Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! cas...@apache.org 于2022年10月13日周四 09:58写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Best Regards! > Chen Xia > > Sunil Govindan 于2022年10月13日周四 08:24写道： > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:43 PM Weiwei Yang wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > Good luck!! > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:13 PM Felix Cheung > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:26 AM Ashish > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would > > > like > > > > to > > > > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please > > > check > > > > > out > > > > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > > Incubator > > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > > > > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > thanks > > > > > ashish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! Chen Xia Sunil Govindan 于2022年10月13日周四 08:24写道： > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:43 PM Weiwei Yang wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > Good luck!! > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:13 PM Felix Cheung > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:26 AM Ashish wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would > > like > > > to > > > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please > > check > > > > out > > > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > Incubator > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > > > [3] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > thanks > > > > ashish > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 binding On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:43 PM Weiwei Yang wrote: > +1 (binding) > Good luck!! > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:13 PM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:26 AM Ashish wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would > like > > to > > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please > check > > > out > > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > Incubator > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > > [3] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > thanks > > > ashish > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Good luck!! On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:13 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:26 AM Ashish wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like > to > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check > > out > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Yu > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > [3] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > > > > -- > > thanks > > ashish > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:26 AM Ashish wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check > out > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > [3] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > -- > thanks > ashish >
Re: [RESULTS] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0 RC2
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:51 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > Hi all, > > The vote to release Apache NuttX (incubating) 11.0.0-rc2 is now closed. > Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. > > The release has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. > > Binding: > > +1 Nathan Hartman > +1 Duo Zhang > +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > Non-Binding > +1 TimH > > Vote thread > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0h6wq2cqk3ckdttz78964fw4007b51lr > > We will proceed with the official release of 11.0.0 > Thank you and congrats to everyone who helped make this release possible!! Cheers Nathan
[RESULTS] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0 RC2
Hi all, The vote to release Apache NuttX (incubating) 11.0.0-rc2 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Nathan Hartman +1 Duo Zhang +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré Non-Binding +1 TimH Vote thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/0h6wq2cqk3ckdttz78964fw4007b51lr We will proceed with the official release of 11.0.0
Re: package names (pekko related)
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 16:46, John D. Ament wrote: > > We should keep in mind that the trademarks requirements and the release > requirements are two different sets of requirements. They're often > conflated. The main thing to remember with trademarks and naming is that > the first time a project is referenced in documentation, websites, etc, it > must be referred to as "Apache " and subsequent calls can just be > "". This would mean that README files in the source repo refer to the > project this way, descriptions on github repos etc are all named this way > as well. Likewise, our release process indicates the source tarball for a > release is named "apache-...tar.gz" or similar. The foundation has > always had a waving stance on binary releases, e.g. the JAR files you might > download from Maven Central. The convention (not requirement) is that > those JAR files are packaged under "org.apache.". Unless there's a > good reason not to, projects should follow this if they publish to maven. > By similar convention, we have applied this to the package names used by a > project. The existing projects I was able to look at within the ASF all > used scala in a hybrid format with java code, meaning they had a mix of the > two and within a JAR file had both java and scala sourced files. They're > not the best of examples as a result, but did all align to the > "org.apache." naming convention. > > there is no requirement to have your package name start with > org.apache.pekko, but by convention this is what is seen. There are good reasons for this. The ASF 'owns' the org.apache prefix, and can therefore ensure uniqueness of names within that. Who owns pekko? What's to stop two different projects using pekko.somename? Furthermore, if there is any code already using pekko.*, we should not release code that uses the same prefix. > A source release > with source code starting with "pekko.*" would just as easily get a +1 to > release from me as "org.apache.pekko.*" as long as any documentation in the > source release said Apache Pekko (Incubating). > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:37 PM Matthew Benedict de Detrich > wrote: > > > I can’t speak for maven but since Akka works with sbt its more likely to > > use sbt-assembly to perform any shading which handles cases like this (i.e. > > see https://github.com/sbt/sbt-assembly#merge-strategy and > > https://github.com/sbt/sbt-assembly#shading). > > > > -- > > Matthew de Detrich > > Aiven Deutschland GmbH > > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > > m: +491603708037 > > w: aiven.io e: matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io > > On 11. Oct 2022, 07:37 -0500, tison , wrote: > > > One point from the technical perspective: > > > > > > I remember that akka's config use akka. prefix and it causes several > > issues > > > prevent you shaded it. That is, Maven Shaded Plugin cannot distinguish a > > > string literal starts with akka. a config key or package name. > > > > > > From this perspective, if possible, I tend to use org.apache.pekko in > > > package name and use pekko. in the config name (or even akka? lol). > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 于2022年10月11日周二 20:22写道： > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I am not sure about Kafka and Netbeans cases, as I was not working > > > > inside the foundation back there. > > > > For the recent years' new podlings, `org.apache.*` is preferred by the > > > > incubator. > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > PJ Fanning 于2022年10月11日周二 20:14写道： > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > I'm creating a new thread to avoid filling the Pekko thread with > > emails > > > > that are only partially related to the proposal. > > > > > > > > > > The current Akka code uses packages that start with 'akka.' and a > > lot of > > > > the people involved with Pekko seem to prefer to keep the use 'pekko.' > > > > instead of 'org.apache.pekko.' when we rename the Akka packages. > > > > > > > > > > Kafka and Netbeans are examples of Apache projects that don't use > > > > 'org.apache' prefix in their package names. > > > > > > > > > > Is 'pekko.' a viable option or is there a strong preference within > > the > > > > ASF and the Incubator PMC for 'org.apache.pekko.'? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > PJ > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe,
Re: package names (pekko related)
We should keep in mind that the trademarks requirements and the release requirements are two different sets of requirements. They're often conflated. The main thing to remember with trademarks and naming is that the first time a project is referenced in documentation, websites, etc, it must be referred to as "Apache " and subsequent calls can just be "". This would mean that README files in the source repo refer to the project this way, descriptions on github repos etc are all named this way as well. Likewise, our release process indicates the source tarball for a release is named "apache-...tar.gz" or similar. The foundation has always had a waving stance on binary releases, e.g. the JAR files you might download from Maven Central. The convention (not requirement) is that those JAR files are packaged under "org.apache.". Unless there's a good reason not to, projects should follow this if they publish to maven. By similar convention, we have applied this to the package names used by a project. The existing projects I was able to look at within the ASF all used scala in a hybrid format with java code, meaning they had a mix of the two and within a JAR file had both java and scala sourced files. They're not the best of examples as a result, but did all align to the "org.apache." naming convention. there is no requirement to have your package name start with org.apache.pekko, but by convention this is what is seen. A source release with source code starting with "pekko.*" would just as easily get a +1 to release from me as "org.apache.pekko.*" as long as any documentation in the source release said Apache Pekko (Incubating). On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:37 PM Matthew Benedict de Detrich wrote: > I can’t speak for maven but since Akka works with sbt its more likely to > use sbt-assembly to perform any shading which handles cases like this (i.e. > see https://github.com/sbt/sbt-assembly#merge-strategy and > https://github.com/sbt/sbt-assembly#shading). > > -- > Matthew de Detrich > Aiven Deutschland GmbH > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > m: +491603708037 > w: aiven.io e: matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io > On 11. Oct 2022, 07:37 -0500, tison , wrote: > > One point from the technical perspective: > > > > I remember that akka's config use akka. prefix and it causes several > issues > > prevent you shaded it. That is, Maven Shaded Plugin cannot distinguish a > > string literal starts with akka. a config key or package name. > > > > From this perspective, if possible, I tend to use org.apache.pekko in > > package name and use pekko. in the config name (or even akka? lol). > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > > > Sheng Wu 于2022年10月11日周二 20:22写道： > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I am not sure about Kafka and Netbeans cases, as I was not working > > > inside the foundation back there. > > > For the recent years' new podlings, `org.apache.*` is preferred by the > > > incubator. > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > PJ Fanning 于2022年10月11日周二 20:14写道： > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I'm creating a new thread to avoid filling the Pekko thread with > emails > > > that are only partially related to the proposal. > > > > > > > > The current Akka code uses packages that start with 'akka.' and a > lot of > > > the people involved with Pekko seem to prefer to keep the use 'pekko.' > > > instead of 'org.apache.pekko.' when we rename the Akka packages. > > > > > > > > Kafka and Netbeans are examples of Apache projects that don't use > > > 'org.apache' prefix in their package names. > > > > > > > > Is 'pekko.' a viable option or is there a strong preference within > the > > > ASF and the Incubator PMC for 'org.apache.pekko.'? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > PJ > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:49 PM Yu Li wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > -- thanks ashish
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding), good luck. Kaijie Chen On 2022/10/12 11:03:42 Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > > > On Oct 12, 2022 at 18:49:16, Willem Jiang wrote: > > > +1 (binding). > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:49 AM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Yu > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 non-binding Thanks, Cheng Pan On Oct 12, 2022 at 18:49:16, Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:49 AM Yu Li wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > Please cast your vote: > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding). Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:49 AM Yu Li wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1（non-binding） Good Luck. Best wishes, Charles Zhang from Apache InLong Madhawa Gunasekara 于2022年10月12日周三 17:41写道： > +1 (binding) > Good luck > > Thanks, > Madhawa > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:49 AM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like > to > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check > > out > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Yu > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > [3] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Good luck Thanks, Madhawa On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:49 AM Yu Li wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check > out > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > [3] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:49 AM Yu Li wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would like to > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+ 1 （non-binding） Best wishes! Yu Xiao Apache ShenYu zhongyi tan 于2022年10月12日周三 14:24写道： > > +1 binding > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:24 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > Furkan KAMACI 于2022年10月12日周三 12:58写道： > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Good luck! > > > > > > On 11 Oct 2022 Tue at 21:57 Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:43 Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:50 AM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would > > like > > > > to > > > > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please > > check > > > > > out > > > > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > > Incubator > > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > > > > [2] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best wishes！ > > > > > CalvinKirs > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
About docker image release and license
We applied for the Docker Hub permission before[1], but the feedback Docker Hub is out of seats. It is recommended to use the Github Docker Registry. Does this meet the ASF docker image distribution requirements (The official website document[2] mentions:artifacts need to be placed in https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/) In addition, for the Dockfile file used to build the docker image[3], use the basic image such as CentOS, or the basic environment package installed by yum command such as `yun install unzip`, or use `ADD/COPY` to add resources to a destination inside the Docker image. Whether the use of these third-party tools needs to be listed separately in the LICENSE file. If so, for the toolkit installed by the yum command, it seems that the indirect dependency license cannot be listed well. 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22785 2. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html#docker 3. https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/blob/dev-1.3.0/linkis-dist/docker/ldh.Dockerfile Best Regards! Apache Linkis(Incubating) Chen Xia - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator
+1 binding On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:24 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > +1 binding > > Furkan KAMACI 于2022年10月12日周三 12:58写道： > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Good luck! > > > > On 11 Oct 2022 Tue at 21:57 Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:43 Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:50 AM Yu Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Celeborn [1] [2], I would > like > > > to > > > > > call a VOTE to accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator, please > check > > > > out > > > > > the Celeborn Proposal from the incubator wiki [3]. > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Celeborn into the Incubator > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring Celeborn into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > Incubator > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rlkzg8m5923vngyon0bwcv97x3m68x4c > > > > > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjy3gpvocjtls5vp9h1llcvmwkgz3lcy > > > > > [3] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CelebornProposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best wishes！ > > > > CalvinKirs > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
