Re: sha2 utilities: Print or check SHA-2 digests
On 06/10/2006 12:35 AM, rmyster wrote: --print-md algo [files] --print-mds [files] Print message digest of algorithm ALGO for all given files or stdin. With the second form (or a deprecated * as algo) digests for all available algorithms are printed. Oh...I never would have made the connection. I can see what it refers to now but when I read it, the algorithm ALGO was one I had never heard of. Realistically, I wouldn't have caught it even if it was written as --print-md algorithm [files] Ever heard of the funny story about the user calling helpdesk because cannot find the any key on his keyboard? ;-) -- Q.E.D. ICQ UIN: 301825501 OpenPGP key ID: 0x58D14EB3 Key fingerprint: 00B9 3E17 630F F2A7 FF96 DA6B AEE0 EC27 58D1 4EB3 Check fingerprints before trusting a key! ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: sha2 utilities: Print or check SHA-2 digests
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:27 +0200, Qed wrote: --print-md algo [files] --print-mds [files] Print message digest of algorithm ALGO for all given files or stdin. With the second form (or a deprecated * as algo) digests for all available algorithms are printed. Oh...I never would have made the connection. I can see what it refers to now but when I read it, the algorithm ALGO was one I had never heard of. Realistically, I wouldn't have caught it even if it was written as --print-md algorithm [files] Ever heard of the funny story about the user calling helpdesk because cannot find the any key on his keyboard? ;-) Yes, and supposedly it's causing problems for support departments. On the other hand, if you're looking for the command to calculate sha256 and sha512 hashes, what are the odds you will be targeting words like ALGO? HASH maybe, but algo? I'd be curious as to how many users even know that gpg can do sha256 and sha512 hashes based on what is written in the docs. MD5SUM and SHA1SUM are spelled out as clear as day in contrast to the ones I was trying to use. I had been using other applications to get the values. Still, does anyone know what the coreutils docs are referring to when it implies that sha512 hashes can be obtained with a command called sha512sum in the same manner of usage as md5sum and sha1sum? (i.e sha512sum file) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: sha2 utilities: Print or check SHA-2 digests
Still, does anyone know what the coreutils docs are referring to when it implies that sha512 hashes can be obtained with a command called sha512sum in the same manner of usage as md5sum and sha1sum? (i.e sha512sum file) Maybe you could try to tell us what version of coreutils do you have installed and what OS are you using, we don't have a magic ball to ask. Two of your headers: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I suppose you are using SuSE Linux, version 10.1 includes Evolution 2.6.0. Incidentally I am using the same version of this nice distribution, I have coreutils-5.93 here and there is no trace of sha2 support in documentation. However you should have noticed that this is not a linux mailing list. - -- Yes, suse 10.1 with coreutils-5.93-20. In the info manual, sha2 is mentioned under section 6.6 (sha2 utilities) and all it says is The usage and options of these commands are precisely the same as for `md5sum'. While this isn't a linux mailing list, md5sum is part of gnupg. The closest other choice was the coreutils bug lists and this didn't seem like a bug related question. I'll take your hint and drop the topic. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: sha2 utilities: Print or check SHA-2 digests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 rmyster wrote: Yes, suse 10.1 with coreutils-5.93-20. In the info manual, sha2 is mentioned under section 6.6 (sha2 utilities) and all it says is The usage and options of these commands are precisely the same as for `md5sum'. While this isn't a linux mailing list, md5sum is part of gnupg. No, it's not. md5sum is part of the coreutils package. You're using suse, which is an rpm based distro, so if I may extend the slightly off-topic posts a little, here's a handy way for you to find out what package a file belongs to: $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/md5sum On my FC5 system this returns coreutils-5.93-7.2. The closest other choice was the coreutils bug lists and this didn't seem like a bug related question. How not? If the docs state an application is available and it's not it's a bug - either in the docs or in the packaging. In any case, I took a blind leap of faith and searched for the string sha2 on the coreutils mailing list and the very first item returned[1] was titled: Re: Not finding sha256sum It's a documentation bug in coreutils. Total time spent, 30 secs. :) [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-12/msg00170.html - -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp == A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to Hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip. -- Anonymous -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. iG0EARECAC0FAkSK+zkmGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9ib3guY29tL350bXovcGdwL3Rt ei5hc2MACgkQuv+09NZUB1pfBwCfQpESyyiX4VaoB3PxkUfu6tmgzHYAoMtHAQz9 86lV+58Vw46GWqxG5S0s =BkqK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GnuPG asks for confirmation...
On Sunday 04 June 2006 07:54, Todd Zullinger wrote: Ingo Klöcker wrote: On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:57, engage wrote: On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:59 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote: engage wrote: Why is someone sending an encrypted message to this list? It's not encrypted. It's just signed and armored. Doesn't your mail client automatically display this for you? No. I keep getting prompted for my passphrase for this message. Kmail. My KMail (1.9.x) shows the message without asking for a passhphrase. And I'm not aware of changes in this part of the code which would explain the different behavior. Strange. Ingo, are you using the gpg-agent? Sure. Okay, that might explain the different behavior. In any case, KMail isn't fully functional without gpg-agent, e.g. you can't decrypt OpenPGP/MIME messages. So using KMail without gpg-agent is not recommended. Regards, Ingo pgpDNwEvt5Vw7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
