[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1291537] [RFE] Provide mechanism to spin up reproducible test environment for all developers

2016-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291537



--- Comment #10 from Vijay Bellur  ---
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/13355 committed in master by Niels de Vos
(nde...@redhat.com) 
--
commit c7d2037b8c6293663280a759a2e447d5aef130bd
Author: Raghavendra Talur 
Date:   Thu Feb 4 14:33:54 2016 +0530

vagrant-tests: Fix bug when git branch name has a /

It is possible for a git branch to have a / in it.

Source copy from host to VM used relative path on
the assumption that VM vagrant dir will always be
three levels down the topdir of repo. This assumption
breaks when git branch has a / in it.

Of the two solutions to fix it:
a. Mangle the git branch name to not have a /
b. Accomodate the possibility of have a / in git branch name.

I have chosen b) because that looks cleaner.

Change-Id: I6b71c31da2f5f7c349d6d6882767768b2534d14f
BUG: 1291537
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Talur 
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13355
Smoke: Gluster Build System 
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System 
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System 
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos 

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xN15TSsvcv=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra


Re: [Gluster-infra] Migrating Gerrit and Jenkins out of iWeb

2016-02-06 Thread Vijay Bellur

On 02/06/2016 07:37 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:

Le samedi 06 février 2016 à 05:41 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :


- Original Message -

From: "Kaushal M" 

Hi Vijay.

I spoke with Michael about migrating off of iWeb.


Another option we discussed yesterday (sorry, should have thought to have you 
join us) with Karanbir, in the context of using more of CentOS CI, was moving 
gerrit to gerrithub.

(Keeping our own jenkins master on Rackspace, but using slaves in CentOS CI.)

The advantage is that gerrithub is then responsible for keeping gerrit up to 
date (and up).

KB and Amye will be sending email about this soon. Watch this space.


So as I suspect that gerrithub is gonna take some time before we do
evaluate everything, I will proceed with the migration of gerrit to RH
DC for now. We would be likely in a better shape for a migration
anywhere from here.

And when I say "8h", that's a worst case. I suspect it would be better,
but I propose to schedule a documentation day or something where we can
put developpers to good use when gerrit is down and copied.




I think starting around 0900 UTC on Friday of next week (12th Feb) 
should be possible. We should be done with 3.7.8 before that and can 
afford a bit of downtime then. In case any assistance is needed post the 
migration, we can have folks around the clock to help.


If migration fails for an unforeseen reason, would we be able to 
rollback and maintain status quo?


Thanks,
Vijay
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] Migrating Gerrit and Jenkins out of iWeb

2016-02-06 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 06 février 2016 à 05:41 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kaushal M" 
> > 
> > Hi Vijay.
> > 
> > I spoke with Michael about migrating off of iWeb.
> 
> Another option we discussed yesterday (sorry, should have thought to have you 
> join us) with Karanbir, in the context of using more of CentOS CI, was moving 
> gerrit to gerrithub.
> 
> (Keeping our own jenkins master on Rackspace, but using slaves in CentOS CI.)
> 
> The advantage is that gerrithub is then responsible for keeping gerrit up to 
> date (and up).
> 
> KB and Amye will be sending email about this soon. Watch this space.

So as I suspect that gerrithub is gonna take some time before we do
evaluate everything, I will proceed with the migration of gerrit to RH
DC for now. We would be likely in a better shape for a migration
anywhere from here. 

And when I say "8h", that's a worst case. I suspect it would be better,
but I propose to schedule a documentation day or something where we can
put developpers to good use when gerrit is down and copied.

-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra