Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev!
When I tried to install freebsd 5.3 in a PIII machine with 80GB hard disk I get the following error: Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev! The creation of filesystems will be aborted Could some one help me out ? Thanks Sajith __ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? http://my.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP speed touch USB Chap Input: FAILURE
Hello I have some problem with Wanadoo ADSL connection and Alcatel speed touch usb I have installed the port: /usr/ports/net/pppoa here my configuration: /etc/usbd.conf (activate in /etc/rc.conf) === device Alcatel SpeedTouch USB devname ugen[0-9]+ vendor 0x06b9 product 0x4061 attach /usr/local/sbin/modem_run -f /usr/local/libdata/mgmt.o detach killall modem_run netstat -rn before connection = Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default192.168.0.1UGSc2 0rl0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0lo0 192.168.0 link#1 UC 1 0rl0 192.168.0.100:e0:18:df:ed:48 UHLW3 0rl0427 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%rl0/64 link#1 UC rl0 fe80::210:a7ff:fe1c:8e17%rl0 00:10:a7:1c:8e:17 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 Uc lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#6 UHL lo0 ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0 ff02::%rl0/32 link#1 UC rl0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 === /etc/ppp/ppp.conf == default: delete ALL ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set log Phase Chat IPCP CCP tun command adsl: set authname ** set authkey *** accept chap deny pap set device !pppoa2 -vpi 8 -vci 35 -v 2 -d /dev/ugen0 set speed sync set timeout 0 # set mtu 1492 # set mru 1492 disable ipv6cp disable pred1 deny pred1 disable lqr deny lqr set dial set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR == /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup == MYADDR: delete ALL add 0 0 HISADDR adsl: delete ALL add 0 0 193.253.60.3 == so i have run connection with: ppp -auto adsl netstat -rn after connection == Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default10.0.0.2 UGSc0 0 tun0 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 UH 1 0 tun0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0lo0 192.168.0 link#1 UC 1 0rl0 192.168.0.100:e0:18:df:ed:48 UHLW0 0rl0918 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%rl0/64 link#1 UC rl0 fe80::210:a7ff:fe1c:8e17%rl0 00:10:a7:1c:8e:17 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 Uc lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#6 UHL lo0 ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0 ff02::%rl0/32 link#1 UC rl0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 ff02::%tun0/32 fe80::210:a7ff:fe1c:8e17%tun0 UC tun0 == /var/log/ppp.log == Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: closed - opening Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - login Feb 14 09:44:35 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: login - lcp Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Authenticate Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: his = CHAP 0x05, mine = none Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: Chap Input: CHALLENGE (16 bytes from BSVZY154) Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: Chap Output: RESPONSE (fti/cvqz6a3) Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: Chap Input: FAILURE Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: lcp - logout Feb 14 09:44:39 server ppp[135]: tun0: Phase: deflink: logout - hangup Feb 14 09:44:39 server
RE: All your laptops are belong to Windows.
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of bsdnooby Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 11:33 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: All your laptops are belong to Windows. I'm defeated. The FreeBSD install gives no hints as to why it turns off my laptop. When I try to install FreeBSD, my brand new I'm blue.HP Pavilion laptop turns itself off. It does not matter if I use 4.x or 5.x, CD or floppies. There is no error log since it just shuts off after I choose to load a kernel. I have tried loading with ACPI off, and it does not help. I believe I tried all the kernel options available from the menu on 5.x. After reading that 4.X is killing it, my guess is that what's going on is that one of the device drivers compiled into the kernel that is for a piece of hardware that is NOT on your laptop is issuing a probe that is hitting a port that HP decided to use for something. If you really wanted to, and you have a system already running 5.X, it is possible to compile a custom kernel that has all device drivers stripped out of it, then put this kernel onto the first install floppy and do a floppy install of FreeBSD. Then make sure a copy of that kernel exists on the system when you reboot. This is a long and complicated procedure, unfortunately, and since your laptop is brand new, probably isn't worth it since you can simply return the laptop to the store and get a different one. (since it's under the 30 day return policy) Before you do that though it would be very kind if you could please submit a PR for this so we can get it documented. I also still think that the ACPI could possibly be at fault. I know that there's an option to disable ACPI probes, but I had a similar problem with a different system back in the early 4.X series of FreeBSD. I forget the version of FreeBSD that they introduced ACPI support, but I clearly recall the prior version of FreeBSD booting and running on a desktop, then the next 4.x version which had ACPI, not booting on this system, despite turning off the ACPI probe. As I recall a BIOS update from the manufacturer fixed the problem. (ACPI still didn't work but at least the diskettes booted) Of course, since power management on a laptop is pretty required, an exercise in getting a stripped kernel running on that Pavilion is purely academic. The computer is a HP Pavilion zv5445us, with 512MB RAM, P4-3Ghz, 100GB HD, 15.4 Hi-Def Screen, 54G 802.11b WLAN. I purchased it from Best Buy. Best Buy is fairly good at taking exchanges within 30 days. Their written policy kind of threatens a restocking charge of 15% on opened notebook computers - but the exception is if the item is defective. In your case you have a grey area, but if you were to take it back and tell them that the system is periodically shutting itself down and you want to exchange it for a different model because you don't have any confidence in the zv5445us, they wouldn't be able to verify this and you could probably talk your way out of the restock charge, PARTICULARLY if you bought the item on a credit card - since credit card issuers generally take a dim view of restock fees on consumer items. I have had a family member do this exact thing with a laptop he bought from there a few years ago. (it wasn't a FreeBSD thing, the laptop was just not very well made and he ended up buying a more expensive laptop from them) This is also particularly if you bring back ALL OF the original packing materials AND THE SOFTWARE particularly if it's unopened, and repack the laptop in it's box. Remember that Best Buy has to send the thing back to HP and if it breaks in transit and it wasn't in the factory cardboard, HP is going to charge Best Buy for the loss. abruptly shutdown when trying to do the install. It turns off before the install really starts, so I do not have much information to solve this problem. The HD is never touched. I'm blue. Don't be. The project doesen't intend for end users to solve these sorts of problems, frankly. Return the laptop and get a different model which will probably work fine and consider it a learning experience. There's enough people within the Project that have contacts within HP that if a decently-written PR was filed, it could be quitely handled within HP. I must warn you though that unless a PR is filed, nobody is going to bother with a complaint on a mailing list. You can file a PR from any FreeBSD system you have. See the handbook for details. A PR also documents the problem so that other potential purchasers will know to avoid the problem model. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All your laptops are belong to Windows.
Hello, Have a look at http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ , I have not found your model, but perhaps you can take some hints from other HP laptops. Good Luck Ramiro ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik Steffl Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 10:54 AM To: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: ... of laziness. In my case I unfortunately decided it might be a good thing to use a Microsoft client mail program to handle e-mail. This was a decade ago. I now have around ten thousand archived e-mail messages accumulated in a massive *.pst file that I really want to keep - not because I want to look at all of them again some day, but because from time to time I have to go digging around in that archive looking for some specific piece from some specific person - sometimes these messages might be 5-6 years old. One of these days though when I get some time, that file is going to get exported so that I can get out of dealing with Outlook. As it is ... not sure how you plan to do the conversion but it looks like you are thinking about doing something with file itself. I'd install an IMAP server (it's good way to handle email anyway) and just use outlook to copy the emails from local folders (i.e. pst file) to an IMAP server. Pretty easy and you don't have to think about file formats etc., outlook does all the work for you. (maybe you already knew this but I thought it would be useful to have it out here for all readers because I have seen people puzzling about how to get the email out from outlook and not considering this trivial solution) Yes, that is how I was planning on doing it since I am already using IMAP Note that for Outlook 98, and Outlook 2000, you MUST install Outlook in Internet mode NOT corporate/workgroup mode in order to use IMAP with Outlook. This doesen't apply to Outlook Express, BTW. Only to the Outlook that comes with Office XXX. They might have changed that in Outlook 2003 though. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updated perl - broke stuff
On 14 Feb Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:24:07PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Meaning I don't run this update script when updating perl from say 5.8.5 to 5.8.6 ? No, that what I meant by when updating from an older version. When perl changes from e.g. 5.8.6 to 5.8.6_1 (an internal port change that doesn't change where the files are stored on disk) you don't need to take special action. Ah yes. So I DO run the script for the update to 5.8.6 ? OK, nice to know I didn't do that in veign ;-) The /usr/ports/UPDATE script for perl contains a little typo imho. It's referring to perl/5.[68].[1245] ! I think this should be changed to perl/5.[68].[12456] if updating to 5.8.6 (six)! Or not? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:49 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: That is laughable. MS IE on Windows has one of the worst reputations around for following web standards. Go ask any professional designer. I did better. I actually ran the W3C conformance tests against MSIE, and it passed. At the time, no other browser came close. This isn't the problem with IE Yes, IE does pass the conformance tests. The problem isn't that, the problem is that not only does IE digest correctly written HTML and display it, the problem is that it ALSO digest IMPROPERLY written HTML and displays whatever it damn well pleases. In short, there's no way to know how an incorrectly written HTML page will display on IE. By contrast it's easy to know how an incorrectly written HTML page will display on Netscape - it displays a blank page. As a result of this, people that create web pages (and I am NOT polluting the title 'web designer' by lumping every moron that writes a web page into that group) and only look at them with IE usually end up making lots of mistakes. They fix these by layering on even more bandaids and mistakes until they get something somewhat resembling what they are after. Is is of course only displayable in IE. Needless to say this is a VERY bad thing for the Internet because it undercuts the standards as it enables the proliferation of websites that don't follow them. By contrast the Netscape browser tends to reject bad HTML and displays nothing. And naturally what's sauce for the goose isn't sauce for the gander with Microsoft - since the homepage for MSN is made sure by the MSN designers to be perfectly displayable on even older versions of Netscape, which are the most intolerant of bad HTML. Whether or not IE really is failing compliance by doing this is arguable - it is pretty difficult to test for non-compliance when the way that the browser is non-compliant is because it is accepting incorrect HTML in addition to correct HTML. However web designers who are far more understanding of this have in fact created example web pages that display what some of the more obvious problems are. Today, MSIE is not the only browser with good conformance, but it is still one of the best. That depends on your definition of best Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT with SIP-Spoofing
Dear all, Somehow I can't set-up my NAT router after changing the connection settings. It was working before, I changed the ppp connection to a SIP-Spoofing connection (In my ADSL router and FreeBSD Box). I have a local connection on my FreeBSD box. My ro0 interface is configured with my public IP. I started nat; /sbin/natd -v yes -interface rl0 There is no real output from this process. I have routed all traffic: /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via rl0 I used these instructions to get my FreeBSD Box connected to the Internet with SIP-Spoofing: http://www.xs4all.nl/~possamai/adsl/sip_spoof/ (Dutch) NAT was working correctly when I used the nat enabled option in my ppp script. The DNS lookup is correctly done on all workstation (With my own DNS server, forwarding from ISP). All workstations are using my FreeBSD box as default gateway (DHCP). Is there a conflict between SIP-Spoofing and NATd? If any more information is required please feel free to contact me. Thanks in advance, Zeo Smeijsters ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All your laptops are belong to Windows.
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of bsdnooby Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 11:33 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: All your laptops are belong to Windows. I'm defeated. The FreeBSD install gives no hints as to why it turns off my laptop. When I try to install FreeBSD, my brand new I'm blue.HP Pavilion laptop turns itself off. It does not matter if I use 4.x or 5.x, CD or floppies. There is no error log since it just shuts off after I choose to load a kernel. I have tried loading with ACPI off, and it does not help. I believe I tried all the kernel options available from the menu on 5.x. After reading that 4.X is killing it, my guess is that what's going on is that one of the device drivers compiled into the kernel that is for a piece of hardware that is NOT on your laptop is issuing a probe that is hitting a port that HP decided to use for something. If you really wanted to, and you have a system already running 5.X, it is possible to compile a custom kernel that has all device drivers stripped out of it, then put this kernel onto the first install floppy and do a floppy install of FreeBSD. Then make sure a copy of that kernel exists on the system when you reboot. This is a long and complicated procedure, unfortunately, If the laptop can do PXE-boot, it may be easier to build that custom-kernel for a PXE-install... Search for FreeBSD PXE install on Google. But I agree that it might be a better idea to get another laptop. I didn't have much problems with the FSC E8010, but it's not the cheapest and the power-management left something to be desired, I will retry it, though in the next weeks or months. Also, as the support for vmware4 on FreeBSD matures, it might also kill the only other reason for Linux on that thing ;-) If you want to keep a HP, try a NX 7010 and see if that works better. The Pavillion-series is really the low-end of the spectrum. cheers, Rainer -- === ~ Rainer Duffner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ~ Freising - Munich - Germany ~ ~Unix - Linux - BSD - OpenSource - Security ~ ~ http://www.ultra-secure.de/~rainer/pubkey.pgp ~ === ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN!
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:18:17 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A spammer is forging several of SORBS spamtrap e-mail addresses on their outgoing spams. The spams hit freebsd.org which of course is bouncing them back to the sender, which is in this case is the spamtrap e-mail addresses. This triggers the SORBS autolisting. Well, in this case, how about avoiding bounces completely? Bouncing to a forged sender address is not the most clever (re)action these days. Spammers and viruses abuse this succesfully (you pointed this very well). I belive that deleting (maybe dropping, tarpitting or deffering - adjust to taste) these bad bad messages is a better idea. -- Adrian Pircalabu Public KeyID = 0x04329F5E -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sendmail
i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Feb 15 11:21:24 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: from=qkim, size=44, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 15 11:21:44 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=qkim (1960/1975), delay=00:00:20, xdelay=00:00:20, mailer=relay, pri=30044, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1FALOJ9040845 Message accepted for delivery) Feb 15 11:22:27 srv102 sm-mta[40857]: j1FALOJ9040845: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1960/1975), delay=00:00:43, xdelay=00:00:43, mailer=esmtp, pri=30375, relay=gsmtp171.google.com. [64.233.171.27], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1108462951) where do this delay come from? Mvh Kim Johansen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel preemption
I've compiled the kernel with options PREEMTION I've tried rtprio I've tried sched_setscheduler(...scheduler=FIFO, priority=31...); Swapping is turned off. I still get 250ms pausing in the tcp comm. Maybe it is the stack?! Is it losing frames perhaps? Any good ideas what to look for - someone. Regarding the HZ - My application never uses the cpu for more than 1ms or so before it blocks. So that should not be tha case. There are not many other processes and I have none of them running at an elevated priority/scheduler scheme. ___ This e-mail communication (and any attachment/s) may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) or entity named above and to others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error by reply e-mail, and delete the e-mail subsequently. Thank you. _ Ce message (ainsi que le(s) fichier/s), transmis par courriel, peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou protégés et est destiné à l?usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu?il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, le distribuer ou le reproduire. Si vous l?avez reçu par inadvertance, veuillez nous en aviser et détruire ce message. Merci. _ ___ This e-mail communication (and any attachment/s) may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) or entity named above and to others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error by reply e-mail, and delete the e-mail subsequently. Thank you. _ Ce message (ainsi que le(s) fichier/s), transmis par courriel, peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou protégés et est destiné à l?usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu?il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, le distribuer ou le reproduire. Si vous l?avez reçu par inadvertance, veuillez nous en aviser et détruire ce message. Merci. _ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATI 9000 IGP
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:56:14 +0200 Cristian Teodorescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a Acer Travelmate 2000 with ATI 9000 IGP graphic card due to this all devices from computer are seen as produced by ATI inclusive soud card that is a Realtek ALS650 AC'97. Currently I am using Freebsd 5.2.1, everything works except for sound. I think all it need to be modified is some PCI id in the sound subsystem but I did not managed to find where realtek driver is. The card id for sound id 0x41431002 as reported by pciconf -lv. Can anybody tell me where i can find the realtek driver in order to fix it? You have more chances to get a response on multimedia@ or mobile@ Also note that 5.2.1 was a preview release and a lot has changed since. Did you try 5.3 ? -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up own domain and mailserver
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:56:01PM -0800, Luke wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, RL wrote: 1. I have adelphia cable internet. I would like to get a dyndns or no-ip.com account to have a static IP for my new godaddy domain. Simple enough. However, I would like to also do my own DNS to learn more about it. Will I be able to do this if I set my nameserver on godaddy to my box's dyndns address? And from there can I set up A records, MX Records, etc and all that good stuff? For a domain name to be effective, you need a public and highly referenced source to map your name to your IP address. You certainly need a DNS server. That's what these public registrars do. The registrar certainly puts an NS record in the top-level zone file. Beyond that, some of them no doubt provide nameservice for an extra fee, or are associated with some DNS provider. But registration of the name and provision of DNS are separate issues. You want them to map your name to your address. You can't move that service to your own box because... well.. how would anybody find you in the first place? While your conclusion might be true for the OP (we have established elsewhere that he almost certainly can't do what he was hoping he could), it's not about being able to find his machine. If he fulfilled the technical requirements (static IP addresses, more than one host providing DNS), he certainly could point the world at his own box by nominating it, and another, as the namerservers with his registrar. Technically you can do SOME of the domain service yourself if you're running a network. Public DNS servers might get them to yourdomain.com, and then you could direct them to machine1.yourdomain.com, machine2.yourdomain.com, etc. but you probably don't have any need for something like that at home. Unless you're describing port redirection of some kind, you're describing the OP doing his own DNS. I think we've ruled that out. You can run your own DNS service to do lookups for yourself though, and it's a fun way to learn about how the global system works. Check out the sections of the FreeBSD Handbook on BIND. Running DNS for a small network in my home was pretty educational for me. I agree. Running BIND on your own network is a good exercise. 3. I would also like to run my own mailserver for that domain (again to learn). Would I be able to do this and send receive email from/to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know most ISPs block port 25 and no-ip.com has a pay service called mail reflector that can get around this. Is this necessary? Why couldn't I just set up sendmail to use a port other than 25 like 8080? Sending isn't the problem. You can send from just about any port you want. It's receiving that's the problem. When a mail server tries to deliver mail to mynewdomain.com, it's going to be looking for your mail server on port 25, because that's the standard. It's just like how your web browser always goes looking for a web server on port 80 when you contact another machine. Unless there's some trick you can do with the MX records for your domain to advertise to the world that your mail server is running on a nonstandard port, There is no such trick. I don't know how you could get around the receiving problem if your ISP blocks incoming connections to port 25, short of having some external service like those you've mentioned cache the mail for you. As an aside, are there still ISPs that do this? How draconian. -- Paul. w http://logicsquad.net/ h http://paul.hoadley.name/ pgplm4gSER3KN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sendmail
Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Hi, that sounds like a DNS issue. Make sure that forward an reverse lookups are working correctly, and that your hostname is set properly in /etc/rc.conf. Simon pgpf1T7WOHK3d.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sendmail
I cant find any problemes with dns. try to ping localhost/hostname/domain, i got a answear, it takes 0.046 ms. Kim Johansen On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:01:34 +0100, Simon Barner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Hi, that sounds like a DNS issue. Make sure that forward an reverse lookups are working correctly, and that your hostname is set properly in /etc/rc.conf. Simon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache2 with worker MPM on 5.3
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:20:10PM +0200, Toomas Aas wrote: We are running a fairly busy website with Apache 2.0.52. At times a lot of httpd processes gather up and consume all the available memory, which slows down web access. You should check and see if apache is validly spawning all those sub-processes to cope with a traffic spike, or whether there's some condition that's gumming up the works -- having a whole row of apace processes hanging because they are attempting to talk to some database that itself has gone a bit tits-up and isn't responding correctly could quite easily lead to the sort of effect you're seeing. An important tip with running Apache on high performance we sites is to limit the maximum number of clients that will be spawned at any one time so that it doesn't drive the system into swapping -- essentially decide how muchof the system RAM you can dedicate to Apache, look at the size of an individual apache process via ps(1), divide one by the other and use that as the 'MaxClients' setting in httpd.conf. Note that loading such modules as mod_perl or mod_php will increase the size of individual apace processes enormously. Don't load such modules unless you actually need them, and in some cases it may even be worth running several instances of apache, both with and without those modules, plus adroit use of proxying and mod_rewrite in order to get the best performance. Note too that Apache 1.3.x processes are generally smaller than equivalently configured Apache 2.0.x processes so may help you get the most out of your server. Apache2 was installed from ports and defaulted to prefork MPM. I read from the Apache performance tuning document that worker MPM may perform better on busy websites and has smaller memory footprint. Is it safe to run Apache2 with worker MPM on FreeBSD 5.3? There must be a reason why prefork is the default... Prefork is the original mechanism Apache used to multiplex itself. It generally works exceedingly well on Unix systems where fork(2) is fast and efficient, which is why it is the default. Threaded MPMs may or may not be better for your particular situation, depending on: i) OS -- some have vastly better implemented threading infrastructure than others. For some, the overhead of fork()+exec() is huge, making use of threads anecessity. ii) Web application -- if you're just serving static HTML, then there's no need to use anything other than the prefork MPM. On the other hand, if you're running large, complicated web apps written in perl, PHP, Java etc. then a threaded MPM may fit better with the design of that particular application. iii) The nature of the workload -- how much data are you shifting, how much does it cost your servers to generate that data, how does demand vary with time-of-day or day-of-week. There isn't any one-size-fits-all answer. You will have to experiment with your particular set up in order to tune it for maximum performance. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor School Rd PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK pgpVKqhz2qwuJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sendmail
err, just an idea, youre relaying via smtp from gmail. isnt that smtp.gmail.com? just from what ive lately seen, the gmail smtp server is a little bit slow on sending On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:23, Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Feb 15 11:21:24 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: from=qkim, size=44, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 15 11:21:44 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=qkim (1960/1975), delay=00:00:20, xdelay=00:00:20, mailer=relay, pri=30044, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1FALOJ9040845 Message accepted for delivery) Feb 15 11:22:27 srv102 sm-mta[40857]: j1FALOJ9040845: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1960/1975), delay=00:00:43, xdelay=00:00:43, mailer=esmtp, pri=30375, relay=gsmtp171.google.com. [64.233.171.27], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1108462951) where do this delay come from? Mvh Kim Johansen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail
Thats not the problem, it takes 20 secound before sendmail can get the message accepted. it is been queued after 20 secounds. So a phpscript with mail would be running for 20secounds just to send a mail. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:10:43 +0100, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: err, just an idea, youre relaying via smtp from gmail. isnt that smtp.gmail.com? just from what ive lately seen, the gmail smtp server is a little bit slow on sending On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:23, Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Feb 15 11:21:24 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: from=qkim, size=44, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 15 11:21:44 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=qkim (1960/1975), delay=00:00:20, xdelay=00:00:20, mailer=relay, pri=30044, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1FALOJ9040845 Message accepted for delivery) Feb 15 11:22:27 srv102 sm-mta[40857]: j1FALOJ9040845: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1960/1975), delay=00:00:43, xdelay=00:00:43, mailer=esmtp, pri=30375, relay=gsmtp171.google.com. [64.233.171.27], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1108462951) where do this delay come from? Mvh Kim Johansen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:07 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Yes, and unfortunately that happens a lot. The most frequent constraint I encounter myself is the need to read or write Microsoft Word files. Fortunately it is mostly just reading, so I can get away with the free Word viewer downloaded from MS, but if I must write the files, I have no choice but to use the dusty old copy of Office running on my oldest desktop machine. Many wordprocessors write in Microsoft Word format these days. I personally have no use for Word at all, since I do all my text processing on Quark these days, but other people don't have Quark XPress, usually. That is what AW used to layout my book, as a matter of fact. It's currently the defacto standard in the publishing industry because they can go directly from it to a printing press. But it is rediculously expensive at $1,045.00 SRP. I hesitate to tell you how large of a percentage of my book royalties a purchase like this would take, but I will say it's definitely more than a single digit percentage. IMHO this is self-defeating. Very few book authors would spend this for writing software, and the publishers (like AW) spend millions a year in retyping costs to take manuscripts from printouts and such to stick them into Quark. Quark is really vulnerable from being disloged from this monopoly. I can see that Quark is already starting to fight a rearguard action as they are dumping copies of it at the educational price into the academic market, now. (where a lot of books originate) You should at least check out Scribus http://www.scribus.org.uk/ This is an open source project that is aiming to replace Quark There has already been one book published with it. While perhaps you might not be able to use it now, give it another 5 years and it might do it. I would have probably used this for writing mine if it had been available then. But even if this were not the case, the obvious question still arises: WHY would I switch to 100% UNIX, when Windows works perfectly on the desktop? YOU personally might not. But you were originally arguing that FreeBSD was unsuitable for a desktop OS. Now I see this is subtly changing, you are now only arguing that FreeBSD is unsuitable for YOUR desktop OS. But, you see, that is the point that I was trying to make in my last post. Anything can be used as a desktop OS, depending on your needs for a desktop. One of our customers for example uses Wyse Winterms (my idea, incidentally) that he purchases off Ebay, that are logged into a Fedora server. His desktops are at a number of stores that are in the grocery store chain that he manages the IT for, they have cash registers attached to them. The company he works for is one of the faster growing regional Mexican grocery store chains in this area. I am quite sure that his company is successful in a large part because of the massive inventory control they have - the second something is sold in any of their stores it's updated in the master inventory, there isn't any of this batching bullcrap that a lot of grocery stores use, where they have individual servers at each store who all dial into each other at night and attempt to create some recognizable update to the database. His chain can probably move product between stores and get product ordered faster than any of their competitors, and when your dealing with perishables this is of paramount importance. (particularly when most of them are shipped from Mexico) Now, most people aren't going to be using Winterms but the point is that people have wildly varying needs, and many of them could in fact use FreeBSD successfully as a desktop OS. They don't need an excuse. If they have a program that they know how to use, there's no reason at all for them to learn to use another program. Tell that to Microsoft then. The new versions of Word, Excel, etc ARE ANOTHER PROGRAMS the training required to bring most of the office users up to speed on them is considerable. I know this from experience I used to work as a sysadmin for a number of years and worked at several companies. I always hated when Microsoft brought out new versions of software because users would pester me with support questions for MONTHS after updating them. The worse offenders in fact were usually the same people who were the biggest pushers to get updated. And the costs had nothing to do with it. I remember the Office 95 - Office 97 upgrade, for example. At the company I was working at that time they were a small startup and didn't have a lot of cash - I sat down with the CFO the day after pricing was announced for Office 97 and laid out exactly all of the costs required for updating - from new system purchases (for some people with older systems that would just be too
Re: sendmail
may you please post your sendmail.mc file? On Tuesday 15 February 2005 12:21, Kim johansen wrote: Thats not the problem, it takes 20 secound before sendmail can get the message accepted. it is been queued after 20 secounds. So a phpscript with mail would be running for 20secounds just to send a mail. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:10:43 +0100, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: err, just an idea, youre relaying via smtp from gmail. isnt that smtp.gmail.com? just from what ive lately seen, the gmail smtp server is a little bit slow on sending On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:23, Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Feb 15 11:21:24 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: from=qkim, size=44, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 15 11:21:44 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=qkim (1960/1975), delay=00:00:20, xdelay=00:00:20, mailer=relay, pri=30044, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1FALOJ9040845 Message accepted for delivery) Feb 15 11:22:27 srv102 sm-mta[40857]: j1FALOJ9040845: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1960/1975), delay=00:00:43, xdelay=00:00:43, mailer=esmtp, pri=30375, relay=gsmtp171.google.com. [64.233.171.27], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1108462951) where do this delay come from? Mvh Kim Johansen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache2 with worker MPM on 5.3
Matthew Seaman wrote: Prefork is the original mechanism Apache used to multiplex itself. It generally works exceedingly well on Unix systems where fork(2) is fast and efficient, which is why it is the default. Threaded MPMs may or may not be better for your particular situation, depending on: Thanks a lot for the insight, Matthew. on Sunday I tried installing Apache2 with worker MPM and found out that I also had to rebuild PHP to make libphp4.so support threading. And then I found out that several PHP extensions that we need (such as php4-mysql) do not want to work with threading enabled. I didn't spend too much time investigating because I wanted to get the web server back up within reasonable time, but it seems that some PHP extensions just aren't considered thread safe and refuse to load when threaded version of PHP is in use. So I had to put back Apache2 with prefork MPM. On the positive note, it has been performing better than before. Upgrading the Apache and PHP ports to latest may have something to do with it, as well as me finding and fixing a procedure which occasionally pulled /var/tmp full from remote server via http (aargh). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:11 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Ted Mittelstaedt writes: Like Anthony, I do use Windows on the desktop myself. Well, that says it all, doesn't it? No, the rest of the posting says it all If you had only one computer that could boot only one OS, which would it be? I have been in that situation before. Back in 1986 I was the stereotypical starving student and could not afford to run out and buy new computer hardware. And by that time, it was obvious the future was in Intel-based PC hardware, so none of my older computer gear was worth screwing with, and worse was that the used market for old computer gear was pretty well stuffed with non-Intel gear. People were still in 1986, using IBM XTs for business work, and if they were Dumpsterizing them, it wasn't in any of the Dumpsters I ever dived into. So, buying a cheap older used computer wasn't really an option then like it is today. I ended up buying the pieces of a clone IBM XT, brand new, and assembling a computer. I was too poor to afford a case for it so the thing sat with all it's guts on the table. The monitor was an amber composite that I had purchased, also new, back sometime in 1982 or 1983, driven from a CGA card (some of those older CGA cards had composite output) No hard drive, this was a dual floppy system. (initially, I ended up getting a 10MB drive later on) I initially ran a pirated copy of DOS on it (remember, at that time MS wasn't selling DOS retail) but shortly after I got it up I switched over to...drumroll Minix. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FTP server problem
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 01:16 -0500, Jon Bruce wrote: Hi there, just trying to install FreeBSD, I am in the install section and can seemingly login to an ftp server. However everyone I try just brings me back to the ftp server listing. Any help would be great. Thanks Are you behind a firewall or gateway? If so, try passive mode - it's one of the options. Peter. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: probably a simple problem with permissions
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 23:53 -0500, David Wassman wrote: I am probably understanding this problem incorrectly meaning there is a simple explanation that is escaping me. My /dev/cd0 is owned by root so I have tried to change both the owner and the group so I can use it as a user. I have tried: chmod 777 /dev/cd0 chmod -R 777 /dev/cd0 chgrp 777 /dev/cd0 The problem is that when I reboot the system the old permissions return and I have to su and change the permissions back. How do I make these changes permanent? There is probably a security reason for this but it is very inconvenient on a desktop station. Any help would be appreciated. I am running 5.3. You need to make appropriate entries in /etc/devfs.conf Read the file - it has some examples. Peter. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to configure a port for install
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:48 -0500, Bob Ababurko wrote: Hello- I am trying to figure out how to configure the portswhat I am trying to do is add mhash to my system that a new script needs and I have to add the --with-mhash=[dir] when I compile php. Well I installed php with the ports and I am hoping to reinstall it with this added. I have tried to add it to the Makefile under the configure options, but I got an error that said: Unassociated shell command. That obviously is not the right way. Just install: /usr/ports/security/php4-mhash on top of your existing php installation. An alternative is to install /lang/php4-extensions and check the relevant boxes. Peter. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to configure a port for install
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 11:48 +, Peter Risdon wrote: On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:48 -0500, Bob Ababurko wrote: Hello- I am trying to figure out how to configure the portswhat I am trying to do is add mhash to my system that a new script needs and I have to add the --with-mhash=[dir] when I compile php. Well I installed php with the ports and I am hoping to reinstall it with this added. I have tried to add it to the Makefile under the configure options, but I got an error that said: Unassociated shell command. That obviously is not the right way. Just install: /usr/ports/security/php4-mhash on top of your existing php installation. An alternative is to install /lang/php4-extensions and check the relevant boxes. Ugh. errant slash: install lang/php4-extensions Peter. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN!
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adi Pircalabu Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:15 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN! On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:18:17 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A spammer is forging several of SORBS spamtrap e-mail addresses on their outgoing spams. The spams hit freebsd.org which of course is bouncing them back to the sender, which is in this case is the spamtrap e-mail addresses. This triggers the SORBS autolisting. Well, in this case, how about avoiding bounces completely? Bouncing to a forged sender address is not the most clever (re)action these days. Spammers and viruses abuse this succesfully (you pointed this very well). I belive that deleting (maybe dropping, tarpitting or deffering - adjust to taste) these bad bad messages is a better idea. Once you can figure out how to program the FreeBSD mailservers to determine exactly which incoming message is spam that needs to be dropped, and which is a legitimate message that is just perhaps misspelled and needs to be returned to the sender, your life wouldn't be worth a plugged nickel because every spammer on the face of the Earth would be gunning for you. ;-) Better yet is figuring out how to program a mailserver to determine which incoming mail senders address is the forged one, and which is the real one. A forgery wouldn't be much good if they forged an invalid e-mail address, now would it? ;-) Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN!
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:18:17 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A spammer is forging several of SORBS spamtrap e-mail addresses on their outgoing spams. The spams hit freebsd.org which of course is bouncing them back to the sender, which is in this case is the spamtrap e-mail addresses. This triggers the SORBS autolisting. Well, in this case, how about avoiding bounces completely? Better yet, why doesn't SORBS clean up it's act and only accept bounces for messages that were sent by their systems? Some kind of simple token in the test messages (much like how mailing list software uses unique IDs) would avoid these kinds of fake-bounces-causing-blacklisting errors. -- Matt Emmerton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem with GCC search path on FreeBSD5.3 AMD64
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maicon Stihler Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 10:18 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: problem with GCC search path on FreeBSD5.3 AMD64 Hi, I installed FreeBSD 5.3 for AMD64 on my computer following the standard procedure. To my surprise, when I tried to compile new packages I find out that /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include wasnt on gcc's search path. As a workaround I compiled the packages with CFLAGS=-B /usr/local/lib -I/usr/local/include. As far as I know, and the gcc info pages seems to agree, these too directories should be in the default search path. this isn't a gcc problem. Is someone else experiencing this same problem? Is there a way to add these directories to the default path without resorting to these env variables or runtime switches? ldconfig However, most packages use the -R and -L flags to the linker if they are linking to a shared library in /usr/local/lib because not all UNIX systems provide a ldconfig-type utility, and it is more portable to hard code it. Note that if your generating a library, don't use either of these flags. Libraries that depend on other dynamic libraries (such as openssl's libraries that can be linked to zlib) at runtime should confine themselves to only linking to libraries in /usr/lib (or build static) There are pros and cons to using the hints file that ldconfig generates vs compiling in the runtime location of the libraries. Neither is better than the other. Another trick used is to softlink the library from /usr/local/lib to /usr/lib The LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable should never be used except for testing Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operation: ipfw on a gateway box
I followed your advice and rewrote my firewall rules. Although, even now, there are some major difficulties. I still, can't acces the net from my 2 other computers via my FreeBSD firewalled gateway. Although I set up on it to allow traffic on ports 21, 22, 53, 8080 I can only telent to port 21, all the others report a connection refused error. I can ping the FreeBSD box, but i cannot ping any outside IP addresseses from the FreeBSD box or the other boxes on my home LAN. Also when FreeBSD is booting I caught some error messages that said unknow command setup for some of my firewall rules. I'm getting desperate please assist me in any way possible. Here's my fwrules file: fwcmd=/sbin/ipfw #Outside interface oif=tun0 #Inside interface iif=rl0 # Force a flushing of the current rules before reload $fwcmd -f flush #Check the state of all packets $fwcmd add check-state #Divert all packets through the tunnel interface. $fwcmd add divert natd ip from any to any via $oif # Allow all data from my network card and localhost $fwcmd add allow all from any to any via lo0 $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via $iif # Allow all connections that I initiate $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any out xmit $oif setup # Once connections are made, allow them to stay open $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any via $oif established # Everyone on the internet is allowed to connect $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any 22 setup $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any 21 setup $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any 8080 setup $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any 53 setup $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to any 4662 setup $fwcmd add allow udp from any to any 4672 setup # This sends a RESET to all ident packets $fwcmd add reset log tcp from any to any 113 in recv $oif # Allow outgoing DNS queries ONLY to the specified servers $fwcmd add allow udp from any to 161.53.114.135 53 out xmit tun0 $fwcmd add allow udp from any to 161.53.114.145 53 out xmit tun0 # Allow them back in with the answers $fwcmd add allow udp from 161.53.114.135 53 to any in recv $oif $fwcmd add allow udp from 161.53.114.145 53 to any in recv $oif # Allow ICMP $fwcmd add 65435 allow icmp from any to any # Deny all the rest. #$fwcmd add 65435 deny log ip from any to any -- It was as though a veil had been rent. I saw on that ivory face the expression of sombre pride, of ruthless power, of craven terror -- of an intense and hopeless despair. Did he live his life again in every detail of desire, temptation, and surrender during that supreme moment of complete knowledge? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - (was Re: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN!)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:58:01 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Once you can figure out how to program the FreeBSD mailservers to determine exactly which incoming message is spam that needs to be dropped, and which is a legitimate message that is just perhaps misspelled and needs to be returned to the sender, your life wouldn't be worth a plugged nickel because every spammer on the face of the Earth would be gunning for you. ;-) Well :) let's put it in terms of cost: what's the cost of losing a misspelled legitimate mail vs. the cost of bouncing ALL misspelled mails which include virii and spam? This is quite a dilema, but I tend to reduce the costs by dropping few legitimate mails instead of bouncing them together with many other bad ones. -- Adrian Pircalabu Public KeyID = 0x04329F5E -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NFS hangs on 5.3-RELEASE-p5
Good evening, We have a problematic FreeBSD box, which acts as nfs server and runs 5.3-RELEASE-p5 on an i386 AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (in a 32-bit mode). The purpose of the box is to supply another FreeBSD (5.2.1-RC) ftp server with more disk space. As of -p5, we have src/usr.sbin/nfsd/nfsd.c,v 1.30 2004/08/07 04:27:52. Average system load is about 2,5. The problem is, that the nfs server hangs after running for a while, like, 20 minutes. Any file operations (at the nfs mount points and below) hang on the ftp server too, making it inaccessible. The nfsd processes on the nfs server do not respond to any signals sent by `kill`, so only a reboot of the system is a temporary solution. We have ACPI enabled, NMBCLUSTERS set to 65535, SMP, debug.mpsafenet=0 and also some kern.ipc.* customizations which, as we assume, do not affect the behavior of nfsd. Everything is served via 3COM 3C940 single port, 1000baseT adapter (device sk). The whole dmesg is available at http://webart.lt/~molotov/dmesg Some file operations on the nfs server cause system panic. I didn't debug anything, because I do not have much experience in it, but I could try to do it by a request from anyone, who is willing to help. The strace utility shows that no system calls are performed by any of nfsd processes while they are inoperative. Any help or comments would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- Simonas Kareiva ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pagedaemon sometimes eat CPU
Why pagedaemon somtimes eat CPU (about 1-3 minute)? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot manager doesn't boot (solved)
14 Lut 2005 (Poniedziaek) o 23:53 (+0100) Marcin Simonides napisa(a): In the few recent months I've been having problems with the standard FreeBSD bootmanager: instead of booting some systems it would just beep and do nothing. [...] Ok, in my case setting the packet option for the bootmanager solved the problem. I guess it's something to do with geometry perhaps? Well I need read about that :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All your laptops are belong to Windows.
I'm in a situation similar to you... I've just purchased a Medion SIM2000, it boots up but I've also some troubles with sound modem. Here the strange problem is that the sound card is a AC97 ALS (SiS7012) and it just outputs from headphone and the modem is a SiS7013 (Intel Winmodem) that isn't in the ports tree (while there is the LT winmodem). For the Video Card with some trick I was able to get a full 16:9 resolution like in windows but without DRI (this is an Xorg problem). Above all I'm almost surprised because I know the difficulty to work with a laptop unix. I've tried Fedora Core 3 Debian III but it gives me an error during boot (acpi error). So like a BSD users I feel above all lucky enough. The only suggestion I feel to give you is to wait the awake of 6.0 because it will have many changes in ACPI calls. I'm waiting too to have some tricks about my sound card :) bye Davide - Original Message - From: bsdnooby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:32 AM Subject: All your laptops are belong to Windows. I'm defeated. The FreeBSD install gives no hints as to why it turns off my laptop. When I try to install FreeBSD, my brand new I'm blue.HP Pavilion laptop turns itself off. It does not matter if I use 4.x or 5.x, CD or floppies. There is no error log since it just shuts off after I choose to load a kernel. I have tried loading with ACPI off, and it does not help. I believe I tried all the kernel options available from the menu on 5.x. The computer is a HP Pavilion zv5445us, with 512MB RAM, P4-3Ghz, 100GB HD, 15.4 Hi-Def Screen, 54G 802.11b WLAN. I purchased it from Best Buy. Under Windows, it appears Hyper-Threading is turned on, and I have not found a way to turn it off inside the CMOS. The machine runs Windows XP Pro fine, but I am trying to switch to FreeBSD on all my boxen. I was really surprised to find this one abruptly shutdown when trying to do the install. It turns off before the install really starts, so I do not have much information to solve this problem. The HD is never touched. I'm blue. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN!
-Original Message- From: Matt Emmerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:06 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Adi Pircalabu; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN! On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:18:17 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A spammer is forging several of SORBS spamtrap e-mail addresses on their outgoing spams. The spams hit freebsd.org which of course is bouncing them back to the sender, which is in this case is the spamtrap e-mail addresses. This triggers the SORBS autolisting. Well, in this case, how about avoiding bounces completely? Better yet, why doesn't SORBS clean up it's act and only accept bounces for messages that were sent by their systems? SORBS doesen't send messages. Your thinking of ORBS which probes submitted mailservers to detect relaying. SORBS is like most other blacklists in that it uses spamtraps. The solution is for SORBS to determine which ones of their spamtrap e-mail addresses is being forged, then replace them with different spamtraps. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony
On 15 Feb Timothy Smith wrote: Stijn Hoop wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:34:24AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost any other browser. Firefox does pretty well, tough; Opera much less so. Thank you for giving me another reason to killfile you again, after you resurfaced without your vanity domain. You clearly don't know jack about the things you write. Maybe you could write some code instead of exploding the lists with drivel. *plonk* hah well said sir I think most of the time Anthony *does* know what he writes about but does not care enough to be honoust about *all* the facts. In Holland we also had a person like him -silent for quite some time now- polluting a list with propaganda and twisted truths about windows/linux things. Discussion will *never* silence such a person, nor will polite questions do the trick. They feed on response. The only way we got rid of this person was to *totally* ignore everything he wrote about. *Everything*! It took quite a while before everybody understood this to be the way to go. As long as people keep on responding, Anthony's will florish.. As he once said (one of the things I agree about): a killfile is no solution; it's the easy way out; a bit childish even ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd vs. linux
On Feb 14, 2005, at 7:43 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: Eric Kjeldergaard writes: Well, no that's not entirely true...First off, there's the claim by Windows itself that it's not drivers. The OS itself never identifies problems as being within the drivers. Driver code is assimilated with the kernel while it is running. You've read the code (as you say) and know that Windows wouldn't possibly lie about the fact that it's not the drivers. Sure it would. Most error messages are generic; few programmers are conscientious enough to put in extremely detailed and specific error messages. And in some cases the OS doesn't really know what happened, especially for faults in the kernel (or the drivers, which are assimilated with the kernel, as I've said). And then there's the thing where since one is including drivers along with an operating system, they are part of the operating system even if they were written by a third party. They are not part of the operating system. You spend a lot of time arguing...Let's look at it this way. It's not part of the OS! Fine. Will MS let me buy just the kernel? Didn't think so. It's all or nothing. While that's the technical way of looking at it (not part of the OS) they ARE part of the distribution, and for practicality's sake, and for the definition of any reasonable person, they ARE part of the OS. If it comes with the average CD installation, it's part of the OS. I don't hunt the @#$$% driver down, I don't run a separate installer, I don't jump through hoops to install it, the OS detects the device and installs the driver then for all purposes of the rest of the sane Earth it's part of the OS. Why? I bought Windows, I installed it, and it installed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] driver without intervention. Extend it a little more, even MS argued that Internet Explorer was part of the operating system and could not be unbundled. For their product definition, it was part of the OS. Technically, it was not. Practically, it was. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd vpn tunnel with two subnets on one site
Hi, i have created a vpn tunnel between two freebsd 5.3 machines with ipsec and racoon. Iam routing two private networks behind the vpn gateways over the internet. Its working fine. 192.168.0.0 / 24 | | VPN Gateway 1 | | Internet | | VPN Gateway 2 | | 192.168.1.0 / 24 If I now want to add a new network on one site for example 192.168.2.0 / 24, how can I do this ? Is this a routing problem, or is ipsec limited to route only one network ? Thanx for your answers . ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost any other browser. Firefox does pretty well, tough; Opera much less so. You are _definitely_ not a web designer. MSIE is _hell_ with standards compliance. Mozilla is the best, followed by Opera, KHTML/Safari is also up there; MSIE is the _worst_ and has several glaring errors when it comes to supporting standards. It botches: * The box model. * Transparent PNGs. * Position: Fixed. etc. Webmasters should probably be replaced if they design an open Web site for any _specific_ browser. Internal web sites are a different story. In an ideal world. But in the real world you have to build your site using standards compliance, then do tricks to make it work in explorer. Don't believe? look through my website code. Or even look at the variety of projects and tutorials dedicated to getting around the flaws in explorer. An example: http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/intro/ Vonleigh Simmons http://illusionart.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd vs. linux
On Feb 15, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: Microsoft doesn't understand servers very well. Most people at Microsoft grew up using microcomputers, and that's all they know (sound familiar?). They truly have no idea of some of the constraints that apply to the server world. As a result, they don't build ideal server software. The closest they've come has been with the early versions of Windows NT, which had a very solid kernel. They were an outside team that worked on VMS. They started NT before Windows became a marketing drone's dream. The Windows subsystem became the default subsystem after Windows 3.x took off. Originally it wasn't going to have a GUI. A GUI always detracts from a server's function. Nobody is sitting in front of a server, Three of ours are sitting right behind me. That has never been an objective of Microsoft. Their servers have elaborate GUIs because the operating systems come from the desktop world, and won't function without a GUI. They have GUIs because they thought it was easier to market. They have GUIs because they're easier for novices to use as servers. They have GUIs because MS started trying to market servers to the workgroup and not corporate markets. They have GUIs because NT was a new kid on the block, people were familiar with Windows, and they were able to help marketing-wise slip some sales in because it was a lower learning curve. They have GUIs because believe it or not, sometimes you don't need the strict definition of a Server in order to serve files to a couple other computers in your home network and that Server can, in fact, do double duty. One of the most serious criticisms made of Windows in the server world is that you cannot run a Windows server without a GUI, and remote administration is an unbelievably awkward nightmare. That's two criticisms, and at this point, I really think most people don't give a rat's behind about the GUI in a server, since the OS should be paging out unused pages to swap if the server settles down. Remote administration sucks, yes I'd agree. You have to jump through hoops to find decent tools for reigning in Windows in many situations. Apple is smart enough to pull it off ... Apple has no advantage over Microsoft in this respect. They are locking their own OS into a GUI, too. But they probably realize that their future is in desktops, not servers. That surely explains their sales of XServes and RAID servers. Don't want the GUI, then install Darwin. Want GUI and remote admin/monitoring tools, use OS X Server. Don't log into it, and it'll swap out most of the GUI stuff to disk. ... but all Microsoft has done is continue to guarantee employment for MSCE's who continue to exclusively recommend any and everything Microsoft who in turn continually ensures these champions stay employed. As I've said, Microsoft doesn't care about employment of MCSEs. They most certainly profit from MCSEs. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How do I set the source address on a multi-homed host?
Am Samstag, 12. Februar 2005 16:05 schrieb Daniela: On Friday 11 February 2005 21:27, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote: Daniela wrote: I have two NICs (one inside and one outside interface) with NAT activated. The problem is that every time I establish a connection with a machine on my LAN, it uses the address of the outside interface as the source of the packets, which creates problems with my firewall. How do I tell my machine to use the other address whenever I connect to a local machine? Daniela Hi Daniela, Can you please be more specific? You mean this happens when you are connecting from inside intranet to some other point inside intranet? Yes, this happens when I connect from my machine (which functions as a router with NAT to allow the other LAN machines connect to the internet) to another LAN machine. When the router establishes a connection to another point in the intranet, the source address used is my official IP, and not 10.0.0.1, which is the intranet IP of the router. In other words, I want the source address to be 10.0.0.1 on every outgoing connection where the destination is inside my intranet. It's easy if your doing NAT with PF or IPF, something like: nat pass on $o_if from $localnet to !$otherlocal_net - $oif_addr is what you want. -Harry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgps7gxuxybHt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sendmail
yes, also when i ping my ip. i cant find any sendmail.mc file. i find freebsd.mc and freebsd.submit.mc, somone of them you want? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
On Monday 14 February 2005 09:32 pm, Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: You can say all you want. Thank you. I feel better about it knowing that it's okay with you. Every professional designer I have ever talked with lamented the poor state of standards conformance of IE for Windows. They probably never actually tested the browser. And they could document it. Excellent ... where can I find a copy of their documentation? MS only has compatibility with itself, and that is it. It interprets HTML correctly according to W3C standards, and it handles CSS correctly as well. What other compatibility do you require? You can find test suites here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Test/ (HTML4) http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/ (CSS) And since it is the 800lb gorilla, they think they can basically do whatever they want. They know that some criticism of what they do has no basis in fact, and that people without emotional investment in a hatred of Microsoft may actually check the facts and invalidate the criticisms. People I highly respect have done lots of tests of browsers with the standard and conformance to the W3C standards suites and IE Windows does not do that well. I've done the tests myself, instead of believing what others say, and MSIE does fine. The URLs are above. I worked as a professional web developer and designer from 1996-2002. You have no idea what you're talking about. Not only have I done the tests, I've worked with it for a living. Knowing whether it was compliant was part of my job. A huge part of my job was spent hacking existing sites that were perfectly compliant as written so that they would work properly in IE. Talk to *any* web developer, and they'll tell you the same thing. MSIE at one time was getting better with compliance (around when NS 4.7 was the most popular, a horrible time for compliance in general), but it still wasn't very compliant, and the spec has changed since they last updated it years ago. MSIE's CSS2 support is pathetic, and CSS isn't very good as it is. It allows - and encourages - sloppy markup. They need to do more than push out security fixes. - jt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mx2.freebsd.org in SORBS, AGAIN!
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:43:42AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: The solution is for SORBS to determine which ones of their spamtrap e-mail addresses is being forged, then replace them with different spamtraps. This, and keeping a record of IP addresses that were already listed in error once (some kind of grey/whitelist). Each time a grey/whitelisted address is scheduled for auto-listing, a script or even a human should have a look at this before relisting it again. This wouldn't prevent them from initial mistakes, but it would help reduce the kind of DoS attacks they are being subject to right now. Ted -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony
On Feb 15, 2005, at 7:56 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 15 Feb Timothy Smith wrote: Stijn Hoop wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:34:24AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost any other browser. Firefox does pretty well, tough; Opera much less so. Thank you for giving me another reason to killfile you again, after you resurfaced without your vanity domain. You clearly don't know jack about the things you write. Maybe you could write some code instead of exploding the lists with drivel. *plonk* hah well said sir I think most of the time Anthony *does* know what he writes about but does not care enough to be honoust about *all* the facts. In Holland we also had a person like him -silent for quite some time now- polluting a list with propaganda and twisted truths about windows/linux things. Discussion will *never* silence such a person, nor will polite questions do the trick. They feed on response. The only way we got rid of this person was to *totally* ignore everything he wrote about. *Everything*! It took quite a while before everybody understood this to be the way to go. As long as people keep on responding, Anthony's will florish.. The problem with that is that the propaganda will be picked up by Google caches and the like; people that know enough to search for answers and and starting out trying to learn the ropes start finding the drivel and lies and if no one responds, by nature, people tend to believe the crap. No one offered a counter to it :-/ These events also show the personality of the cult in which new people are starting to dip their toes into. I can't count the number of people I've read accounts from saying that they were turned off to Linux a couple of times simply because the help was to go to IRC or newsgroups, and the people there were childish monsters. Here is a list forum that has attracted people with FreeBSD questions (technical questions, general questions...I see it listed on the reply as just questions and not tech-questions) and some of these side discussions are now being met with listmoms demanding it be moved to -discussion (if it's supposed to be strict, wouldn't this forum be to ask questions and discussion be to get answers?). If the list starts getting really negative, other people will be turned off to it. (All this talk about logo/mascot contests...why would people WANT to get involved for marketing it if the people that usually help new people or people having trouble turn sour at others when they could opt just to ignore it?). Sometimes the discussion DOES still help people. One person commented that they thought the Ernie Ball story was interesting. I had assumed people involved in using OSS or have to market it to their bosses would have found that information years ago already. Eventually people probably will get so sick of it they just stop replying. As I said early on to Anthony, he didn't hear what he wants to hear, so there's no point in answering him. Sorry, no photoshop for FreeBSD, and if that's the only kind of criticism you have, there's nothing we can do about it. Go away then. But he continued to post about things that can mislead other people. Yes, I'm guilty of feeding him too at the moment...I've worked hard at learning FreeBSD and Linux, and when people rip at it with information that is inaccurate, I don't want others to find that and think it's gospel truth. It's just an OS but I've wasted a good portion of my life trying to learn the ropes of it and introducing it to my workplace, and I know what it's like to run into people with these kind of attitudes and I know that I've personally found ways that for me (and for what the majority of other people do) there *are* workarounds and alternatives available to them. Anthony comes off as the type of person that already has his mind set and what he's hoping to accomplish here I don't know... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
no they did and could point out specific problems and likely intentional changes. Where can I see a list of these? Here are just a few: http://www.positioniseverything.net/ie-primer.html A very basic one is the box model problem. Basically if you define the width of a box to be 100 pixels, and you put in a padding of 10 pixels, the total box size should be 120 pixels (100 pixels plus the 10 pixels on each side for the padding). However, explorer decided to take the width as the total size, so in the above example the box is only 100 pixels wide instead of 120. It would be ridiculously easy to fix it and behave as the standard dictates, however, they refuse to do it. This is a major problem and can completely destroy a design. Another major thing that would be easy to fix is the handling of transparent pings. This would allow great versatility in site design, and many times I would've loved to use it. What Explorer does however is not just disregard the transparency, which would make it workable, but puts a light blue background behind the whole transparent image; a behaviour that makes no sense. Not only that, using proprietary IE code is the only way to make transparency work, and it doesn't work with repeating images (so the code is there to make it work, they just make you use IE only code for it to work). And these are just a few examples, on every single site I've designed I've run into new issues. Explorer is the worst browser when it comes to standards compliance, I have spent too many hours hacking up my code that works beautifully in every other browser, just so it works in Explorer. It did better than any other overall. Next time STFW (really, google turns up many pages describing problems web designers have with IE), or at least don't talk about something you have no idea about. Vonleigh Simmons http://illusionart.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD motherboard survey site disappeared
There was a site collecting information about motherboards. It was at: http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ It seems to be gone along with all the information that was collected. For reference, this was the original list mail that started the project: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031121094707.G89525 Anyone know where the site went or the whereabouts of the site's owner ( Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] )? Thanks, Randy -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:56:06PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I think most of the time Anthony *does* know what he writes about He certainly know more about some subjects than I do, I will not dispute that. However in all these e-mails I've never seen him back off once on subjects that I *do* know, even when faced with overwhelming evidence that contradict his 'facts'. Discussion will *never* silence such a person, nor will polite questions do the trick. They feed on response. The only way we got rid of this person was to *totally* ignore everything he wrote about. *Everything*! It took quite a while before everybody understood this to be the way to go. As long as people keep on responding, Anthony's will florish.. As he once said (one of the things I agree about): a killfile is no solution; it's the easy way out; a bit childish even ;-) It is a bit childish; that's why he currently is the *only* person whose mail goes directly to /dev/null. I had actually given him the benefit of the doubt; this is my second encounter with a person named 'Anthony Atkielski' on this list (given the name I presume it's the same one), and it's not pretty _for the second time_. Reasoning wouldn't work the first time, and I can certainly ignore a lot of e-mail that I get from him or others, but I do get a bit upset when a person simply misstates the facts and will not back down (IE better at standards support being just one of said facts). I agree that response is what keeps these threads alive, and I know that I'm contributing once again to the flames. However I'm still hoping that Anthony will stop writing e-mails and start writing code or documentation, or maybe triage bugs, or *anything* else that benefits the FreeBSD project more than bickering about logo's, other OS's, and desktops, and who 'is right' in one situation vs another. Actually *doing* things is pretty satisfying too, you know. In any case, this is my last public e-mail on the subject. --Stijn -- Beware of he who would deny you access to information. For in his heart he thinks himself your master. -- Sid Meier, Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri pgplwxL9hrnjH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Updated perl - broke stuff
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:15:18PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Sunday 13 February 2005 02:02 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote: - Original Message - From: Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Updated perl - broke stuff I stopped using portupgrade because it only upgrades ports that are out-of date. It then modifies the installed software database to change any dependencies that relied on the old port to show them as relying on the new port. For most ports, this works. For Perl, particularly mod_perl, this doesn't work. If you install a new perl you have to rebuild everything that depends on perl even if it hasn't been updated. So I stopped using portupgrade. Wouldn't it make more sense to fix mod_perl? (Or portupgrade - whichever one is the culprit?) All the ports that depended upon perl appear to have had their dependencies updated properly except for libwww and mod_perl. ISTM, fixing those two ports makes more sense. If you don't use portupgrade, then what *do* you do? Wouldn't you have to deinstall and reinstall every port that depended upon perl? Or will pkgdb -F do the trick? Pkgdb -F is what screws up the installed ports registry. Here is an example of what happens: 1. port-A needs dependency port-B installed 2. port-B is installed 3. port-A is installed and marks its registry as being dependent on port-B and here is where things go wrong using sysutils/portupgrade: 4. port-B gets upgraded to port-B.1 and portupgrade reports port-A has a stale dependency. Then you run pkgdb -F and port-A's registry is changed to say it was built with port-B.1, portupgrade claims this fixes the registry when it really breaks it. Remember, port-A was built with port-B, not port-B.1 and the correct way to fix the stale dependency is to upgrade port-A so it is built with the newer dependency. sysutils/portmanager also updates ports, put it doesn't cheat. When port-B became port-B.1 portmanager will rebuild port-A using port-B.1 as the dependency. port-A's registry stays reliable, reflecting how the I don't see why any port should be rebuild just because a Port it depend on is updated. In more than 99% of all cases this is not needed. you whould en up in rebuilding openoffice or mozilla/firefox quite often. Correct me if im wrong. But most of the problem was caused by the fact that the installation directory of the perl modules has changed with the update. That's a Problem that ist unique to script languages like perl, ruby and python, and don't affect the vast majority of the Ports. Most ob the dependencies a of the type program A uses program B or program A uses a library ob program B. In both cases there is no need for an update of program A when program B is updated because programm a will work well with the new version of program b or more than just a recomile is needed to make it work with the new version. I might have helped if with the update of the perl ports all ports depending on perl would have been version bumped. So portupgrade had updated them with the perl port automaticly. I don't see where there is cheating with the update ob the dependency information. You install port A and port B. port B depends on port A. after some time you update port A to a new version. port B still works without a problem. But port B still has the dependency for the old version of port A. Some time later you try to delete program A. There is a hell of work to be done finding out if any of the ports still installed need this port if the dependency information is not consisten with the installed version numbers. The dependency infomation should reflect the information what other ports are needed and not the information which version of a port A was installed on the system on building time of port B. It should be the responsibility of a Port Maintainer to decide if a port has to be rebuild or not. A port maintainer can trigger a rebuild with a bump of the port revision. In case of such a widly dependen port like perl this bump could be done by the portmgr. A totaly different problem is the fact that the update of the perl port didn't update the information in /etc/make.conf. So the rebuild ob all dependend ports din't work until you called use.perl ports yourself after afterthe perl update. just my 2 cent. Bye Estartu Gerhard Schmidt| Nick : estartu IRC : Estartu | Fischbachweg 3 || PGP Public Key 86856 Hiltenfingen | Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | auf Anfrage/ Germany||on Request pgpi0095AEUmi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Mail Server
How do i go about setting up a mail server on my gateway machine to collect and store all email locally from the outside world etc ? -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specify location of port install?
I have a situation where I need both gpgme03 and gpgme installed. However, both install their includes and other files in very similar locations and another program I'm installing can't find the needed gpgme03 files. I don't believe anything else I have installed depends on gpgme03, so I was wondering if there was a way when installing it again I could specify the install directory such that I could point other apps I'm installing to it more directly (I think their finding the gpgme files when they need the gpgme03 files). Is this possible? Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSH-agent setting
Hello, I set ssh-agent just fine for a session from a xterm under X. But what I'd like to have is once I log in to have session start from my .profile so that when I do startx every subsequent xterm 'inherits' the ssh-agent so that I don't have to type in the password. Is such a thing do-able ? Thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diskless NFS mounts weirdness
Hi,
I've set up a pool of diskless workstations loosely following
the instructions in
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2004/09/30/diskless_clients.html
Everything runs just fine, except for one weirdness with mount and
/var:
% mount
192.168.122.1:/var/diskless_ro on / (nfs, read-only)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/etc on /etc (nfs)
/dev/md0 on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/tmp on /tmp (nfs)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/home on /home (nfs)
1. /var *is* actually mounted on
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var
but it is not listed in mount(8)s output. Why?
2. Which part of the system created /dev/md0 and mounted that
on /var? I don't need that and would like to save some RAM
anyway.
It is possible to manually mount /var after booting the workstation,
though it doesn't seem to be necessary. All this does is add one line
to mount's output:
# mount /var
% mount
192.168.122.1:/var/diskless_ro on / (nfs, read-only)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/etc on /etc (nfs)
/dev/md0 on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/tmp on /tmp (nfs)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/home on /home (nfs)
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var on /var (nfs)
More details:
-
The first rc script to run is:
server# cat /var/diskless_ro/etc/rc
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin; export PATH
boot_ip=`kenv boot.netif.ip`
mount -t nfs 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/${boot_ip}/var /var
mount -t nfs 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/${boot_ip}/etc /etc
mount -t nfs 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/${boot_ip}/tmp /tmp
mount -t nfs 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/home /home
. /etc/rc2
exit 0
We see that /var is (or should be) mounted from the NFS server.
This is then followed by rc2, which is nothing more than a copy
of the regular /etc/rc, adapted for every single diskless client.
Every client has its own fstab, e.g.:
server# cat /pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/etc/fstab
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass#
192.168.122.1:/var/diskless_ro / nfs ro 0
0
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/etc /etcnfs rw
0 0
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var /varnfs rw
0 0
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/tmp /tmpnfs rw
0 0
192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/home /home nfs rw 0 0
All this is not terribly important (as said, everything works just
fine), but if someone has already experimented with diskless
workstations... :)
Thanks,
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SCSI device numbers
Mike Jeays [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have at present two emulated SCSI devices on my system; a USB flash drive, and a DVD-writer. They get assigned: 0,0,0 0) 'SanDisk ' 'Cruzer Micro' '2033' Removable Disk 2,0,0 200) 'HL-DT-ST' 'DVDRAM GSA-4160B' 'A300' Removable CD-ROM if the USB device is present at boot time (I think). So my script for burning CDs, which says: mkisofs -J -L -R -o x1.iso $* cdrecord -v dev=2,0,0 x1.iso rm -f x1.iso is very fragile. How should I do it? Write a script to read the output of cdrecord -scanbus and grab the device number? There has to be a right way, and instinct says this isn't it. It's not a bad way. I'm not sure I understand why the device numbering is so fragile, though; wouldn't the ATAPI buses available at boot time be the same whether they have devices or not? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird disk problems
Heh, should've mentioned; I'm installing FreeBSD 5.3 Ulf Magnusson wrote: Today I decided to install FreeBSD, and so I grabbed a FreeBSD installation CD off the net. The first time I booted from the installation CD, everything went fine (seemingly), and I soon found myself in sysinstall. Not quite ready to install at that point, and needing to shut down the system, I quit sysinstall without having initiated any install or changed any settings (except maybe for the keymap, I can't remember). I returned later to commence the installation only to find that the boot process now hangs, the last message being GEOM configure ad0s1, start 32256 length 112785007104 end 112785039359 (verbose logging). I did not start my computer between the two occasions, and didn't change my hardware configuration either. Windows, which I have installed on the same disk (I shrunk the NTFS partition by 10 GiB using Partition Magic to make way for FreeBSD), still boots fine. Help appreciated, Ulf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
removing pkgdb.db, and re-generate it
Just for the kicks of it I tried removing /var/db/pkgdb.db, and re-generate it by running pkgdb. The funny thing is that the file is taking lesser space. (from 4.6M to 3.9M) - not that it is much, but still why? -- cso, not subscribed. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Broken shell - I can't login at all
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:57:28 -0800 Jeff BSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi- I'm in the process of upgrading a 4.6 system to 5.3. When I boot the machine it gets to: init: bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode Enter root password, or ^D to go multi-user Password: I enter the password, then: Enter full pathname of shell of RETURN for /bin/sh: pid # (sh), uid 0: exited on signal 12 init: bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode Enter root password, or ^D to go multi-user Password: Round and round I go. Sounds like I broke /bin/sh to me. I've messed around in safe mode but I can't see how I can use it to possibly fix my problem, assuming I did do anything to /bin/sh (which I don't think I did - intentionally/directly that is). How do I fix it so I can boot it? A bit of the chicken and the egg, what? hello jeff, please see if it will accept /rescue/sh (the statically compiled rescue binary) gl, epi Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mlock: not setgid mail
I asked this question before but we did not arrive at an answer. I'm getting in my mail log the following entry repeated: usr/local/libexec/mlock[755]: (64) not setgid mail And I can't figure out what it's complaining about. Below is the previous thread on questions which didn't arrive at anything but did rule out some things. Any help resolving this issue is greatly appreciated. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/ 067212.html Vonleigh Simmons http://illusionart.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD motherboard survey site disappeared
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 07:48 am, Randy Pratt wrote: There was a site collecting information about motherboards. It was at: http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ It seems to be gone along with all the information that was collected. For reference, this was the original list mail that started the project: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031121094707.G89525 Anyone know where the site went or the whereabouts of the site's owner ( Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] )? Thanks, Randy I don't know anything about the site mentioned above; but you may find the New York City *BSD Users Group's (NYCBUG) dmesg database helpful: http://nycbug.org/index.php?NAV=dmesgd Best regards, Andrew Gould ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help: Kernel Error
Hi, I am getting this message on FREEBSD /var/log/message file. Please help me to fix the issue. Thanks, Feb 15 08:54:37 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error Feb 15 08:54:37 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 08:54:37 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 08:54:38 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 Feb 15 08:54:38 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 Feb 15 09:22:48 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x28] Feb 15 09:22:48 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x28] Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Medium Error [k:0x3,c:0x11,q:0xb] Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Medium Error [k:0x3,c:0x11,q:0xb] Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 09:22:52 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 Feb 15 09:22:52 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 dmesg aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x28] aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Medium Error [k:0x3,c:0x11,q:0xb] aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPSec and Racoon Question
Hey all,
I have a question or two regarding IPSec and the Racoon port. I have a
wired LAN and a wireless LAN in my house. The BSD box acts as the primary
gateway/firewall/router. For the wireless LAN, the AP has WEP enabled with
a 128-bit key. Of course, with all of the nifty WEP cracking tools out
there I definitely want more protection, so I found a wireless networking
how-to using FreeBSD with IPSec and Racoon.
The initial configuration went very well and I am able to use IPSec between
the Windows XP wireless clients and the FreeBSD box. However, the
connection seems to time out from time to time. It's not the wireless
network because if I don't use IPSec I get an occasional time out due to
signal loss, but nothing near as much when I'm using IPSec.
It seems as though when the client(s) are idle for a period of time, they
loose their connection with the server and can no longer communicate. When
I ping the BSD box from an XP client, it just states Negotiating Security
forever until I stop the IPSec service, wait a few minutes, and restart it.
Obviously I do not want to do this for each and every client when they drop
their wireless connection due to something with IPSec and/or Racoon.
Again, I do NOT have this problem when I take IPSec out of the picture. I
never drop connections when I'm a floor away or on the same floor as the AP.
It's only an anomaly when I'm using IPSec.
Below are the following configuration files: racoon.conf, psk.txt, and
ipsec.conf.
If anyone has any ideas on why these connections are dropping, any help
would be appreciated. Maybe there is another method of creating a VPN
tunnel for the wireless LAN?
Thanks,
Tim
** /usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf **
path include /usr/local/etc/racoon ;
path pre_shared_key /usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt ;
path certificate /usr/local/etc/cert ;
log debug;
padding
{
maximum_length 20; # maximum padding length.
randomize off; # enable randomize length.
strict_check off; # enable strict check.
exclusive_tail off; # extract last one octet.
}
listen
{
isakmp 192.168.20.1 [500];
}
timer
{
counter 5; # maximum trying count to send.
interval 20 sec;# maximum interval to resend.
persend 1; # the number of packets per a send.
phase1 30 sec;
phase2 15 sec;
}
remote anonymous
{
exchange_mode aggressive,main;
doi ipsec_doi;
situation identity_only;
my_identifier user_fqdn [EMAIL PROTECTED];
peers_identifier user_fqdn [EMAIL PROTECTED];
nonce_size 16;
lifetime time 1 min;# sec,min,hour
initial_contact on;
support_mip6 on;
proposal_check obey;# obey, strict or claim
proposal {
encryption_algorithm 3des;
hash_algorithm sha1;
authentication_method pre_shared_key ;
dh_group 2 ;
}
}
remote ::1 [8000]
{
exchange_mode aggressive,main;
doi ipsec_doi;
situation identity_only;
my_identifier user_fqdn [EMAIL PROTECTED];
peers_identifier user_fqdn [EMAIL PROTECTED];
nonce_size 16;
lifetime time 1 min;# sec,min,hour
proposal {
encryption_algorithm 3des;
hash_algorithm sha1;
authentication_method pre_shared_key ;
dh_group 2 ;
}
}
sainfo anonymous
{
pfs_group 1;
lifetime time 30 sec;
encryption_algorithm 3des ;
authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1;
compression_algorithm deflate ;
}
sainfo address ::1 icmp6 address ::1 icmp6
{
pfs_group 1;
lifetime time 60 sec;
encryption_algorithm 3des, cast128, blowfish 448, des ;
authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1, hmac_md5 ;
compression_algorithm deflate ;
}
** /usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf **
** /usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt **
192.168.20.3pre shared key 1
192.168.20.4pre shared key 2
** /usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt **
** /etc/ipsec.conf **
flush;
spdflush;
spdadd 192.168.20.3/32 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec
esp/tunnel/192.168.20.3-192.168.20.1/use;
spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.20.3/32 any -P out ipsec
esp/tunnel/192.168.20.1-192.168.20.3/use;
spdadd 192.168.20.4/32 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec
esp/tunnel/192.168.20.4-192.168.20.1/use;
spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.20.4/32 any -P out ipsec
esp/tunnel/192.168.20.1-192.168.20.4/use;
** /etc/ipsec.conf **
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntop Problem
I have been running Ntop for the last few weeks and each time it updates the CPU usage screams up to 70% and basically hangs my comp untill such time as it has finished updating the graph -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH-agent setting
Hello, I set ssh-agent just fine for a session from a xterm under X. But what I'd like to have is once I log in to have session start from my .profile so that when I do startx every subsequent xterm 'inherits' the ssh-agent so that I don't have to type in the password. Is such a thing do-able ? in ~/.xinit start your windowmanager with something like: /usr/bin/ssh-agent ~/bin/startmywindowmanager if you are using xdm, some applications in ports can help you with providing a password-dialog, among others ssh_askpass_gtk2. -- Hilsen Lars Thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD on 8x AMD64
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:59:59 -0800 Richard Knott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to know if anyone has tested 5.3 release or later on a 8 CPU AMD Opteron system? No, but I'd be glad to give one a workout if anybody gave me one. :-) Jacob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: removing pkgdb.db, and re-generate it
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote: Just for the kicks of it I tried removing /var/db/pkgdb.db, and re-generate it by running pkgdb. The funny thing is that the file is taking lesser space. (from 4.6M to 3.9M) - not that it is much, but still why? Maybe the database gets fragmented over time from entries being removed, or maybe it's using a different file format. Kris pgpXxp0MlA9SD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Ntop Problem
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:38:41AM +1000, Warren wrote: I have been running Ntop for the last few weeks and each time it updates the CPU usage screams up to 70% and basically hangs my comp untill such time as it has finished updating the graph This post didn't contain a question :) If your ntop is making your computer do too much work, run the process less often, run it with a niceness to reduce impact on other processes, etc. Kris pgpI1ZYSi5tBX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: SSH-agent setting
Hello, I set ssh-agent just fine for a session from a xterm under X. But what I'd like to have is once I log in to have session start from my .profile so that when I do startx every subsequent xterm 'inherits' the ssh-agent so that I don't have to type in the password. Is such a thing do-able ? in ~/.xinit start your windowmanager with something like: correction: i have this in the file ~/.xsession , sorry. /usr/bin/ssh-agent ~/bin/startmywindowmanager if you are using xdm, some applications in ports can help you with providing a password-dialog, among others ssh_askpass_gtk2. -- Hilsen Lars Thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help: Kernel Error
Manu Jha wrote: Hi, I am getting this message on FREEBSD /var/log/message file. Please help me to fix the issue. Thanks, Well, at first glance, it certainly looks like one of the disks )0:2:0) in your RAID array is developing some issues, but IANAE. You have checked your disks? (Also, you have backups, right?) Kevin Kinsey Feb 15 08:54:37 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error Feb 15 08:54:37 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 08:54:37 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 08:54:38 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 Feb 15 08:54:38 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 Feb 15 09:22:48 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x28] Feb 15 09:22:48 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x28] Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Medium Error [k:0x3,c:0x11,q:0xb] Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Medium Error [k:0x3,c:0x11,q:0xb] Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 09:22:51 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed Feb 15 09:22:52 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 Feb 15 09:22:52 prod /kernel: aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 dmesg aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x28] aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Medium Error [k:0x3,c:0x11,q:0xb] aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Unrecovered Read Error aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 failed REBUILD task: I/O error - drive 0:2:0 failed aac0: **Monitor** Container 0 started REBUILD task on drive 0:0:0 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports
Could you please give some detail about setting options for
individual ports in make.conf? Maybe I missed something in 'man
make.conf' or 'man ports' but everything seems to refer to global
options. The only example I've found is in man portmanager, but I'm
still a little unsure about the how to do it properly.
This example from portmanager's manual is how to do it in make.conf:
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/local/sysutils/portmanager}
PREFIX=/home/mike/TEMP
.endif
#
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/multimedia/mplayer}
WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=yes WITHOUT_RUNTIME_CPUDETECTION=yes \
WITH_GTK1=yes WITH_RTC=yes WITH_LIBUNGIF=yes WITH_ARTS=yes \
WITH_FRIBIDI=yes WITH_CDPARANOIA=yes WITH_LIBDV=yes\
WITH_MAD=yes WITH_SVGALIB=yes WITH_AALIB=yes WITH_THEORA=yes\
WITH_SDL=yes WITH_ESOUND=yes WITH_VORBIS=yes WITH_XANIM=yes \
WITH_LIVEMEDIA=yes WITH_MATROSKA=yes WITH_XVID=yes WITH_LZO=yes \
WITH_XMMS=yes WITH_LANG=en
.endif
Just wanted to point this out because this is really good info. I had
been looking for a while how to define additional make parameters for
specific applications in make.conf, since every time I updated I had to
recompile some programs by hand to put in the additional options I
needed (-DMAKE_WITH... etc).
Thanks a lot.
Vonleigh Simmons
http://illusionart.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diskless NFS mounts weirdness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. /var *is* actually mounted on 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var but it is not listed in mount(8)s output. Why? 2. Which part of the system created /dev/md0 and mounted that on /var? I don't need that and would like to save some RAM anyway. I guess you are using 5.3 or newer? the /etc/rc.d/diskless script has been replaced, by among other things, a script /etc/rc.d/var which creates a memory disk, /dev/md0, using up your precious ram. I have tried to remove the script but get an error because nfs wants to update the /var/db/mounttab - before /var is actually mounted - so the mount fails. The /etc/rc.d/var script creates a memory disk if it detects that /var is read-only - which is the case since the nfs mount failed. And the memory disk is then populated. If the root partition is rw-mounted the nfs-mount will succeed. If you have enough ram this is not a problem, simply let var be a memory disk. You can set the size of the memory disk in rc.conf. /dev/md0 on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var on /var (nfs) Now this is wierd - how can you have to mounts on the same mount point? Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diskless NFS mounts weirdness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. /var *is* actually mounted on 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var but it is not listed in mount(8)s output. Why? 2. Which part of the system created /dev/md0 and mounted that on /var? I don't need that and would like to save some RAM anyway. I guess you are using 5.3 or newer? the /etc/rc.d/diskless script has been replaced, by among other things, a script /etc/rc.d/var which creates a memory disk, /dev/md0, using up your precious ram. I have tried to remove the script but get an error because nfs wants to update the /var/db/mounttab - before /var is actually mounted - so the mount fails. The /etc/rc.d/var script creates a memory disk if it detects that /var is read-only - which is the case since the nfs mount failed. And the memory disk is then populated. If the root partition is rw-mounted the nfs-mount will succeed. If you have enough ram this is not a problem, simply let var be a memory disk. You can set the size of the memory disk in rc.conf. /dev/md0 on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) 192.168.122.1:/pool/diskless_rw/192.168.122.11/var on /var (nfs) Now this is wierd - how can you have to mounts on the same mount point? Wierd yes, but very easy to do. A mount point is just a directory. That directory does not have to be empty. First /dev/md0 was mounted, then the NFS share was mounted. So, the NFS share is what is being used as /var. This indicates poor design (or an error). -- Ean Kingston E-Mail: ean_AT_hedron_DOT_org URL: http://www.hedron.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All your laptops are belong to Windows.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:40:51 +0100, Davide Lemma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in a situation similar to you... I've just purchased a Medion SIM2000, it boots up but I've also some troubles with sound modem. Here the strange problem is that the sound card is a AC97 ALS (SiS7012) and it just outputs from headphone and the modem is a SiS7013 (Intel Winmodem) that isn't in the ports tree (while there is the LT winmodem). For the Video Card with some trick I was able to get a full 16:9 resolution like in windows but without DRI (this is an Xorg problem). Above all I'm almost surprised because I know the difficulty to work with a laptop unix. I've tried Fedora Core 3 Debian III but it gives me an error during boot (acpi error). So like a BSD users I feel above all lucky enough. The only suggestion I feel to give you is to wait the awake of 6.0 because it will have many changes in ACPI calls. I'm waiting too to have some tricks about my sound card :) bye Davide - Original Message - From: bsdnooby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:32 AM Subject: All your laptops are belong to Windows. I'm defeated. The FreeBSD install gives no hints as to why it turns off my laptop. When I try to install FreeBSD, my brand new I'm blue.HP Pavilion laptop turns itself off. It does not matter if I use 4.x or 5.x, CD or floppies. There is no error log since it just shuts off after I choose to load a kernel. I have tried loading with ACPI off, and it does not help. I believe I tried all the kernel options available from the menu on 5.x. The computer is a HP Pavilion zv5445us, with 512MB RAM, P4-3Ghz, 100GB HD, 15.4 Hi-Def Screen, 54G 802.11b WLAN. I purchased it from Best Buy. Under Windows, it appears Hyper-Threading is turned on, and I have not found a way to turn it off inside the CMOS. The machine runs Windows XP Pro fine, but I am trying to switch to FreeBSD on all my boxen. I was really surprised to find this one abruptly shutdown when trying to do the install. It turns off before the install really starts, so I do not have much information to solve this problem. The HD is never touched. I'm blue. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have an HP or Compaq laptop, and you see this problem TRY the R3000Z patches. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCSI Problem
Hello There; I have a problem my freebsd box my server sometimes rebooting and booting normally i get a dmesg and messeges output. I searching this error on the web and asking my server installer person tagging queue must will be disabled when this error. Thank you Freebsd box -- postmaster:/var/log#uname -a FreeBSD postmaster.egecom.net 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 8 18:41:42 EET 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POSTMASTER i386 dmesg out postmaster:/var/log#dmesg | grep ahc ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 47 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 46 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 52 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 30 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 35 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no comm41 32 34 36 21 24 18 7 9 8 13 0 15 26 25 27 11 3 14 17 19 1 5 16 2 4 65 156 157 158 159 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 100 101 55 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 68 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 39 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 33 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 49 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 31 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 54 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 44 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 50 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 40 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 37 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 29 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 43 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 57 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 20 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 67 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 51 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 23 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 12 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 47 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 46 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 52 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 30 (cmdcmplt) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 55 (cmdcmplt) ahc0:A:1: no active SCB for reconnecting target - issuing BUS DEVICE RESET (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34c ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:1. 27 SCBs aborted (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x33 - timex0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34c ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:1. 27 SCBs aborted (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x30 - timed out ahc0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x7 (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34c ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:1. 27 SCBs aborted (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x43 - timed out ahc0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x8 (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34c ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:1. 27 SCBs aborted (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x14 - timed out ahc0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x8 (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent (da0:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34c ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:1. 27 SCBs aborted ahc0: Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI adapter port 0xee00-0xeeff mem 0xdbc0-0xdbc00fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on pci0 da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 messages out -- Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 49 SCB_CONTROL[0x6c] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 33 SCB_CONTROL[0x6c] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 39 SCB_CONTROL[0x6c] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 68 SCB_CONTROL[0x6c] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 58 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 55 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 35 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 30 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 52 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 46 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 47 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 12 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 23 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 59 SCB_CONTROL[0x68] SCB_SCSIID[0x17] SCB_LUN[0x0] Feb 15 18:03:39 postmaster /kernel: 22 SCB_CONTROL[0x68]
Re: SSH-agent setting
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Lars Kristiansen wrote: Hello, I set ssh-agent just fine for a session from a xterm under X. But what I'd like to have is once I log in to have session start from my .profile so that when I do startx every subsequent xterm 'inherits' the ssh-agent so that I don't have to type in the password. Is such a thing do-able ? in ~/.xinit start your windowmanager with something like: correction: i have this in the file ~/.xsession , sorry. /usr/bin/ssh-agent ~/bin/startmywindowmanager Thanks Lars ! I'm doing something like this, in my .xinitrc, as I start the X from the command line using 'startx': /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/X11R6/bin/wmaker Then in the xterm I just type ssh-add and every consecutive xterm can use ssh without prompting for the password. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless PCMIA problems
Hey, I have a 3Com 3CRSHPW_96 Wireless PCMIA card for my laptop. However I'm a newbie at using PCMIA cards on FreeBSD. BSD finds the card when I plug it in, but it doesn't show up when I use the ifconfig command. Can anyone help me with this problem, so I can get it up and running. The system is a fresh installed FreeBSD 5.3 Thanks in advance Lars ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH-agent setting
Why not use keychain and put it in the appropriate rc file (.bashrc, cshrc, etc.), then you'll be connected to the agent automatically. on 02-15-2005, kilim wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Lars Kristiansen wrote: Hello, I set ssh-agent just fine for a session from a xterm under X. But what I'd like to have is once I log in to have session start from my .profile so that when I do startx every subsequent xterm 'inherits' the ssh-agent so that I don't have to type in the password. Is such a thing do-able ? in ~/.xinit start your windowmanager with something like: correction: i have this in the file ~/.xsession , sorry. /usr/bin/ssh-agent ~/bin/startmywindowmanager Thanks Lars ! I'm doing something like this, in my .xinitrc, as I start the X from the command line using 'startx': /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/X11R6/bin/wmaker Then in the xterm I just type ssh-add and every consecutive xterm can use ssh without prompting for the password. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Clayton Scott Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]The software states that it UNIX System Administrator requires Microsoft Windows 95, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0 or Linux, Solaris, HP-UX higher, so I installed FreeBSD. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configure X Server
I have just installed Freebsd 5.3 using a standard install, with all packages, and ports. When I go to Configure X (as per the handbook 2.9.12) using Configure Do post-install configuration of Freebsd, in the Configuration menu there is no sub menu XFree86 Where did I go wrong.? -- Peter Peace is never more than one thought away ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd questions not ending up in mailing.freebsd.questions
Hello, Since 12th of Feb no postings to freebsd-questions have ended up in mailing.freebsd.questions on usenet. Is anyone aware of this and why? Cheers, Jarv. ___ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ping question
Hi Loren Thank you for your mail again For the monitor sofeware iptraf , I can't get it in the port. Why freebsd doesn't support it! I tried to install in freebsd from the tarball and got an error messages! I need sth to prove the traffic to those routers from outside. Do you have experience the max traffic freebsd can support? It seems to support max 230M only! Thank you --- Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:21:03AM -0800, ann kok wrote: Hi all Thank you very much for your help The freebsd router is behind the cisco router. Do you have any experience to determine the traffic is in freebsd and cisco from outside? Can traceroute give figure to prove it? I'm not quite sure if I understand what you're asking, but if you want to see what traffic is going into/out of/through them, tcpdump is a good command-line based packet sniffer and ethereal is it's gui cousin. You can even use tcpdump to capture data and later view it on a different computer with ethereal. iptraf will show you general usage of the traffic crossing your router. If your asking to see what path the traffic is taking from point A to point B, then traceroute is your best friend. Please help Thank you again --- Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:50:32AM -0800, ann kok wrote: Hi all I ping from redhat to cisco router and freebsd router but I don't understand ttl (time to live) Cisco router has ttl=251 and freebsd router has 58 Does it set by the router itself? Can I change it in freebsd? FreeBSD's default ttl, I believe, is 64, Cisco's is probably 255. As long as the number of hops neccessary to get to a certain computer is never more than 64, there's nothing wrong with it. The highest I've seen is about 30 and the Internet is going to have to grow a bit, I think, before it's an issue. Thank you 64 bytes from 212.223.x.193: icmp_seq=1151 ttl=251 time=100 ms 64 bytes from 212.223.x.193: icmp_seq=1152 ttl=251 time=103 ms 64 bytes from 212.223.x.193: icmp_seq=1153 ttl=251 time=104 ms 64 bytes from 212.223.x.193: icmp_seq=1154 ttl=251 time=106 ms 64 bytes from 212.x.254.4: icmp_seq=1182 ttl=58 time=105 ms 64 bytes from 212.x.254.4: icmp_seq=1183 ttl=58 time=105 ms 64 bytes from 212.x.254.4: icmp_seq=1184 ttl=58 time=104 ms 64 bytes from 212.x.254.4: icmp_seq=1185 ttl=58 time=108 ms __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: In short, there's no way to know how an incorrectly written HTML page will display on IE. The solution is to not write HTML incorrectly. That's what HTML validators are for. No browser has any obligation to behave in any particular predetermined way in the face of bad HTML. As a result of this, people that create web pages (and I am NOT polluting the title 'web designer' by lumping every moron that writes a web page into that group) and only look at them with IE usually end up making lots of mistakes. They fix these by layering on even more bandaids and mistakes until they get something somewhat resembling what they are after. Is is of course only displayable in IE. Needless to say this is a VERY bad thing for the Internet because it undercuts the standards as it enables the proliferation of websites that don't follow them. These Web sites harm no one except themselves. Webmasters are sovereign over their sites and I think they should be allowed to write anything they want. If I don't like the way their site does or does not display in my browser, I'll leave the site. I already do that routinely for any site that contains Flash animation. That depends on your definition of best It is likely to display most pages in a correct way. I've been testing Opera, Firefox, and MSIE side by side, and right now it's between Firefox and MSIE. Opera is already out of the running. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated reply from robert@www.webtent.com
I will be out of the office until Friday, February 18th, 2004. Your message will be reviewed as soon as I return. If you need technical support or immediate assistance, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call the office at 813-286-6502. Thank you :) Robert Fitzpatrick ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless PCMIA problems
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 10:40 am, Lars Hederidder wrote: Hey, I have a 3Com 3CRSHPW_96 Wireless PCMIA card for my laptop. However I'm a newbie at using PCMIA cards on FreeBSD. BSD finds the card when I plug it in, but it doesn't show up when I use the ifconfig command. Can anyone help me with this problem, so I can get it up and running. The system is a fresh installed FreeBSD 5.3 Thanks in advance Lars When you say FreeBSD sees the card, do you mean it is associated with a device, or just that the card's name appears in dmesg? It would appear, from the email message link below, that this card requires the use of it's Windows drivers. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2004-September/004804.html Follow the link below to the online handbook's chapter on wireless networking. Read the whole chapter; but pay particular attention to section 25.3.3.6.3, toward the bottom, regarding the NDISulator. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html Best of luck, Andrew Gould ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configure X Server
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 10:55 am, Peterhin wrote: I have just installed Freebsd 5.3 using a standard install, with all packages, and ports. When I go to Configure X (as per the handbook 2.9.12) using Configure Do post-install configuration of Freebsd, in the Configuration menu there is no sub menu XFree86 Where did I go wrong.? Use Chapter 5.4 instead: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html I have always had an easier time configuring X separately from the installation process. Best of luck, Andrew Gould ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
login error:cannot not find root directory
Hi all. Look i was hardering my freebsd box 4.10 p5, but i made one mistake: I didnt test my system before i reboot I was reading some docs about security, i use chflags on: mistake# chflags schg /bin/* mistake# chflags schg /sbin/* Them apply some chmod on /root files: mistake# chmod 0600 /root/.* (i think :-?) I was trying to make my root directory only visible by root user. But dont remenber wich mod i apply. I made more changes but dont remember all. The result was that went i try to access my box like normal user (wheel group), the systema say: error: cannot find root directory Them i boot single-user, i input my password: init: single-user failed Here i could not access my system, my God Ok, them get my 3 floppys, kern, mfs, and fixit .flp. I mount / to access my system: -delete the schg label on /bin and /sbin mistake#chflags noschg /bin/* mistake#chflags noschg /sbin/* On the root directory, i change my .files attr: mistake# chmod 0644 /root/.* I change my ttys, to let root access the system: from insecure - secure. I was checking other system with the same version 4.10 p5, and let the files attributes on /root and / with the same attributes. I dont touch the /kernel file, after this change root could access the system, but the other users dont have access: error: cannot find root directory. This is my situation right now, could some one give some clues to resolve this problem, i dont want to install again the S.O, this machine i working very well. I will apreciate any clue. Thanks all for your time. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH-agent setting
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:51:41AM -0500, Clayton Scott Kern wrote: on 02-15-2005, kilim wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Lars Kristiansen wrote: I set ssh-agent just fine for a session from a xterm under X. But what I'd like to have is once I log in to have session start from my .profile so that when I do startx every subsequent xterm 'inherits' the ssh-agent so that I don't have to type in the password. Is such a thing do-able ? in ~/.xinit start your windowmanager with something like: correction: i have this in the file ~/.xsession , sorry. /usr/bin/ssh-agent ~/bin/startmywindowmanager I'm doing something like this, in my .xinitrc, as I start the X from the command line using 'startx': /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/X11R6/bin/wmaker Then in the xterm I just type ssh-add and every consecutive xterm can use ssh without prompting for the password. Why not use keychain and put it in the appropriate rc file (.bashrc, cshrc, etc.), then you'll be connected to the agent automatically. You top posted. Anyways. Because if I have ssh-agent in .profile everytime I start an xterm I'll have another ssh-agent starting. Then for each and every one of them I'll have to run ssh-add and type in the pass pharase. Which completely defeats the whole point. But thanks for trying anyways. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd vs. linux
In a message dated 2/12/2005 2:41:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: quoth the David Kelly: Look closely at the Linux community and you'll find its mostly ex-Windows users focused on what Microsoft is doing. The desire is to one-up Microsoft at Microsoft's own game. Their definition of computer and human interface was written by Microsoft and still can't think outside of that box. I think your interpretation here is a tad glib. Sure there are thousands of people coming to Linux because they 'hate' MS. Sure they don't know gcc from ppc but I don't think it is fair to call them the 'community', rather a small subset. Do you think these people are writing any software? Are they designing programming interfaces? Do they have a damn thing to do with the development of Linux or any of its supporting software? Hell no. They are just users clogging up the message boards and mailing lists with stupid questions. Human Interface? Am I missing something? Can you please tell me where the much superior FreeBSD human interface can be downloaded? In the console they are pretty much the same keystroke for keystroke, and on the desktop it is all the same software... I run FreeBSD and Linux, and I love them both. I am trying to point out that when you slam Linux developers with pettiness and name calling that you are no better than all the lusers slamming MS, and thinking they're leet because they installed Fedora? I have noticed a lot of this on FreeBSD lists, and I think it is counterproductive because it is unprofessional and in the end more people using Linux means more people running free software which benefits _all_ of us...and besides, it is offensive to people like me that just like playing with 'nix boxes and run both. Why can't you just run your FreeBSD and feel superior, silently? Look closely at the BSD community and you'll find those who are working at creating a better tool to serve their needs. Much debate about exactly what constitutes better so there is also quite a bit of experimenting. What you won't find is Microsoft as the yardstick by which BSD's measure. I think you are all just plain off the mark. People use what they use because it suits their needs best. If you can't program then source code is useless, and if you don't know much about networking you might not be able to get linux or any unix to work at all. You don't generally hear secretaries whining about not having source; they just want the thing to work. In all walks of life, people choose what suits them best. Just because someone is a republican doesn't mean he's a right-wing anti-abortionist. It just means that it suits him better than the other choices. I suspect the same goes for your choice of an O/S. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:58 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: [snip] Please copy this down and put it on a sticky note on your monitor: PLEASE SHUT UP ANTHONY. Do you find it strange that you get so much flack in pseudo-technical discussions? Your understanding of the technology and the issues surrounding it are horrendously amateur. Please dump your subscription to PC World. Subscribers of freebsd mailing lists, please simply plonk him and move on. He will not concede when proved wrong and insists on the last word. Google him - I found him arguing friggin breastfeeding with female pediatricians!! Don't feed the trolls. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd vs. linux
In a message dated 2/12/2005 2:41:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: quoth the David Kelly: Look closely at the Linux community and you'll find its mostly ex-Windows users focused on what Microsoft is doing. The desire is to one-up Microsoft at Microsoft's own game. Their definition of computer and human interface was written by Microsoft and still can't think outside of that box. I think your interpretation here is a tad glib. Sure there are thousands of people coming to Linux because they 'hate' MS. Sure they don't know gcc from ppc but I don't think it is fair to call them the 'community', rather a small subset. Do you think these people are writing any software? Are they designing programming interfaces? Do they have a damn thing to do with the development of Linux or any of its supporting software? Hell no. They are just users clogging up the message boards and mailing lists with stupid questions. Human Interface? Am I missing something? Can you please tell me where the much superior FreeBSD human interface can be downloaded? In the console they are pretty much the same keystroke for keystroke, and on the desktop it is all the same software... I run FreeBSD and Linux, and I love them both. I am trying to point out that when you slam Linux developers with pettiness and name calling that you are no better than all the lusers slamming MS, and thinking they're leet because they installed Fedora? I have noticed a lot of this on FreeBSD lists, and I think it is counterproductive because it is unprofessional and in the end more people using Linux means more people running free software which benefits _all_ of us...and besides, it is offensive to people like me that just like playing with 'nix boxes and run both. Why can't you just run your FreeBSD and feel superior, silently? Look closely at the BSD community and you'll find those who are working at creating a better tool to serve their needs. Much debate about exactly what constitutes better so there is also quite a bit of experimenting. What you won't find is Microsoft as the yardstick by which BSD's measure. I think you are all just plain off the mark. People use what they use because it suits their needs best. If you can't program then source code is useless, and if you don't know much about networking you might not be able to get linux or any unix to work at all. You don't generally hear secretaries whining about not having source; they just want the thing to work. In all walks of life, people choose what suits them best. Just because someone is a republican doesn't mean he's a right-wing anti-abortionist. It just means that it suits him better than the other choices. I suspect the same goes for your choice of an O/S. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH-agent setting
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:51:41AM -0500, Clayton Scott Kern wrote: Why not use keychain and put it in the appropriate rc file (.bashrc, cshrc, etc.), then you'll be connected to the agent automatically. My bad. Please disregard my previous email. I apologise ! Your suggestion is great. What I didn't realise is that keychain is a great tool which resides in /usr/ports/security/keychain and it does this: allowing you to easily have one long-running ssh-agent process per system, rather than per login session. as its web site states: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/keychain/index.xml Thank you Clayton ! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: Many wordprocessors write in Microsoft Word format these days. Currently I use Quark XPress instead of Word, as Word is too bloated and too uncontrollable, and does not produce output suitable for professional printing. That is what AW used to layout my book, as a matter of fact. It's currently the defacto standard in the publishing industry because they can go directly from it to a printing press. Yes, that's why I like it. But it is rediculously expensive at $1,045.00 SRP. That's cheap. In Europe, it sells for about 2500, and it requires a dongle. But it is likely to disappear slowly in the future, as it is overpriced and is taking a beating from the steadily rising InDesign. Unfortunately, Adobe isn't much better than Quark in its attitude, and that will only get worse. IMHO this is self-defeating. Very few book authors would spend this for writing software, and the publishers (like AW) spend millions a year in retyping costs to take manuscripts from printouts and such to stick them into Quark. Quark is really vulnerable from being disloged from this monopoly. It is indeed vulnerable, and the battle has already begun. Quark severely abused its dominant position (such as with the price gouging mentioned above), and now nobody wants to buy its more recent versions, leaving it with a dwindling revenue stream. Adobe is attacking with InDesign, with increasing success. It may going out of the frying pan and into the fire with InDesign, though. I can see that Quark is already starting to fight a rearguard action as they are dumping copies of it at the educational price into the academic market, now. (where a lot of books originate) Too little, too late, IMO. You should at least check out Scribus http://www.scribus.org.uk/ This is an open source project that is aiming to replace Quark There has already been one book published with it. While perhaps you might not be able to use it now, give it another 5 years and it might do it. I would have probably used this for writing mine if it had been available then. DTP programs are unusual in that they need only be able to write clean PostScript to succeed. The native file formats are relatively unimportant. I was able to move from PageMaker to Quark with relatively minimal fuss, for example, as they both produce clean PostScript as output. YOU personally might not. But you were originally arguing that FreeBSD was unsuitable for a desktop OS. Now I see this is subtly changing, you are now only arguing that FreeBSD is unsuitable for YOUR desktop OS. No, I'm still arguing that it is generally unsuitable for the desktop. When my mom and dad can run FreeBSD with the same ease and advantages that they can for Windows, I will know that FreeBSD is suitable for the desktop. Now, most people aren't going to be using Winterms but the point is that people have wildly varying needs, and many of them could in fact use FreeBSD successfully as a desktop OS. FreeBSD could be used as an OS on the desktop under certain conditions, but a native FreeBSD desktop might not look anything like Windows. For example, the FreeBSD console itself is in fact a desktop, it just doesn't look like anything that lovers and haters of Windows would want. Tell that to Microsoft then. I've tried. In fact, I tried this very day, without much success. The new versions of Word, Excel, etc ARE ANOTHER PROGRAMS the training required to bring most of the office users up to speed on them is considerable. An increasing number of sites just don't bother to upgrade at all. I haven't upgraded Office since 1997. And even the 1997 version still does more than I want or need, but that was the current version when I bought it. I know this from experience I used to work as a sysadmin for a number of years and worked at several companies. I always hated when Microsoft brought out new versions of software because users would pester me with support questions for MONTHS after updating them. The worse offenders in fact were usually the same people who were the biggest pushers to get updated. They are probably people who really weren't doing much with their PCs. People who have time to worry about and pine after updates are usually wasting their machines. People who have to do real work never are interested in updating anything unless the update is required to allow them to do something essential that they cannot currently do. And the few times I tried telling the user's supervisors to tell them to go get training, I was rebuffed with the that's what we are paying you for line. The job of a sysadmin is a thankless one. Hopefully they got the idiot they deserved after you left. So, don't give me the bullcrap about people wanting to stay with what they know. They don't. They do if they are doing serious work. But if you have a lot of goof-offs who spend their days just playing on the PC, they'll constantly whine for
Re: Specify location of port install?
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 06:20 am, S Salamander wrote: I have a situation where I need both gpgme03 and gpgme installed. However, both install their includes and other files in very similar locations and another program I'm installing can't find the needed gpgme03 files. I don't believe anything else I have installed depends on gpgme03, so I was wondering if there was a way when installing it again I could specify the install directory such that I could point other apps I'm installing to it more directly (I think their finding the gpgme files when they need the gpgme03 files). Is this possible? Thanks. If the port is prefix compliant you should be able to do make PREFIX=/alternate base dir/ Then watch out for libraries the port installs, because they will end up in /alternate base dir/lib. When that happens run ldconfig -m /alternate base dir/lib, add /alternate base dir/bin to your path and everything should be set. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail Server
Warren wrote: How do i go about setting up a mail server on my gateway machine to collect and store all email locally from the outside world etc ? That depends highly on how your clarify your question. You should certainly be reading a lot. See the Handbook, chapter 22, for a thorough discussion of many aspects of electronic mail. One specific example. I use fetchmail, from the Ports Collection, to grab email for the whole family onto my FreeBSD gateway/firewall at home. It polls their ISP mail accounts every 10 minutes. This computer also runs a POP server, only accessible from the LAN, and the family member's computers grab their mail from it with whatever client they prefer. It gives the appearance of a high-speed connection for POP transactions, when it's really on a low b/w line. There is a lot to learn, though, to attempt to run most MTA's. Unless you've got good reasons (like you are doing this for rdksupportinc.com, your job, etc.), I wouldn't advise running an SMTP server. If you are the sys admin or postmaster for a domain, give the Handbook a thorough read, as well as Googling for documentation, checking your vendors' site (Sendmail is the default FreeBSD MTA, see www.sendmail.org) PostFix and Exim are two other frequently mentioned MTAs. FreeBSD's mail servers now run PostFix. Their site is www.postfix.org. My $.02, Kevin Kinsey ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: I initially ran a pirated copy of DOS on it (remember, at that time MS wasn't selling DOS retail) but shortly after I got it up I switched over to...drumroll Minix. Ah, but anything even remotely similar to UNIX would have been superior to MS-DOS, so that move would make perfect sense. The situation is different today. At times that I've only had one computer, it has always been a MS-DOS (in the olde days) or Windows computer. I was tempted to try OS/2 once, but OS/2 wasn't around long enough for me to change my mind, and it wasn't free. I recall using CP/M very briefly, long ago. I like FreeBSD because it gives me something nice to run as a server. Windows is too expensive and too bloated for server use. My oldest machine does indeed run Windows NT Server 4.0 (as a PDC, no less), but I never actually used it in a server capacity--I was just trying to foresee the unforeseeable. By the time I actually needed a server of my own, I had discovered FreeBSD. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd vs. linux
Bart Silverstrim writes: It's not part of the OS! Fine. Will MS let me buy just the kernel? No, but you don't have to buy or install most of the drivers. If you run with only required default drivers, the system will be stable. Extend it a little more, even MS argued that Internet Explorer was part of the operating system and could not be unbundled. For their product definition, it was part of the OS. Technically, it was not. Practically, it was. They tried very hard to make it part of the OS, which was a serious mistake, but they were very taken with the whole idea of web-everything at the time. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd vs. linux
Bart Silverstrim writes: They were an outside team that worked on VMS. They started NT before Windows became a marketing drone's dream. The Windows subsystem became the default subsystem after Windows 3.x took off. Originally it wasn't going to have a GUI. Oh well ... it's a bit late to dream about what could have been. As I recall, this is what caused Microsoft and IBM to part ways. IBM was to collaborate on the NT project. But IBM wanted a CLI, like DOS or OS/2, whereas Microsoft insisted that a GUI was the wave of the future on the desktop. As it turned out, Microsoft was right. Three of ours are sitting right behind me. Unless you have eyes in the back of your head, then, you aren't looking at their screens. I have my FreeBSD server running right next to me. The console always has top running, just to give me an idea of what the server is doing. Sometimes I just turn the monitor off. If I need to talk to the machine, I start a ssh session from my Windows desktop. I often have one or more ssh and sftp sessions open. They have GUIs because they thought it was easier to market. They have GUIs because they're easier for novices to use as servers. They have GUIs because MS started trying to market servers to the workgroup and not corporate markets. They have GUIs because NT was a new kid on the block, people were familiar with Windows, and they were able to help marketing-wise slip some sales in because it was a lower learning curve. They have GUIs because believe it or not, sometimes you don't need the strict definition of a Server in order to serve files to a couple other computers in your home network and that Server can, in fact, do double duty. Right. That's two criticisms, and at this point, I really think most people don't give a rat's behind about the GUI in a server, since the OS should be paging out unused pages to swap if the server settles down. The GUI still requires destabilizing code in the kernel. It still takes up space and resources. And, worst of all, on a GUI-oriented server like Windows, you cannot administer the machine without using the GUI. Remote administration sucks, yes I'd agree. You have to jump through hoops to find decent tools for reigning in Windows in many situations. As far as I know, only a tiny fraction of all necessary administration functions for Windows have ever been provided for in CLI interfaces. Most of the time, you _must_ point and click. That surely explains their sales of XServes and RAID servers. They're off the radar for servers. The only people who install Apple servers are people who are already in love with Apple desktops. They're kind of the inverse of people who fall in love with server operating systems and then insist on forcing them onto the desktop as well. Don't want the GUI, then install Darwin. Want GUI and remote admin/monitoring tools, use OS X Server. Don't log into it, and it'll swap out most of the GUI stuff to disk. Why not just install FreeBSD? They most certainly profit from MCSEs. Yes, by training and certifying them. But after that, they're on their own, and out of Microsoft's revenue stream. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Script Questions
Hi Giorgos, This seems to work. # slocate -i -d /tmp/04vfile001_db '.wmv' |\ perl -ne 'chomp; print $_\0;' |\ xargs -0 ls -ldh Thanks for the help. I really appreciate it! On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:57:07AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, what you really want to use is: # slocate -i -d /tmp/04vfile001_db '.wmv$' |\ perl -ne 'chomp; print $_\0;' |\ xargs -0 ls -l See if that works better, please. If not, mail me again. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firefox, java, plugins - need to go back to the port?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:30:55PM -0600, John wrote: I installed firefox from the packages, and now that it seems like I may have Java installed, I'd like to get the two to play together. I see a few different firefox plugins in /usr/ports/www, but no java, and I don't see any references to firefox or plugs in /usr/ports/java - clearly, I'm missing a piece of the puzzle. All my hits on google have talked about rebuilding the port after Java is installed. Is that what I have to do? Is there no way to get a java plugin without rebuilding the whole port? No-one have an anwer or a pointer for me? Is it necessary to install the JDK (or JRE if we ever get one again) and then build firefox from ports to get the Java plug-in? -- John Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firefox, java, plugins - need to go back to the port?
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 10:03 am, John wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:30:55PM -0600, John wrote: I installed firefox from the packages, and now that it seems like I may have Java installed, I'd like to get the two to play together. I see a few different firefox plugins in /usr/ports/www, but no java, and I don't see any references to firefox or plugs in /usr/ports/java - clearly, I'm missing a piece of the puzzle. All my hits on google have talked about rebuilding the port after Java is installed. Is that what I have to do? Is there no way to get a java plugin without rebuilding the whole port? No-one have an anwer or a pointer for me? Is it necessary to install the JDK (or JRE if we ever get one again) and then build firefox from ports to get the Java plug-in? That isn't where you look from my experience. I have /usr/local/jdk1.4.2/bin/java and it changes with the version. That is what I add in mozilla. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
