Re: gpg - difference --encrypt-to and --recipient

2018-12-30 Thread Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users
Hello.

Am Sonntag, den 30.12.2018, 22:40 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:05:37 +0100, Gernot Pokorny wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > What is the difference between --encrypt-to and --recipient and
> > what are the advantages and disadvantages of using one over the
> > other, which one should you use for encrypting your own files and
> > what does the following mean?

> > --encrypt-to ... The key specified by name is used only when there
> > are other recipients given by the user or by use of the option
> > recipient. ...

> Simply said you put encrypt-to, with your key-id, in your gpg.conf
> and when you do a gpg --recipient yourfriend it encrypts to your
> friend and also to you.

Yes, that's correct. Anyways, I prefer using the --hidden-recipient for
this purpose. That prevents the disclosure of the communication paths
with pure GPG-Packet analysis.

Regards,
Dirk

-- 
Dirk Gottschalk
Paulusstrasse 6-8
52064 Aachen, Germany

GPG: DDCB AF8E 0132 AA54 20AB  B864 4081 0B18 1ED8 E838
Keybase.io: https://keybase.io/dgottschalk
GitHub: https://github.com/Dirk1980ac



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: gpg - difference --encrypt-to and --recipient

2018-12-30 Thread Stefan Claas
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:05:37 +0100, Gernot Pokorny wrote:
Hi,

> What is the difference between --encrypt-to and --recipient and what are
> the advantages and disadvantages of using one over the other, which one
> should you use for encrypting your own files and what does the following
> mean?
> 
> --encrypt-to ... The key specified by name is used only when there are
> other recipients given by the user or by use of the option recipient. ...
> 
> 
> I also posted that question under stackoverflow:
> https://superuser.com/questions/1389024/gpg-difference-encrypt-to-and-recipient/1389030#1389030

Simply said you put encrypt-to, with your key-id, in your gpg.conf and when
you do a gpg --recipient yourfriend it encrypts to your friend and also to
you.

Regards
Stefan


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


gpg - difference --encrypt-to and --recipient

2018-12-30 Thread Gernot Pokorny
What is the difference between --encrypt-to and --recipient and what are
the advantages and disadvantages of using one over the other, which one
should you use for encrypting your own files and what does the following
mean?

--encrypt-to ... The key specified by name is used only when there are
other recipients given by the user or by use of the option recipient. ...


I also posted that question under stackoverflow:
https://superuser.com/questions/1389024/gpg-difference-encrypt-to-and-recipient/1389030#1389030

Thank you
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Unblocking the user PIN does not work with a new PIN

2018-12-30 Thread Robin Krahl
Hi Peter,

you are right, that was the problem.  If I choose a longer PIN, it is
working as expected.  Thank you!

/Robin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Unblocking the user PIN does not work with a new PIN

2018-12-30 Thread Peter Lebbing
Hi,

PINs need to be at least 6 characters long (8 for Admin PIN). Do you
perhaps try to set a too short PIN?

HTH,

Peter.

-- 
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at 





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users