Re: [Gendergap] more women's voices

[Neotarf]

Health professionals thinking about what belongs in an educational video
might want to walk down the hall to the outpatient department and see what
kind of films are being shown to family members while they wait.  Who
knows, there might even be something out of copyright that can be made
available to the public. If obstetrics is being described in terms of
storks (what, no cabbage patch?) then pediatrics on Wikipedia is even more
dismal. I wondered about this article on infant sleep training and why it
is assigned to women's health project.  Does Wikipedia recognize no
difference between gynecology and pediatrics?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Infant_sleep_training And then I
realized there is no project for pediatrics. With the medicine project
developing the offline Kiwix application that can be used by practitioners
who treat refugees and populations in the developing world, this seems like
a knowledge gap that has huge implications for maternal and infant health
worldwide.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Risker  wrote:

> Noting that the discussion has now closed with the video being removed.
>
> Risker/Anne
>
> On 29 October 2017 at 14:50, Ryan Kaldari  wrote:
>
>> It would be nice to have some women weighing on this debate:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abortion#RfC_regarding_video
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
>> visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] more women's voices

[J Hayes]

Yeah, if you wanted a case study of what implicit bias looks like, just
look at health care.
It is good working on disaster response, but the vital chronic public
health topics are relatively neglected.
This infant sleep article got elevated by our oclc friends. Much criticism
of the start by the librarians.


On Nov 1, 2017 8:41 PM, "Neotarf"  wrote:

> Health professionals thinking about what belongs in an educational video
> might want to walk down the hall to the outpatient department and see what
> kind of films are being shown to family members while they wait.  Who
> knows, there might even be something out of copyright that can be made
> available to the public. If obstetrics is being described in terms of
> storks (what, no cabbage patch?) then pediatrics on Wikipedia is even more
> dismal. I wondered about this article on infant sleep training and why it
> is assigned to women's health project.  Does Wikipedia recognize no
> difference between gynecology and pediatrics?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Infant_sleep_training And then I
> realized there is no project for pediatrics. With the medicine project
> developing the offline Kiwix application that can be used by practitioners
> who treat refugees and populations in the developing world, this seems like
> a knowledge gap that has huge implications for maternal and infant health
> worldwide.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Risker  wrote:
>
>> Noting that the discussion has now closed with the video being removed.
>>
>> Risker/Anne
>>
>> On 29 October 2017 at 14:50, Ryan Kaldari  wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to have some women weighing on this debate:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abortion#RfC_regarding_video
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
>>> visit:
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
>> visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

[Gendergap] Fwd: "Selective incivility"

[Neotarf]

More research on 'selective incivility':

This refers to an academic discussion of whether discrimination is no
longer overt but has become covert, in the form of incivilty that selectively
targets gender and other marginalized groups without making open reference
to those groups.

Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Workplace Incivility: Who Is Most Targeted
and Who Is Most Harmed? https://www.researchgate.net/p
ublication/301762104_Gender_Sexual_Orientation_and_Workplace
_Incivility_Who_Is_Most_Targeted_and_Who_Is_Most_Harmed

Research on bystander intervention.  Includes various ways to classify
bystander
responses: 1) assertive to stop the incivility, 2) supporting to the
perpetrator by minimizing, ignoring, or downplaying the transgression 3)
passive by social support to the target.

Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility
intervention in the workplace
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318911812_Witnessing_wrongdoing_The_effects_of_observer_power_on_incivility_intervention_in_the_workplace


-- Forwarded message --
From: Neotarf 
Date: Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:16 AM
Subject: "Selective incivility"
To: "Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase the
participation of women within Wikimedia projects." <
gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>


This is a body of research going back to at least 2008, usually referred to
in the literature as "Cortina’s theory of selective incivility". It
categorizes types of selective incivility, and has data showing that
selective incivility causes marginalized groups to leave organizations.

"That is, 'generally' uncivil words and deeds make no overt reference to
gender or race (or any other social dimension). Nevertheless, incivility
may sometimes represent a covert manifestation of gender and racial bias
when women and people of color are selectively targeted."

The most frequently cited study is Selective Incivility as Modern
Discrimination in Organizations (2013):  http://journals.sagepub.com/do
i/abs/10.1177/0149206311418835
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap