Re: [event] Weekly Meet on Tuesdays in mumble, starting TUE 30th June

[sva]

Haha LOL,

Thanks for asking!

On 22/06/2020 23:32, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:26 PM sva  wrote:
>> one of the outcomes from the online event is that we're trying to come
>> together every Tuesday to continue trying stuff & playing around.
> 
> At what time?
The group decided for 8 PM CEST (thats UTC+2)

Cheers,
sva.

Re: [event] Weekly Meet on Tuesdays in mumble, starting TUE 30th June

[Marcos Marado]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:26 PM sva  wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> one of the outcomes from the online event is that we're trying to come
> together every Tuesday to continue trying stuff & playing around.

At what time?

Best regards,
-- 
Marcos Marado

[event] Weekly Meet on Tuesdays in mumble, starting TUE 30th June

[sva]

Dear all,

one of the outcomes from the online event is that we're trying to come
together every Tuesday to continue trying stuff & playing around.

By default we'll meet in mumble (gnunet.org) but as it turned out to be
very helpful to have the option for Screenshare we might use BBB in
parallel, too - the link will be spread via mumble once about time.

Most likely the first topics will be:

* groupchat https://git.gnunet.org/groupchat.git/ and
* the CADET-gtk https://gitlab.com/TheJackiMonster/cadet-gtk

The second Tuesday will be 7th of July, the day of our monthly meeting,
where we will be discussing various things, maybe followed up by some
learn, try & play afterwards, too :)

Looking forward to see some of you there!

Cheers,
sva.

Re: Namestore Issue

[Christian Grothoff]

Are you sure it's a path length issue? We usually have a mechanism to
truncate for this.

gnunet-namestore is NOT expected to create the .sock file. This should
exist already if you started the peer properly. Note that the namestore
service is a per-user service, so you if you are using the multi-user
setup, you are likely are missing the per-user launch of gnunet-arm
(that is, if your peer is running at all).  See

https://docs.gnunet.org/handbook/gnunet.html#Minimal-configuration


On 6/21/20 6:49 PM, William Dobbs wrote:
> When executing gnunet-namestore for an A or  record, the Unix path
> gnunet-service-namestore.sock  is
> not created. This is because the warning indicates the path is too long.
> Moreover, there are other system items in that directory.
> 
> util-client-2744


0x939E6BE1E29FC3CC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature