On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:38:24AM +0100, Dave Holland wrote: > the email address obfuscation advertised in the mail-archive.com FAQ is > not always working, see (e.g.) > http://www.mail-archive.com/abcusers@argyll.wisemagic.com/msg04233.html
On further reading, I discovered the "@" method. My apologies for not investigating in more depth before I posted. Is this level of obfuscation considered sufficient? I would expect that anyone trawling mail-archive.com for addresses would be wise to that trick and just un-obfuscate the addresses. Personally I think that addresses should either be stripped out, or replaced using a scheme like: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> "dave@HIDDEN". The latter gives you a chance to identify quoted text when it's only identified by an email address. Thanks, Dave Holland _______________________________________________ Gossip mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
