Re: Info doc conflict between 1.4.6 and 2.0.1?
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted a few messages explaining why). If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded to compile 2.0.1. Thanks. I know that there are some problems. Please give me some time wor work through them. IIRC, you need to use --disable-nls as weel as the latest versions of the libraries (maybe even from SVN). Shalom-Salam, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Info doc conflict between 1.4.6 and 2.0.1?
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory GNU Utilities just as 2.0.1 does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Without knowing much about how install-info That is quite possible. I forgot to did this chnage in the release candidate and it was too late to do another one due to the security bug. If I'm doing something wrong or am incorrect in expecting that the info files should be parallel installable, let me know. If not, would a proper fix be to use gpg2 as the entry for 2.0.1? I think so and will change it for the next release. Salam-Shalom, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Info doc conflict between 1.4.6 and 2.0.1?
Werner Koch wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory GNU Utilities just as 2.0.1 does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Without knowing much about how install-info That is quite possible. I forgot to did this chnage in the release candidate and it was too late to do another one due to the security bug. Yes, I can understand that there were far more important things to be done. Here's hoping you can take this weekend off and relax. :) If I'm doing something wrong or am incorrect in expecting that the info files should be parallel installable, let me know. If not, would a proper fix be to use gpg2 as the entry for 2.0.1? I think so and will change it for the next release. If it helps, attached a one line patch against current svn. That seems to be all that's needed to get both 1.4 and 2.0 installed together happily. Thanks again to you and the whole GnuPG team! -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp == To tax and to please, no more than to love and be wise, is not given to men. -- Edmund Burke Index: doc/gnupg.texi === --- doc/gnupg.texi (revision 4372) +++ doc/gnupg.texi (working copy) @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ @dircategory GNU Utilities @direntry -* gpg: (gnupg).OpenPGP encryption and signing tool. +* gpg2: (gnupg). OpenPGP encryption and signing tool. * gpgsm: (gnupg). S/MIME encryption and signing tool. @end direntry pgpRCQVqLRW84.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Info doc conflict between 1.4.6 and 2.0.1?
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already): install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gnupg' I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory GNU Utilities just as 2.0.1 does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Without knowing much about how install-info works, I'm guessing that it's balking because both programs try to create a gpg entry in the same info section. If I'm looking to install both 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 simultaneously, shouldn't the info pages for both versions be able to coexist? If I'm doing something wrong or am incorrect in expecting that the info files should be parallel installable, let me know. If not, would a proper fix be to use gpg2 as the entry for 2.0.1? -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp == No oppression is so heavy or lasting as that which is inflicted by the perversion and exorbitance of legal authority. -- Joseph Addison pgpzKcvT8nwVM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Info doc conflict between 1.4.6 and 2.0.1?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Zullinger wrote the following on 12/6/06 11:37 PM: I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already): install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gnupg' I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory GNU Utilities just as 2.0.1 does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Without knowing much about how install-info works, I'm guessing that it's balking because both programs try to create a gpg entry in the same info section. If I'm looking to install both 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 simultaneously, shouldn't the info pages for both versions be able to coexist? If I'm doing something wrong or am incorrect in expecting that the info files should be parallel installable, let me know. If not, would a proper fix be to use gpg2 as the entry for 2.0.1? I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted a few messages explaining why). If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded to compile 2.0.1. Thanks. I had no problem compiling 1.4.6 (and all its predecessors) from source. Charly KeyOnCard at: http://homepage.mac.com/shavital/iblog/B788933981/C1591872826/E20061125110933/index.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: GnuPG for Privacy Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRXehaSRJoUyU/RYhAQKz2gQAgNde+O79/HZW/5tiwb4Ci7g56wMo5gyC UAFnrVvJeB+u6YjHSOxqEN+R8ik6sEdDloDrPNDUOzyXaibbno7gIE8Xv6JvoF7E wHU7lYY6jzImUiR5x/+Ic+utXJgqwGpPiJy9folzByn2rieFXHFNlitN4uJYGQNZ W+xXerzuX7E= =jvRB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Info doc conflict between 1.4.6 and 2.0.1?
Charly Avital wrote: I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted a few messages explaining why). If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded to compile 2.0.1. Thanks. Sorry, I'm using linux. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp == It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do. -- Jerome K. Jerome pgpeT7d3729pq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
