Re: portsnap refuse

2010-06-06 Thread RW
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:55:22 +0800
Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:

 The postsnap says adding refuse statements to select the parts of the 
 port tree you have use for will shorten the download process and 
 conserve disk space on your host. That only the port categories not 
 REFUSED will be selected and compressed for download.
 
 Well for a test I ran portsnap with out any portsnap.conf file. The 
 download process took 16 minuets. The I mv portsnap.conf.sample to 
 portsnap.conf  and added REFUSE for all the categories except
 sysutils.
 
 Reran the portsnap and still it took 16 minuets.

I'm not sure what you are saying here, if you ran portsnap twice in
succession then the second run shouldn't need any downloads. 

If you deleted portsnap's data in between then that's what I'd expect.
portsnap can request updates to ports or files, but the initial
download is a single large file which it can't customize.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


portsnap refuse

2010-06-04 Thread Fbsd1
The postsnap says adding refuse statements to select the parts of the 
port tree you have use for will shorten the download process and 
conserve disk space on your host. That only the port categories not 
REFUSED will be selected and compressed for download.


Well for a test I ran portsnap with out any portsnap.conf file. The 
download process took 16 minuets. The I mv portsnap.conf.sample to 
portsnap.conf  and added REFUSE for all the categories except sysutils.


Reran the portsnap and still it took 16 minuets.

What gives here??
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: portsnap refuse

2010-06-04 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:

 The postsnap says adding refuse statements to select the parts of the
 port tree you have use for will shorten the download process and
 conserve disk space on your host. That only the port categories not
 REFUSED will be selected and compressed for download.

You are paraphrasing here.
I'm not clear whether your paraphrase is accurate.  
It's certainly making some assumptions that are
not explicitly laid out in the manual page.

 Well for a test I ran portsnap with out any portsnap.conf file. The
 download process took 16 minuets. The I mv portsnap.conf.sample to
 portsnap.conf  and added REFUSE for all the categories except
 sysutils.

 Reran the portsnap and still it took 16 minuets.

 What gives here??

You could check whether the REFUSEd parts are getting updated after all,
then you could check whether they're in the downloaded snapshot.

My tech support crystal ball predicts that you will find your REFUSE
entries aren't really matching.  Could be wrong, but at least the tests
I suggested would point you in the right direction if it's right.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org