Re: sending fax from commandline/or via appliance

2012-08-24 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 24, 2012 a las 05:01:34AM +0200, Frank Reppin escribió:

 Hi all,
 
 is someone aware of a solution which can do
 the following:
 
 1) given a freebsd host which hosts an application xxABxx
 2) this application xxABxx sends an ordinary email with a .ps
 attachment to another host by mailing it to
 recipient_fax_number@tld
 3) this attachment is then fax'ed to the recipient phone number
 4) HylaFAX is not the solution
 5) better some cli solution which could feed this .ps via a CLI
 directly and  non-interactive into a multifunction printer
 (which can do fax ofcourse)

Hi,

Just curious: We did 1) ... 3) for many years in a production
environment with HylaFAX; why this is not a solution for you?

Thx

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner


Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?

It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1 in .profile
(running bash) and have verified that it is set to that value with SET,
it appears to me that the function keys are mapped to weird xterm-like
strings instead of their ANSI values (example: F7 = E[18~ not E[S).

I cannot figure out how to enter ^[ in rc.conf using keychange or
kbdcontrol -f, but after some experimentation it appears keychange does not
alter the function keys at a low enough level.  (Besides the fact that
altering some 50-odd keys with keychange seems like it cannot be the right
answer.)

Termcap seems to be in order. cons25l1 tc's cons25w, and cons25w seems to
have the correct ANSI values for the function keys.

So howcome if TERM=cons25l1 is set, the keyboard produces weird xterm-like
strings?

--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:

 
 Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?
 
 It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1 in .profile
 (running bash) and have verified that it is set to that value with SET,
 it appears to me that the function keys are mapped to weird xterm-like
 strings instead of their ANSI values (example: F7 = E[18~ not E[S).

The TERM environment variable is supposed to describe the terminal
not control it.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: /tmp filesystem full

2012-08-24 Thread Andy Wodfer
Hi everybody!

Thanks for answering my questions and helping me out with this problem.

It's been fixed now and I managed to locate the problem with the find /
-type d | awk 'length  900' command.

What caused it was something that looked like a directory loop or at least
a very deep list of sub directories from two old backups of src + kernel
compilations that recently got moved to this server from another one
(accidentally and in a hurry due to disk failure on the other server). I
think I counted 12 full lines in my terminal window for the directory bash
path...

I deleted them and now it works great again. Thanks again for great help!

Best regards,
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:



Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?

It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1 in .profile
(running bash) and have verified that it is set to that value with SET,
it appears to me that the function keys are mapped to weird xterm-like
strings instead of their ANSI values (example: F7 = E[18~ not E[S).


The TERM environment variable is supposed to describe the terminal
not control it.



Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~ instead
of the standard E[S?


--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:13:09 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:

 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
  Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:
 
 
  Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?
 
  It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1 in .profile
  (running bash) and have verified that it is set to that value with SET,
  it appears to me that the function keys are mapped to weird xterm-like
  strings instead of their ANSI values (example: F7 = E[18~ not E[S).
 
  The TERM environment variable is supposed to describe the
  terminal not control it.
 
 
 Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~ instead
 of the standard E[S?

In the kernel config there's an option TEKEN_CONS25 which will build
the console terminal emulator in CONS25 mode. You'll need a custom kernel
of course.

I'm curious though - why ? As long as TERM is set correctly
anything that uses curses will handle the keyboard and screen correctly.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread J B
 Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~ instead
 of the standard E[S?

I think you will find a hint here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Home_and_End_keys_not_working

Btw, in the vi editor you can type a control key into your text file
by first typing
'^V' followed by the control character desired, e.g. '^V^H' for '^H'.

jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:13:09 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:



Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?

It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1 in .profile
(running bash) and have verified that it is set to that value with SET,
it appears to me that the function keys are mapped to weird xterm-like
strings instead of their ANSI values (example: F7 = E[18~ not E[S).


The TERM environment variable is supposed to describe the
terminal not control it.



Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~ instead
of the standard E[S?


In the kernel config there's an option TEKEN_CONS25 which will build
the console terminal emulator in CONS25 mode. You'll need a custom kernel
of course.


I find it really interesting that this change which broke just about every
critical application I run was not mentioned in the release notes or
UPDATING.



I'm curious though - why ? As long as TERM is set correctly
anything that uses curses will handle the keyboard and screen correctly.


If 9.0 had not broken my most important applications, I wouldn't be asking.



--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:13:09 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:



Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?

It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1 in .profile
(running bash) and have verified that it is set to that value with SET,
it appears to me that the function keys are mapped to weird xterm-like
strings instead of their ANSI values (example: F7 = E[18~ not E[S).


The TERM environment variable is supposed to describe the
terminal not control it.



Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~ instead
of the standard E[S?


In the kernel config there's an option TEKEN_CONS25 which will build
the console terminal emulator in CONS25 mode. You'll need a custom kernel
of course.


I grepped the entire /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf directory.  There is no
TEKEN_CONS25 or TEKEN or CONS25.  Exactly where is this documented?


--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: harware compatibility queustion

2012-08-24 Thread Graeme Dargie


-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bonomi
Sent: 24 August 2012 03:30
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: harware compatibility queustion


I need to add more than two' internal SATA _ports_ to a box that will be 
running FreeBSD 9.  

When I look at inexpensive SATA controllers, they all seem to be using chipsets 
thar are _not_ explicitly mentioned in the 'supported hardware'
list.

Can anyone say, authoritatively, that, say, a 'SiL3114'-based cnntroller card 
will work in FreeBSD, as far as 'bare drive' functionality goes?

Alternatively, can anybody recommend an inexpensive 4-port (or more) SATA 
controller card that is known to work with FreeBSD?



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list 
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

I have used a SIL3112 card on FreeBSD 7 and 8 which is just a 2 port version of 
the card you are looking at, as far as I recall it worked with no issues.
If you want me to check it with 9.0, I can stick it on the machine that the 
card currently resides in.
Regards

Graeme
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:11:19 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:

 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:13:09 -0500 (CDT)
  Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
  Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:
 
 
  Does 9.0 honor TERM settings?
 
  It appears to me it does not.  Although I set TERM=cons25l1
  in .profile (running bash) and have verified that it is set to that
  value with SET, it appears to me that the function keys are mapped
  to weird xterm-like strings instead of their ANSI values (example:
  F7 = E[18~ not E[S).
 
The TERM environment variable is supposed to describe the
  terminal not control it.
 
 
  Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~
  instead of the standard E[S?
 
  In the kernel config there's an option TEKEN_CONS25 which will
  build the console terminal emulator in CONS25 mode. You'll need a
  custom kernel of course.
 
 I find it really interesting that this change which broke just about every
 critical application I run was not mentioned in the release notes or
 UPDATING.

Bizarre - no well written application should break unless of course
you have TERM set to something that doesn't match what the terminal does.
The whole TERM termcap/terminfo/curses mechanism is designed to support
terminal independent applications.

  I'm curious though - why ? As long as TERM is set correctly
  anything that uses curses will handle the keyboard and screen correctly.
 
 If 9.0 had not broken my most important applications, I wouldn't be
 asking.

Which applications - and are they still broken with the right TERM
settings (TERM=xterm) ?

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:20:18 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner l...@larseighner.com wrote:

 I grepped the entire /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf directory.  There is no
 TEKEN_CONS25 or TEKEN or CONS25.  Exactly where is this documented?

/usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is where I found it.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:38:38AM +0200, J B wrote:
  Well, then, where is the setting that makes the F7 key send E[18~ instead
  of the standard E[S?
 
 I think you will find a hint here:
 https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Home_and_End_keys_not_working

it's not much of a hint (it's Linux-specific, and like most of the Arch
wiki - not insightful).

(other responses in the thread seem to have answered the question)

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


pgpL3GAW9IKHM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:20:18 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner l...@larseighner.com wrote:


I grepped the entire /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf directory.  There is no
TEKEN_CONS25 or TEKEN or CONS25.  Exactly where is this documented?


/usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is where I found it.


Grepped /usr/src/sys/conf/* and did not find it.

I see from google that something seems to have been added to HEAD and its
UPDATING, but there is nothing of the sort in 9.0 RELEASE - p4.

I really should have known better by now than to upgrade to a X.0 - perhaps
by X.2 or X.3 they will have fix most of the stuff they broke with X.0.

Fortunately, I have learned enough to try upgrades on the mirror and not on
the production disc.


--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: EXIF inspector

2012-08-24 Thread Bernt Hansson

2012-08-23 19:14, Gary Aitken skrev:


On 08/23/12 08:38, Polytropon wrote:

On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:08 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:

For the photo folks --

What do you use for inspecting EXIF data?
I've tried
exif
exiftags
exifprobe
and none of them show the full compliment of tags present on my oly pen-ep3.
In particular, they omit most of the vendor specific stuff,
and they seem to display different parts of things, but not everything.


I've been using exiv2 (port graphics/exiv2) which fits my needs.
Here's an example of its output:

% exiv2 cam/img_6842.jpg
File name   : cam/img_6842.jpg
File size   : 2887326 Bytes
MIME type   : image/jpeg
Image size  : 2816 x 2112
Camera make : Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot S3 IS
Image timestamp : 2011:08:19 09:14:42
Image number: 120-6842
Exposure time   : 1/50 s
Aperture: F2.7
Exposure bias   : 0 EV
Flash   : No, red-eye reduction
Flash bias  : 0 EV
Focal length: 6.0 mm
Subject distance: 68
ISO speed   : 100
Exposure mode   : Easy shooting (Auto)
Metering mode   : Multi-segment
Macro mode  : Off
Image quality   : Fine
Exif Resolution : 2816 x 2112
White balance   : Auto
Thumbnail   : image/jpeg, 5981 Bytes
Copyright   :
Exif comment:

See man exiv2 for details. It's a really versatile program
which can be excellently integrated into scripts.

In case you need more info from a photo file, use the strings
utility provided by the system and parse its output.


Thanks
This is rather weird.

I had tried exiv2 and concluded it did not report everything because on a
windows system I had previously used PhotoME to ascertain that the image
stabilization parameter for my camera was in a field whose tag name was
ImageQuality3, and exiv2 does not report anything with uality in it.
However, I now see that it does report a string called 
Exif.OlympusCs.ImageStabilization of the same type with the corresponding
value.

Strings reports neither tag.
That makes sense, since exif tags are numerically encoded and not text,
so I don't think strings is particularly useful.

Upon further investigation, it appears that the choice of string to print
for a tag is probably a translation provided by the program, not the image file.
A strings on /usr/local/lib/libexiv2.so.10 shows:
   Image stabilization
   ImageStabilization
   Image Stabilization for the Sony DSLR-A100
   Image stabilization data
   Image Stabilization Data
   ImageStabilizationData
   Image Stabilization A100
   ImageStabilizationA100
   Digital Image Stabilization
and also specific tags for different camera manufacturers, e.g.
   Exif.OlympusCs.
etc.

bah --
   exif doesn't report all the tags


Try exif -l filename and it will show you all exif fields and the fields 
that's in the picture.


From man exif

-l, --list-tags
  List all known EXIF tags and IFDs.  A JPEG image  must  be  pro-
  vided, and those tags which appear in the file are shown with an
  asterisk in the corresponding position in the list.



warren --
   thanks, I thought I tried p5-Image-ExifTool but in looking back at my notes
I have a thing that says install ExifTool and its not there so obviously I
didn't to that.  Will check it if exiv2 doesn't work out.

Gary

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:11:19 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:



If 9.0 had not broken my most important applications, I wouldn't be
asking.


Which applications - and are they still broken with the right TERM
settings (TERM=xterm) ?


Joe, most, lynx (which is also my file manager) in functions involving
function keys.  I could, of course, remap all of the macros, but that would
be silly since I have about five pages of keymapping in .Xdefaults to
make xterm in X emulate cons25.

But that does give me an idea for an emergency solution -- perhaps I can run
my console applications in an xterm in X since I made it emulate cons25.  Of
course there is nothing in X that will put 4000 characters (80x25) on the
screen at once as legibly as VGA fonts do - which is why I use console
applications to begin with - so that is strictly a get out of a jam
solution, not practical for production.


--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:58:36 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:

 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:20:18 -0500 (CDT)
  Lars Eighner l...@larseighner.com wrote:
 
  I grepped the entire /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf directory.  There is no
  TEKEN_CONS25 or TEKEN or CONS25.  Exactly where is this documented?
 
  /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is where I found it.
 
 Grepped /usr/src/sys/conf/* and did not find it.
 
 I see from google that something seems to have been added to HEAD and its
 UPDATING, but there is nothing of the sort in 9.0 RELEASE - p4.

It's there on my 9.0-RELEASE-p4 boxes. In /etc/freebsd-update.conf
do you have src among the components to update ?

 I really should have known better by now than to upgrade to a X.0 -
 perhaps by X.2 or X.3 they will have fix most of the stuff they broke
 with X.0.

I've yet to see any breakage, do your applications really break
with TERM=xterm on the console ?

 Fortunately, I have learned enough to try upgrades on the mirror and not
 on the production disc.

Well yes - no untested updates should ever hit a production system,
that's what the QA boxes are for.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Lars Eighner

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:58:36 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:20:18 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner l...@larseighner.com wrote:


I grepped the entire /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf directory.  There is no
TEKEN_CONS25 or TEKEN or CONS25.  Exactly where is this documented?


/usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is where I found it.


Grepped /usr/src/sys/conf/* and did not find it.

I see from google that something seems to have been added to HEAD and its
UPDATING, but there is nothing of the sort in 9.0 RELEASE - p4.


It's there on my 9.0-RELEASE-p4 boxes. In /etc/freebsd-update.conf
do you have src among the components to update ?


I have never been able to get update to work.  I cvsup the source tree
(which I suppose is now really serviced by subversion).


I really should have known better by now than to upgrade to a X.0 -
perhaps by X.2 or X.3 they will have fix most of the stuff they broke
with X.0.


I've yet to see any breakage, do your applications really break
with TERM=xterm on the console ?


Only the essential stuff: joe, most, lynx.  Of course things which do not
use any function keys (including the movement keys) are not affected.


Fortunately, I have learned enough to try upgrades on the mirror and not
on the production disc.


Well yes - no untested updates should ever hit a production system,
that's what the QA boxes are for.


also the -V switch doesn't give such good results in mergemaster

--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does 9.0 honor TERM settings

2012-08-24 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:12:57 -0500 (CDT)
Lars Eighner l...@larseighner.com wrote:

 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:11:19 -0500 (CDT)
  Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:
 
  If 9.0 had not broken my most important applications, I wouldn't be
  asking.
 
  Which applications - and are they still broken with the right
  TERM settings (TERM=xterm) ?
 
 Joe, most, lynx (which is also my file manager) in functions involving
 function keys.  I could, of course, remap all of the macros, but that
 would be silly since I have about five pages of keymapping in .Xdefaults
 to make xterm in X emulate cons25.

You have something bizarrely wrong on your machine. Lynx works
perfectly in an xterm without any keymapping, it's a curses application so
it should do and it does. I suspect you have something forcing TERM=CONS25
into the environment - you'd be well served by finding and removing it.
Nothing apart from the curses library should ever need to care what the
terminal type is provided TERM matches reality.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Lockups/panics with arbitrary 7.2 boxes

2012-08-24 Thread Sriram Gorti
Hello,

We have been observing the following on quite a few of our i386
FreeBSD 7.2 systems in the course of the last few months:
1. Boxes locking up - to clarify, manual reboot necessary to bring it
back into operation.
2. Boxes panicking somewhere in virtual memory code eg., vdrop, page_fault.

In both cases, did not find anything specifically unusual in their
usage profile, when compared with other similar machines. For example,
SWAPMETA was well within limits, available vm.kmem_map_free was quite
normal. One observation was that the re-start of a periodically
re-starting memory-intensive process coincided with the lockup/panic.

Suspecting that we did not have the fix for some kernel bug that was
perhaps fixed later, looked thru the known FreeBSD 7.2 issues that had
similar back-traces but did not find any. I know this is somewhat of
an old release but any history/pointers for known bugs or any other
suggestions would be most helpful.

Unfortunately, it is not quite an option to debug these boxes when
they hit the issue.

Data for config, selected sysctls and sample backtraces follow.

[1] Key-portions of config

machine  i386
cpu I686_CPU
maxusers256
makeoptionsDEBUG=-g

options SCHED_4BSD
options PREEMPTION  # Enable kernel thread preemption
options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!]
options INET #InterNETworking
options INET6   #IPv6
options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem
options SOFTUPDATES#Enable FFS soft updates support
options MD_ROOT#MD is a potential root device
options PROCFS  #Process filesystem
options PSEUDOFS
options SCSI_DELAY=2000  #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI
options UFS_DIRHASH
options VFS_AIO
options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions

options SYSVSHM
options SYSVSEM
options SYSVMSG
options SHMMAXPGS=65536
options SEMMNI=40
options SEMMNS=240
options SEMUME=40
options SEMMNU=120

options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel
device  apic# Symmetric (APIC) I/O

device  pci
device  ata
device  atadisk # ATA disk drives
device  atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
device  ataraid # ATA RAID drives
options ATA_STATIC_ID   #Static device numbering

device  ahc# AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices
device  scbus# SCSI bus (required)
device  da # Direct Access (disks)
device  pass #CAM passthrough driver
device  aac   # Adaptec FSA RAID, Dell PERC2/PERC3
device  amr   # AMI MegaRAID

device  atkbdc
device  atkbd
device  vga
device  sc
device  sio

device  miibus  # MII bus support
device  fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558)
device  bge # Broadcom BCM570x (``Tigon III'')
device  bce
device  em
device  le

device  loop# Network loopback
device  ether   # Ethernet support
device  vlan# Virtual LAN support
device  pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc)
device  md  # Memory disks
device  bpf #Berkeley packet filter

options KDB
options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER   # ~CR^B
options KDB_UNATTENDED  # reboot on default
options DDB # reboot on default
options KDB_TRACE   # traceback
options GDB

#HW Crypto
device  crypto# core crypto support
device  cryptodev   # /dev/crypto for access to h/w
device  ubsec# Broadcom 5501, 5601, 58xx
device  hifn# Hifn 7951, 7781, etc.
device  safe   # SafeNet 1141

device  smb   # /dev/smb*
device  smbus   # bus
device  ichsmb  # Intel ICH SMBus controller chips

device  acpi
device  random

options COMPAT_FREEBSD4
options COMPAT_FREEBSD6
options COMPAT_LINUX
options LINPROCFS
options LINSYSFS
device  ichwd
device  mpt

device  ed

# add in IPv6 support
options INET6   # IPv6 communications protocols
device  gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling
device  faith  # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation)

#buffer kernel logging so messages don't get split
options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=256

device  sg  # Linux SCSI passthrough
device  mfip# LSI MegaRAID SAS passthrough, requires CAM
#Bump up kernel message buffer size to capture tty logs.
optionsMSGBUF_SIZE=98304

device ichgpio

# 2 fibs.
options ROUTETABLES=2

[2] Sample back-traces

page fault
db_trace_self_wrapper+38
kdb_backtrace+41
panic+615
trap_fatal+819
trap_pfault+592
trap+946
calltrap+6
vm_page_cache_remove+14
vm_page_alloc+789
vm_fault+2215
trap_pfault+315
trap+560
calltrap+6
sched_switch+406
mi_switch+326

Upgrading 9.1-BETA1 - 9.1-RC1

2012-08-24 Thread Maarten Billemont
I've installed a FreeBSD server using the BETA1 release because RC1 was 
delayed.  I notice the 9.1-RC1 is available now, so I thought I'd upgrade ASAP.

The following command, however, fails me:

freebsd-update -r 9.1-RC1 upgrade
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-BETA1 from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed.
Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-BETA1 from update3.FreeBSD.org... failed.
Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-BETA1 from update5.FreeBSD.org... failed.
No mirrors remaining, giving up.

Upon inspection of the code, it appears BETA1's ssl.pub cannot be found at any 
of the mirrors, and as such the process aborts.

The release notes for RC1 specifically mention freebsd-update.

How do I perform a correct update to RC1, and why is the freebsd-update flow 
failing me or not supported?

Thanks!

Re: EXIF inspector

2012-08-24 Thread Gary Aitken
On 08/24/12 05:05, Bernt Hansson wrote:
 2012-08-23 19:14, Gary Aitken skrev:
 
 On 08/23/12 08:38, Polytropon wrote:
 On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:08 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
 For the photo folks --

 What do you use for inspecting EXIF data?
 I've tried
 exif
 exiftags
 exifprobe
 and none of them show the full compliment of tags present on my oly 
 pen-ep3.
 In particular, they omit most of the vendor specific stuff,
 and they seem to display different parts of things, but not everything.
...
 bah --
exif doesn't report all the tags
 
 Try exif -l filename and it will show you all exif fields and the fields 
 that's in the picture.
 
  From man exif
 
 -l, --list-tags
List all known EXIF tags and IFDs.  A JPEG image  must  be  pro-
vided, and those tags which appear in the file are shown with an
asterisk in the corresponding position in the list.

exif appears to list only known exif tags, and seems to omit vendor specific
information.  Much of the important information about an image is stored in the
vendor specific tags.

In the case of my oly pen-ep3, exif -l lists 143 known exif tags,
of which only 49 are used by my camera.  However, exiv2 shows over
300 pieces of relevant information which actually appear, and well over 100 
I can identify as relevant to the particular image (the others may or may not
be relevant, I just can't interpret them; some are unlabelled).
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


mail, mpack and aliases

2012-08-24 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I'm trying to use converters/mpack to send attachments.
It doesn't seem to know anything about mail(1) aliases.
I tried to save mpack output to a file with -o option,
and then read this file into a mail message, e.g. with ~r.
However, this doesn't seem to work.
The attachment is not recognised as such and
is just displayed as part of the body text.
I think it's because there's an empty line
between the mail header and the mime header
produced by mpack.

So how can I use mpack and my mail aliases?

Thanks

Anton
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Tangental And OT: Commercial Support For 'sudo'

2012-08-24 Thread Tim Daneliuk

Please forgive the OTishness of this, but I'm hoping some of
my fellows in the large data center space may have a hint or
two here ...

I am working with a firm that needs to run sudo in a variety of
OS environments.  A few of these - noteably IBM AIX - do not provide
vendor support and legal indemnification of many open source packages,
sudo among them.  This is official a Big Deal (tm) for this company.

So ... does anyone know of a commercial concern that provide sudo support
and legal indemnification?  GratiSoft - the keeper of sudo - were apparently
going to do this at one point but decided not to.

TIA,

Now back to your regularly scheduled discussion of the World's Finest OS...
--

Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Lockups/panics with arbitrary 7.2 boxes

2012-08-24 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/24/2012 6:47 AM, Sriram Gorti wrote:
 We have been observing the following on quite a few of our i386
 FreeBSD 7.2 systems in the course of the last few months:

7.2 reached EoL June 30th, 2010. See http://www.freebsd.org/security/

You should really upgrade.

Bryan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Unable to get crash dump

2012-08-24 Thread Rick Miller
Hi All,

Running 8.3-STABLE 5/21/2012 on HP DL360.  While testing crash dump
functionality, the dump aborts with the following message:

Aborting dump due to I/O error.
status == 0xb, scsi status == 0x0

** DUMP FAILED (ERROR 5) **
Automatic reboot in 5 seconds - press a key on the console to abort

Googling and searching freebsd.org have produced what appeared to be
some what relevant messages, but I found nothing pointing to a cause
and fix.  I'm hoping someone might be able to point me in a direction
to figuring this out.

-- 
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: EXIF inspector

2012-08-24 Thread Bernt Hansson

2012-08-24 17:14, Gary Aitken skrev:

On 08/24/12 05:05, Bernt Hansson wrote:

2012-08-23 19:14, Gary Aitken skrev:


On 08/23/12 08:38, Polytropon wrote:

On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:08 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:

For the photo folks --

What do you use for inspecting EXIF data?
I've tried
 exif
 exiftags
 exifprobe
and none of them show the full compliment of tags present on my oly pen-ep3.
In particular, they omit most of the vendor specific stuff,
and they seem to display different parts of things, but not everything.

...

bah --
exif doesn't report all the tags


Try exif -l filename and it will show you all exif fields and the fields that's 
in the picture.

  From man exif

-l, --list-tags
List all known EXIF tags and IFDs.  A JPEG image  must  be  pro-
vided, and those tags which appear in the file are shown with an
asterisk in the corresponding position in the list.


exif appears to list only known exif tags, and seems to omit vendor specific
information.  Much of the important information about an image is stored in the
vendor specific tags.


exif -'|' filename show the camera vendors stuff

kw# exif -'|' IMG_0657.JPG
MakerNote contains 109 values:
Macro Mode  |Normal
Self-timer  |Off
Quality |Fine
Flash Mode  |Off
Drive Mode  |Single
Unknown Tag |0x
Focus Mode  |Single
Unknown Tag |0x
Record Mode |JPEG
Image Size  |Large
Easy Shooting Mode  |Full auto
Digital Zoom|None
Contrast|Normal
Saturation  |Normal
Sharpness   |Normal
ISO |Auto
Metering Mode   |Evaluative
Focus Range |Auto
AF Point|0x4006
Exposure Mode   |Easy shooting
Unknown Tag |0x7fff
Lens Type   |0x
Long Focal Length of|6
Short Focal Length o|5000
Focal Units per mm  |1000
Maximal Aperture|3.40
Minimal Aperture|8.00
Flash Activity  |0x
Flash Details   |
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Focus Mode  |Continuous
AE Setting  |Normal AE
Image Stabilization |On
Display Aperture|3.40
Zoom Source Width   |4000
Zoom Target Width   |4000
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Photo Effect|0x
Manual Flash Output |Off
Color Tone  |0x7fff
Unknown Tag |0x7fff
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x0078
Focal Type  |Zoom
Focal Length|5000
Focal Plane X Size  |6.35 mm
Focal Plane Y Size  |4.75 mm
Unknown Tag |
Auto ISO|4.000
Shot ISO|100
Measured EV |2.38 EV
Target Aperture |3.40
Target Exposure Time|1/25
Exposure Compensatio|0.00 EV
White Balance   |Auto
Slow Shutter|Off
Sequence Number |0
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Flash Guide Number  |0.00
AF Point|0x
Flash Exposure Compe|0.00 EV
AE Bracketing   |Off
AE Bracket Value|0.00 EV
Unknown Tag |0x0001
Focus Distance Upper|61 mm
Focus Distance Lower|0 mm
FNumber |3.47
Exposure Time   |1/27
Unknown Tag |0x
Bulb Duration   |0x
Unknown Tag |0x0008
Camera Type |Compact
Auto Rotate |None
ND Filter   |Off
Self-timer  |Off
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Unknown Tag |0x
Manual Flash Output |Off
Image Type  |IMG:PowerShot SX130 IS JPEG
Firmware Version|Firmware Version 1.01
Image Number|121-0657
Owner Name  |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |



In the case of my oly pen-ep3, exif -l lists 143 known exif tags,
of which only 49 are used by my camera.  However, exiv2 shows over
300 pieces of relevant information which actually appear, and well over 100
I can identify as relevant to the particular image (the others may or may not
be relevant, I just can't interpret them; some are unlabelled).



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Tangental And OT: Commercial Support For 'sudo'

2012-08-24 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi,
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
 Please forgive the OTishness of this, but I'm hoping some of
 my fellows in the large data center space may have a hint or
 two here ...
 
 I am working with a firm that needs to run sudo in a variety of
 OS environments.  A few of these - noteably IBM AIX - do not provide
 vendor support and legal indemnification of many open source packages,
 sudo among them.  This is official a Big Deal (tm) for this company.
 
 So ... does anyone know of a commercial concern that provide sudo support
 and legal indemnification?  GratiSoft - the keeper of sudo - were apparently
 going to do this at one point but decided not to.

It wouldn't surprise me if no firm offered useful legal indemnification
with contract terms the lawyer of your firm would consider acceptable.

Why suppliers might not like to offer cover:
How long is a piece of string ? Define what doors the string
connects, contracturaly definie routes  limits  values of
potential consequential damage to data  service  3rd parties.

How much would lawyers  insurance brokers/suppliers push
up the price for defining cover ?

Reduced motivation to purchase cover anyway in realisation
its a grey area, eminently disputable,  come a big claim
on insurer, he'd be looking for loopholes, so insuree (your
firm) could end up sueing insurer.  

Yet more lawyers  insurance fees; a profitable interesting
relatively safe software supply business is different
from the insurance business.

Some managers are clueless, first demand the impossible, don't get it,
then compromise without,  do business without:

One customer demanded as standard, my welding certificate
 insurance over a million Euros, I refused, offered I would
stand on street  pass a floppy disk through their fence.
It escalated to someone responsible, they abandoned their
conditions  purchased.

Several customers wanted me/my company to accept unlimited
risk in event of copyright law suit (possible to research
that risk, though still dangerous as even defending frivolous
law suits can cost) and to cover risk of software patent
litigation (impossible to know risks that lurk, no way!).

Iv'e always refused, but offered to help explore
contacts in insurance business if customer Really wants to purchase
own insurance. After Thinking, they've Always backed
down,  decided that's Their business operating risk they
should shoulder  not try to pass to others, as no
one else is stupid enough to accept undefinable risk, except
possibly at very heavy extra cost  debatable usefulness.

Even if a firm categorically demands insurance,
- does not mean they will get it,
- indicates some manager is clueless, foolish or deluded/ aggressive,
- shows the firm is a business risk, as it doesn't understand
  associated business issues.

Every cloud has a silver lining.  An indemnity contract (if any
found) will have legal terms that purchasers lawyer will need to
consult a computer professional about. The purchasing firm will end
up paying 2 professionals to define its risk,  probably decide to
skip it,  carry it's own risk.

PS Another discussion forum to ask on: SAGE, System Administrators Guild

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script,  indent with  .
 Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
 Mail from Yahoo  Hotmail to be dumped @Berklix.  http://berklix.org/yahoo/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Gary Kline

been here the whole day since around 09.00.  one question since the
guy who did my kvm switch used too-short cablesthey were ~4ft
instead of 6.  my question:  Do any of you know if I can just buy
kvm cables... of say 6ft?  it's a trendnet TK-409K.


#2:: I have no idea how a USB port could burn out, but that's what
the tech found.  anybody care to reply to either point??

tx very tmuch

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
  Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Jerry Dunham
On 24 Aug 2012 at 17:52, Gary Kline wrote:

 been here the whole day since around 09.00.  one question since the guy
 who did my kvm switch used too-short cablesthey were ~4ft instead
 of 6.  my question:  Do any of you know if I can just buy kvm cables...
 of say 6ft?  it's a trendnet TK-409K. 

KVM cables are generally pretty standard critters, though there are several 
types.  You 
could probably just do a Google search, but I can tell you that NewEgg has a 
variety of 
them.



--
Jerry Dunham
Moderator, Texas Great Dane Rescue
jdun...@texas.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi,

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:52:53 -0700
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:

 #2:: I have no idea how a USB port could burn out, but that's what
 the tech found.  anybody care to reply to either point??
 
every electrical or electronic device can burn out. I would check the
hardware directly connected to the affected port. Especially the
motherboard if it is a built-in one.

Erich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Al Plant

Gary Kline wrote:

been here the whole day since around 09.00.  one question since the
guy who did my kvm switch used too-short cablesthey were ~4ft
instead of 6.  my question:  Do any of you know if I can just buy
kvm cables... of say 6ft?  it's a trendnet TK-409K.


#2:: I have no idea how a USB port could burn out, but that's what
the tech found.  anybody care to reply to either point??

tx very tmuch


Aloha Gary,

Check pccables.com thats where I got mine. 6 foot.



~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
  + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
  + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD  7.2 - 8.0 - 9* +
   email: n...@hdk5.net 
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:39:29AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:39:29 +0700
 From: Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com
 Subject: Re: RRRgghhh-h-h.  [[tooo tired]]
 To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
 
 Hi,
 
 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:52:53 -0700
 Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
 
  #2:: I have no idea how a USB port could burn out, but that's what
  the tech found.  anybody care to reply to either point??
  
 every electrical or electronic device can burn out. I would check the
 hardware directly connected to the affected port. Especially the
 motherboard if it is a built-in one.

the tech tried every USB port; none responded.  the motherbd 
was a drop-in since the box was oeiginally a 2.75GHz
single-proc bare-bones from 2005.

gary

ps: I have two copies of everything so just d/loaded Fedora.
see if that reactivates the ports.
 
 Erich

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
  Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 08:00:05PM -0500, Jerry Dunham wrote:
 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:00:05 -0500
 From: Jerry Dunham jdun...@texas.net
 Subject: Re: RRRgghhh-h-h.  [[tooo tired]]
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Cc: 
 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63)
 
 On 24 Aug 2012 at 17:52, Gary Kline wrote:
 
  been here the whole day since around 09.00.  one question since the guy
  who did my kvm switch used too-short cablesthey were ~4ft instead
  of 6.  my question:  Do any of you know if I can just buy kvm cables...
  of say 6ft?  it's a trendnet TK-409K. 
 
 KVM cables are generally pretty standard critters, though there are several 
 types.  You 
 could probably just do a Google search, but I can tell you that NewEgg has a 
 variety of 
 them.
 
 

wow! outstanding.  thanks.

gary

 
 --
 Jerry Dunham
 Moderator, Texas Great Dane Rescue
 jdun...@texas.net
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
  Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AAAARRRgghhh-h-h. [[tooo tired]]

2012-08-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:08:56PM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:08:56 -1000
 From: Al Plant n...@hdk5.net
 Subject: Re: RRRgghhh-h-h.  [[tooo tired]]
 To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
 CC: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
 
 Gary Kline wrote:
 been here the whole day since around 09.00.  one question since the
 guy who did my kvm switch used too-short cablesthey were ~4ft
 instead of 6.  my question:  Do any of you know if I can just buy
 kvm cables... of say 6ft?  it's a trendnet TK-409K.
 
 
 #2:: I have no idea how a USB port could burn out, but that's what
 the tech found.  anybody care to reply to either point??
 
 tx very tmuch
 
 Aloha Gary,
 
 Check pccables.com thats where I got mine. 6 foot.


