Re: Elliptic curves in gnupg status?

2010-04-23 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

markus reichelt escribió:
> * Alexander Murauer  wrote:
> 
>> is there any plan to get ecc in mainstream gnupg? most stuff i
>> found about gnupg and ecc is outdated. does somebody know something
>> about this?
> 
> search the archives of the devel mailinglist. ecdsa. don't expect any
> real info, tho.

  Well, I don't know anything about development plans, I think it is
very likely we won't see ecc implemented in GnuPG _unless_ it is
included first in OpenPGP standard. If GnuPG implements ecc before it
becomes standard, we would get keys that would only work with GnuPG
versions including ecc.

  Best Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJL0mRSAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAgnYH/10YdE1TV3yKVkZOumx68zeG
x7GqeB/PYYI4myETemSsDEhjqa7DqQdinMRthuwnXwLAS6hGjOx+AdpwrCvn807H
QZGMowlKoE/hmQSf1XOHvjPzbrtyMdBzWx0JkNDUSqYBHedfZnLgfFbnfaKOV1ps
LhLIpRZQ88ijt9e0cMDibIVlEW86sQnghL9Mte6UsfOZRT9+3zCR+o1Cgbjgg9kJ
zR2rh6y8L9C7bZSF5vqw3HEwEB99/rlUQOXsklxvwr0ycq41l05nsf6rYrFeyJtd
nm+IiT3BRo23g1CV7BrYNlS5aNsqTsHy3bHGRKIaJk01pyLORwoOvc51G16P9xk=
=Az31
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: gpg: mpi larger than indicated length ERROR

2010-04-23 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

HORNBOSTEL, LIBBY A (ATTSI) escribió:
> I have installed gpg4win version 1.1.4 with the following
> details/versions:
> GnuPG:  1.4.9
...
> I have installed GPGShell version 3.7.2 on top to maintain the keys with
> a gui interface.  I have created many keys without issue and have no
...

  I don't have any idea about your problem, but maybe you should know
the current version of GnuPG v1.x serie is 1.4.10b, and last version of
GPGShell is 3.76

  Best Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJL0mIwAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAr2cH/0nSwU9/pcr+cWExu16J1uYT
5aQK2bTRoneQEHrZqGRkAcQSrbDvUrinCg0RXILU61K/cP/gDoEFw6KPmPV1iGRu
727CkPzNHqD7XYkyxg4mTGGOxK81bTgPrUCw8j09IGUXmU/nHbbv6eh5zqSfWuce
UPaRFpnyW3LfXv2ljZVdt/lv6kpGAFj4+1FLkj8UKoJA+6sGE6kVHLY55w63FD2X
aYfyZmYNwPNtd3ybYRXhlI9e3xZF9ygItCKmGPWdtcKn7OpoGlKCnOTzOJbiVnZB
6fz13NTzU6vJ4cpRkuzXQAqfB4YBB8thkvZtOQWAmFBimTZu671oExgvUjgtgsQ=
=qC/P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Elliptic curves in gnupg status?

2010-04-23 Thread markus reichelt
* Alexander Murauer  wrote:

> is there any plan to get ecc in mainstream gnupg? most stuff i
> found about gnupg and ecc is outdated. does somebody know something
> about this?

search the archives of the devel mailinglist. ecdsa. don't expect any
real info, tho.


> i own a OpenPGP Smartcard v2. does it / will it support ECC, or do
> i have to wait for an OpenPGP Smartcard v3 ? :)

you bought the wrong card. v5 is the one you want.

-- 
left blank, right bald


pgpa70ZdFjZhr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


gpg: mpi larger than indicated length ERROR

2010-04-23 Thread HORNBOSTEL, LIBBY A (ATTSI)
I have installed gpg4win version 1.1.4 with the following
details/versions:
GnuPG:  1.4.9
GnuPG2: 2.0.10
DirMngr: 1.0.3-svn310
GPA:0.8.0
GPGol:  0.9.92
GPGee:  1.3.1
WinPT:  1.2.0
Claws-Mail: 3.0.0-rc2
Novices:1.0.0
Einsteiger: 2.0.2
Durchblicker:   2.0.2

I have installed GPGShell version 3.7.2 on top to maintain the keys with
a gui interface.  I have created many keys without issue and have no
issues decrypting any files. Until yesterday; I created a key pair,
distributed the public key, and received a test file from my partner.  I
received the following error: 'gpg: mpi larger than indicated length
(258 bytes)'.
I have found the only references to this error back in the 2005-2006
timeframe and involving GnuPG version 1.4.2.  I assume that version
1.4.9 (that I am using) would contain the fix that was used to correct
this issue.
Any ideas?  Do I need to delete the key and create a new one?


Libby Hornbostel 



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users