Re: zfs enabled freebsd requires root zfs partition?
mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: ... PCBSD can install a typical FreeBSD install without all of the PCBSD extra packages. Is there a writeup somewhere on how to do this, much preferably involving something like memstick rather than having to burn a CD or DVD? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw fwd and ipfw allow
Am I asking something unreasonable? Victor Sudakov wrote: What tricks do you use if you need to allow a packet and then fwd it (or vice versa)? The search terminates and the packet quits ipfw on fwd as well as on allow. How do I allow a packet and then policy route it? An example ruleset will be appreciated. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Regex Help For Procmail
2010-09-06 19:46, Drew Tomlinson skrev: On 9/5/2010 4:02 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Frank Shutefr...@shute.org.uk wrote: Drew, try this: * ^From:.*famous-smoke\.com I think it's not catching it because the period isn't backslash escaped ... Unless there's some edge case that I'm not thinking of, adding a backslash to escape a period will never convert a non-match into a match. An unescaped period in an RE matches any character, including a period. An escaped period matches only a period. I have confirmed this. I did add the backslash but procmail is still not matching. Adding the backslash _does_ better represent what the OP wants to accomplish, but the lack of it is not the cause of the RE not matching. (I'm not sufficiently familiar with how procmail uses REs to figure out what _is_ causing it not to match.) True and thus I'll leave the backslash. However I have no idea what _is_ causing it not to match either. I'm stumped. I think it is the dash. Try to escape it like so: * ^From:.*famous\-smoke\.com Thanks, Drew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: zfs enabled freebsd requires root zfs partition?
From: Gil Vidals [mailto:gvid...@gmail.com] Sent: Tue 07/09/2010 03:55 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: zfs enabled freebsd requires root zfs partition? I'm new to both FreeBSD and ZFS and need some guidance. The only way I could get zfs to work was by installing FreeBSD directly on a freebsd-ZFS file system, which isn't supported by default by sysinstall. I had to run the zfsinstall.sh script which creates the freebsd-ZFS file system and compiles freeBSD. Whenever If I used the standard install (UFS file system), I would always get an unsupported file system error whenever I tried to kldload zfs.ko. Is there away to install FreeBSD on the standard UFS file system and then use the other disks on the server for ZFS? I would appreciate any hints. Thanks, Gil Vidals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Once you have installed FreeBSD 8.0 to a ufs partition have you from your SU account have you tried zpool create ? Regards Graeme ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: NFS Issue
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Bill Tillman wrote: I have two LAN segments with a FreeBSD server on each. Server A is 10.0.0.254 Server B is 192.168.0.102 I setup server A has two drives and I setup a share on drive #2 to be shared via NFS with the both networks. I also made a symlink on drive #2 to a folder on drive #1 On server B I can nfs_mount the share on server A and see the symlink. But when I try to access the files in the symlink it shows the link is broken, In other words no files show up. On server A I can see the files in the symlink folder just fine. This is expected NFS behaviour: NFS exports filesystems starting at a given (exported) mount point. While there are many reasons for this, think about the security issues if a user on B could create a symlink on your exported volume (because the origin of the symlink will make no difference to the server) to access any file anywhere on A. If you want both disks 1 and 2 visible, the standard solution is to export and mount both disks on B. If the paths (absolute is easiest, but relative can be made to work) are consistent between A and the mounted image of A's filesystems on B, then your symlinks will work -- that is, if you have this kind of /etc/fstab entry, mounting /disk1 on A to /disk1 on B: A:/disk1/somedir/disk1/somedir A:/disk2/disk2 then a symlink in /disk1/somedir/link pointing to /disk1/something will work just fine. A. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw fwd and ipfw allow
On 9/7/2010 12:00 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Am I asking something unreasonable? Not really, but if you ask, one could say that IPFW is a first match wins firewall, so a fwd or an allow action would be the terminal one. You must design your rules accordingly. There is also the skipto action which can alter the way packets flow through the rules. Could you describe in a conrete example what you're trying to achieve? HTH, Nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: NFS Issue
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, A. Wright wrote: your symlinks will work -- that is, if you have this kind of /etc/fstab entry, mounting /disk1 on A to /disk1 on B: A:/disk1/somedir/disk1/somedir A:/disk2/disk2 then a symlink in /disk1/somedir/link pointing to /disk1/something will work just fine. That should have read: then a symlink in /disk1/somedir/link pointing to /disk2/something will work just fine A. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw fwd and ipfw allow
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Am I asking something unreasonable? Not really, but if you ask, one could say that IPFW is a first match wins firewall, so a fwd or an allow action would be the terminal one. You must design your rules accordingly. There is also the skipto action which can alter the way packets flow through the rules. Could you describe in a conrete example what you're trying to achieve? I want forwarded packets to create a dynamic allow rule. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw fwd and ipfw allow
On 9/7/2010 2:00 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Am I asking something unreasonable? Not really, but if you ask, one could say that IPFW is a first match wins firewall, so a fwd or an allow action would be the terminal one. You must design your rules accordingly. There is also the skipto action which can alter the way packets flow through the rules. Could you describe in a conrete example what you're trying to achieve? I want forwarded packets to create a dynamic allow rule. You can combine fwd and keep-state. Could you be more specific? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: enclosed: bwerror. i'm lost.
I believe I have seen 3 occurences of same phenomena Gary K reported, maybe same thing as also mentioned by rannum...@globaleyes.net which was subject of a PR kern/134914 closed Sat Jun 27 05:31:16 UTC 2009 by linimon@ I'm not clear whats going on yet, I too see the problem as self clearing on 2 of 3 hosts so far, (doesnt help to define it ;-) I wish I could make a clearer statement of fact, but I can't as yet. All I can do is join these 3 observations together so far. My ongoing notes are in http://berklix.org/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/sys/boot/i386/\ Makefile.skip_broken_zfsboot.REL=7.3-RELEASE.diff Which contains all further URLs to mails PR etc. Before people ask me What did you do to clear it ? I ran my patch above, after a make ; make install ; make world , whatever I then no longer needed my patch on the cured machine. If I could be clearer I would, but it goes away. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text, Not HTML, quoted-printable base 64 dumped with spam. Avoid top posting, It cripples itemised cumulative responses. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw fwd and ipfw allow
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Am I asking something unreasonable? Not really, but if you ask, one could say that IPFW is a first match wins firewall, so a fwd or an allow action would be the terminal one. You must design your rules accordingly. There is also the skipto action which can alter the way packets flow through the rules. Could you describe in a conrete example what you're trying to achieve? I want forwarded packets to create a dynamic allow rule. You can combine fwd and keep-state. I hope so. I just don't understand how. Could you be more specific? A packet generated locally 1) should be forwarded by a 'fwd' rule and 2) should create a dynamic 'allow' rule for returning traffic. Could you please suggest a ruleset for this. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD vendors
Hi, I have a client who uses FreeBSD on IBM X3550 M3 Servers (x86). The problem is that they are big supporters of both IBM and FreeBSD but they do not seem to work too well together. They are reporting problems at the RAID and hence, a massive slow down in performance. I notice from your vendor list that IBM is not mentioned. Is this because your product hasn't been tested with IBM or are there any case studies or models that you could provide to me to show that FreeBSD can work on certain IBM servers. Any advice or information would be greatly received. Thanks best regards, Danny Danny Willacy Business Development Location: 710 Birchwood Boulevard, Birchwood, Warrington, WA3 7PS Mobile: +44 (0) 7872 544 203 e-mail: daniel.will...@scc.commailto:daniel.will...@scc.com web: www.scc.comhttp://www.scc.com The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail immediately. The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses, so please scan all attachments. No changes to Terms and Conditions of trade can be accepted through e-mail communication. All changes to Terms and Conditions must be in writing evidenced by a director of the company and in hard copy format. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the company. The company does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. * SPECIALIST COMPUTER HOLDINGS PLC is a company registered in England and Wales with Company No. 04279856. Registered office: James House, Warwick Road, BIRMINGHAM. B11 2LE. VAT Registration Number is GB 313 6516 80 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD vendors
Exactly what make/model/firmware revision of RAID card are we talking about here? Can you also include a dmesg dump for the list's perusal? Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Daniel Willacy daniel.will...@sch-group.com wrote: Hi, I have a client who uses FreeBSD on IBM X3550 M3 Servers (x86). The problem is that they are big supporters of both IBM and FreeBSD but they do not seem to work too well together. They are reporting problems at the RAID and hence, a massive slow down in performance. I notice from your vendor list that IBM is not mentioned. Is this because your product hasn't been tested with IBM or are there any case studies or models that you could provide to me to show that FreeBSD can work on certain IBM servers. Any advice or information would be greatly received. Thanks best regards, Danny Danny Willacy Business Development Location: 710 Birchwood Boulevard, Birchwood, Warrington, WA3 7PS Mobile: +44 (0) 7872 544 203 e-mail: daniel.will...@scc.commailto:daniel.will...@scc.com web: www.scc.comhttp://www.scc.com The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail immediately. The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses, so please scan all attachments. No changes to Terms and Conditions of trade can be accepted through e-mail communication. All changes to Terms and Conditions must be in writing evidenced by a director of the company and in hard copy format. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the company. The company does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. * SPECIALIST COMPUTER HOLDINGS PLC is a company registered in England and Wales with Company No. 04279856. Registered office: James House, Warwick Road, BIRMINGHAM. B11 2LE. VAT Registration Number is GB 313 6516 80 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Need supported SAS controller
Is the any PCIe SAS controller that is supported by FreeBSD 8.1 that I can purchase today? The controller should preferably be low-profile. RAID is not needed since I have just one disk, but if only RAID controllers are available, I can live with that. FreeBSD supports several controllers, but most of them seems old and impossible to purchase today. I have tried a new Adaptec 2405 but I have serious issues with data inte- grity (the beginning of the virtualised disk does not read back the same data as just written). It is unknown if this is a problem with the cont- roller or with the FreeBSD drivers. Due to technical and administrative experiences with Adaptec during this process, no other Adaptec controller will be considered, see http://gmplib.org/~tege/adaptec.html. The Supermicro controllers listed by FreeBSD as supported seem to be rebranded Adaptec controllers, and they are therefore also disqualified. The LSI controllers FreeBSD list as supported at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/hardware.html (with the mpt driver) are no longer in production, as far as I can tell. My hope is that some currently produced LSI controllers actually work with FreeBSD 8.1. Please help if you know something about that. -- Torbjörn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need supported SAS controller
Il 09/07/10 20:26, Torbjorn Granlund ha scritto: Is the any PCIe SAS controller that is supported by FreeBSD 8.1 that I can purchase today? The controller should preferably be low-profile. RAID is not needed since I have just one disk, but if only RAID controllers are available, I can live with that. I have never seen a non-RAID SAS controller in my life: notice I'm not saying mean they don't exist, but everyone I used was RAID capable. That said, I'm using: Adaptec SAS RAID 3405 a...@pci0:2:14:0: class=0x010400 card=0x02bb9005 chip=0x02859005 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Adaptec Inc' device = 'AAC-RAID RAID Controller' class = mass storage subclass = RAID Adaptec SAS RAID 3805 a...@pci0:4:14:0: class=0x010400 card=0x02bc9005 chip=0x02859005 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Adaptec Inc' device = 'AAC-RAID RAID Controller' class = mass storage subclass = RAID Intel SRCSASJV m...@pci0:2:0:0:class=0x010400 card=0x10068086 chip=0x00601000 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic (Was: Symbios Logic, NCR)' device = 'SAS1078 PCI-X Fusion-MPT SAS' class = mass storage subclass = RAID I've also used a couple of HPs in the past: I think it was a P400, but I don't have access to those machines any more. Never had any problems with any of these; only note: I could not get access to HP management via FreeBSD, but things might possibly have changed since then. N.B. I'm using 7.x, but I see no reason why 8.1 should be more troublesome. bye av. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: zfs enabled freebsd requires root zfs partition?
The exact error message I get is: linker_load_file: Unsupported file type kldload: can't load zfs.ko: Exec format error. I would appreciate any additional guidance. In the meantime, Randal Schwartz was kind of enough to suggest PC-BSD, which includes an installer that supports ZFS, so I will check them out. --Gil Vidals On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Gil Vidals gvid...@gmail.com wrote: Whenever If I used the standard install (UFS file system), I would always get an unsupported file system error whenever I tried to kldload zfs.ko. That doesn't seem like a logical error, the only occurrence of the unsupported file system text in the src tree is in /usr/src/sbin/ggate/shared/ggate.c. Can you be more specific about the steps you are taking to reach this error, and it's exact message. Is there away to install FreeBSD on the standard UFS file system and then use the other disks on the server for ZFS? That's a very common approach. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: zfs enabled freebsd requires root zfs partition?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Gil Vidals gvid...@gmail.com wrote: The exact error message I get is: linker_load_file: Unsupported file type kldload: can't load zfs.ko: Exec format error. I would appreciate any additional guidance. In the meantime, Randal Schwartz was kind of enough to suggest PC-BSD, which includes an installer that supports ZFS, so I will check them out. Well that error makes a lot more sense, but doesn't pinpoint the exact cause. I don't know what this is: zfsinstall.sh It's not part of the base system. Without more info, my best guess is that your zfs module is out of sync with your kernel. Two things you can do, install a clean FreeBSD, and just use zfs from there. It works. Or resync the kernel/modules by rebuilding them. Make sure your src tree is in sync, eg csup with RELENG_8_1 or whatever you're trying to run Follow these instructions: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html Just rebuild with GENERIC to make sure no other vars are interfering. That means don't use the KERNCONF=MYKERNEL part of the line or at least set it to GENERIC. Once you have installed the new kernel, reboot and kldload zfs should work. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Regex Help For Procmail
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 14:24:56 2010 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:01:40 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.net To: Drew Tomlinson d...@mykitchentable.net Cc: fr...@shute.org.uk, per...@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regex Help For Procmail 2010-09-06 19:46, Drew Tomlinson skrev: On 9/5/2010 4:02 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Frank Shutefr...@shute.org.uk wrote: Drew, try this: * ^From:.*famous-smoke\.com I think it's not catching it because the period isn't backslash escaped ... Unless there's some edge case that I'm not thinking of, adding a backslash to escape a period will never convert a non-match into a match. An unescaped period in an RE matches any character, including a period. An escaped period matches only a period. I have confirmed this. I did add the backslash but procmail is still not matching. Adding the backslash _does_ better represent what the OP wants to accomplish, but the lack of it is not the cause of the RE not matching. (I'm not sufficiently familiar with how procmail uses REs to figure out what _is_ causing it not to match.) True and thus I'll leave the backslash. However I have no idea what _is_ causing it not to match either. I'm stumped. I think it is the dash. Nope. dashes are 'special' *ONLY within a 'character class' (i.e., within square brackets). Try to escape it like so: * ^From:.*famous\-smoke\.com Z. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
BWN driver error messages
When I attempt to use the if_bwn driver I get the following messages: Is my card not supported or am I missing a step or is it something else? siba_bwn0: Broadcom BCM4312 802.11b/g Wireless mem 0xf470-0xf4703fff irq 1 8 at device 0.0 on pci4 bwn0 on siba_bwn0 bwn0: WLAN (chipid 0x4312 rev 15) PHY (analog 6 type 5 rev 1) RADIO (manuf 0x17f ver 0x2062 rev 2) bwn0: DMA (64 bits) bwn0: Using 1 MSI messages bwn0: [FILTER] wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:21:00:e7:75:20 bwn_v4_lp_ucode15: could not load firmware image, error 2 bwn0: the fw file(bwn_v4_lp_ucode15) not found bwn-open_v4_lp_ucode15: could not load firmware image, error 2 bwn0: the fw file(bwn-open_v4_lp_ucode15) not found -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: BWN driver error messages
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 21:46:43 Eitan Adler wrote: When I attempt to use the if_bwn driver I get the following messages: Is my card not supported or am I missing a step or is it something else? siba_bwn0: Broadcom BCM4312 802.11b/g Wireless mem 0xf470-0xf4703fff irq 1 8 at device 0.0 on pci4 bwn0 on siba_bwn0 bwn0: WLAN (chipid 0x4312 rev 15) PHY (analog 6 type 5 rev 1) RADIO (manuf 0x17f ver 0x2062 rev 2) bwn0: DMA (64 bits) bwn0: Using 1 MSI messages bwn0: [FILTER] wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:21:00:e7:75:20 bwn_v4_lp_ucode15: could not load firmware image, error 2 bwn0: the fw file(bwn_v4_lp_ucode15) not found bwn-open_v4_lp_ucode15: could not load firmware image, error 2 bwn0: the fw file(bwn-open_v4_lp_ucode15) not found You need a package or port of: bwn-firmware-kmod-0.1.0 Broadcom AirForce IEEE 802.11 Firmware Kernel Module ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Exporting ZFS Pool
I'm relatively new to ZFS and have been playing around with different file-backed set ups to determine how I will eventually configure my pools. I've recently come across a problem with exporting a pool, but I'm not sure if it's a bug or just my poor understanding of ZFS. I create a simple pool using 2 128MB files. After exporting the pool, I am unable to import it and the pool is not found by the zpool command. Any advise would be appreciated. I'm currently running 8.1 STABLE. ratchet# dd if=/dev/zero of=/disk1.dd bs=1m count=128 128+0 records in 128+0 records out 134217728 bytes transferred in 2.852547 secs (47051891 bytes/sec) ratchet# dd if=/dev/zero of=disk2.dd bs=1m count=128 128+0 records in 128+0 records out 134217728 bytes transferred in 2.740976 secs (48967128 bytes/sec) ratchet# zpool create pool /usr/tmp/disk1.dd /usr/tmp/disk2.dd ratchet# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT pool 246M75K 246M 0% ONLINE - ratchet# zpool status pool: pool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool ONLINE 0 0 0 /usr/tmp/disk1.dd ONLINE 0 0 0 /usr/tmp/disk2.dd ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors ratchet# zpool export pool ratchet# zpool import -d . If I then attempt to recreate the pool, I get an error indicating that one of the files is a part of an exported pool. ratchet# zpool create z /usr/tmp/disk1.dd /usr/tmp/disk2.dd invalid vdev specification use '-f' to override the following errors: /usr/tmp/disk1.dd is part of exported pool 'pool' -- Pete Erickson redlamb _at_ redlamb _dot_ net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need supported SAS controller
On 09/07/2010 02:46 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Il 09/07/10 20:26, Torbjorn Granlund ha scritto: Is the any PCIe SAS controller that is supported by FreeBSD 8.1 that I can purchase today? The controller should preferably be low-profile. RAID is not needed since I have just one disk, but if only RAID controllers are available, I can live with that. I have never seen a non-RAID SAS controller in my life: notice I'm not saying mean they don't exist, but everyone I used was RAID capable. I'm currently using a Perc5i PCIe 2-port SAS controller in production on 7.2-RELEASE amd64. It's whatever came with the Dell PowerEdge 1950 I'm running, and it's been rock-solid; no RAID capabilities at all, but hosts a gmirror just fine. It identifies as such: m...@pci0:2:8:0:class=0x01 card=0x1f061028 chip=0x00541000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic (Was: Symbios Logic, NCR)' device = 'SAS 3000 series, 8-port with 1068 -StorPort' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net cyber...@cyberleo.net Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/peace/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
