[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |14.2 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed for 14.2, thanks for the report (and to the dup reporters).
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e909d360dfaeafa9f45eda2461a1bedffac99ac2 commit r14-10215-ge909d360dfaeafa9f45eda2461a1bedffac99ac2 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu May 16 17:15:55 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Fix typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator [PR115119] libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/115119 * include/bits/unicode.h (_Iterator::operator++(int)): Fix typo in increment expression. * testsuite/ext/unicode/grapheme_view.cc: Check post-increment on view's iterator. (cherry picked from commit c9e05b03c18e898be604ab90401476e9c473cc52)
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9e05b03c18e898be604ab90401476e9c473cc52 commit r15-629-gc9e05b03c18e898be604ab90401476e9c473cc52 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu May 16 17:15:55 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Fix typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator [PR115119] libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/115119 * include/bits/unicode.h (_Iterator::operator++(int)): Fix typo in increment expression. * testsuite/ext/unicode/grapheme_view.cc: Check post-increment on view's iterator.
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 115134 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 115124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=115121 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've opened PR 115121 for the accepts-invalid compiler bug.
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It fails to compile if that member function is instantiated (which libstdc++ itself never does). /home/jwakely/gcc/15/include/c++/15.0.0/bits/unicode.h:805:11: error: increment of read-only location '(std::__unicode::__v15_1_0::_Grapheme_cluster_view >::_Iterator*)this' 805 | ++this; | ^~ /home/jwakely/gcc/15/include/c++/15.0.0/bits/unicode.h:805:11: error: lvalue required as increment operand But ++this could be rejected without treating it as a dependent expression. Anyway, I'll fix the library typo.
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2024-05-16 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Which would be ++*this ++this shouldn't even compile.
[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- No ++this is correct. We want to increment the iterator and not the what the iterator points too here.
