Re: Developer Referral

[Aaron Laws]

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:16 AM, YMX  wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> I am a user of an agency m management software package (Saas) that
> utilizes OFX credit card download functionality. I am not the developer,
> just a user of this specific SaaS.
>
> Until last year the software was able to download Chase credit card
> transactions. As many of you know, Chase changed how the handle this around
> November 2015.
>
> Given what I’ve read on the GnuCash postings, and how GnuCash has solved
> for this, I’m wondering if there is a developer that I could refer to the
> software developer to help them resolve this for their software?
>
> Thanks so much for your help.
>
> YM


It looks like you didn't get an answer to this, so I'll wager something.

I think the best way to proceed in this case is to tell the developer about
this list. Tell him that there likely are individuals on this list that can
help him, and they may even be willing to help, too.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

[Alex Aycinena]

>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: John Ralls 
> To: Derek Atkins 
> Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:19:45 -0700
> Subject: Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"
>
> > On Sep 13, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Derek Atkins  wrote:
> >
> > Geert,
> >
> > Geert Janssens  writes:
> >
> >> Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a
> >> visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some
> >> further refinements in that area.
> >>
> >> There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1]
> >>
> >> While our policy states new features should be added on the master
> >> branch only, I'm considering backporting a minimal base part of Roberts
> >> work to maint anyway. That is the indicator itself only. This is a
> >> relatively well contained bit of gui code that's not too complicated to
> >> review. I'm talking about commits 5bb53c044..5f75f106ee here. Robert
> >> made more improvements, but this minimal set would greatly increase the
> >> usefulness of the file association feature.
> >
> > IMHO, useful features that are small, useful, and relatively self
> > contained (and don't affect lots of strings) are welcome to be
> > backported.
> >
> >> Any objections ?
> >
> > None from me.
>
> I agree.
>
> Regards,
> John Ralls
>
>
>
So do I,

Alex
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

[John Ralls]

> On Sep 13, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Derek Atkins  wrote:
> 
> Geert,
> 
> Geert Janssens  writes:
> 
>> Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a 
>> visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some 
>> further refinements in that area.
>> 
>> There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1]
>> 
>> While our policy states new features should be added on the master 
>> branch only, I'm considering backporting a minimal base part of Roberts 
>> work to maint anyway. That is the indicator itself only. This is a 
>> relatively well contained bit of gui code that's not too complicated to 
>> review. I'm talking about commits 5bb53c044..5f75f106ee here. Robert 
>> made more improvements, but this minimal set would greatly increase the 
>> usefulness of the file association feature.
> 
> IMHO, useful features that are small, useful, and relatively self
> contained (and don't affect lots of strings) are welcome to be
> backported.
> 
>> Any objections ?
> 
> None from me.

I agree.

Regards,
John Ralls

___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

[Derek Atkins]

Geert,

Geert Janssens  writes:

> Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a 
> visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some 
> further refinements in that area.
>
> There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1]
>
> While our policy states new features should be added on the master 
> branch only, I'm considering backporting a minimal base part of Roberts 
> work to maint anyway. That is the indicator itself only. This is a 
> relatively well contained bit of gui code that's not too complicated to 
> review. I'm talking about commits 5bb53c044..5f75f106ee here. Robert 
> made more improvements, but this minimal set would greatly increase the 
> usefulness of the file association feature.

IMHO, useful features that are small, useful, and relatively self
contained (and don't affect lots of strings) are welcome to be
backported.

> Any objections ?

None from me.

> Regards,
>
> Geert
>
> P.S. I asked for this on the bugreport as well, but didn't see any 
> responses. Probably my request got lost in the noise.
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744790

-derek

-- 
   Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
   Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
   URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
   warl...@mit.eduPGP key available
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

[Christian Stimming]

Good idea. No objections. Feel free to go ahead with useful back ports. Thanks!

Christian 

> Am 13.09.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Geert Janssens :
> 
> Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a 
> visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some 
> further refinements in that area.
> 
> There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1]
> 
> While our policy states new features should be added on the master 
> branch only, I'm considering backporting a minimal base part of Roberts 
> work to maint anyway. That is the indicator itself only. This is a 
> relatively well contained bit of gui code that's not too complicated to 
> review. I'm talking about commits 5bb53c044..5f75f106ee here. Robert 
> made more improvements, but this minimal set would greatly increase the 
> usefulness of the file association feature.
> 
> Any objections ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Geert
> 
> P.S. I asked for this on the bugreport as well, but didn't see any 
> responses. Probably my request got lost in the noise.
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744790
> ___
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

[Geert Janssens]

Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a 
visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some 
further refinements in that area.

There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1]

While our policy states new features should be added on the master 
branch only, I'm considering backporting a minimal base part of Roberts 
work to maint anyway. That is the indicator itself only. This is a 
relatively well contained bit of gui code that's not too complicated to 
review. I'm talking about commits 5bb53c044..5f75f106ee here. Robert 
made more improvements, but this minimal set would greatly increase the 
usefulness of the file association feature.

Any objections ?

Regards,

Geert

P.S. I asked for this on the bugreport as well, but didn't see any 
responses. Probably my request got lost in the noise.


[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744790
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel