mail/claws-mail: INBOX shows still moved or deleted mails, filtering not working properly

2013-05-28 Thread O. Hartmann

After a struggle with OpenLDAP and Thunderbird (core dumps all over the
place when using Thunderbird with OpenLDAP backed users), I moved to
Evolution, which is unsatisfying, since calendar function immediately
makes Evolution crahs on all tested FreeBSD platforms (9.1-STABLE,
10.0-CURRENT).

I tried mail/claws-mail for now and I'm surprised how cryptic and
fast an email client can be, but I also have serious struggles with
this email client.

When fetch and filtering Emails from the account of our computer
center's IMPA4 mail servers, the moved and even deleted emails remain
visible (but greyished) in the INBOX or any other folder and marked
deleted.

Filtered and filter induced moves of mails also are greyed, still
visible in the main INBOX of the email account but marked with the flag
for new mail in INBOX. I can not delete them from INBOX.

This behaviour is odd. I searched Grand Master Google for that and
found relatively old bug reports about such behaviour, but that should
be solved.

I exclude misconfigurations, since I already configured those
immediate actions as recommended.

Nor Evolution nor thunderbird show that weird behaviour and they
operate as expected on all mail actions.

Maybe someone could give me a hint what to check. Personally, I
consider this behaviour a bug and renders another email client unusable
on FreeBSD, but I might be terribly wrong here and still suffer from a
configuration inconvenience.

Please CC me, I'm no subscriber of both lists.

Thanks in advance,

Oliver Hartmann
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


using ports or gems (easy_install)

2013-05-28 Thread Albert Shih
Hi everybody,

I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
(python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ? 

For exemple when you want install some software with lots of dependances
you can use (if the software use easy_install) just one easy_install and
everything is installed, you can use ports for some packages but sometime
not every packages are in the ports so you should need to installed it
through easy_install. 

After that same question about updating

So what you do ? And why ? 

Regards.

JAS
-- 
Albert SHIH
DIO bâtiment 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
France
Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71
xmpp: j...@obspm.fr
Heure local/Local time:
mar 28 mai 2013 09:36:34 CEST
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: using ports or gems (easy_install)

2013-05-28 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi,

 I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
 (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ? 

As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.

But I am using mostly Perl and CPAN is very well integrated in FreeBSD
ports.

Voila.

Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Any arp table size limitations?

2013-05-28 Thread Peter Andreev
Hello,

We are connecting to an IXP, they have tested our FreeBSD 9.1 server and
said we can store only about 600 MACs simultaneously. So I'd like to ask if
there is any arp table size limitations and if so, how we can increase the
limit?

-- 
AP
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread s m
hello all,

i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to have
a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: / ,
/var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.

but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have problem
with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition) and
every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use fstab
file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have a
freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?

any comments are appreciated.
SAM
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:57+0430, s m wrote:

 hello all,
 
 i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to have
 a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: / ,
 /var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.
 
 but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have problem
 with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition) and
 every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use fstab
 file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have a
 freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?
 
 any comments are appreciated.
 SAM

If you really want to keep /etc as a separate filesystem, then I would 
try something like this:

1. Create the file /etc-mount and give it the following contents:

#!/bin/sh
/sbin/mount /dev/ada0pX /etc
exec /etc/rc $*

2. Make sure to substitute the right device file for the mount 
command.

2. Make /etc-mount executable: chmod a+x /etc-mount

3. On the root filesystem, let /etc/rc be a symlink to /etc-mount.

This is just off the top of my head. It may work, or it may not work.

HTH.

-- 
+---++
| Vennlig hilsen,   | Best regards,  |
| Trond Endrestøl,  | Trond Endrestøl,   |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator,  |
| Fagskolen Innlandet,  | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway,  |
| tlf. mob.   952 62 567,   | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567,   |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00.  | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00.  |
+---++___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread saeedeh motlagh
thanks Trond but i think it can not help me.

you know i want to separate my /etc completely from root. for some reasons,
i want to unmount /etc while root is mounted.

by your procedure, i think /etc is dependent to root yet. isn't it?


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Trond Endrestøl 
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:

 On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:57+0430, s m wrote:

  hello all,
 
  i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to have
  a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: / ,
  /var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.
 
  but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have problem
  with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition) and
  every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use fstab
  file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have a
  freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?
 
  any comments are appreciated.
  SAM

 If you really want to keep /etc as a separate filesystem, then I would
 try something like this:

 1. Create the file /etc-mount and give it the following contents:

 #!/bin/sh
 /sbin/mount /dev/ada0pX /etc
 exec /etc/rc $*

 2. Make sure to substitute the right device file for the mount
 command.

 2. Make /etc-mount executable: chmod a+x /etc-mount

 3. On the root filesystem, let /etc/rc be a symlink to /etc-mount.

 This is just off the top of my head. It may work, or it may not work.

 HTH.

 --
 +---++
 | Vennlig hilsen,   | Best regards,  |
 | Trond Endrestøl,  | Trond Endrestøl,   |
 | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator,  |
 | Fagskolen Innlandet,  | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway,  |
 | tlf. mob.   952 62 567,   | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567,   |
 | sentralbord 61 14 54 00.  | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00.  |
 +---++
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




-- 
*Sa.M*
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:29+0430, saeedeh motlagh wrote:

 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Trond Endrestøl 
 trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
 
  On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:57+0430, s m wrote:
 
   hello all,
  
   i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to have
   a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: / ,
   /var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.
  
   but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have problem
   with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition) and
   every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use fstab
   file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have a
   freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?
  
   any comments are appreciated.
   SAM
 
  If you really want to keep /etc as a separate filesystem, then I would
  try something like this:
 
  1. Create the file /etc-mount and give it the following contents:
 
  #!/bin/sh
  /sbin/mount /dev/ada0pX /etc
  exec /etc/rc $*
 
  2. Make sure to substitute the right device file for the mount
  command.
 
  2. Make /etc-mount executable: chmod a+x /etc-mount
 
  3. On the root filesystem, let /etc/rc be a symlink to /etc-mount.
 
  This is just off the top of my head. It may work, or it may not work.
 
  HTH.

 thanks Trond but i think it can not help me.
 
 you know i want to separate my /etc completely from root. for some reasons,
 i want to unmount /etc while root is mounted.
 
 by your procedure, i think /etc is dependent to root yet. isn't it?

When the system boots, init(8) fires up a shell to execute the 
commands contained in (the real) /etc/rc. At boot only the root file 
system is mounted, thus you need a mechanism to mount /etc ahead of 
normal startup and pass whatever arguments the fake /etc/rc was 
invoked with on to the real /etc/rc.

As long as no processes holds open any files within /etc and you don't 
need any of the files, /etc/{,s}pwd.db og /etc/group comes to mind, 
you should be able to unmount /etc at your own pace. I guess you 
should be in single user mode while doing this.

Why do you need this strange detachment anyway?
Backups? Snapshots?

-- 
+---++
| Vennlig hilsen,   | Best regards,  |
| Trond Endrestøl,  | Trond Endrestøl,   |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator,  |
| Fagskolen Innlandet,  | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway,  |
| tlf. mob.   952 62 567,   | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567,   |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00.  | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00.  |
+---++___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: mail/claws-mail: INBOX shows still moved or deleted mails, filtering not working properly

2013-05-28 Thread RW
On Tue, 28 May 2013 09:17:55 +0200
O. Hartmann wrote:


 I tried mail/claws-mail for now and I'm surprised how cryptic and
 fast an email client can be, but I also have serious struggles with
 this email client.
 
 When fetch and filtering Emails from the account of our computer
 center's IMPA4 mail servers, the moved and even deleted emails remain
 visible (but greyished) in the INBOX or any other folder and marked
 deleted.
 ... 
 Nor Evolution nor thunderbird show that weird behaviour and they
 operate as expected on all mail actions.

This is how a traditional IMAP client works, you mark as deleted and
manually expunge - and move is done through copy,delete and expunge.

In the advanced section of the per account preferences there is a
setting that starts  Move deleted mails to trash ..., check that you
haven't unset that.


BTW please don't cross post without a very good reason. 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread Arthur Chance

On 05/28/13 09:27, s m wrote:

hello all,

i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to have
a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: / ,
/var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.

but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have problem
with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition) and
every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use fstab
file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have a
freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?


Generally speaking, a separate /etc partition is A Bad Thing(TM), and a 
sign you're doing things wrong.


However, nanobsd does (partially) separate /etc out, and it does so 
using /etc/rc.initdiskless and its early (pre-rc) mounting code. Take a 
look at rc.initdiskless and the nanobsd code in


/usr/src/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh

if you really want to go down this route.

--
In the dungeons of Mordor, Sauron bred Orcs with LOLcats to create a
new race of servants. Called Uruk-Oh-Hai in the Black Speech, they
were cruel and delighted in torturing spelling and grammar.

_Lord of the Rings 2.0, the Web Edition_
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:13+0430, s m wrote:

 On 5/28/13, Trond Endrestøl trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
  On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:25+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
 
  On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:29+0430, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
 
   On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Trond Endrestøl 
   trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
  
On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:57+0430, s m wrote:
   
 hello all,

 i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to
 have
 a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: /
 ,
 /var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.

 but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have
 problem
 with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition)
 and
 every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use
 fstab
 file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have
 a
 freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?

 any comments are appreciated.
 SAM
   
If you really want to keep /etc as a separate filesystem, then I
would
try something like this:
   
1. Create the file /etc-mount and give it the following contents:
   
#!/bin/sh
/sbin/mount /dev/ada0pX /etc
exec /etc/rc $*
   
2. Make sure to substitute the right device file for the mount
command.
   
2. Make /etc-mount executable: chmod a+x /etc-mount
   
3. On the root filesystem, let /etc/rc be a symlink to /etc-mount.
   
This is just off the top of my head. It may work, or it may not work.
   
HTH.
 
   thanks Trond but i think it can not help me.
  
   you know i want to separate my /etc completely from root. for some
   reasons,
   i want to unmount /etc while root is mounted.
  
   by your procedure, i think /etc is dependent to root yet. isn't it?
 
  When the system boots, init(8) fires up a shell to execute the
  commands contained in (the real) /etc/rc. At boot only the root file
  system is mounted, thus you need a mechanism to mount /etc ahead of
  normal startup and pass whatever arguments the fake /etc/rc was
  invoked with on to the real /etc/rc.
 
  As long as no processes holds open any files within /etc and you
  don't need any of the files, /etc/{,s}pwd.db and[!] /etc/group comes
  to mind, you should be able to unmount /etc at your own pace. I
  guess you should be in single user mode while doing this.
 
  [Typo corrected.]
 
  Why do you need this strange detachment anyway?
  Backups? Snapshots?

 thanks guys,
 
 you know i have a server and change my pwd files most of the time. i
 want to safe my server, so i prefer to mount my root read-only and
 because of changes in pwd files, i should mount /etc read-write.
 therefore i want to separate my /etc from root.
 
 moreover, if i want to enable journaling on /etc, i should unmount it
 (journaling cannot been set for root partition).

To enable journaling, i.e. soft updates, for the root filesystem, do 
the exact following:

1. Reboot into single user mode.
2. Run /sbin/tunefs -j enable /dev/ada0pX
3. Issue the reboot command.

 now, do you have any suggestion for my status? how can i mount /etc
 partition at boot time?

As I said earlier in this thread you need a mechanism for mounting 
/etc prior to running the startup scripts.

OK, here's a more detailed list than the previous one, assuming the 
root filesystem is currently mounted read-write:

1. Create and edit the file /fake-rc, giving it this contents (the 
next 3 lines):

#!/bin/sh
mount /dev/ada0pX /etc
exec /etc/rc $*

2. Don't forget to substitute the right device file corresponding to 
the /etc filesystem.

3. Let /fake-rc be executable: chmod a+x /fake-rc

4. Go to single user mode. I'm still assuming the _root_ filesystem is 
mounted read-write. Please ensure it is.

5. Unmount /etc.

6. Let /etc/rc be a symbolic link to /fake-rc, by issuing the command: 
/bin/ln -s /fake-rc /etc/rc

7. Remount /etc manually, i.e. mount /dev/ada0pX /etc

8. Make the necessary changes to /etc/fstab so that the root file 
system is never mounted read-write during startup.

9. Reboot the system and observe to see if the behaviour is the 
desired one.

Remember this, because this is important:

When the system boots, init(8) fires up a shell to execute the
commands contained in (the real) /etc/rc.

At boot only the _root_ file system is mounted, thus you need a 
mechanism to mount /etc ahead of normal startup and pass whatever 
arguments the fake /etc/rc was invoked with on to the real /etc/rc.

This is what you would accomplish by erecting /etc/rc on the _root_ 
filesystem as a symlink to the fake /fake-rc, also on the _root_ 
filesystem. The fake /fake-rc takes care of mounting /etc at startup 
and resuming running the startup scripts by executing the real 
/etc/rc, now that the /etc filesystem is finally mounted (read-write).

Use this opportunity to really learn how FreeBSD behaves during 
startup and what its expectations 

Re: freebsd8.2 with /etc mount point can't run correctly

2013-05-28 Thread Eduardo Morras
On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:57:41 +0430
s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com wrote:

 hello all,
 
 i want to install freebsd8.2 with different partitions. i want to have
 a separated partition for /etc. therefore this is my partitions: / ,
 /var, /etc. /tmp, /usr, swap.

 but after installing, freebsd can not run correctly and have problem
 with fstab. i checked my fstab file (fstab file in /etc partition) and
 every thing is ok. i think i should do something in order to use fstab
 file in different mount point. is it true? what should i do to have a
 freebsd with a separate /etc mount point?
 
 any comments are appreciated.

No, starting in single user mode mount / only and will fail to start. I, and 
others for sure, use single user mode for recovery faulty systems. But as 
always, they are your feet ;)

What's wrong with /usr/local/etc ? It can be wherever you want and have 
whatever you need.


 SAM
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


---   ---
Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Create bond on Infiniband ports

2013-05-28 Thread Alex Liptsin
Hi.

I use FreeBSD 9.1 with OFED compiled on it.

There is a Mellanox adapter:

[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# pciconf -lv |grep mlx4 -A 3
mlx4_core0@pci0:0:5:0:  class=0x028000 card=0x005015b3 chip=0x100315b3 rev=0x00 
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Mellanox Technologies'
device = 'MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3]'
class  = network

I want to create Bond on the two ports (ib0 and ib1) of this device:

[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500

options=209bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC
ether 00:50:56:23:1e:06
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet 10.195.30.6 netmask 0x broadcast 10.195.255.255
nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
status: active
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
options=63RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
ib0: flags=8043UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 65520
options=80018VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,LINKSTATE
lladdr 80.0.0.48.fe.80.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.c9.0.1.0.d0.51
inet 11.195.30.1 netmask 0x broadcast 11.195.255.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%ib0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
ib1: flags=8043UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 65520
options=80018VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,LINKSTATE
lladdr 80.0.0.49.fe.80.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.c9.0.1.0.d0.52
inet 12.195.30.1 netmask 0x broadcast 12.195.255.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%ib1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL


1.  Is there bond in FreeBSD or its Lagg?

2. I tried to create this way, but failed:



[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig lagg0 create

root@qa-h-vrt-031-005 conf]# ifconfig lagg0 laggproto failover laggport ib0 
laggport ib1

ifconfig: SIOCSLAGGPORT: Protocol not supported

Any ideas?
Is it supported on Infiniband ports?


Regards,
Alex Liptsin


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: using ports or gems (easy_install)

2013-05-28 Thread Albert Shih
 Le 28/05/2013 ? 14:50:25+0700, Olivier Nicole a écrit
 Hi,
 
  I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
  (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ? 
 
 As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.

Me too. But what you do when you cannot ? (Like the ports don't exist) ? 

I see three possibility : 

1/ write the ports (unfortunately not for me)

2/ wait until someone does (many time it's impossible)

3/ use easy_install or gem


 
 But I am using mostly Perl and CPAN is very well integrated in FreeBSD
 ports.

Yes much better than ruby or python. 

Regards.

JAS
-- 
Albert SHIH
DIO bâtiment 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
France
Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71
xmpp: j...@obspm.fr
Heure local/Local time:
mar 28 mai 2013 15:03:58 CEST
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


http://localhost/phpmyadmin

2013-05-28 Thread Md Junon

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


midori preferences segmentation fault

2013-05-28 Thread Harald Weis
midori  Edit  Preferences results, nearly every time, in:

*** NSPlugin Viewer  *** ERROR: rpc_end_sync called when not in sync!
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

This occurs since 9.1-RELEASE.

All ports (midori, linux-f10-flashplugin11, nspluginwrapper, etc) are up to
date. No problem with chromium. Haven't tried firefox this time. Compile
time for chromium is about 6 hours. As far as I remember, firefox compile
time takes even longer.

What is wrong with midori ?  

Thank you in advance,
Harald
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[OT] What's the http://localhost/phpmyadmin mail about?

2013-05-28 Thread Arthur Chance
Many apologies for the off topic post, but my curiosity has got the 
better of me.


Every once in a while we get a post with a subject of 
http://localhost/phpmyadmin; and no body. What is the point of this - 
borked mailer, existentialist spam, hacking attempt by a wannabe script 
kiddie even more clueless than usual, first contact with aliens evolved 
from web servers? I'm baffled.


--
In the dungeons of Mordor, Sauron bred Orcs with LOLcats to create a
new race of servants. Called Uruk-Oh-Hai in the Black Speech, they
were cruel and delighted in torturing spelling and grammar.

_Lord of the Rings 2.0, the Web Edition_
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: slice and partition in FreeBSD 9.1

2013-05-28 Thread Warren Block

On Tue, 28 May 2013, Polytropon wrote:


See this comparison:

http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/geom-glabel.html

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-adding.html


There is a little information on the common types here, too:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall-partitioning.html#bsdinstall-part-manual


Still you have the choice to use MBR partitioning if this is
a requirement (maybe due to hardware that has problems booting
GPT partitioned media? who knows).


Some BIOS systems think GPT partitions mean the system is running UEFI. 
On those system, MBR is required to boot correctly.  I think this is 
still a problem with the Thinkpad T4xx and T5xx models, possibly others.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Create bond on Infiniband ports

2013-05-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Alex Liptsin al...@mellanox.com wrote:

 Hi.

 I use FreeBSD 9.1 with OFED compiled on it.

 There is a Mellanox adapter:

 [root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# pciconf -lv |grep mlx4 -A 3
 mlx4_core0@pci0:0:5:0:  class=0x028000 card=0x005015b3 chip=0x100315b3
 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
 vendor = 'Mellanox Technologies'
 device = 'MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3]'
 class  = network

 I want to create Bond on the two ports (ib0 and ib1) of this device:

 [root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
 em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500

 options=209bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC
 ether 00:50:56:23:1e:06
 inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
 inet 10.195.30.6 netmask 0x broadcast 10.195.255.255
 nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
 status: active
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
 options=63RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6
 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
 nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 ib0: flags=8043UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 65520
 options=80018VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,LINKSTATE
 lladdr 80.0.0.48.fe.80.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.c9.0.1.0.d0.51
 inet 11.195.30.1 netmask 0x broadcast 11.195.255.255
 inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%ib0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
 nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 ib1: flags=8043UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 65520
 options=80018VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,LINKSTATE
 lladdr 80.0.0.49.fe.80.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.c9.0.1.0.d0.52
 inet 12.195.30.1 netmask 0x broadcast 12.195.255.255
 inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%ib1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
 nd6 options=23PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL


 1.  Is there bond in FreeBSD or its Lagg?


It's lagg. Setting up bonded interfaces is different (Anthony C. or someone
else can provide more details about this). failover mode via lagg is
completely different from failover mode with IB IIRC.


 2. I tried to create this way, but failed:

 [root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig lagg0 create

 root@qa-h-vrt-031-005 conf]# ifconfig lagg0 laggproto failover laggport
 ib0 laggport ib1

 ifconfig: SIOCSLAGGPORT: Protocol not supported

 Any ideas?
 Is it supported on Infiniband ports?


The media setting pieces are look to only be supported with mlx4 in en mode:

1076 static int mlx4_en_ioctl(struct ifnet *dev, u_long command, caddr_t
data)
1077 {
...
1115 case SIOCGIFMEDIA:
1116 error = ifmedia_ioctl(dev, ifr, priv-media, command);
1117 break;

If I remember correctly, IB ports with mlx4 default to ib mode, not en mode
(it also helps to have the right drivers loaded for this).

Cheers,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


pfctl and verbosely listing tables not giving full output on 9.x

2013-05-28 Thread Philip Kizer
On some of my older systems, I try and view some tables verbosely as the manual 
describes:

 We can now use the table show command to output, for each address
 and packet direction, the number of packets and bytes that are
 being passed or blocked by rules referencing the table.  The time
 at which the current accounting started is also shown with the
 ``Cleared'' line.

   # pfctl -t test -vTshow
  129.128.5.191
   Cleared: Thu Feb 13 18:55:18 2003
   In/Block:[ Packets: 0Bytes: 0]
   In/Pass: [ Packets: 10   Bytes: 840  ]
   Out/Block:   [ Packets: 0Bytes: 0]
   Out/Pass:[ Packets: 10   Bytes: 840  ]

and I get what I would expect when I issue the command:

# uname -r
8.3-RELEASE-p3
# pfctl -t spam -vTshow
No ALTQ support in kernel
ALTQ related functions disabled
   61.156.238.56
Cleared: Mon May 27 16:06:03 2013
In/Block:[ Packets: 23 Bytes: 1673   ]
In/Pass: [ Packets: 0  Bytes: 0  ]
Out/Block:   [ Packets: 0  Bytes: 0  ]
Out/Pass:[ Packets: 0  Bytes: 0  ]
   101.44.1.135
Cleared: Tue May 28 11:14:23 2013
In/Block:[ Packets: 21 Bytes: 1520   ]
In/Pass: [ Packets: 0  Bytes: 0  ]
Out/Block:   [ Packets: 0  Bytes: 0  ]
Out/Pass:[ Packets: 0  Bytes: 0  ]

All of my newer systems seem to not be showing me the data I expect:

# uname -rm
9.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64
# pfctl -t spam -vTshow
No ALTQ support in kernel
ALTQ related functions disabled
   46.21.161.37
Cleared: Tue May 14 10:37:11 2013
   46.29.248.152
Cleared: Sat May 25 03:47:26 2013
   46.165.236.153
Cleared: Tue May 14 06:12:05 2013
[...]

# uname -rm
9.1-RELEASE i386
# pfctl -t spam -vTshow
No ALTQ support in kernel
ALTQ related functions disabled
   1.235.138.249
Cleared: Sat Apr 27 19:55:15 2013
   27.50.140.140
Cleared: Fri Apr 26 13:43:11 2013
   31.3.245.178
Cleared: Tue Apr 30 19:30:29 2013
[...]

# uname -rm
9.1-RELEASE amd64
# pfctl -t spam -vTshow
No ALTQ support in kernel
ALTQ related functions disabled
   46.29.248.152
Cleared: Sat May 25 03:49:12 2013
   50.73.11.52
Cleared: Wed May 22 01:57:10 2013
   61.132.228.240
Cleared: Sun May 19 23:46:07 2013

Can anyone confirm similar behaviour on their systems, or has anyone even 
tried?  I didn't see any active PRs about this.


Thanks,
Philip

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: swap partition leads to instability?

2013-05-28 Thread jb
Follow up comment.

It has been pointed out to me that there is Varnish software taking advantage 
of system VMM and swap space.

Well, there are cache-oblivious algorithms that perform as well, and so they
make the above (disk access model; cache-aware model) unnecessary
(obsolete ?) and are superior in their generality.

jb


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: swap partition leads to instability?

2013-05-28 Thread Fred Morcos
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:42 PM, jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Follow up comment.

 It has been pointed out to me that there is Varnish software taking
 advantage
 of system VMM and swap space.

 Well, there are cache-oblivious algorithms that perform as well, and so
 they
 make the above (disk access model; cache-aware model) unnecessary
 (obsolete ?) and are superior in their generality.


Note that such cache-oblivious algorithms cannot be trivially applied to
any problem. Also, properly written cache-oblivious algorithms tend to
recursively decompose the problem until it is small enough to fit in a
cache and solve each part iteratively. The improvement effect can be
noticed on large inputs. These algorithms will most probably perform quite
badly on small inputs.


 jb


 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: swap partition leads to instability?

2013-05-28 Thread Terje Elde
On 26. mai 2013, at 10:58, M. V. bored_to_deat...@yahoo.com wrote:
 But recently I heard from a FreeBSD expert that I shouldn't have swap 
 partition for my server, and having swap partition could make my server 
 unstable

Any chance this could be a simple misunderstanding?

That he objected to the thought of the server swapping on an SSD (or 
whereever), more than the idea of having the partition itself?

If you're heavily swapping on an SSD with no redundancy, sooner or later it 
will kill your server. 

Generally though, havin too little memory will also give issues. ;)

I usually recommend viewing swap like you view filesystems. If you don't want 
downtime or dataloss when it dies, plan for failiure, and use gmirror or zfs 
mirror and zvol. 

Terje

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


openvpn and tap device

2013-05-28 Thread Pol Hallen
Hi all!

I installed openvpn (I use it like client).

There isn't any openvpn_enable=YES and openvpn_if=tap in rc.conf but
after start openvpn I can connect to openvpn server and clients.

ifconfig doesn't show me any tap interface

is it a correct situation?

thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


BSD sleep

2013-05-28 Thread Kenta Suzumoto
Hi. Is there no built-in way of making sleep sleep in increments 
of minutes, hours, etc? The GNU sleep can be invoked like sleep 
1h for an hour. The FreeBSD one's manpage leads me to believe we 
can only use seconds, which is kind of annoying. Is there an 
undocmented or missing feature here? Seems really trivial to 
implement.

~ $ sleep 1h
usage: sleep seconds

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: BSD sleep

2013-05-28 Thread Joshua Isom

On 5/28/2013 6:01 PM, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:

Hi. Is there no built-in way of making sleep sleep in increments
of minutes, hours, etc? The GNU sleep can be invoked like sleep
1h for an hour. The FreeBSD one's manpage leads me to believe we
can only use seconds, which is kind of annoying. Is there an
undocmented or missing feature here? Seems really trivial to
implement.

~ $ sleep 1h
usage: sleep seconds



You think it's trivial until you read this:

http://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time

If you sleep one hour, do you sleep one hour from now or one hour from 
the system clock which may change in the next hour?  If it's the system 
clock, you may sleep for ten minutes or ten hours.  If you need to sleep 
for 3600 seconds, that's simple and understandable.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: using ports or gems (easy_install)

2013-05-28 Thread Olivier Nicole
Albert,

   I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
   (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ? 
  As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
 Me too. But what you do when you cannot ? (Like the ports don't exist) ? 
 I see three possibility : 
 1/ write the ports (unfortunately not for me)
 2/ wait until someone does (many time it's impossible)
 3/ use easy_install or gem

I use the solution 3 (cpan in the case of Perl).

Best regards,

olivier

 
 
  
  But I am using mostly Perl and CPAN is very well integrated in FreeBSD
  ports.
 
 Yes much better than ruby or python. 
 
 Regards.
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: BSD sleep

2013-05-28 Thread Quark


You think it's trivial until you read this:

http://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time

If you sleep one hour, do you sleep one hour from now or one hour from 
the system clock which may change in the next hour?  If it's the system 
clock, you may sleep for ten minutes or ten hours.  If you need to sleep 
for 3600 seconds, that's simple and understandable.


what is stopping from interpreting 1h in similar manner to 3600? i.e. from now

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: BSD sleep

2013-05-28 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:


 You think it's trivial until you read this:

 http://infiniteundo.com/post/**25326999628/falsehoods-**
 programmers-believe-about-timehttp://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time


Some days have 86400 seconds, some have 86401.  There is a provision for
two leap seconds to be applied at once, but that hasn't ever happened.
 Still, a truly correct clock, set to UTC, might someday read

23:59:59
23:59:60
23:59:61
00:00:00

How many seconds did that hour have?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org