[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1721353] Run 'line-coverage' regression runs on a latest fedora machine (say fedora30).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721353 Worker Ant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Last Closed||2020-03-12 12:36:20 --- Comment #3 from Worker Ant --- This bug is moved to https://github.com/gluster/project-infrastructure/issues/19, and will be tracked there from now on. Visit GitHub issues URL for further details -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1721353] Run 'line-coverage' regression runs on a latest fedora machine (say fedora30).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721353 Deepshikha khandelwal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dkhan...@redhat.com Assignee|b...@gluster.org|dkhan...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1721353] Run 'line-coverage' regression runs on a latest fedora machine (say fedora30).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721353 Kotresh HR changed: What|Removed |Added CC||khire...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Kotresh HR --- I have also witnessed the small difference when I was working to improve lcov of glusterd-georep.c. On fedora 30, I used to see 70.1 % but on centos 69.9 %. I didn't spend time debugging that though. Didn't expect it was platform dependent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1721353] Run 'line-coverage' regression runs on a latest fedora machine (say fedora30).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721353 --- Comment #1 from Amar Tumballi --- Ok, when I used the lcov tool with the same commands as that of lcov.sh from build-jobs repo, I got below numbers for stack.h (which I used as an example above). on current builder : stack.h - lines(262/497 - 52.7%), functions(17/41 - 41.5%) on fedora29 (local): stack.h - lines(94/111 - 84.7%), functions(6/7 - 85.7%) I hope just by running the regression on fedora, we would get more up-to-date information, and more coverage details. Just note that I suspect this to be more of an header file specific details, and even then, up-to-date information is better than stale info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
