Re: [Gluster-infra] All rpm jobs are now in jenkins job builder

[Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Niels de Vos  wrote:
> Coincidentally I've asked Humble about the option to provide a container
> (and maybe VM) image through the CentOS Storage SIG. Just as with the
> packages, we should try to utilize the integration with different
> distributions.

I agree. Containers (and even VM) images are build-time artifacts
which we should produce and make available in a regular manner.

I have a follow-up question on the production of these artifacts -
when do we check whether the RPMs or, the images produced are sane?
For example, that the RPMs are packaged well and as per specifications
...




-- 
sankarshan mukhopadhyay

___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] All rpm jobs are now in jenkins job builder

[Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Nigel Babu  wrote:
> All the rpm jobs are now in Jenkins job builder format. I've disabled the
> old jobs and replaced them with new ones:
>
> glusterfs-rpm -> rpm-fedora
> glusterfs-rpm-el6 -> rpm-el6
> glusterfs-devrpm -> devrpm-fedora
> glusterfs-devrpm-el6 -> devrpm-el6
> glusterfs-devrpm-el7 -> devrpm-el7

I wonder if it would be worthwhile to have a job which produces a
container image for a build. The availability of such a build would be
useful in generating a bit more interest around the container(ized)
Gluster story. I recollect that Humble was maintaining the build
script and such which lead to a container (ready for push into the
registry)



-- 
sankarshan mukhopadhyay

___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] All rpm jobs are now in jenkins job builder

[Nigel Babu]

Hello,

All the rpm jobs are now in Jenkins job builder format. I've disabled the
old jobs and replaced them with new ones:

glusterfs-rpm -> rpm-fedora
glusterfs-rpm-el6 -> rpm-el6
glusterfs-devrpm -> devrpm-fedora
glusterfs-devrpm-el6 -> devrpm-el6
glusterfs-devrpm-el7 -> devrpm-el7

Please let me know if the old jobs are misbehaving in anyway. The code for
these jobs can be seen in the pull request[1].

[1]: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/pull/22

--
nigelb
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1349450] Use something else that chroot to build rpm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349450

Saravanakumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||Triaged
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nj0gWwG7DN=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1349450] Use something else that chroot to build rpm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349450

Saravanakumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sarum...@redhat.com
   Assignee|b...@gluster.org|msche...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q3dAD6tUT4=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1350631] Some machines don't have /opt/qa updated

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350631



--- Comment #3 from M. Scherer  ---
So slave25 is the same, but not slave29. I didn't found yet any relevent
difference. It also work when run from my laptop and nigel one (the ansible
playbook, that's it). I strongly suspect a issue on the salt bus.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FLUGOW8Jbi=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1350631] Some machines don't have /opt/qa updated

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350631



--- Comment #2 from M. Scherer  ---
So on slave24:

fatal: [slave24.cloud.gluster.org]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "cmd":
"/usr/bin/git ls-remote origin -h refs/heads/master", "failed": true, "msg":
"", "rc": 128, "stderr": "", "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []}

I test slave25 now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PtO6jTpKIY=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1350631] Some machines don't have /opt/qa updated

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350631

M. Scherer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||msche...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from M. Scherer  ---
I suspect the 2 servers were down during the last run of ansible-playbook, but
this is also supposed to be run at night. I will dig the log.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Twre33gIHh=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra