10.0) the issue with not updating icon titles --
the problem I entered into your bug system somewhere around the early
2008, AFAIR. :)

-- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net --

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Emanuel Haupt
Hi

I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
the new beta state nvidia driver [1].

Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be seperate from
x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.

Emanuel

[1] http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142120
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
 Hi
 
 I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
 the new beta state nvidia driver [1].

Yup, thanks for the pointer.  I'm considering options right now.

 
 Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from
 x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
 could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.

This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing
to do.  From user's perspective, one should be able to cd
category/port and make install.  The rest (including taking care of
architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
infrastructure.  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.

./danfe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Rainer Hurling

On 04.12.2009 16:18 (UTC+1), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:

On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:

Hi

I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
the new beta state nvidia driver [1].


Yup, thanks for the pointer.  I'm considering options right now.


Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from
x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.


This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing
to do.  From user's perspective, one should be able to cd
category/port and make install.  The rest (including taking care of
architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
infrastructure.  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.


I tried it with patching your Makefile and distinfo. In Makefile I only 
changed DISTVERSION and DISTNAME and commented out ONLY_FOR_ARCHS.


It installs fine and as far as I can see now all is well :-)

This is on 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) from today.

Rainer Hurling


./danfe


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Emanuel Haupt
 On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
  Hi
  
  I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
  the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
 
 Yup, thanks for the pointer.  I'm considering options right now.
 
  
  Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate
  from x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and
  x11/nvidia-driver could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.
 
 This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best
 thing to do.  From user's perspective, one should be able to cd
 category/port and make install.  The rest (including taking care of
 architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
 infrastructure.  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task,
 and my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.

Right, you can put shared make functionality in a seperate file and
include it by both ports. Personally I'd prefer two seperate ports
rather than OPTIONS because the two drivers don't provide the same
funcionality (ie missing TRIM support) and have different versions.

Emanuel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:32:11PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
  On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
   Hi
   
   I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
   the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
  
  Yup, thanks for the pointer.  I'm considering options right now.
  
   
   Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate
   from x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and
   x11/nvidia-driver could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.
  
  This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best
  thing to do.  From user's perspective, one should be able to cd
  category/port and make install.  The rest (including taking care of
  architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
  infrastructure.  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task,
  and my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.
 
 Right, you can put shared make functionality in a separate file and
 include it by both ports. Personally I'd prefer two separate ports
 rather than OPTIONS because the two drivers don't provide the same
 functionality (ie missing TRIM support) and have different versions.

In any case, I'll post a diff here for review before I make any commits
WRT amd64 support in nvidia-driver.

./danfe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:25:22PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
 On 04.12.2009 16:18 (UTC+1), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
  my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.
 
 I tried it with patching your Makefile and distinfo. In Makefile I only 
 changed DISTVERSION and DISTNAME and commented out ONLY_FOR_ARCHS.
 
 It installs fine and as far as I can see now all is well :-)
 
 This is on 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) from today.

Good to hear.  I expect few things would require some adjustments
(OPTIONS and packaging list come to mind first), but the fact port works
with just your simple changes is definitely a good sign.

./danfe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Robert Noland
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:18 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
  Hi
  
  I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
  the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
 
 Yup, thanks for the pointer.  I'm considering options right now.
 
  
  Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from
  x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
  could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.
 
 This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing
 to do.  From user's perspective, one should be able to cd
 category/port and make install.  The rest (including taking care of
 architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
 infrastructure.  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
 my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.

I've never actually used the blob, but is the new driver only amd64?  I
presume that it does need at least 8.0-RELEASE to work, but I can't
imagine that the underlying code would be different for i386/amd64.
i.e. the new driver *should* be better on both i386 and amd64, at least
if they have compiled an i386 version.

I do still wish that nvidia would join the rest of the modern world and
decide to release docs and code like every other vendor, but that is a
different debate I suppose.

robert.

 ./danfe
 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
-- 
Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD Port: zaptel-1.4.11.2

2009-12-04 Thread Peter Sprokkelenburg
Setting up a Asterisk box on Freebsd 7.2 i386

 

Need to install the wct4xxp driver for our TE212P card.

 

Extracted the sources from the ports tarball to do a manual config of the
make file.

 

When doing a make it stops in the wct4xxp directory with this :

 

 

awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/device_if.m -h

awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/bus_if.m -h

awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/isa/isa_if.m -h

awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/dev/pci/pci_if.m -h

cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99
-nostdinc  -I/root/zaptel-ports/zaptel-bsd-1.4.11.2/wct4xxp/../zaptel -I.
-I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100
--param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common  -mno-align-long-strings
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
-mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual  -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c base.c

base.c: In function '__t4_pci_in':

base.c:433: warning: implicit declaration of function 'udelay'

base.c:433: warning: nested extern declaration of 'udelay'

base.c: In function '__t4_pci_out':

base.c:441: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast

base.c: In function 't4_gpio_setdir':

base.c:485: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_gpio_set':

base.c:493: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_pci_out':

base.c:501: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_pci_in':

base.c:525: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_framer_in':

base.c:549: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_framer_out':

base.c:580: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 'hdlc_start':

base.c:955: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_hdlc_hard_xmit':

base.c:1259: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_rbsbits':

base.c:1338: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c:1429:11: error: macro msleep requires 5 arguments, but only 1 given

base.c: In function 't4_shutdown':

base.c:1429: error: 'msleep' undeclared (first use in this function)

base.c:1429: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once

base.c:1429: error: for each function it appears in.)

base.c:1390: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_chanconfig':

base.c:1482: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 'init_spans':

base.c:1573: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'vpm'

base.c:1574: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'vpm450m'

base.c:1634: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:1635: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:1644: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:1645: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c: In function '__t4_findsync':

base.c:1781: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_startup':

base.c:2024: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_receiveprep':

base.c:2159: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:2164: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c: In function '__receive_span':

base.c:2254: warning: implicit declaration of function 'prefetch'

base.c:2254: warning: nested extern declaration of 'prefetch'

base.c: In function 't4_transmitprep':

base.c:2317: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:2319: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c: In function 't4_check_alarms':

base.c:2438: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_framer_interrupt':

base.c:2651: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: At top level:

base.c:2795: warning: no previous prototype for 't4_interrupt'

base.c: In function 't4_interrupt':

base.c:2797: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_isr_bh':

base.c:2899: warning: unused variable 'wc'

base.c: At top level:

base.c:2917: warning: no previous prototype for 't4_interrupt_gen2'

base.c: In function 't4_interrupt_gen2':

base.c:3018: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'vpm'

base.c:3018: error: 'vpmdtmfsupport' undeclared (first use in this function)

base.c:3019: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'vpm450m'

base.c:3041: warning: implicit declaration of function 'tasklet_schedule'

base.c:3041: warning: nested extern declaration of 'tasklet_schedule'

base.c:3041: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 't4_tlet'

base.c: In function 't4_reset_dma':

base.c:3065: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:3066: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c: In function 't4_tsi_assign':

base.c:3396: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_tsi_unassign':

base.c:3417: warning: unused variable 'flags'

base.c: In function 't4_hardware_init_1':

base.c:3452: error: 'struct t4' has no member named 'wc_dma'

base.c:3453: error: 

The new cups ports seem to not recognize usb printers on FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE

2009-12-04 Thread eculp
At the end of this email I'm referencing a previous email that I sent  
about this before checking if the problem was the new BSD stack and it  
appears that it is.  I just checked with my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT laptop  
and it finds the USB printer perfectly and prints as expected. It  
would seem that I'm going to have to upgrade all my 7.2-STABLE servers  
to either 8.0 or 9.0 that all have usb printers that are being shared  
by others through cups. I assume that either of the two would be  
equally problematic.  I hadn't wanted to upgrade just yet but now I  
see little choice.  I've almost always run current on them and upgrade  
less than on my laptop and have never had any major problem since 4.0  
or maybe before.  That makes my upgrading seamless although a bit risky.


I wonder, if anyone who has upgraded, could give me a suggestion as to  
which method to use cvsup or burn a cd/dvd and I will need to  
recompile all ports and the first thing that pops into my mind is the  
example in the portmaster manual page.


One other question, Shouldn't this have a notation in UPGRADING and  
maybe a work around?


Thanks for any suggestions,

ed

Reference: Re: The new cups ports seem to not recognize or I don't  
know how to configure usb printers.


Quoting eculp ec...@encontacto.net:

I haven't had a problem like this with cups in years. I updated cups  
yesterday and can no longer print, install, reinstall usb printers.  
In admin/add a printer I have no local options only:


Other Network Printers: Internet Printing Protocol (http)
Internet Printing Protocol (ipp)
LPD/LPR Host or Printer
AppSocket/HP JetDirect

No input for discription, location, etc.  The usb printers are  
recognized when connected or disconnected by the kernel.


I am seeing this on both up to date current and 7.2 Stable.  I am  
going through the documentation hoping to find the problem.  If not,  
what is the best way to go back to the previous port?


