Cacti
What Commands to restart cacti ?please. Kunle ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Cacti
On 03/12/2012 12:28 PM, Olafiranye Olakunle wrote: What Commands to restart cacti ?please. Kunle ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org There is no command to restart cacti. Data is gathered by the script poller.php which runs as a cronjob and the interface to cacti graphs is available via apache webserver. Maybe you want to restart apache? apachectl (re)start or /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22 (re)start this is for apache 2.2.x Kind regards Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Cacti
Olafiranye Olakunle wrote: What Commands to restart cacti ?please. Kunle You are too lazy to deserve help from that ! We are not mind readers, so work harder ! State what uname -a reports State what version of cacti you use. State if you read any/which docs. with package FreeBSD supports 23,000+ packages Something called cacti does seem to be there grep -i cacti /usr/ports/INDEX* yet Ive never heard of it, prob many others here too. FreeBSD supports about 80 or so mail lists, http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ Select the list you decide most appropriate (eg freebsd-net@ maybe ? ) Then repost your request for help there, with sufficient info that people can help you. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, indent with . Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: question about SMTP-authentication (2nd )
Dear Matthew, According to your recommendation (as following). When I do make at /usr/src/sur.sbin/sendmail it show as following. ns1:kamolpat:/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmailmake clean rm -f sm_os.h sendmail alias.o arpadate.o bf.o collect.o conf.o control.o convtime.o daemon.o deliver.o domain.o envelope.o err.o headers.o macro.o main.o map.o mci.o milter.o mime.o parseaddr.o queue.o ratectrl.o readcf.o recipient.o savemail.o sasl.o sfsasl.o shmticklib.o sm_resolve.o srvrsmtp.o stab.o stats.o sysexits.o timers.o tls.o trace.o udb.o usersmtp.o util.o version.o mailq.1.gz newaliases.1.gz aliases.5.gz sendmail.8.gz mailq.1.cat.gz newaliases.1.cat.gz aliases.5.cat.gz sendmail.8.cat.gz ns1:kamolpat:/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmailmake ln -sf /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include/sm/os/sm_os_freebsd.h sm_os.h cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB -DNIS -DTCPWRAPPERS -DMAP_REGEX -DDNSMAP -DNETINET6 -DSTARTTLS -D_FFR_TLS_1 -I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL=2 -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/alias.c In file included from /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/alias.c:14: /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:135:25: error: sasl/sasl.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:136:29: error: sasl/saslutil.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/alias.c:14: /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:607: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:691: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'sasl_conn_t' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail. then I try to find where is sasl.h ns1:kamolpat:/usrfind . -name sasl.h ./local/include/sasl/sasl.h ./ports/security/cyrus-sasl2/work/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25/include/sasl.h ./ports/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd/work/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25/include/sasl.h What should I do next? Shold I just copy the sasl.h to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail ? Thanks Kamolpat On 3/9/2012 12:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 08/03/2012 15:55, kamolpat wrote: Setup Reference == 1. I read the how to setup from FreeBSD Handbook (online)- Chapter 29 Electronic Mail - 29.10 SMTP Authentication from freebsd.org 2. setup for cyrus-sasl2 was fine (setup via usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2) 3. setup for openssl was 90% fine (setup via port) reference to FreeBSD Handbook (online)-Chapter 15 Security - 15.8 OpenSSL accept the STARTTLS line doesn't appear as mention on the last part of article. Did you rebuild sendmail with the right flags so that it would enable all the SASL bits? Apart from that you seem to have done all the right stuff that I can see. You need to add this to /etc/make.conf: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 and then rebuild sendmail -- assuming you have system sources installed: # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail # make clean # make # make install If you haven't got the system sources installed, then you can get them easily enough with csup(1) or freebsd-update(8) or several other ways. Or you could just install sendmail from ports -- obviously, make sure to choose the option to enable SASL in the config dialogue. If you use the ports sendmail, so long as you set up mailer.conf(5) to point to the ports version -- like so: lucid-nonsense:/etc/mail:% cat mailer.conf # $FreeBSD: stable/8/etc/mail/mailer.conf 93858 2002-04-05 04:25:14Z gshapiro $ # # Execute the real sendmail program, named /usr/local/sbin/sendmail # sendmail/usr/local/sbin/sendmail send-mail /usr/local/sbin/sendmail mailq /usr/local/sbin/sendmail newaliases /usr/local/sbin/sendmail hoststat/usr/local/sbin/sendmail purgestat /usr/local/sbin/sendmail and put the following in /etc/make.conf so it uses the latest configuration file bits: SENDMAIL_CF_DIR=/usr/local/share/sendmail/cf MAKEMAP=/usr/local/sbin/makemap then the ports sendmail is pretty much a drop-in replacement for the system one, and you can use all the config bits in /etc/mail in exactly the same way as normal. Cheers, Matthew E-mail message checked by Internet Security (7.0.0.508) Database version: 6.19440 http://www.pctools.com/en/internet-security/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Terminal (TERM=xterm) on FreeBSD doesn not accept DEL or ALT key on/in a Linux YAST2 session
Administering Linux Suse boxes makes it opf need to login onto those boxes and use the well designed kiddy-cloaking scripting environment, called YAST/YAST2. The problem I face now is that I can not use DEL key to delete characters or even use the ALT key to enforce actions like ALT-e or ALT-d for enabling/disabling. I tried to set environment variable TERM = xterm to TERM = cons25 since I thought this could be a problem with the terminal. But it wans't. Either the outdated X on FBSD causes problems or there is another issue. I desperately need some help ... Regards and thanks in advance, Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: question about SMTP-authentication (2nd )
On 12/03/2012 13:26, kamolpat wrote: According to your recommendation (as following). When I do make at /usr/src/sur.sbin/sendmail it show as following. ns1:kamolpat:/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmailmake clean rm -f sm_os.h sendmail alias.o arpadate.o bf.o collect.o conf.o control.o convtime.o daemon.o deliver.o domain.o envelope.o err.o headers.o macro.o main.o map.o mci.o milter.o mime.o parseaddr.o queue.o ratectrl.o readcf.o recipient.o savemail.o sasl.o sfsasl.o shmticklib.o sm_resolve.o srvrsmtp.o stab.o stats.o sysexits.o timers.o tls.o trace.o udb.o usersmtp.o util.o version.o mailq.1.gz newaliases.1.gz aliases.5.gz sendmail.8.gz mailq.1.cat.gz newaliases.1.cat.gz aliases.5.cat.gz sendmail.8.cat.gz ns1:kamolpat:/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmailmake ln -sf /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include/sm/os/sm_os_freebsd.h sm_os.h cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB -DNIS -DTCPWRAPPERS -DMAP_REGEX -DDNSMAP -DNETINET6 -DSTARTTLS -D_FFR_TLS_1 -I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL=2 -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/alias.c In file included from /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/alias.c:14: /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:135:25: error: sasl/sasl.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:136:29: error: sasl/saslutil.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/alias.c:14: /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:607: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail.h:691: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'sasl_conn_t' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail. then I try to find where is sasl.h ns1:kamolpat:/usrfind . -name sasl.h ./local/include/sasl/sasl.h ./ports/security/cyrus-sasl2/work/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25/include/sasl.h ./ports/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd/work/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25/include/sasl.h What should I do next? Shold I just copy the sasl.h to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/sendmail ? No. Don't do that. It won't help anything. You need to follow my instructions correctly. Specifically this line needs to be in /etc/make.conf in order to pick up the SASL header files: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 Where, you will note, this does *not* say /usr/local/include/sasl, which is what appears in your compiler output. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Modbus RTU with GSM communication
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
9.0 spontaneously reboots
Hi all. I have one machine behaving unstable. This happened before 9.0. After upgrading to 9.0 machine was given a light load and now it reboots. Memory was already tested (without any errors) and changed after another reboot. I just have one snippet in the logs: Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: interrupt total Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq18: ehci0 uhci5+ 325 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq19: uhci2 uhci4 4350 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq23: ehci1 uhci3272776 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu0:timer 306304013 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq256: mpt0 106758743 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu1:timer 50588836 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu14:timer 40862828 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu12:timer 0057 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu6:timer 51650325 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu13:timer 35826328 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu3:timer 47414874 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu10:timer101158759 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu2:timer 116817563 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu8:timer 137051223 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu7:timer 31732225 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu11:timer 43244351 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu4:timer 83143936 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu9:timer 49622770 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu5:timer 40662969 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: cpu15:timer 27434472 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq257: igb0:que 0 20058599 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq258: igb0:que 1 15054525 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq259: igb0:que 2 14738762 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq260: igb0:que 3 14702046 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq261: igb0:que 4 14842310 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq262: igb0:que 5 15035818 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq263: igb0:que 6 14826606 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq264: igb0:que 7 14924631 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: irq265: igb0:link 2 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: Total 1461395023 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #0 0x8038d458 at kdb_backtrace+0x58 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #1 0x80315b4b at watchdog_fire+0x8b Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #2 0x80315e10 at hardclock_anycpu+0x2a0 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #3 0x80583278 at handleevents+0xd8 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #4 0x80583e36 at timercb+0x2d6 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #5 0x805aec46 at lapic_handle_timer+0xb6 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #6 0x80557f2c at Xtimerint+0x8c Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #7 0x8055c348 at cpu_idle_acpi+0x38 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #8 0x8055c402 at cpu_idle+0xa2 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #9 0x80380b7f at sched_idletd+0x37f Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #10 0x80331d36 at fork_exit+0x76 Mar 12 07:51:56 beeb kernel: #11 0x8055790e at fork_trampoline+0xe What should I blame now? Is it some programming error or should I continue with testing/changing motherboard and cpu? -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Modbus RTU with GSM communication
El día Saturday, March 10, 2012 a las 02:43:10AM -0300, Exemys escribió: This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Your message has no content at all. Consider sending your mail in ASCII. HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Modbus RTU with GSM communication
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Saturday, March 10, 2012 a las 02:43:10AM -0300, Exemys escribió: This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly. Hi Matthias, Please re-send your mail in plain text. -- Alejandro Imass ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Terminal (TERM=xterm) on FreeBSD doesn not accept DEL or ALT key on/in a Linux YAST2 session
On 03/12/12 15:21, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:51:55PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: Administering Linux Suse boxes makes it opf need to login onto those boxes and use the well designed kiddy-cloaking scripting environment, called YAST/YAST2. The problem I face now is that I can not use DEL key to delete characters or even use the ALT key to enforce actions like ALT-e or ALT-d for enabling/disabling. I tried to set environment variable TERM = xterm to TERM = cons25 since I thought this could be a problem with the terminal. But it wans't. Either the outdated X on FBSD causes problems or there is another issue. I desperately need some help ... Simple questions first just to be sure: You set TERM with the command export TERM=xterm, correct? No extra spaces? Of course, it is either setenv TERM xterm in csh or TERM=xterm in bourne-alike shells. In my FreeBSD driven environment everything is fine and shiny, but when login into a Suse 12.1 box and doing a YAST2, DEL key does not work (produce nothing) and ALT-plus-key doesn't work either. But in several cases, I need to edit lines and confirm those changes with key shortcuts like ALT-e, for instance for enable is much appreciated than hopping around with the TAB key. And you are using xterm (not rxvt)? No, pure and plain and conservative xterm as it comes with the port and no extravagant terminal thingy. What happens when you use the DEL key? Except in YAST/YAST2, it works as expected ... I'm not familiar with YAST. Are you having problems at a normal shell command line, or are you having problems in something run from a shell? I'm also not familiar with YAST (I start hating this crap), but I need it since I have not the scientific support on FreeBSD platforms I need as I have on Linux (we run TESLA driven boxes acting as supercomputers. Try it, es ist, als würden Engel schieben ...). Regards, Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Terminal (TERM=xterm) on FreeBSD doesn not accept DEL or ALT key on/in a Linux YAST2 session
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:30 AM, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 03/12/12 15:21, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:51:55PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: Administering Linux Suse boxes makes it opf need to login onto those boxes and use the well designed kiddy-cloaking scripting environment, called YAST/YAST2. [...] Of course, it is either setenv TERM xterm in csh or TERM=xterm in bourne-alike shells. Hi Oliver, DEL and BS (Backspace) are one of those things where terminals have failed to standardize. Remember there are *many* layers of translations from the time you hit the key until it echoes on the terminal. First you have local keymaps which might be sending the wrong control sequence (e.g. Mac keyboard vs. regular PC). Then you have the character encoding of the terminal's OS, the you may have further translation in the protocol agents (ssh, telnet, etc.) then you have the remote shell's settings and encodings, etc. and many other things in between Take a look at this article and you will probably fix the problem, and it's probably not even on the FBSD side: www.ibb.net/~anne/keyboard.html Cheers, -- Alejandro Imass ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: question about SMTP-authentication (3rd )
Dear Matthew, Ok, I got sendmail complied. Thanks. But seem like ... POP3 still working in clear text usr/pwd sending to Server (but it work, I can get mail from server normal). When I chose option in ThunderBird to another mode, it doesn't work (accept connection security: none, authentication method: password transmitted insecurity this is the option that TB dectected during setting mail account) SMTP doesn't work it declare from Thunder Bird: Send Message Error The Kerberos/GSSAPI ticket was not accepted by the SMTP server mail.dmaccess.co.th Please check that you are logged in to the Kerberos/GSSAPI realm. (event I change authentication method: Kerberos/GSSAPI, it still inform this message) from /var/log/maillog Mar 12 22:38:04 ns1 sendmail[93331]: q2CMc4jF093331: ppp-58-8-130-33.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.130.33] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA this is my test on server = ns1:kamolpat:/etctelnet dmaccess.co.th 25 Trying 202.170.122.33... Connected to dmaccess.co.th. Escape character is '^]'. 220 ns1.dmaccess.co.th ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.4/8.14.4; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:23:14 GMT ehlo dmaccess.co.th 250-ns1.dmaccess.co.th Hello ns1.dmaccess.co.th [202.170.122.33], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP quit 221 2.0.0 ns1.dmaccess.co.th closing connection Connection closed by foreign host. this is my /etc/mail/freebsd.mc = Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=78 dnl Uncomment the first line to change the location of the default http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=78down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=78up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=79 dnl /etc/mail/local-host-names and comment out the second line. http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=79down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=79up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=80 dnl define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/sendmail.cw') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=80down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=80up=1 *Define* http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=81 define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=81down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=81up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=82 http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=82down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=82up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=83 dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=83down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=83up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=84 DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=84down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=84up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=85 DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=85down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=85up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=86 http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=86down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=86up=1 *Define* http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=87 define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBroken') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=87down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=87up=1 *Define* http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=88 define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `add-to-undisclosed') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=88down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=88up=1 *Define* http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=89 define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,noexpn,novrfy') http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=89down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=89up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=90 http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=90down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=90up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=91 GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/genericdomains'); http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=91down=1http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/move.cgi?idx=91up=1 Other http://202.170.122.33:10099/sendmail/edit_feature.cgi?idx=92
Re: Suggestion
On 3/11/2012 7:33 PM, Da Rock wrote: On 03/11/12 21:03, ajtiM wrote: On Saturday 10 March 2012 17:36:53 Da Rock wrote: No system is actually truly capable of this, with the exception of the newest kid on the block Plan9. Winblows, in its current form, is the bastard love child of DOS and some black sheep cousin of Unix (twice-removed), so its not happening there either; just some sleight of hand tricks to partially achieve the result with a decrease of security to boot. Windows is a poorly made joke. We all know this deep down. Does no one read Computer History? Microsoft was marketing Xenix before IBM said We need an OS that blows for a Computer that has similar power to a calculator ten years from now and Microsoft said We can do that! Well, we can BUY that Seattle Computer Products has this OS called QDOS that is a rip off of CP/M and stands for Quick Dirty Operating System if we buy that for a rip off price and rename it Disk Operating System, even though it can't handle Disks anyway, we can use this! IMO it is the Microsoft and CO. tactics how to eliminate concurency - Unix, Mac... They never tried to be better... Hah! They didn't need to. The guys who designed Unix finally wound up their work once ported, and then said we can do a lot better now and Plan9 was born. The change was too dramatic for commerce to change for supposedly little reward, and so Plan9 was left on the backburner while a lot of its features were integrated into other *nix platforms (rc, file based devices, etc). Plan 9 is a record label started by Glenn Danzig. And a movie. As for the OS, I don't care. They got it right with Unix years earlier, why stop now? ATT didn't care about Unix until they were allowed to make money off it, but the problem there, is that Berkeley got a copy of it, and some Brilliant Hackers started working on it. The CSRG at Berkeley did things that made more possible. Then they came up with BSD, and, well, we're still using it Today. Many people would consider 6 months to a year a long time in Computer terms, and 5 years with the same OS, is considered damn good. So what does this say about BSD? We're still using an OS that was born in 1969, changed in the 70s by the Brilliance of Berkeley, and now still going strong after so long. That's not only saying something, that's a Historical thing. So in a way they did try to be better, but not exactly with the original designers blessing. And Plan9 is still an immature child... shame. Oh well. We don't really have to deal with DOS anymore, and FreeDOS has done things even Microsoft couldn't buy their way through. Then we have Windows, Linux, Unix, and of course, the other toys from other people. I'd like BeOS to come back, but I'm quite happy with BSD and Linux. Of course, if I won the Lotto or something, I'd re-design my House, and turn this room into a true Computer Lab. My Wife and I both are into Computers, and we both Love Unix. We'd buy sun Machines, Sparcs and, for me, a full set of SGI Workstations and Servers. And I'd like them to be running IRIX, except the new ones, I don't know what I'd use on those. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:14:39 -0400 Allen unix.hac...@comcast.net wrote: Plan 9 is a record label started by Glenn Danzig. I never thought I'd see this on FreeBSD list! I guess I have now lived long enough as they say. Of course, if I won the Lotto or something, I'd re-design my House, and turn this room into a true Computer Lab. My Wife and I both are into Computers, and we both Love Unix. We'd buy sun Machines, Sparcs and, for me, a full set of SGI Workstations and Servers. And I'd like them to be running IRIX, except the new ones, I don't know what I'd You are either stealing my thoughts or are my long lost twin. Either way, no matter what you post from now on you are a genius in my book! -- Rod Person http://www.rodperson.com rodper...@rodperson.com 'Silence is a fence around wisdom' ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots
On 12/03/2012 14:07, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: What should I blame now? Is it some programming error or should I continue with testing/changing motherboard and cpu? Instability that appears spontaneously (and especially if it persists across system updates) is almost always caused by hardware problems. So, yes, carry on swapping out components until you can isolate where the problem is. Some common hardware problems which might result in the problems you've seen: * PSU going flakey. If you have the right measuring equipment, this is pretty easy to detect by looking at the output voltages -- if they've drifted out of spec, or if you've got mains frequency jitter leaking through then its no wonder your system crashes. * Similarly, if the crashing is associated with system load, (particularly at startup, when things are happening like disks spinning up) this can indicate a power supply fading under load. That can happen due to age, or because you've been adding extra hardware and haven't considered the power requirements. * The other reason for crashing under load is overheating. Sometimes this can be cured easily by cleaning dust out of vents and heat-sinks. Check too for fans either seized or running slowly. * You may need to clean off any old heat-sink compound and re-apply a fresh layer, especially if you've taken CPU coolers off at some point. * There's also the old capacitor problem: electrolytic capacitors have a failure mode that generates some positive pressure inside them. This is detectable by the end of the capacitor being bowed out, rather than slightly concave. (Generally this means a new motherboard, although I've heard of people being able to solder in replacements successfully.) Other than that, try disconnecting and reconnecting peripherals like disks or DVDs and so forth in various combinations to test if that improves system stability. One faulty component can knock the whole machine over. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Suggestion
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:14:39PM -0400, Allen wrote: I'd like BeOS to come back, but I'm quite happy with BSD and Linux. Give the Haiku project a look. It's meant to be some kind of inheritor of the BeOS legacy. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Chris wrote: ... One word that is rampant... Alligations Is that where someone makes a claim that someone else is an alligator? -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:14:39PM -0400, Allen wrote: I'd like BeOS to come back, but I'm quite happy with BSD and Linux. Give the Haiku project a look. It's meant to be some kind of inheritor of the BeOS legacy. May I suggest MenuetOS if you are really looking for something cool -- Alejandro Imass ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can't install WindowMaker
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 05:27:14PM +, jb wrote: Sabine Baer baerks at t-online.de writes: ... After your ports updates, do not forget to test integrity of ports: # portmaster --check-depends # portmaster --check-port-dbdir Wow, lots of garbage. and retry the compilation again. No success. Sabine -- Let my words echo in the depths of your soul: When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews - make no mistake about it. (Martin L. King) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On 12/03/2012 18:40, Chad Perrin wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Chris wrote: ... One word that is rampant... Alligations Is that where someone makes a claim that someone else is an alligator? sometimes i wish the lists had a like button :P -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546PLEASE NOTE NEW MOBILE e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: question about SMTP-authentication (3rd )
On 12/03/2012 15:47, kamolpat wrote: Dear Matthew, Ok, I got sendmail complied. Thanks. But seem like ... POP3 still working in clear text usr/pwd sending to Server (but it work, I can get mail from server normal). When I chose option in ThunderBird to another mode, it doesn't work (accept connection security: none, authentication method: password transmitted insecurity this is the option that TB dectected during setting mail account) SMTP doesn't work it declare from Thunder Bird: Send Message Error The Kerberos/GSSAPI ticket was not accepted by the SMTP server mail.dmaccess.co.th Please check that you are logged in to the Kerberos/GSSAPI realm. (event I change authentication method: Kerberos/GSSAPI, it still inform this message) from /var/log/maillog Mar 12 22:38:04 ns1 sendmail[93331]: q2CMc4jF093331: ppp-58-8-130-33.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.130.33] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA what are you using as the authentication method for sasl? there are multiple authentication mechansims available for sasl(2), simplest is probably saslauthd *In /etc/rc.conf *saslauthd_enable=yes In /usr/local/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf have: pwcheck_method: saslauthd make sure its running /usr/local/etc/rc.d/saslauthd start add a user with saslpasswd2 Test your u/p locally with testsaslauthd testsaslauthd -u user -p PASS (if thats not working it won't work over the network either) have TB set to conn security to STARTTLS and password security set to normal password, (for non encrypted password obv) Paul. -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546PLEASE NOTE NEW MOBILE e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Terminal (TERM=xterm) on FreeBSD doesn not accept DEL or ALT key on/in a Linux YAST2 session
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:43:17AM -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: Take a look at this article and you will probably fix the problem, and it's probably not even on the FBSD side: www.ibb.net/~anne/keyboard.html not really (that page gives a lot of poor advice, particularly with regard to xterm). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgp09mjj8DUHz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Terminal (TERM=xterm) on FreeBSD doesn not accept DEL or ALT key on/in a Linux YAST2 session
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:30:58PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: And you are using xterm (not rxvt)? No, pure and plain and conservative xterm as it comes with the port and no extravagant terminal thingy. Linux generally uses DEL (127) and (almost) everyone else uses BS (8). Adding to the confusion, most keyboards label it Backspace. Most (but not all) applications on a given host are consistent with the choice (or accept either code). There are exceptions, of course. With xterm, you can use control/Backspace to toggle between the two (for one keypress), or use the control/left-mouse menu to toggle the Backarrow Key (BS/DEL) entry. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgpDPKal5B5Nj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Editor With NO Shell Access?
I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. So ... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like joe or vi to inhibit this feature? TIA, -- Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots
Matthew Seaman wrote: On 12/03/2012 14:07, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: What should I blame now? Is it some programming error or should I continue with testing/changing motherboard and cpu? Instability that appears spontaneously (and especially if it persists across system updates) is almost always caused by hardware problems. So, yes, carry on swapping out components until you can isolate where the problem is. Some common hardware problems which might result in the problems you've seen: * PSU going flakey. If you have the right measuring equipment, this is pretty easy to detect by looking at the output voltages -- if they've drifted out of spec, or if you've got mains frequency jitter leaking through then its no wonder your system crashes. * Similarly, if the crashing is associated with system load, (particularly at startup, when things are happening like disks spinning up) this can indicate a power supply fading under load. That can happen due to age, or because you've been adding extra hardware and haven't considered the power requirements. * The other reason for crashing under load is overheating. Sometimes this can be cured easily by cleaning dust out of vents and heat-sinks. Check too for fans either seized or running slowly. * You may need to clean off any old heat-sink compound and re-apply a fresh layer, especially if you've taken CPU coolers off at some point. * There's also the old capacitor problem: electrolytic capacitors have a failure mode that generates some positive pressure inside them. This is detectable by the end of the capacitor being bowed out, rather than slightly concave. (Generally this means a new motherboard, although I've heard of people being able to solder in replacements successfully.) Other than that, try disconnecting and reconnecting peripherals like disks or DVDs and so forth in various combinations to test if that improves system stability. One faulty component can knock the whole machine over. Cheers, Matthew Aloha, Have seen the problems Matthew is addressing here in Hawaii. And if your equipment is in a non climate controlled room check for corrosion on the board or any plugins. Clean all the cabled and components that can be removed. (No air-con in my systems here in Hawaii and humidity is around 60-70% normally so we have to clean and put teflon on contacts about 2 times a year.) Corrosion is worse if your on the ocean or brackish river. Happy hunting. ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* + email: n...@hdk5.net All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all. I have one machine behaving unstable. This happened before 9.0. After upgrading to 9.0 machine was given a light load and now it reboots. Memory was already tested (without any errors) and changed after another reboot. So your RAM is good enough to pass a memory test. It doesn't mean it's not the culprit. Way too many false negatives from those things. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. So ... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like joe or vi to inhibit this feature? man vi (see -S) -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgpJTSE7KtVaE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 03/12/2012 03:13 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. So ... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like joe or vi to inhibit this feature? man vi (see -S) It turns out you can still work around this if your know the trick. I am still researching this, but restricted vi appears to be compromised. -- Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Which compiler compiled system?
Hi, Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or clang? I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ. Regards, kaltheat ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Mar 12 14:22:29 2012 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:19:06 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Editor With NO Shell Access? I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. So ... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like joe or vi to inhibit this feature? If the need is for 'simple'/'minimal' editing -- as opposed to, say, regex- based global-search-and-replace, A more-or-less 'easy' way to do this could be to use a web browser. .htaccess to determine who can access what file, probably from a specific list. a cgi-bin that, on validate access, loads the file into a 'textarea' on a form. (form has a 'hidden' field that identifies the file being edited, User makes changes in the 'text' block, clicks 'update' (form 'submit' button) when finished. There's a .htaccess on the form-processing cgi-bin to re-validate the submission. (prevents somebody 'faking' a file update without actual permission.) The cgi-bin then re-writes the edited file. Depending on 'security' requirements, you may need a shared-memory cache -- used between the two cgi-bin invocations -- to provide 'session' locking, prevent 'overlapping' updates, and trap _all_ 'forged' file updates. This has some 'maintainablity' advantages over the 'hacked' editor approach. It's much clearer to a future person just _what_ is going on. It's also clear to the user what they can, and _cannot_ do. This has major beneficial effect on those who attempt to 'push the limits'. Hack the editor to disable functionality, and _somebody_ *will* complain that they =need= that functionality, for a 'superficially plausable' reason. Otherwise, hacking the source code for, say, 'vi', should -not- be very difficult. Look for the logic that processes '!!' or :! at the beginning of an input sequence, and disable the related functionality. You could probably make a dinky little library -- with 'fake' routines for 'fork', 'exec', and 'pipe'; routes that 'do nothing' other than raise a security alert, and include that in the compile/link for a customized 'vi', before 'libc'. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Which compiler compiled system?
If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang... On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, kalth...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or clang? I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ. Regards, kaltheat ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: apache22 + mod_fastcgi
socket file: -socket /var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock are same for both default and virtual host the only difference is a directory with phpscript On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: Have you tried pointing your vhost's fcgi handler to the same unix socket path you use for your default vhost ? On 10 Mar 2012, at 02:35, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: if it would be incorrectly it wouldn't work the first time (default host) virtualhost has a copy from a default host, the only difference is local path to directory, that's all ifmodule is there just in case if for whatever reason module is missing, site can operate in degraded state vs not operate at all and other virtual hosts can work as well otherwise i have to go and comment out alot of lines manually so it's not ifmodule as that proven to work, but in any case i added ifmodule after, line was there before without ifmodule so it didn't work before either.. mbp:~ alexus$ curl -I http://XX.XXX.XX.XXX/php/phpinfo.php HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:34:29 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.21 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.21 OpenSSL/0.9.8q DAV/2 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.7.2 mod_fastcgi/2.4.6 X-Powered-By: PHP/5.3.8 Content-Type: text/html mbp:~ alexus$ curl -I http://virtualhost.com/php/phpinfo.php HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:34:42 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.21 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.21 OpenSSL/0.9.8q DAV/2 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.7.2 mod_fastcgi/2.4.6 Last-Modified: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:10:09 GMT ETag: 97c8ef-11-4b99824b74240 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 17 Content-Type: application/x-httpd-php mbp:~ alexus$ On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: I think you're naming your module incorrectly. First, try just setting the handler in your vhost w/o the ifmodule stuff. If that works, you know where you've gone wrong. On 9 Mar 2012, at 21:12, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: i'd like to follow up with this question if possible On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:31 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: --- LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so IfModule mod_fastcgi.c AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data/php -socket /var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock /IfModule --- this works for my apache for default virtualhost, yet if i use same thing under a virtualhost it won't work VirtualHost *:* ServerName DocumentRoot /home/xxx/xxx/htdocs/ IfModule mod_fastcgi.c AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php FastCgiExternalServer /home/xxx/xxx/htdocs/php -socket /var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock /IfModule /VirtualHost in default virtual host i PHP scripts gets executed no problem, under second it actually just starts downloading that php script.. any ideas? -- http://alexus.org/ -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- http://alexus.org/ -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 2012-03-12 15:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. So ... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like joe or vi to inhibit this feature? I don't know if this will help, but it may provide an idea that could spark something further. You can force a user directly into an editor so they have no shell access. For example, if the user has '/bin/csh' as their login shell, adding: exec /usr/local/bin/vim into their ~/.cshrc file will force them directly into vim. When they exit vim, they are immediately logged off. However, I don't believe this will provide them any way to see their files though. vim's :open filename and :w filename still work, but shell commands (eg :! ls -la) don't. Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can't install WindowMaker
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:42:24 +0100, Sabine Baer wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 05:27:14PM +, jb wrote: Sabine Baer baerks at t-online.de writes: ... After your ports updates, do not forget to test integrity of ports: # portmaster --check-depends # portmaster --check-port-dbdir Wow, lots of garbage. and retry the compilation again. No success. Did you have the chance to try to compile it using only ports infrastructure? E. g. making sure the ports tree is up to date, and then # cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/windowmaker/ # make install to start with a clean (!) build? Just to be sure, you could remove any possibly offending distfiles/ archives and work/ subtrees. If this has worked, you can run the portmaster checks again, but if I understood you correctly, getting WindowMaker (not sure about the current correct spelling!) installed and running is your top priority. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On 3/12/2012 2:00 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: On 12/03/2012 18:40, Chad Perrin wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Chris wrote: ... One word that is rampant... Alligations Is that where someone makes a claim that someone else is an alligator? sometimes i wish the lists had a like button :P HA! I just love my HTC auto correct. But to the point ... Sure, I *like* it. -- Keep well, Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:40:10 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: You can force a user directly into an editor so they have no shell access. For example, if the user has '/bin/csh' as their login shell, adding: exec /usr/local/bin/vim into their ~/.cshrc file will force them directly into vim. When they exit vim, they are immediately logged off. Just an idea about extending this idea: What if the shell field for that user does not contain a shell, but the name of the editor instead? I assume it has to be noted in /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe could work (haven't tested that). A list of the files can be obtained when opening a file ^KE and pressing the Tab key. It would be worth testing if shell escapes like !command will work in this constellation... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc I'm not sure... I assume logging in is handled by /usr/bin/login, and control is then (i. e. after successful login) transferred to the login shell, which is the program specified in the shell field (see man 5 passwd) of /etc/passwd. How is login supposed to know if the program specified in this field is actually a dialog shell? From man 1 login I read that many shells have a built-in login command, but /usr/bin/login is the system's default binary for this purpose if the shell (quotes deserved if it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability of performing a login. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc I'm not sure... I assume logging in is handled by /usr/bin/login, and control is then (i. e. after successful login) transferred to the login shell, which is the program specified in the shell field (see man 5 passwd) of /etc/passwd. How is login supposed to know if the program specified in this field is actually a dialog shell? From man 1 login I read that many shells have a built-in login command, but /usr/bin/login is the system's default binary for this purpose if the shell (quotes deserved if it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability of performing a login. Now i gotta try this out. Off to hosed my system. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On 03/13/12 02:14, Allen wrote: On 3/11/2012 7:33 PM, Da Rock wrote: On 03/11/12 21:03, ajtiM wrote: On Saturday 10 March 2012 17:36:53 Da Rock wrote: No system is actually truly capable of this, with the exception of the newest kid on the block Plan9. Winblows, in its current form, is the bastard love child of DOS and some black sheep cousin of Unix (twice-removed), so its not happening there either; just some sleight of hand tricks to partially achieve the result with a decrease of security to boot. Windows is a poorly made joke. We all know this deep down. Does no one read Computer History? Microsoft was marketing Xenix before IBM said We need an OS that blows for a Computer that has similar power to a calculator ten years from now and Microsoft said We can do that! Well, we can BUY that Seattle Computer Products has this OS called QDOS that is a rip off of CP/M and stands for Quick Dirty Operating System if we buy that for a rip off price and rename it Disk Operating System, even though it can't handle Disks anyway, we can use this! IMO it is the Microsoft and CO. tactics how to eliminate concurency - Unix, Mac... They never tried to be better... Hah! They didn't need to. The guys who designed Unix finally wound up their work once ported, and then said we can do a lot better now and Plan9 was born. The change was too dramatic for commerce to change for supposedly little reward, and so Plan9 was left on the backburner while a lot of its features were integrated into other *nix platforms (rc, file based devices, etc). Plan 9 is a record label started by Glenn Danzig. And a movie. As for the OS, I don't care. They got it right with Unix years earlier, why stop now? You realise, of course, that a lot of things you take for granted on BSD Unix was ported from Plan9? Yes, they got it right the first time. _And_ the second. People were impressed, but it would have taken too much effort to change ingrained ways and habits. ATT didn't care about Unix until they were allowed to make money off it, but the problem there, is that Berkeley got a copy of it, and some Brilliant Hackers started working on it. The CSRG at Berkeley did things that made more possible. Then they came up with BSD, and, well, we're still using it Today. Many people would consider 6 months to a year a long time in Computer terms, and 5 years with the same OS, is considered damn good. So what does this say about BSD? We're still using an OS that was born in 1969, changed in the 70s by the Brilliance of Berkeley, and now still going strong after so long. That's not only saying something, that's a Historical thing. It is astounding. For around 20 years it hung around before they came up with something new, 40 years on and its still going strong - cars don't even last that long; or some buildings for that matter! So in a way they did try to be better, but not exactly with the original designers blessing. And Plan9 is still an immature child... shame. Oh well. We don't really have to deal with DOS anymore, and FreeDOS has done things even Microsoft couldn't buy their way through. Then we have Windows, Linux, Unix, and of course, the other toys from other people. I'd like BeOS to come back, but I'm quite happy with BSD and Linux. Of course, if I won the Lotto or something, I'd re-design my House, and turn this room into a true Computer Lab. My Wife and I both are into Computers, and we both Love Unix. We'd buy sun Machines, Sparcs and, for me, a full set of SGI Workstations and Servers. And I'd like them to be running IRIX, except the new ones, I don't know what I'd use on those. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots
On 03/13/12 02:56, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 12/03/2012 14:07, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: What should I blame now? Is it some programming error or should I continue with testing/changing motherboard and cpu? Instability that appears spontaneously (and especially if it persists across system updates) is almost always caused by hardware problems. So, yes, carry on swapping out components until you can isolate where the problem is. Some common hardware problems which might result in the problems you've seen: * PSU going flakey. If you have the right measuring equipment, this is pretty easy to detect by looking at the output voltages -- if they've drifted out of spec, or if you've got mains frequency jitter leaking through then its no wonder your system crashes. * Similarly, if the crashing is associated with system load, (particularly at startup, when things are happening like disks spinning up) this can indicate a power supply fading under load. That can happen due to age, or because you've been adding extra hardware and haven't considered the power requirements. * The other reason for crashing under load is overheating. Sometimes this can be cured easily by cleaning dust out of vents and heat-sinks. Check too for fans either seized or running slowly. * You may need to clean off any old heat-sink compound and re-apply a fresh layer, especially if you've taken CPU coolers off at some point. * There's also the old capacitor problem: electrolytic capacitors have a failure mode that generates some positive pressure inside them. This is detectable by the end of the capacitor being bowed out, rather than slightly concave. (Generally this means a new motherboard, although I've heard of people being able to solder in replacements successfully.) Yes, that works (relatively easily); but you need to be good with a soldering iron and be able to remove the cap without breaking tracks or shorting them. If you're not that or confident, I wouldn't try; although if the MB is cactus anyway you may have nothing to lose :) Other than that, try disconnecting and reconnecting peripherals like disks or DVDs and so forth in various combinations to test if that improves system stability. One faulty component can knock the whole machine over. Cheers, Matthew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots
On 03/13/12 06:07, Adam Vande More wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrkoc.kw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all. I have one machine behaving unstable. This happened before 9.0. After upgrading to 9.0 machine was given a light load and now it reboots. Memory was already tested (without any errors) and changed after another reboot. So your RAM is good enough to pass a memory test. It doesn't mean it's not the culprit. Way too many false negatives from those things. Overnight soak test with memtest possible? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Which compiler compiled system?
On 03/13/12 06:49, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang... I wouldn't say that is categorical. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM,kalth...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or clang? I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ. Regards, kaltheat ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Which compiler compiled system?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 03/13/12 06:49, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang... I wouldn't say that is categorical. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM,kalth...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or clang? I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ. strings on a clang v. gcc compile shows no differences (at least in my tests), but binaries compiled with clang and gcc seem to reliable show differences at the 25th character of the compiled program, although the differences at the 25th character are not consistent across programs ... $ # one example $ gcc -Wall -o hello_world.gcc hello_world.c $ clang -Wall -o hello_world.clang hello_world.c $ cmp hello_world.gcc hello_world.clang hello_world.gcc hello_world.clang differ: char 25, line 1 this does suggest that if you know gcc and clang are the only 2 options for compilation on a system, and you have a version compiled with the same flags on the same system from a known compiler, you should be able to reliably detect compilation by the other compiler using cmp ... although this may be more or less meaningless to you depending on how much control you have over the variables (e.g. binaries built on the same system, ability to know which compilation flags were sent at compile time, etc ...): $ # hello_world here is ``in the wild'' $ clang -Wall -o hello_world.clang hello_world.c $ if cmp hello_world.clang hello_world /dev/null 2 /dev/null; then echo built with clang; else echo built with gcc; fi built with clang Regards, kaltheat __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@**freebsd.orgfreebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- regards, matt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Jail and questions
