Re: Reading key capabilities information before importing a key

2013-04-12 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 03:00, mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de said:

 That is an inconsistent explanation. If --list-packets can show data from 
 signatures without checking the signatures then obviously --with-colons 

It does not show that.  It dumps the packets.  The key capabilities need
to be computed.



Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: gpa reports error: Unsupported Protocol

2013-04-12 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:20:50 +0200
Werner Koch articulated:

 It seems that GPGME has not been build with support for GPGSM.  The
 output of configure when building gpgme should tell you this.
 
 Please try the patch for GPA below.

I completely removed GNUPG, GPA, GPGME and everything else related to
this mix and then did a fresh install. Now everything is working
correctly. I did this BEFORE I received your patch. I had tried
rebuilding the apps before, but I had not deleted them all first.
Evidently, it makes a difference.

Thanks for your time invested though. I appreciate it.

-- 
Jerry ♔

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


OT [was: Re: Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science]

2013-04-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/12/2013 01:29 PM, nelsonste...@hushmail.com wrote:

[ bizarre and off-topic background stripped ]

 Sorry for posting to multiple lists. Spreading the word is the only way to 
 stop 
 this bogus conference. Please forward this message to other mailing lists and 
 people. 

I understand that you have a problem with this situation, and that you
feel it is important, but it's really not relevant to the gnupg-users
mailing list.  Please stay on-topic here, so that this channel remains
relevant for the purposes of discussing GnuPG and does not drown under a
flood of unrelated-yet-important messages.

If you reply to this message, please reply to me personally, not on-list.

Regards,

--dkg




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users