Thanks,

ed




___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Sean C. Farley

On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Robert Noland wrote:

*snip*

I've never actually used the blob, but is the new driver only amd64? 
I presume that it does need at least 8.0-RELEASE to work, but I can't 
imagine that the underlying code would be different for i386/amd64. 
i.e. the new driver *should* be better on both i386 and amd64, at 
least if they have compiled an i386 version.


My understanding is that the blob is the same on all platforms.  The 
driver may be the same (or close).  The package is different.  While 
both ship with Linux x86 libraries, they contain only the FreeBSD 
libraries specific to the platform (amd64 or i386).


I do still wish that nvidia would join the rest of the modern world 
and decide to release docs and code like every other vendor, but that 
is a different debate I suppose.


I concur, yet I am very happy at the moment to see them support FreeBSD 
amd64.


Sean
--
s...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:20:10AM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
 I've never actually used the blob, but is the new driver only amd64?  I
 presume that it does need at least 8.0-RELEASE to work, but I can't
 imagine that the underlying code would be different for i386/amd64.

Driver we talk about is beta 195.22, and it exists for both i386 and
amd64.  It officially supports FreeBSD 7.2 with a current RELENG_7 kernel
(= 702106; use of a top-of-tree RELENG_7 kernel is recommended to ensure
recent Linux ABI compatibility fixes are picked up); 8.0 is also
supported:

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142120

./danfe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-04 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:18 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
  Hi
 
  I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
  the new beta state nvidia driver [1].

 Yup, thanks for the pointer.  I'm considering options right now.

 
  Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from
  x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
  could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.

 This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing
 to do.  From user's perspective, one should be able to cd
 category/port and make install.  The rest (including taking care of
 architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
 infrastructure.  Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
 my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.

 I've never actually used the blob, but is the new driver only amd64?  I
 presume that it does need at least 8.0-RELEASE to work, but I can't

it also works with RELENG_7 (but not 7.2R)
as a side note, I installed wine in a 32bit chroot and installed the
32bit version of the new nvidia driver
and I can Play World of Warcraft without any issues, so I guess it
works Just like linux does.

Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


php5-ffmpeg = config.m4 broken

2009-12-04 Thread ML
Hello,

I don't know if this issue concern port maintainer or php ffmpeg extension team 
directly, but after make extract in FreeBSD ports there's an error in 
config.m4, this line use PHP == operator that is of course not available in a 
.m4 file :

  if test $enable_ffmpeg_swscale == yes; then

the wrong line must be replaced with :

  if test $enable_ffmpeg_swscale = yes; then

or the ffmpeg_frame-toGDImage() function will not work because detection of 
swscale presence made by configure script is not working

Thanks to fix and/or to tell me where to direct the issue.

Hope this help !

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: The new cups ports seem to not recognize usb printers on FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE

2009-12-04 Thread Steve Randall
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:49:10 -0600
eculp ec...@encontacto.net wrote:

 At the end of this email I'm referencing a previous email that I sent  
 about this before checking if the problem was the new BSD stack and it  
 appears that it is.  I just checked with my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT laptop  
 and it finds the USB printer perfectly and prints as expected. It  
 would seem that I'm going to have to upgrade all my 7.2-STABLE servers  
 to either 8.0 or 9.0 that all have usb printers that are being shared  
 by others through cups. I assume that either of the two would be  
 equally problematic.  I hadn't wanted to upgrade just yet but now I  
 see little choice.  I've almost always run current on them and upgrade  
 less than on my laptop and have never had any major problem since 4.0  
 or maybe before.  That makes my upgrading seamless although a bit risky.

I took me some time, but I can confirm that the new CUPS does not see
USB printers on a GENERIC 7.2 kernel. It does, however, if you delete
the ulpt driver from the kernel. Which you don't need anymore anyway.

HTH
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: rt-3.8.4_1

2009-12-04 Thread Steven Kreuzer

On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Steven Kreuzer wrote:

 
 On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Kyle McKinley wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I was just wondering when the 3.8.6 would be available?  Thanks!
 
 I am currently running 3.8.6 through tinderbox so the answer is in the very 
 near
 future..
 
 If you (or anyone on the ports mailing list) happen to be in a position to 
 help me test out this update,
 please get in touch with me

Patch can be found at http://exit2shell.com/~skreuzer/patches/rt38.patch

This is a fairly complex port so if anyone is able to assist in testing a live 
install, please do so and let me know if you encounter any problems.
I am going to test it out a little bit more and hopefully next week I'll commit 
it to the ports tree. 

--
Steven Kreuzer
http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[HEADS UP] Experimental 3D HW accel support for Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx.

2009-12-04 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx users!

I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
graphics/libdrm.  Please see also my attached patch file.  I'll
update these as soon as tomorrow.

Mesa3D 7.6 supports experimental r600 driver, as known as AMD
R6xx/R7xx architecture.  I confirmed that it's good works, but
buggy on my Radeon HD 4850 environment with 9-current/amd64 and
xf86-video-radeonhd-devel.  Please see also [I known problem]
section.

[kernel support]
maybe, 7-stable, 8-release(at least 8-stable) and 9-current are OK.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/196470 (HEAD 2009/08/23)
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/198685 (RELENG_8 2009/10/30)
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/198686 (RELENG_7 2009/10/30)

[X11 driver support]
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati  OK
x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd I don't know
x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd-devel   OK

[To enable xorg.conf]
Section ServerFlags
Option  AIGLX true
EndSection

[I know a problem]
3D accelerated applications like glxgear, compiz display with
bluish coloring.  I confirmed git master branch Mesa3D codes,
too.  So I consider that this problem wasn't be fixed.

[Why update to 7.6]
I confirmed git master and 7.6, I think these are almost same
quality.  So I choose 7.6.
Index: dri/distinfo
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/dri/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 distinfo
--- dri/distinfo24 Jun 2009 01:15:07 -  1.17
+++ dri/distinfo5 Dec 2009 00:59:36 -
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-MD5 (MesaLib-7.4.4.tar.bz2) = b66528d314c574dccbe0ed963cac5e93
-SHA256 (MesaLib-7.4.4.tar.bz2) = 
eaf73d7a3a2dc959ddc0753abaa18160c64bec00b35bf4a0c96040b2072918ec
-SIZE (MesaLib-7.4.4.tar.bz2) = 3375615
+MD5 (MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2) = 8c75f90cd0303cfac9e4b6d54f6759ca
+SHA256 (MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2) = 
782a7b2810b1c466b3a994eba96485b59b47cc1120c0caa24de1aecf1e013830
+SIZE (MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2) = 4866983
Index: dri/pkg-plist
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/dri/pkg-plist,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 pkg-plist
--- dri/pkg-plist   24 Jan 2009 18:13:00 -  1.11
+++ dri/pkg-plist   5 Dec 2009 00:59:36 -
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 lib/dri/r128_dri.so
 lib/dri/r200_dri.so
 lib/dri/r300_dri.so
+lib/dri/r600_dri.so
 lib/dri/radeon_dri.so
 lib/dri/savage_dri.so
 lib/dri/sis_dri.so
Index: dri/files/patch-configure
===
RCS file: dri/files/patch-configure
diff -N dri/files/patch-configure
--- dri/files/patch-configure   10 Apr 2009 18:00:47 -  1.1
+++ /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
 configure.orig 2009-03-28 00:59:46.0 +
-+++ configure  2009-04-05 11:53:44.0 +
-@@ -5739,7 +5739,7 @@
- ;;
- *freebsd* | dragonfly*)
- case $host_cpu in
--i*86|x86_64) default_driver=dri;;
-+i*86|x86_64|powerpc*|sparc*) default_driver=dri;;
- esac
- ;;
- esac
Index: libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 bsd.mesalib.mk
--- libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk22 Aug 2009 00:22:54 -  1.15
+++ libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk5 Dec 2009 00:59:36 -
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 # $FreeBSD: ports/graphics/libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk,v 1.15 2009/08/22 00:22:54 
amdmi3 Exp $
 #
 
-MESAVERSION=   7.4.4
+MESAVERSION=   7.6
 MASTER_SITES?= SF/mesa3d/MesaLib/${PORTVERSION}:mesa \

ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/pub/unix/X11/graphics/Mesa/:mesa,glut,demos
 MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=mesa3d
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 
 CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS=-I${LOCALBASE}/include \
LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib
+CONFIGURE_ARGS=--disable-gallium
 
 ALL_TARGET=default
 
Index: libGL/distinfo
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/libGL/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 distinfo
--- libGL/distinfo  24 Jun 2009 01:15:06 -  1.11
+++ libGL/distinfo  5 Dec 2009 00:59:36 -
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-MD5 (MesaLib-7.4.4.tar.bz2) = b66528d314c574dccbe0ed963cac5e93
-SHA256 (MesaLib-7.4.4.tar.bz2) = 
eaf73d7a3a2dc959ddc0753abaa18160c64bec00b35bf4a0c96040b2072918ec
-SIZE (MesaLib-7.4.4.tar.bz2) = 3375615
+MD5 (MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2) = 8c75f90cd0303cfac9e4b6d54f6759ca
+SHA256 (MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2) = 
782a7b2810b1c466b3a994eba96485b59b47cc1120c0caa24de1aecf1e013830
+SIZE (MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2) = 4866983
Index: libGL/pkg-plist

Re: The new cups ports seem to not recognize usb printers on FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE

2009-12-04 Thread Brian W.

