Re: A problem with winpt encrypting the current window
Julia Dashkevich wrote: the MUA. Tried the same thing with gpgshell, and it worked fine. Do you think it is a bug? When the feature does not work with _any_ window on your system, the answer is yes. Otherwise no. The current window mode should work for almost every window but in reality it doesn't work for some windows. There is, IMHO, nothing I can do about it. But it is a good idea always to use the newest WinPT version (1.0.1) because each new release contains bug fixes and possible improvment of existing features. Timo ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: A problem with winpt encrypting the current window
--- Timo Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your insights, Timo. Following your advice, i have downloaded winpt v.1.0.1, but i don't know how to install it: there is no tool for uninstalling my current version separately from gpg4win. What are the steps for updating winpt to the newer version and can it be done without affecting the current gpg installation? When the feature does not work with _any_ window on your system, the answer is yes. Otherwise no. The current window mode should work for almost every window but in reality it doesn't work for some windows. There is, IMHO, nothing I can do about it. Trying to use this feature with different windows now: IE - no luck, but i guess it should not be ever needed:) TB compose window, triggered by clicking 'mail' in IE - it works. I wonder, why it should not work in _the_same_ kind of compose window, but triggered by TB itself (!!!) Notepad - the same error message it gave when trying to encrypt from TB. When the compose window triggered by IE was still open, it tried to encrypt that instead, although the current window was notepad. MS Word - does not work either I can't think of anything else that i might want/need to use it with. Well, using IE each time i want to encrypt the current compose window does not seem like a valid option to me. Although, the clipboard encryption option works fine. Looking forward to any further insights, Julia But it is a good idea always to use the newest WinPT version (1.0.1) because each new release contains bug fixes and possible improvment of existing features. Timo ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
pgp.sig as an attachment
Hello, I am using GnuPG with Apple Mail and the GPGMail plugin. When I sign a message, the mail is sent with the attached file pgp.sig. However, I would prefer to have the signature inside the message and not in an attachment. How would I do this? Thanks Sebastian ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: pgp.sig as an attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian wrote: I am using GnuPG with Apple Mail and the GPGMail plugin. When I sign a message, the mail is sent with the attached file pgp.sig. However, I would prefer to have the signature inside the message and not in an attachment. How would I do this? You need to tell GPGMail not to use PGP/MIME. You can disable that by default (in the prefs on the Composing tab). Check the GPGMail docs for details on this. The GPGMail mailing list might be able to offer more insights if you need them. - -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp == Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -- Groucho Marx -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQFDBAEBAgAtBQJFMoJwJhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBvYm94LmNvbS9+dG16L3BncC90 bXouYXNjAAoJEEMlk4u+rwzjnqAIAJpYIVOH6Oc0a95ufeT80Tj8SK4bWm3I8CDd P1dH1Fcp5hF5XiMZd/J8GKw6nqSjGja8pVfyCfP2k7kMlaojYw/ZSaWlkGAyAcri K8WaFIDMJ6Ih6MrP2Qau9TG34WK4AEBC5Nq0A7c+OPovO0AYUQqiKXU5Cn6kNL/3 ksJL/HTXSpy3JzN8wSBD69ggPf3mhrsm2kHTILxMK9+Zq19/LuZoJnO9E7nruN+c 246QMC5Rz5rxekSGQc+NxP0WpuPQaL55Lz8wz72WfoHwAxRVQ9srbCY70HyZEWwS wp3Zor2DagpGKexsJnmFNWByZyYJq4Qz5sttoFWT46pYP46ZY7s= =lEy/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG Outlook Plug-In and Signatures
On 10/14/06, Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, HTML mails are evil. But unfortunately they're here to stay. RFC 2557 is now listed as standards track. I used to rail against HTML mail myself, but all my reasoning was soundly rebuffed by the CEO, CFO, my Mom, my sister, and really just about everybody else. They want their pretty fonts and pictures in their email. Security, legibility, and compatibility be damned. Now, well, I gave up fighting that battle. I still write mostly plain-text email, but reply in HTML when sent it. But even I originate an HTML email or two when a bulleted list or table is needed. It can add value to the content of a message when used judiciously. -- RPM = All problems can be solved by diplomacy, but violence and treachery are equally effective, and more fun. -Anonymous ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