YES!  

Aloha!!

 
 
 
 ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
   + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
   + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD  7.2 - 8.0 - 9* +
email: n...@hdk5.net 
 All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol
 

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
  Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: EXIF inspector

2012-08-24 Thread Gary Aitken
On 08/24/12 14:54, Bernt Hansson wrote:
 2012-08-24 17:14, Gary Aitken skrev:
 On 08/24/12 05:05, Bernt Hansson wrote:
 2012-08-23 19:14, Gary Aitken skrev:

 On 08/23/12 08:38, Polytropon wrote:
 On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:08 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
 For the photo folks --

 What do you use for inspecting EXIF data?
 I've tried
  exif
  exiftags
  exifprobe
 and none of them show the full compliment of tags present on my oly 
 pen-ep3.
 In particular, they omit most of the vendor specific stuff,
 and they seem to display different parts of things, but not everything.
 ...
 bah --
 exif doesn't report all the tags

 Try exif -l filename and it will show you all exif fields and the fields 
 that's in the picture.

   From man exif

 -l, --list-tags
 List all known EXIF tags and IFDs.  A JPEG image  must  be  pro-
 vided, and those tags which appear in the file are shown with an
 asterisk in the corresponding position in the list.

 exif appears to list only known exif tags, and seems to omit vendor 
 specific
 information.  Much of the important information about an image is stored in 
 the
 vendor specific tags.
 
 exif -'|' filename show the camera vendors stuff
 
 kw# exif -'|' IMG_0657.JPG
 MakerNote contains 109 values:
 Macro Mode  |Normal
 Self-timer  |Off
...
 
 In the case of my oly pen-ep3, exif -l lists 143 known exif tags,
 of which only 49 are used by my camera.  However, exiv2 shows over
 300 pieces of relevant information which actually appear, and well over 100
 I can identify as relevant to the particular image (the others may or may not
 be relevant, I just can't interpret them; some are unlabelled).

Perhaps it depends on the camera; or perhaps Canon puts all of the additional
information in the MakerNote.  For my oly, the MakerNote contains next to 
nothing:

%exif -'|' Bird_0001B_20111214_300mm_IS_30s_Flicker.jpg 
MakerNote contains 7 values:
Speed/Sequence/Panor|Normal/0/0
Camera ID   |OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA 
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |
Unknown Tag |

Another possibility is you are missing some info you aren't aware of.
I'm curious to know if Canon stashes things in other places;
I know nikon does similar to the way oly does as reported below;
exiv2 -u -p a on a nikon raw file shows 112 nikon specific values.

%man exif
  ...
  As EXIF tags are read, any unknown ones are discarded...

%exiv2 -u -p a Bird_0001B_20111214_300mm_IS_30s_Flicker.jpg
Exif.Image.ImageDescription  Ascii  32  OLYMPUS DIGITAL 
CAMERA
Exif.Image.Make  Ascii  24  OLYMPUS IMAGING 
CORP.
Exif.Image.Model Ascii  17  E-P3
Exif.Image.Orientation   Short   1  top, left
Exif.Image.XResolution   Rational1  314
Exif.Image.YResolution   Rational1  314
Exif.Image.ResolutionUnitShort   1  inch
Exif.Image.Software  Ascii  32  Version 1.0
Exif.Image.DateTime  Ascii  20  2011:12:14 13:46:47
Exif.Image.ArtistAscii  64  Gary Aitken
Exif.Image.YCbCrPositioning  Short   1  Co-sited
Exif.Image.Copyright Ascii  64  Dona Aitken
Exif.Image.ExifTag   Long1  218
Exif.Photo.ExposureTime  Rational1  1/30 s
Exif.Photo.FNumber   Rational1  F6.7
Exif.Photo.ExposureProgram   Short   1  Aperture priority
Exif.Photo.ISOSpeedRatings   Short   1  640
Exif.Photo.ExifVersion   Undefined   4  2.21
Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal  Ascii  20  2011:12:14 13:46:47
Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized Ascii  20  2011:12:14 13:46:47
Exif.Photo.ComponentsConfiguration   Undefined   4  YCbCr
Exif.Photo.ExposureBiasValue SRational   1  0 EV
Exif.Photo.MaxApertureValue  Rational1  F4.8
Exif.Photo.MeteringMode  Short   1  Spot
Exif.Photo.LightSource   Short   1  Cloudy weather
Exif.Photo.Flash Short   1  Yes, did not fire
Exif.Photo.FocalLength   Rational1  300.0 mm
Exif.Photo.MakerNote Undefined 10368  (Binary value 
suppressed)
Exif.MakerNote.OffsetLong1  3208
Exif.MakerNote.ByteOrder Ascii   3  II
Exif.Olympus2.SpecialModeLong3  Normal
Exif.Olympus2.CameraID   Undefined  32  OLYMPUS DIGITAL 
CAMERA
Exif.Olympus2.Equipment  Ifd 1  102
Exif.OlympusEq.EquipmentVersion  Undefined   4  1.00
Exif.OlympusEq.CameraType