Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Sabeeh Baig
So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
who need it, it'd be great.

-- 
No person has sustained greater loss than that whose learning could not
restrain him from indulging in vices. | Imam Abu Hanifa

Sabeeh Ahmed Baig
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Peter Cornelius
Hi,

 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
 on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.

Not sure what you are looking for but I have a feeling that it may be something 
like

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/desktopbsd-tools/pkg-descr
http://desktopbsd.net/

Rgds,

Peter.
-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Steve Bertrand
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.

God willing, the majority of effort in regards to FreeBSD will be spent
where it always has.

FreeBSD is not Linux. There are those who are working toward making a
GUI easier-to-implement, but afaik, that is not (and hope not) the
design goal.

Instead of Desktop features to appeal to people, what FreeBSD really
needs is people who are willing to take the time to drop the GUI for a
few weeks, and gain a bit of exposure and enlightenment. If it clicks,
you're hooked. If not, then there's Linux and Windows.

Steve



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Glen Barber
Hi,

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Sabeeh Baigsba...@jhu.edu wrote:
 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.


You may want to have a look at:

http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com
http://pcbsd.org/
http://desktopbsd.net


-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Andrew Gould
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baigsba...@jhu.edu wrote:
 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.

 --

 Sabeeh Ahmed Baig

I am of the opinion that specializing in everything is the same thing
as specializing in nothing.  (Said another way:  If everything is a
priority, nothing is.)  Every operating system has its strengths and
weaknesses.  The more an operating system becomes
all-things-to-all-users, the more it tends to lose its comparative
edge in any one area.

All of that being said,  PC-BSD is a desktop solution on FreeBSD.  You
can download it for free or purchase it with support:
http://www.pcbsd.org/

Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baig sba...@jhu.edu wrote:

 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?


On Debian Lenny, let me know how the install of kde4 goes.  Not attempting
to disregard your view, just saying there are roadblocks to every approach.
IMO, the FreeBSD method allows for greatest flexibility.


 For those
 who need it, it'd be great.




-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Sabeeh Baig wrote:

 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.

Really, all the desktop options you get on Linux are available 
for FreeBSD.KDE and Gnome are the main things and many people
install one of them to make a desktop environment.   The main difference
with FreeBSD over Lunix is that Linux sort of forces it on you and
FreeBSD gives you a choice.   That means you have to click one more
thing during installation to get that stuff installed.   But, if you
are doing a server, you don't have to spend an extra hour or two
getting rid of all the bloat you don't need or want like on some
other systems.

To add to that, some people have packaged desktop versions of FreeBSD
with all those gui extras already included just to make you happy.
Probably someone else will post their favorites with links.

jerry


 -- 
 No person has sustained greater loss than that whose learning could not
 restrain him from indulging in vices. | Imam Abu Hanifa
 
 Sabeeh Ahmed Baig
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Matthew Seaman
Andrew Gould wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baigsba...@jhu.edu wrote:
 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.

 --

 Sabeeh Ahmed Baig
 
 I am of the opinion that specializing in everything is the same thing
 as specializing in nothing.  (Said another way:  If everything is a
 priority, nothing is.)  Every operating system has its strengths and
 weaknesses.  The more an operating system becomes
 all-things-to-all-users, the more it tends to lose its comparative
 edge in any one area.
 
 All of that being said,  PC-BSD is a desktop solution on FreeBSD.  You
 can download it for free or purchase it with support:
 http://www.pcbsd.org/

That's true, but the FreeBSD thing is performance[*] which, curiously enough
is at the core of a good desktop system as well as the core of a good server
system.  In fact, the missing parts required to make a good desktop out of
FreeBSD are more to do with graphics hardware support -- much of which comes
out of the Xorg project now -- and support for various proprietary data formats 
and software packages like flash, and, of course, a really well written user 
interface.

Or to put it another way, you can build a good desktop system based on a good
server OS, but it's pretty hard to build a good desktop system based on a bad
server OS.

Cheers,

Matthew

[*] and for completeness, the NetBSD thing is portability, and the OpenBSD 
thing is security.  Not that the big three *BSDs are entirely lacking in any
of those departments.

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   Flat 3
  7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
  Kent, CT11 9PW, UK



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread beni
Op woensdag 19 augustus 2009 09:18:15 schreef Steve Bertrand:
 Sabeeh Baig wrote:
  So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
  operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
  on servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop
  installation, something similar to say Debian's option of Standard
  Desktop?  For those who need it, it'd be great.

 God willing, the majority of effort in regards to FreeBSD will be spent
 where it always has.

 FreeBSD is not Linux. There are those who are working toward making a
 GUI easier-to-implement, but afaik, that is not (and hope not) the
 design goal.

 Instead of Desktop features to appeal to people, what FreeBSD really
 needs is people who are willing to take the time to drop the GUI for a
 few weeks, and gain a bit of exposure and enlightenment. If it clicks,
 you're hooked. If not, then there's Linux and Windows.

 Steve

That seems to be the standard answer here when (periodicaly) this questions 
comes up :-) We don't need it (the we being the server-gurus). It's that 
or if you want it, do it yourself.  But to me it seems that the question 
returns regularly and that there must be a certain demand for it. So why don't 
you let the user decide if he wants a bloated desktop or a lean mean server ? 
Now I don't have that option...  That is why I run pc-bsd now. They are able 
to do a GUI install of a desktop on top of a solid OS, something that the 
hardcore server/headless/serial/admins/whatever users here don't seem to care 
about. 
And yes, I know this discussion has been done already several times here :-)
-- 
Beni.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:00:27PM +0200, beni wrote:

 Op woensdag 19 augustus 2009 09:18:15 schreef Steve Bertrand:
  Sabeeh Baig wrote:
   So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
   operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
   on servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop
   installation, something similar to say Debian's option of Standard
   Desktop?  For those who need it, it'd be great.
 
  God willing, the majority of effort in regards to FreeBSD will be spent
  where it always has.
 
  FreeBSD is not Linux. There are those who are working toward making a
  GUI easier-to-implement, but afaik, that is not (and hope not) the
  design goal.
 
  Instead of Desktop features to appeal to people, what FreeBSD really
  needs is people who are willing to take the time to drop the GUI for a
  few weeks, and gain a bit of exposure and enlightenment. If it clicks,
  you're hooked. If not, then there's Linux and Windows.
 
  Steve
 
 That seems to be the standard answer here when (periodicaly) this questions 
 comes up :-) We don't need it (the we being the server-gurus). It's that 
 or if you want it, do it yourself.  But to me it seems that the question 
 returns regularly and that there must be a certain demand for it. So why 
 don't 
 you let the user decide if he wants a bloated desktop or a lean mean server ? 
 Now I don't have that option...  That is why I run pc-bsd now. They are able 
 to do a GUI install of a desktop on top of a solid OS, something that the 
 hardcore server/headless/serial/admins/whatever users here don't seem to care 
 about. 
 And yes, I know this discussion has been done already several times here :-)

FreeBSD is the one that does let users have an option.  One of
those options is pcBSD.   There are others who make up a bundle
with FreeBSD as the base OS that already has your GUI and other
things built for you -- a FreeBSD desktop.   I hear they install
real easily and work well.It is not what I need so I haven't
tried them, but rather than raile at those who are building a good
platform, just go and get one of those bundles.   Seems you actually
have already - a pretty close to FreeBSD based bundle anyway.

jerry


 -- 
 Beni.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:57:21 -0400, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
 FreeBSD is the one that does let users have an option.  One of
 those options is pcBSD.   There are others who make up a bundle
 with FreeBSD as the base OS that already has your GUI and other
 things built for you -- a FreeBSD desktop.   I hear they install
 real easily and work well.It is not what I need so I haven't
 tried them, but rather than raile at those who are building a good
 platform, just go and get one of those bundles.   Seems you actually
 have already - a pretty close to FreeBSD based bundle anyway.

Even if you state the existance of FreeBSD based preinstalled
and preconfigured GUI oriented desktop environments, the next
problem that will arise is the availability of a live file
system that can be booted and tried out, such as:

The $NAME Linux distribution can be run from a DVD
and I don't have to install it in order to try it
out. And when I want, I can install it from the same
media. Why can't FreeBSD have such thing?

The answer is: Is has. After a short read on the homepage of
the FreeBSD project, the reader will have learned that there
is a live file system (Fixit) on the install CDs or DVDs. But
that's text mode, so no deal.

BUT projects like FreeSBIE feature a XFCE driven FreeBSD based
preinstalled and preconfigured GUI oriented desktop environment
that can be used without installing anything. It's very useful
for diagnostics and recovery preparations. And it's FreeBSD.

I just wanted to mention it, in case a question like above
arises. It usually does. :-)



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
 So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
 operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
 servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
 something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
 who need it, it'd be great.

Just install any of the destkop environment ports like Gnome, KDE or XFCE,
whichever takes your fancy. That will give you the basics. Other apps are just
a port away. :-)

My workstation has been running FreeBSD since 5.3-RELEASE. 

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpUrcd1koh7Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Desktop Install Option

2009-08-19 Thread Al Plant

Sabeeh Baig wrote:

So, I've been wondering about something.  FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers.  Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop?  For those
who need it, it'd be great.



Aloha Manolis Desk Top with XFCE works!

Have a look at Manolis Kiagias work at

http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com/downloads-page


I run it on a HP MIni from a San Disk.
+++

--

~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
  + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
  + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* - 8.* +
   email: n...@hdk5.net 
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org