Organic SEO: Freebsdish.Org : MT
div dir=ltrfontspan style=font-family:verdana,sans-serifDear Freebsdish.Org Team,brbrI thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are not getting enough Organic search engine and Social Media traffic for Freebsdish.Org.br br1. Your website Freebsdish.Org is not ranking top in Google organic search for many competitive keywords.brbr2. Your website profile needs to have regular update in major Social Media sites.brbr3. Your site has less number of Google amp; Yahoo back links, this can be improved further.br brThere are many additional improvements that could be made to your website, and if you would like to learn about them, and are curious to know what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to provide you with a detailed analysis in the form of a WEBSITE AUDIT REPORT for FREE.br brOur clients consistently tell us that their customers find them because they are at the top of the Google search rankings. Being at the top left of Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can do for your company#39;s website traffic and online reputation.br brOur packages are designed for a complete advance SEO experience which includes SMO, Brand management, Reputation management, SEO etc. in order to beat your competitors.brbrSounds interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you.br br--WBRbrBest Regards, brMasha Lockwood |SEO ConsultantbrPH. No: 631-292-4090brAUS: +61-39013-6090brSkype: seo.onlinebusinessbr--WBRbr PS1: This is onetime email and you may ask us to “REMOVE” you from our mailing list. brPS2: We operate 24 x7. I will be happy to send you links to price list, money back guarantee, client rankings, client testimonials, “How we are different from others?”, and “Why should you choose us?” on receiving a response from you.br span/span/span/font/div ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
vBSDcon Registrations Remain Open!
Hi all, As many of you are aware, the social aspect of BSD-related conferences is very important and offers opportunities to meet and socialize with one another. Maintaining that tradition, Verisign's vBSDcon will feature a mid-conference social, brought to you exclusively by Juniper, and will be celebrating 20 years of FreeBSD. We encourage all attendees to join Verisign and Juniper to celebrate this milestone for the FreeBSD project. Conference activities start on October 25, 2013 at 6:00PM Eastern with a reception dinner hosted by Verisign at the Dulles Hyatt. General conference activities start the following morning with a presentation by David Chisnall, FreeBSD Core Team member, on the migration from GCC to LLVM/Clang within FreeBSD. David Chisnall is a Research Associate at the University of Cambridge, where he works on the interface between languages, operating systems, and hardware. He is also a member of the FreeBSD Core Team and an LLVM/Clang committer. He is the author of several books, including the Definitive Guide to the Xen Hypervisor. He created the current GNUstep implementation of Objective-C and has maintained it for some years, and is now mostly responsible for the C++ stack in FreeBSD, having implemented the ABI library and ported the STL implementation. We are in high gear planning for vBSDcon 2013 hosted by Verisign at the Dulles Hyatt in Herndon, VA and we are drawing closer by the week with 5 weeks left to register. Registrations are being accepted on the conference web site at http://www.vbsdcon.com/ through October 23, 2013 after which registrations will only be taken in person at the event. -- Take care Rick Miller ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
syslog program data to remote loghost
I'm trying to send program specific logs to a remote host. I get that logging to a remote server can be done with: *.warn;*.notice;kern.* @loghost And I get that logging a program can be done with: !lwiod audit.* /var/log/audit/smb.log What I want to do is: !lwiod audit.* @loghost But for some reason this doesn't work. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this 48-core box...
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:08:43 -0500 Michael Chen mich...@foxbatcapital.com wrote: I'm considering bidding on this 48-core box: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Supermicro-A-Server-1042G-TF-1U-H8QG6-4-CPUS-48-cores-2-2Ghz-128GB-RAM-/151119828428?pt=COMP_EN_Servershash=item232f7195cc Does anyone have experience with it and can I use all the cores? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I recently bought one like that (48 cores but 'only' 96 Gb ram). It was meant to play a double role as both zfs file server and data processing server (we do lots of satellite image processing), running FreeBSD 9.1. It connects with a SAN and we'll use it to process about 36TB of satellite data in the next months. (In a couple of weeks we will probably have budget to split those roles, and buy a dedicated file server.) After several weeks of tweaking and testing, I can say that: - the zfs/file server part runs without problems - the satellite data processing had problems scaling to all 48 cores, I got max performance when running about 18 processes in parallel, scaling up more would lower the overall performance. However, this (sorry guys) appeared to be a FreeBSD problem, and not a hardware problem. As a test I switched to linux with ZoL (ZFS on Linux), and, though zfs performance is less compared to freebsd, data processing is much much better, like a factor 12 or so. Conclusion: the hardware is alright, however when needed to do lots of heavy calculations on terabytes of data, the combination with FreeBSD appears not ideal. Of course it is you get what you pay for. Decent, OK working hardware, but none of the special handy-dandy features expensive brands will give you. If you don't need them, in my experience it is decent hardware for a good price. regards, Vincent. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
history
when I log into free bsd I am in the sh shell. i type history at the command line and the machine says history not found. If I type h at the command line it works like i expect the history command to work. In the csh or tcsh shells history works as well as h. why does entering history at the command line work in the csh and tcsh shells but not in the sh shell. Considering that all three shells seem to have the same .cshrc file? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this 48-core box...
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Vincent Schut wrote: On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:08:43 -0500 Michael Chen mich...@foxbatcapital.com wrote: I'm considering bidding on this 48-core box: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Supermicro-A-Server-1042G-TF-1U-H8QG6-4-CPUS-48-cores-2-2Ghz-128GB-RAM-/151119828428?pt=COMP_EN_Servershash=item232f7195cc Does anyone have experience with it and can I use all the cores? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I recently bought one like that (48 cores but 'only' 96 Gb ram). It was meant to play a double role as both zfs file server and data processing server (we do lots of satellite image processing), running FreeBSD 9.1. It connects with a SAN and we'll use it to process about 36TB of satellite data in the next months. (In a couple of weeks we will probably have budget to split those roles, and buy a dedicated file server.) After several weeks of tweaking and testing, I can say that: - the zfs/file server part runs without problems - the satellite data processing had problems scaling to all 48 cores, I got max performance when running about 18 processes in parallel, scaling up more would lower the overall performance. However, this (sorry guys) appeared to be a FreeBSD problem, and not a hardware problem. As a test I switched to linux with ZoL (ZFS on Linux), and, though zfs performance is less compared to freebsd, data processing is much much better, like a factor 12 or so. I've noticed this same scaling problem on 32+ core servers but haven't had a chance to look into the detail. From the performance graphs I am confused whether my problems are processing problems or a data I/O problem. Conclusion: the hardware is alright, however when needed to do lots of heavy calculations on terabytes of data, the combination with FreeBSD appears not ideal. Of course it is you get what you pay for. Decent, OK working hardware, but none of the special handy-dandy features expensive brands will give you. If you don't need them, in my experience it is decent hardware for a good price. regards, Vincent. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
how to tell which process call sendmail
So, some idiot is using a cgi or php or something to send mail out of his website that he shouldn't be sending. With a bunch of sites on the server, can't tell who. System accounting can tell me that sendmail was executed 32,976 times, but is there a way to tell what process /file name called it each time? Since it's always called by the www user that doesn't help -- I need to distinguish between legit processes that call 5 or 10 in a day and the idiot who calls the other 31,000 times. Thanks! Glenn. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: how to tell which process call sendmail
Hi Glenn, I once wrote some (quick-and-dirty) perl script that monitors network traffic and logs (for matching outgoing connections) the process command line and (if apache) the respective vhost and request. But this would not help if they are calling the sendmail program directly to inject the message into mail queue. (Unverified guess: if you temporarily remove execute permissions on it, the execution error should probably be logged somewhere?). BTW most probably that is not your user as such, but rather some abused comment form or forum script or something like that. Best wishes Eugene -Original Message- From: Glenn McCalley Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:30 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: how to tell which process call sendmail So, some idiot is using a cgi or php or something to send mail out of his website that he shouldn't be sending. With a bunch of sites on the server, can't tell who. System accounting can tell me that sendmail was executed 32,976 times, but is there a way to tell what process /file name called it each time? Since it's always called by the www user that doesn't help -- I need to distinguish between legit processes that call 5 or 10 in a day and the idiot who calls the other 31,000 times. Thanks! Glenn. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: history
On 9/19/13 3:36 PM, william benton wrote: when I log into free bsd I am in the sh shell. i type history at the command line and the machine says history not found. If I type h at the command line it works like i expect the history command to work. In the csh or tcsh shells history works as well as h. why does entering history at the command line work in the csh and tcsh shells but not in the sh shell. Considering that all three shells seem to have the same .cshrc file? Bourne shell (sh) has no history component. Bourne Again shell (bash) does, as well as C-shell and Turbo C-shell (csh/tcsh). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourne_shell#Criticism Best, --Glenn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: how to tell which process call sendmail
On 19/09/2013 19:30, Glenn McCalley wrote: So, some idiot is using a cgi or php or something to send mail out of his website that he shouldn't be sending. With a bunch of sites on the server, can't tell who. I had a similar problem, but some time back and I can't remember *exactly* what I did. It was something like pointing mailer.conf to my own program which did some logging and then called the real sendmail. Actually, I might just have hacked mailwrapper directly. I think there was some way I managed to cross-reference to the httpd logs, or that might be what I tried to do and failed. Sorry - this may not be helping much. Another approach might be to find some likely text in the outgoing message and do a recursive grep on /home. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: history
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:36:43 +, william benton wrote: when I log into free bsd I am in the sh shell. i type history at the command line and the machine says history not found. If I type h at the command line it works like i expect the history command to work. That is strange. The sh shell (system scripting shell and emergency dialog shell in SUM) does not have a history function. % sh $ h h: not found $ history history: not found $ _ In the csh or tcsh shells history works as well as h. This is correct. A system-wide alias is defined for those shells: alias h 'history 25' It can be found in /etc/csh.cshrc. why does entering history at the command line work in the csh and tcsh shells but not in the sh shell. The sh shell (Bourne-like shell, actually a derivate of ash) does not have this functionality. Bash, the Bourne-again shell, supports the history function internally, and a h alias can be defined for this shell. % bash $ history [...] 501 history $ _ Considering that all three shells seem to have the same .cshrc file? They don't. The csh and tcsh (system default dialog shell) use the cshrc mechanism (/etc/csh.cshrc for global settings, .cshrc for user settings, and .login and .logout for interactive shells), while sh uses /etc/profile and .profile and .shrc similarly. Bash uses .profile as well as .bash_profile and .bash_login in a comparable manner. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
PKGNG
What is the status of pkgng. The handbook says to use it but else were it says that the repos are empty due to a security incident last November. Are there beta repos hidden somewhere that can be used? The reason I ask is I want to install packages like Gimp and LibreOffice which will take a fortnight on my laptop to compile. I tried pkg_add but that broke everything when I updated to 9.2. Thanks, Ethan House ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
