Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-15 Thread Marko Bauhardt

> On 14 Feb 2017, at 19:53, Kristian Fiskerstrand 
>  wrote:
> 
> Trust level is not a property of the public key, it is stored out of
> band (in the local trustdb)


Ah ok. Thanks.


Marko

---

Marko Bauhardt
https://keybase.io/mbauhardt

GPG Key ID: 53192101
GPG Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1  ACDB 970C FD47 5319 2101



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-14 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 02/14/2017 07:51 PM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
> The trust level of my two IDs was `unknown` in the one public key and 
> `ultimate` in the other key.

Trust level is not a property of the public key, it is stored out of
band (in the local trustdb)

-- 

Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk

Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Qui audet vincit
Who dares wins



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-14 Thread Marko Bauhardt
Hi Peter,

> On 13 Feb 2017, at 12:16, Peter Lebbing  wrote:
> 
> 
> An OpenPGP public key is composed of many parts which can be reordered
> without changing the meaning. Keyservers do reorder stuff, so you can't
> just compare two keys byte by byte and say anything useful about their
> equivalence.
> 
> A command like
> 
> $ gpg2 --list-options show-unusable-subkeys,show-unusable-uids
> --list-sigs [KEYID]
> 
> gives a pretty good overview of a public key.

I tried that out with my two public key representations. There was a diff 
between the two keys.
The trust level of my two IDs was `unknown` in the one public key and 
`ultimate` in the other key.

Maybe this is the reason why the armor output is different.
I mean it make sense when the key server will change the trust level of the 
given user-id to `unknown` while uploading.


> I've changed your e-mail address so web spam scrapers can't take it
> easily.

;) Thx!

> If you see all the components there really are on your key
> reflected in this output, then the keyserver is already fully up to date
> and any further sending of your key will not change it any further.

This was the case except of the trust level.

> 
> HTH,
> 
> Peter.

Thank you. Very helpful.
Marko

---

Marko Bauhardt
https://keybase.io/mbauhardt

GPG Key ID: 53192101
GPG Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1  ACDB 970C FD47 5319 2101



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-13 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 12/02/17 13:32, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> The amor definition of my public key i uploaded
> to hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net differs to the public key
> definition i uploaded to another web service.

An OpenPGP public key is composed of many parts which can be reordered
without changing the meaning. Keyservers do reorder stuff, so you can't
just compare two keys byte by byte and say anything useful about their
equivalence.

A command like

$ gpg2 --list-options show-unusable-subkeys,show-unusable-uids
--list-sigs [KEYID]

gives a pretty good overview of a public key. Here is what is on the
keyserver for you:

> pub   rsa4096 2015-08-16 [C]
>   DC0FE85182A372E37FE1ACDB970CFD4753192101
> uid   [  full  ] Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at mailbox.org -
> sig 3970CFD4753192101 2015-08-16  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sig 3970CFD4753192101 2017-02-06  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sig 3970CFD4753192101 2015-08-16  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> uid   [  full  ] Marko Bauhardt (Datameer GmbH) - mb at datameer.com -
> sig 3970CFD4753192101 2017-02-06  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sub   rsa4096 2015-08-16 [S] [expired: 2016-08-15]
> sig  970CFD4753192101 2015-08-16  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sub   rsa4096 2015-08-16 [E] [expired: 2016-08-15]
> sig  970CFD4753192101 2015-08-16  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sub   rsa4096 2015-08-16 [A] [expired: 2016-08-15]
> sig  970CFD4753192101 2015-08-16  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sub   rsa4096 2017-01-28 [S] [expires: 2018-01-28]
> sig  970CFD4753192101 2017-01-28  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sub   rsa4096 2017-01-28 [E] [expires: 2018-01-28]
> sig  970CFD4753192101 2017-01-28  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> sub   rsa4096 2017-01-28 [A] [expires: 2018-01-28]
> sig  970CFD4753192101 2017-01-28  Marko Bauhardt - marko.bauhardt at 
> mailbox.org -
> 

I've changed your e-mail address so web spam scrapers can't take it
easily. If you see all the components there really are on your key
reflected in this output, then the keyserver is already fully up to date
and any further sending of your key will not change it any further.

HTH,

Peter.

-- 
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at 

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-12 Thread Marko Bauhardt
> 
> Signed PGP part
> You can add signatures, user-ids, subkeys, etc. to a key that is
> already on the server. But you cannot delete anything from it.


Sure, understood. But this does not answer the question i have why i can not 
upload my current local GPG public key to a key server? Again i get no error 
message while sending the key, everything looks good. But the key will not 
change online. The representation online will stay the same.

---

Marko Bauhardt
https://keybase.io/mbauhardt

GPG Key ID: 53192101
GPG Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1  ACDB 970C FD47 5319 2101



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-12 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512



On Sunday 12 February 2017 at 12:32:06 PM, in
, Marko Bauhardt
wrote:-


> Is there a rule or something which prevents the
> update of a key?

You can add signatures, user-ids, subkeys, etc. to a key that is
already on the server. But you cannot delete anything from it.

- --
Best regards

MFPA  

No matter what a man's past may have been, his future is spotless.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=Hpf3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users