Re: Odd error

2020-12-01 Thread Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users
Hi,

Werner Koch wrote:
> I looked at the Fedora Libgcrypt source and noticed that they ship
> libgcrypt with the nistp192 and all brainpool curves removed.  I have
> not yet build this version but given that one of your keys has brainpool
> curves this might be the culprit.
> 
> I can understand that they remove nistp192 for security policy reasons.
> But I do not understand why the brainpool curves are removed.  The
> general statement in the spec file is that curves need to be removed due
> to patent rasons.  However, Brainpool curves are less prone to patent
> claims for fast multiplication than the NIST curves and we actually use
> the very same code for all those Weierstrass curves. 

FWIW, I noticed that someone recently asked about the status
of the ECC Brainpool curves on the Fedora Legal list:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WUQNAB4EPWSJMMVECL2TZGKB5KIDESII/

With luck, a fresh review by the Red Hat legal folks will
result in those curves becoming accessible in the Fedora
libgcrypt packages.

Cheers,

-- 
Todd

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Odd error

2020-12-01 Thread Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:20, Werner Koch said:

> I'll build with the Fedora patches in the next days.  If the missing
> curves are really the reason, we can fix that.

Yes, the disabled Brainpool curves lead to the import problem.  I'll see
what we can do.  See https://dev.gnupg.org/T5162


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users