Hello list I've setup a 32-bit jail on amd64 freebsd 8.2-stable. It works, sort of, but when i run portsnap extract in the jail it say Building new INDEX files... make_index: fopen(/dev/stdin): No such file or directory #ls /dev lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel12 6 Mar 02:56 log - /var/run/log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel76 12 Mar 23:09 null -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 10 Mar 03:01 stderr -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1360 7 Mar 04:44 stdout Where is stdin? or running #ps ps: /boot/kernel/kernel: No such file or directory ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 03/12/2012 03:47 PM, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc I'm not sure... I assume logging in is handled by /usr/bin/login, and control is then (i. e. after successful login) transferred to the login shell, which is the program specified in the shell field (see man 5 passwd) of /etc/passwd. How is login supposed to know if the program specified in this field is actually a dialog shell? From man 1 login I read that many shells have a built-in login command, but /usr/bin/login is the system's default binary for this purpose if the shell (quotes deserved if it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability of performing a login. Now i gotta try this out. Off to hosed my system. Does not work. Could not login, it shows Couldn't open *-joerc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Jail and questions
On 03/13/12 09:15, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list I've setup a 32-bit jail on amd64 freebsd 8.2-stable. It works, sort of, but when i run portsnap extract in the jail it say Building new INDEX files... make_index: fopen(/dev/stdin): No such file or directory #ls /dev lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel12 6 Mar 02:56 log - /var/run/log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel76 12 Mar 23:09 null -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 10 Mar 03:01 stderr -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1360 7 Mar 04:44 stdout Where is stdin? or running #ps ps: /boot/kernel/kernel: No such file or directory You may have to unhide it and enable the specific rules for the jail system. I thought stdin was enabled by default, but I could be wrong. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Which compiler compiled system?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:49:38PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang... It's probably more accurate to say If Java is not broken, it's almost certainly built with GCC. If it's broken, it could go either way. (No offense to the Java maintainers at the FreeBSD project, of course. They do a great job of making it possible to get working at all.) -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote: I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. I vaguely recall that pico can be configured to work this way. Check out /usr/ports/editors/pico-alpine. Sorry I can't give much more help; it's been a very long time since I worked with that particular editor. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:34:18 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:47 PM, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc I'm not sure... I assume logging in is handled by /usr/bin/login, and control is then (i. e. after successful login) transferred to the login shell, which is the program specified in the shell field (see man 5 passwd) of /etc/passwd. How is login supposed to know if the program specified in this field is actually a dialog shell? From man 1 login I read that many shells have a built-in login command, but /usr/bin/login is the system's default binary for this purpose if the shell (quotes deserved if it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability of performing a login. Now i gotta try this out. Off to hosed my system. Does not work. Could not login, it shows Couldn't open *-joerc. Very strange message. I know there's a .joerc in ~ (for the user) and a global /usr/local/etc/joe/rjoerc (for system-wide use). I also get this message: Couldn't open '*-joerc' Maybe this is because joe isn't a shell and doesn't set some required variables, such as $PATH or $HOME, and joe cannot find its rc files... The reason is what I see in /usr/ports/editors/joe/work/joe-3.7/main.c line 353 and above. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
There are two edits to make to ex_shell.c in /usr/src/contrib/nvi/ex that will prevent a shell from being executed. 99,100c return (1); . 48,51c return (1); . On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote: I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. I vaguely recall that pico can be configured to work this way. Check out /usr/ports/editors/pico-alpine. Sorry I can't give much more help; it's been a very long time since I worked with that particular editor. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Mar 12 17:46:04 2012 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:47:59 -0700 From: Edward M. eam1edw...@gmail.com To: Polytropon free...@edvax.de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Editor With NO Shell Access? On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc I'm not sure... I assume logging in is handled by /usr/bin/login, and control is then (i. e. after successful login) transferred to the login shell, which is the program specified in the shell field (see man 5 passwd) of /etc/passwd. How is login supposed to know if the program specified in this field is actually a dialog shell? From man 1 login I read that many shells have a built-in login command, but /usr/bin/login is the system's default binary for this purpose if the shell (quotes deserved if it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability of performing a login. Now i gotta try this out. Off to hosed my system. If other configuration is set up right (e.g. /etc/shells), you can name *any* executable as the 'shell' field in /etc/passwd, and have it work. Long, long, ago, I used this for client 'on demand' system back-up. They just put the tape in the drive, and logged in as the 'backup' user. *HOWEVER* this is -not- a solution for the OP's problem, as a skilled, _malicious_, user can change, say, vi(1)'s idea of what executable it should invoke when a '!', or '!!' command is issued. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
tar won't extract a dir
Hello all, never had tar refuse to extract a directory from an archive before. tar archive is: htdocs.1201.tar.gz tar tzf htdocs.1201.tar.gz | grep standrewsglenwood ...shows a list of files contained within the archived dir: htdocs/standrewsglenwood/many whatevers yet the command: tar xzf htdocs.1201.tar.gz htdocs/standrewsglenwood ...extracts nothing. I've tried an individual file in that dir with no success. I've tried other files and dirs with no success. ?? Glenn. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Which compiler compiled system?
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:45 PM, kalth...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or
clang?
I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ.
It's fairly easy to determine whether assembly code was compiled with gcc or
clang from idioms they use-- GCC emits .ascii for strings and then adds a
trailing null; clang uses .asciz, for example. From that you can also figure
out whether a particular executable or shared library was compiled with one or
the other-- gcc is doing a leaf frame caller optimization, where it leave / jmp
to puts() (using the stack frame allocated for main()), whereas clang is doing
normal stack frame handling of %rpb and explicit return.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
% cat h.c
#include stdio.h
int main() {
puts(Hello, world!\n);
}
% gcc -S -O2 -o h-gcc.s h.c
% clang -S -O2 -o h-clang.s h.c
% cat h-gcc.s
.cstring
LC0:
.ascii Hello, world!\12\0
.text
.align 4,0x90
.globl _main
_main:
LFB3:
pushq %rbp
LCFI0:
movq%rsp, %rbp
LCFI1:
leaqLC0(%rip), %rdi
leave
jmp _puts
LFE3:
.section
__TEXT,__eh_frame,coalesced,no_toc+strip_static_syms+live_support
EH_frame1:
.set L$set$0,LECIE1-LSCIE1
.long L$set$0
LSCIE1:
.long 0x0
.byte 0x1
.ascii zR\0
.byte 0x1
.byte 0x78
.byte 0x10
.byte 0x1
.byte 0x10
.byte 0xc
.byte 0x7
.byte 0x8
.byte 0x90
.byte 0x1
.align 3
LECIE1:
.globl _main.eh
_main.eh:
LSFDE1:
.set L$set$1,LEFDE1-LASFDE1
.long L$set$1
LASFDE1:
.long LASFDE1-EH_frame1
.quad LFB3-.
.set L$set$2,LFE3-LFB3
.quad L$set$2
.byte 0x0
.byte 0x4
.set L$set$3,LCFI0-LFB3
.long L$set$3
.byte 0xe
.byte 0x10
.byte 0x86
.byte 0x2
.byte 0x4
.set L$set$4,LCFI1-LCFI0
.long L$set$4
.byte 0xd
.byte 0x6
.align 3
LEFDE1:
.subsections_via_symbols
% cat h-clang.s
.section__TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
.globl _main
.align 4, 0x90
_main: ## @main
Leh_func_begin0:
## BB#0:
pushq %rbp
Ltmp0:
movq%rsp, %rbp
Ltmp1:
leaqL_.str(%rip), %rdi
callq _puts
xorl%eax, %eax
popq%rbp
ret
Leh_func_end0:
.section__TEXT,__cstring,cstring_literals
L_.str: ## @.str
.asciz Hello, world!\n
.section
__TEXT,__eh_frame,coalesced,no_toc+strip_static_syms+live_support
EH_frame0:
Lsection_eh_frame0:
Leh_frame_common0:
Lset0 = Leh_frame_common_end0-Leh_frame_common_begin0 ## Length of Common
Information Entry
.long Lset0
Leh_frame_common_begin0:
.long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag
.byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION
.asciz zR ## CIE Augmentation
.byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor
.byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignment Factor
.byte 16 ## CIE Return Address Column
.byte 1 ## Augmentation Size
.byte 16 ## FDE Encoding = pcrel
.byte 12 ## DW_CFA_def_cfa
.byte 7 ## Register
.byte 8 ## Offset
.byte 144 ## DW_CFA_offset + Reg (16)
.byte 1 ## Offset
.align 3
Leh_frame_common_end0:
.globl _main.eh
_main.eh:
Lset1 = Leh_frame_end0-Leh_frame_begin0 ## Length of Frame Information Entry
.long Lset1
Leh_frame_begin0:
Lset2 = Leh_frame_begin0-Leh_frame_common0 ## FDE CIE offset
.long Lset2
Ltmp2: ## FDE initial location
.quad Leh_func_begin0-Ltmp2
Lset3 = Leh_func_end0-Leh_func_begin0 ## FDE address range
.quad Lset3
.byte 0 ## Augmentation size
.byte 4 ## DW_CFA_advance_loc4
Lset4 = Ltmp0-Leh_func_begin0
.long Lset4
.byte 14 ## DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset
.byte 16 ## Offset
.byte 134 ## DW_CFA_offset + Reg (6)
.byte 2 ## Offset
.byte 4 ## DW_CFA_advance_loc4
Lset5 = Ltmp1-Ltmp0
.long Lset5
.byte 13 ## DW_CFA_def_cfa_register
.byte 6 ## Register
.align 3
Leh_frame_end0:
.subsections_via_symbols
...and here's a disassembly of main() from gcc:
_main:
Re: oops, now: bsd question: how to record a tv stream?
On 12/03/2012 10:16, Da Rock wrote: On 03/12/12 07:19, Polytropon wrote: On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:28:19 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: here us a FBSD qauestion how can i capture any tv stream---or radio stream for later replay? I've been using a BrookTree (Haupauge WinTV) PCI card for capturing from TV which worked very good using the standard programs mplayer and mencoder. For capturing TV programs, there may be some service like the Online TV Recoder which I occassionally use. Maybe this works also for radio programs? Additionally, there may be an option to download some kind of media streams. There are tools for that available. There is cx88 in the ports which will cover a lot of pci devices, and webcamd covers just about all the rest. Then use mplayer or another tool to record the stream. And if you're real tricky you can set it to record at a specific time and shut off at another specified time... :) I wrote a script for this; a bit hackish, but it gets the job done. I have to clean it up someday when I have the spare time. No one suggesting MythTV? I haven't used a tuner card but I thought MythTV was the one to use. -- Shane Ambler FreeBSD (at) ShaneWare (dot) Biz http://ShaneWare.Biz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: oops, now: bsd question: how to record a tv stream?
On 03/13/12 12:27, Shane Ambler wrote: On 12/03/2012 10:16, Da Rock wrote: On 03/12/12 07:19, Polytropon wrote: On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:28:19 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: here us a FBSD qauestion how can i capture any tv stream---or radio stream for later replay? I've been using a BrookTree (Haupauge WinTV) PCI card for capturing from TV which worked very good using the standard programs mplayer and mencoder. For capturing TV programs, there may be some service like the Online TV Recoder which I occassionally use. Maybe this works also for radio programs? Additionally, there may be an option to download some kind of media streams. There are tools for that available. There is cx88 in the ports which will cover a lot of pci devices, and webcamd covers just about all the rest. Then use mplayer or another tool to record the stream. And if you're real tricky you can set it to record at a specific time and shut off at another specified time... :) I wrote a script for this; a bit hackish, but it gets the job done. I have to clean it up someday when I have the spare time. No one suggesting MythTV? I haven't used a tuner card but I thought MythTV was the one to use. Pah! Too much bloat - especially for this use. A lot of setup and configuration is required, and for a one off why bother? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:20:57PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:13 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec requirements in this regard. So ... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like joe or vi to inhibit this feature? man vi (see -S) It turns out you can still work around this if your know the trick. I am still researching this, but restricted vi appears to be compromised. Have you tried restricted vim? $ vim -Z :help restricted Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html pgpqkXozuNJ90.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Can't install WindowMaker
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 05:41:41PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: As a workaround, try removing the '#ifdef' and '#endif' lines around the '# include sys/select.h' line in the file handlers.c[2], then re-start the compilation process (by running 'make' from the port's directory). Don't re-start the portmaster command, as that will undo your changes. If the build goes OK, issue the command 'make install clean' from the port's directory. [2: /usr/ports/x11-wm/windowmaker/work/WindowMaker-0.95.2/WINGs/handlers.c] Been there, done that: |*** Error code 1 |mv -f .deps/wxcopy.Tpo .deps/wxcopy.Po :-\ Sabine -- Man wird hier zunehmend bizarrer.(Christian Schulz in dang) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 03/12/2012 05:33 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Mar 12 17:46:04 2012 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:47:59 -0700 From: Edward M.eam1edw...@gmail.com To: Polytroponfree...@edvax.de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Editor With NO Shell Access? On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe I think this would not let the user to login,etc I'm not sure... I assume logging in is handled by /usr/bin/login, and control is then (i. e. after successful login) transferred to the login shell, which is the program specified in the shell field (see man 5 passwd) of /etc/passwd. How is login supposed to know if the program specified in this field is actually a dialog shell? From man 1 login I read that many shells have a built-in login command, but /usr/bin/login is the system's default binary for this purpose if the shell (quotes deserved if it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability of performing a login. Now i gotta try this out. Off to hosed my system. If other configuration is set up right (e.g. /etc/shells), you can name *any* executable as the 'shell' field in /etc/passwd, and have it work. Long, long, ago, I used this for client 'on demand' system back-up. They just put the tape in the drive, and logged in as the 'backup' user. *HOWEVER* this is -not- a solution for the OP's problem, as a skilled, _malicious_, user can change, say, vi(1)'s idea of what executable it should invoke when a '!', or '!!' command is issued. I tried it out of curiosity to see if it was possible to login in joe, by the way the OS was configure. However my knowledge is not advance to continue, got stock on the message cannot not find *-joerc :-) Regards Ed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