Dirk Meyer wrote:

eculp schrieb:,

  
would seem that I'm going to have to upgrade all my 7.2-STABLE servers  
to either 8.0 or 9.0 that all have usb printers that are being shared  
by others through cups.



Please update the ports and try again.
I would like to know if using libusb solves your problems.

kind regards Dirk

- Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
- [dirk.me...@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.me...@guug.de],[din...@freebsd.org]
http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/errorlogs/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
  
I have been having a different cups problem related to the man page 
portion of this on a FreeBSD 8 system.  This has been  a problem that I 
believe appeared early this week.


Compiling mantohtml.c...
cc  -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I.. 
-D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe  -fno-strict-aliasing 
-I/usr/local/include   -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE 
-D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT  -c mantohtml.c
cc  -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler 
-L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib  -pie -fPIE -Wall -Wno-format-y2k 
-fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -o mantohtml mantohtml.o

echo Converting man pages to HTML...
Converting man pages to HTML...
for file in cancel.1 cupstestdsc.1 cupstestppd.1 lp.1 lpoptions.1 
lppasswd.1 lpq.1 lprm.1 lpr.1 lpstat.1 ppdc.1 ppdhtml.1 ppdi.1 
ppdmerge.1 ppdpo.1; do \

   echo $file...; \
   ./mantohtml `basename $file .1`.man 
../doc/help/man-`basename $file .1`.html; \

   done
   cancel.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   cupstestdsc.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   cupstestppd.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lp.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lpoptions.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lppasswd.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lpq.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lprm.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lpr.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   lpstat.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   ppdc.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   ppdhtml.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   ppdi.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   ppdmerge.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
   ppdpo.1...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR
gmake[1]: *** [html] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.4.2/man'
gmake: *** [all] Error 1
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa 
/tmp/portupgrade20091204-2776-1rxg9wx-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade 
UPGRADE_PORT=cups-base-1.3.10_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.3.10_4 make

** Fix the problem and try again.



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mail/perdition 1.18 available

2009-12-04 Thread Doug Barton
Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
 Hi
 
 Version 1.18 of perdition is available.
 
 Could you please update the port?

You might want to take a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html
and have a go yourself. :)


Good luck,

Doug

-- 

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [HEADS UP] Experimental 3D HW accel support for Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx.

2009-12-04 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 12/4/09, Norikatsu Shigemura n...@freebsd.org wrote:
 Hi Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx users!

 I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
 graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
 graphics/libdrm.  Please see also my attached patch file.  I'll
 update these as soon as tomorrow.

 Mesa3D 7.6 supports experimental r600 driver, as known as AMD
 R6xx/R7xx architecture.  I confirmed that it's good works, but
 buggy on my Radeon HD 4850 environment with 9-current/amd64 and
 xf86-video-radeonhd-devel.  Please see also [I known problem]
 section.

 [kernel support]
 maybe, 7-stable, 8-release(at least 8-stable) and 9-current are OK.
 http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/196470 (HEAD 2009/08/23)
 http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/198685 (RELENG_8 2009/10/30)
 http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/198686 (RELENG_7 2009/10/30)

 [X11 driver support]
 x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati  OK
 x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd I don't know
 x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd-devel   OK

 [To enable xorg.conf]
 Section ServerFlags
 Option  AIGLX true
 EndSection

 [I know a problem]
 3D accelerated applications like glxgear, compiz display with
 bluish coloring.  I confirmed git master branch Mesa3D codes,
 too.  So I consider that this problem wasn't be fixed.

 [Why update to 7.6]
 I confirmed git master and 7.6, I think these are almost same
 quality.  So I choose 7.6.


I patched my ports tree, but when I ran portmaster to update the
installed ports, it was unable to download the MesaLib file:

= Attempting to fetch from
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mesa3d/MesaLib/7.6/.
fetch: 
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mesa3d/MesaLib/7.6/MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2:
Moved Temporarily
= Attempting to fetch from
http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mesa3d/MesaLib/7.6/.
fetch: 
http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mesa3d/MesaLib/7.6/MesaLib-7.6.tar.bz2:
Moved Temporarily

I had to add the following to MASTER_SITES in graphics/libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk:

ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/${MESAVERSION}/:mesa,glut,demos

Scot
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org