Re: [Gluster-users] Graceful way to kill a brick process
Can you let us know why do you need to explicitly kill the brick process? replace-brick ideally does the same and spawns a new process. ~Atin On 11/11/2014 12:37 PM, Raghuram BK wrote: f we'd like to replace a disk on which a brick resides ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
[Gluster-users] Graceful way to kill a brick process
Is there a graceful way to kill a brick process? If we'd like to replace a disk on which a brick resides, we'd like to kill the brick process before replacing the disk. kill -9 does not seem to be a graceful way to do this. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
